ADVERTISEMENT

Ohio State

Funniest comment of the day yesterday was the “so obvious” comment made by their coach.

He didn’t answer the CFP question but with a wink, because it is so obvious that they are not one of the top 12 teams in the country. Their schedule ranking was 106th in strength before the OSU game. That game showed their flaws against a good team.

Just like it is so obvious with Walters as our coach that we are one of the worst 12 teams in the county.
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting and BBG

Ohio State

With A&M and Bama losing, the sec may be beating themselves up enough to allow indiana to sneak in. There is no doubt there are 6-7 SEC teams better than indiana but we will know a lot more in a few days when they release the rankings. It should be noted they already had 4 2-loss sec teams ahead of 1-loss acc and b12 teams. The part that isn’t being discussed is the spite factor. Will the committee representing a wide range of conferences and the sec and big ten with a diluted influence spread the wealth to spite the sec and maybe B1G? Or maybe even the opposite they agreed to redo the criteria after this round are they worried the sec and B1G will come down hard if they don’t get what they want and effectively shut out the others?

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

Then whatever it would have taken. He fills the exact hole we have, another athletic big that can get rebounds, play inside or out, and let us play defensively against teams with multiple athletic big men.

Once we lost Jacobsen, we lost the ability to do that very well. Furst and Berg aren't the answer for that.

It's a moot point obviously, but he's just the type of player to fill that hole. I'm pretty sure Painter would have figured out a way to use a guy like that.
Doesn’t rebound, doesn’t defend, doesn’t play physically. If you could take his physical attributes and turn him into a completely different player I agree.

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

Exactly. His last year stats at Illinois were 12 pts, 37 percent from three, 6 boards a game, 3 assists. Is he a star? Of course not. Is that way better than what you are going to get from any healthy big on the current roster not named TKR right now? Absolutely.

Obviously I have no idea if he's have been a cultural fit. But assuming he would have, I don't see how this staff doesn't turn him into an upgrade over what we have healthy right now.

None of this is an attack on Painter. It's a hypothetical question of who would have helped IF we had used the portal. Obviously, we didn't use it and at the time, they hadn't changed the rules so we couldn't use it because we were capped. But yeah, he would have helped. I don't see how that's in question.
Crazy to assume he would have been a cultural fit.

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

Just add the athleticism on defense and maybe some scoring from the 4/5 spot. I’d say he’d be a nice fill in next to TKR. But I guess he wasn’t known as a dominant rebounder.
He’s never even been a good rebounder. Kid is 6’10, wants to be a guard and isn’t an efficient shooter or scorer. Doesn’t want t to get pay interior defense or rebound.

Probably a decent kid, has never learned how to play winning basketball.
  • Like
Reactions: PaBoiler78

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

In the past, Painter has been very public about who he was recruiting in the portal or as a grad transfer.

We all knew Painter was recruiting the guard from Michigan who came to Purdue.

When Carsen Edwards came to Purdue, we all knew he was zpainter’s third choice and we knew who the other two were. When Edey came to Purdue, we all knew he was Psinter’s third choice and we knew who the other two were - Fickenson and the guy who went to Creighton.

When Jones came to Purdue, we all knew Painter was recruiting both players from SIU and the player who went to Illinois was actually Painter’s first choice of the two players.

All of this is factual in press conferences. Painter has never tried to hide who he was recruiting.

So to answer your question. Just ask what player who was in the portal was Painter actively recruiting last year? If you follow Purdue basketball, you would know Cox was another one of those players that was not on Painter’s original radar. Much like Carsen Edwards, painter was recruiting some one else . Painter was watching that other player, and saw that Cox outplayed him, so he signed Cox.

So Cox is basically the answer to your question. The player that Painter was recruiting at that game, went elsewhere . And Painter obviously liked Cox better than any portal player he was recruiting. Painter was looking at the portal for another shooting guard. And he choose Cox over who he was recruiting in the portal.

Wasn’t Painter also recruiting the player from Wisconsin that ended up going to Kansas? I believe if Painter really wanted him, Purdue could have found the NIL money he was asking for.

I’m beginning to believe Purdue basketball is a lot like Major League Baseball and free agents. The money is available, but Purdue doesn't want to pay a portal player more than their current starters receive. Purdue doesn’t overpay for anybody.
Dafuq?
  • Like
Reactions: DwaynePurvis00

Which would you rather?

Highly unlikely that we keep the Bucket game within 4 TDs, but wondering what everyone thinks.

Would you rather beat IU and risk that Walters would stay on for another year? It is possible that a loss to us could also keep IU out of the CFP. With our record, it should remove them from consideration with the strength of their schedule.

If we would upset IU, I could see Bobinski giving Walters consideration for another year, because we might be turning the corner in his logic. Of course, we know that would make next year a complete lost year and set our program back 2 to 3 years minimum.

So, beat IU and Walters stays or get beat by IU and Walters is gone?
I think Walters is staying unless there is a major overhaul with bobinski going out as well, but…

I want to beat IU. And if we do I’m ok keeping Walters. 2 wins is not acceptable and we had some embarrassing losses but if we win it will show remarkable improvement as indiana is a good team on a road game. I thought we actually looked decent against msu. Another road game with some toigh calls and no calls. But I would say that was our third best game.

I do think as the season went on we got more disciplined, less stupid penalties, didn’t give up as easy.

