Democrats let the violence begin. Didn’t get their way and won’t accept the decision.Back to the states where it belongs:
Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in landmark abortion decision
The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, with their ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ending recognition of a constitutional right to abortion.www.foxnews.com
Just more "peaceful" protests. I just hope the SCOTUS all have good protection for a while so that they aren't "mostly peacefully" killed or hurt by the leftits insurrection... I mean "protest" that is going to happen outside their homes.
Sad but probably true. It’s going to be bad in blue cities. Be safe out there.
It's become abundantly clear now why the gun law was changed and announced ahead of this. Even the SCOTUS knows the left are just unhinged violent beings.
They should have stayed out of our lives with their worthless jab
Yeah government in our lives mandating the vaccine was fine to many on the left. Now, government handing decisions over to the states in our lives saving unborn babies is the worst thing that’s ever happened in this country. It makes no sense.
I wonder how Justice Thomas feels about Loving v Virginia. Does he want that overturned also?
Step back from the edge, Beth. Everything will be ok.
Actually, I live in a state where the overturning of Roe v Wade does not matter so I am not sure what you mean by the edge.
I was replying to the comment above ["Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage."] None of those rulings involved children either so I don't really understand your point unless you count contraception of any kind as killing unborn children.
Abortion is nowhere in the Constitution. Do you know what the SC’s role is in this country? It hasn’t been weaponized.
You were asking about Loving v Virginia. thats quite an extrapolation from Roe vs Wade. I say that is pure panic on your part.
It is the same construct he used in his opinion. Tell us how that is a stretch. I get why he would leave that part out.
Back to the states where it belongs:
Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in landmark abortion decision
The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, with their ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ending recognition of a constitutional right to abortion.
Loving v Virginia isn’t a law that directly impacts women, is it? That was Beth’s post, was it not?
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protectionand Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1][2].
Honestly, what are you on about? To my knowledge no one implied that Loving v Virginia did not affect both women and men. Roe v Wade affects women. Justice Thomas is married to a white woman and would be directly affected by the overturning of that ruling hence he did not mention it in his decision. mdthornb was posting about Roe v Wade.