I’ll just say we need to lose this crazy defense with one linebacker if we keep him. And the offense will be whole new situation.
  • Like
Reactions: awthomps

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

Just add the athleticism on defense and maybe some scoring from the 4/5 spot. I’d say he’d be a nice fill in next to TKR. But I guess he wasn’t known as a dominant rebounder.
Exactly. His last year stats at Illinois were 12 pts, 37 percent from three, 6 boards a game, 3 assists. Is he a star? Of course not. Is that way better than what you are going to get from any healthy big on the current roster not named TKR right now? Absolutely.

Obviously I have no idea if he's have been a cultural fit. But assuming he would have, I don't see how this staff doesn't turn him into an upgrade over what we have healthy right now.

None of this is an attack on Painter. It's a hypothetical question of who would have helped IF we had used the portal. Obviously, we didn't use it and at the time, they hadn't changed the rules so we couldn't use it because we were capped. But yeah, he would have helped. I don't see how that's in question.
  • Like
Reactions: DwaynePurvis00

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

I think he got more from k state
Then whatever it would have taken. He fills the exact hole we have, another athletic big that can get rebounds, play inside or out, and let us play defensively against teams with multiple athletic big men.

Once we lost Jacobsen, we lost the ability to do that very well. Furst and Berg aren't the answer for that.

It's a moot point obviously, but he's just the type of player to fill that hole. I'm pretty sure Painter would have figured out a way to use a guy like that.

Why Trump Needs to Drain the Swamp

Here is the thing I don't think I got through. Whether they are or are not, there was no proclamation that someone was picked outside of the best choice and chosen as a result of DEI. You may, and others may have different perspectives on who was the best, but nobody has a reason to suggest that DEI was in play since it was never a consideration. THAT is a huge problem! When identity politics are a priority not only as a major platform of the democratic party, but when prefigured prior to an appointment of course DEI is a thought held by many. Had identity politics not been in play and had there not been a public statement with preference to identity politics, then most would not have DEI enter their minds. I don't recall Condi with her accomplishments being considered a DEI.

Now relative to the three you listed. I don't have the insight and relative background to know who was best to address the major mandates the public wanted as a result of the overwhelming percent of people that wanted a few things having a major change like the border, economy, crime and the threat of all chaos in all the wars, and other countries that might explode as well since the USA has no leadership.

Hegseth apparently has a good academic background and actual experience in war and military in general as well as his distinguished service. He might not be the best, but who is then? I don't know.

Most of the country realized the politicization of the DOJ, FBI and CIA used against Trump and other conservative causes...even going back to Obama in targeting with the IRS conservatives. Gaetz would be a bulldog to clean up THAT mess as well. However, it is possible that Trump put him out there as a lightening rod from the libs figuring what happened would and now has Bondi that could be just as tough and will fly through since the dems already shot their wad and Trump had to submit another. Course Gaetz could serve with Bondi and not need approval.

Kennedy , that in spite of the anti-vax stance on many things has always been interested in health as well as wanting to see the files on the deaths of Bobby and John...which now that the country has seen first hand the lying and unethical activities of the FBI and such no doubt has rekindled the desire to know more of what was not to be released until we that were alive at the time are dead. We have a major health problem in this country and the food industry and its lobbyists are culprits. Of course there are others that others would prefer...that is always the case...but there is NONE that would compare to the disasters Biden appointed relative to DEI...and Trannies in particular. Could Kennedy be nearly as bad as this?
iu
Man? Woman? Either way, that's one fugly it.
  • Haha
Reactions: tjreese

OT. Geeeezzzzz boys from Wiscon real

Dad watched them. Told me that will be a loss for us. Ace will go nuts on us, he said....might be best 2 way guard in conference. He's right sometimes, as he's been watching Purdue basketball since TV was invented, now 90. Tough place to start for Purdue however it comes out.
Ace is good but I don’t think the supporting cast can help beat us.

Nebraska has length but leave shooters open. If we shoot well and rebound we will be ok, if not, we will lose.

Not sold on Wisconsin…saw them do well and then just tank. Gotta see if they can do it consistently in B1G play.
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck

Bucket Game: Each Team One Game Removed From A Perfect Season

He allowed women’s basketball to go further down the tubes and waited far too long to take action there. And basically his hand was forced given some of the behaviors that were occurring with the coaching staff.
Not very impressed yet with Coach Gearlds and the women’s basketball team. Perhaps the jury is still out, but recruiting doesn’t seem to be where it needs to be for the program to return to its glory days.
Still in wait-and-see mode relative to baseball, softball, soccer. But nothing stellar there yet.
I am hopeful for wrestling, but we seem to have regressed a bit there which could be a natural flow of teams.
Lost a very good head track coach.
Probably others if I would actually do a bit more research, but these are top of mind.
And probably should add relative to Brohm, as several others have noted in other threads, that there did not seem to be any sort of succession plan in place for what was seen by everyone as Brohm’s eventual move to Louisville. In the medical profession that would be considered malpractice.

Just for fun....had Painter used the portal..

In the past, Painter has been very public about who he was recruiting in the portal or as a grad transfer.

We all knew Painter was recruiting the guard from Michigan who came to Purdue.

When Carsen Edwards came to Purdue, we all knew he was zpainter’s third choice and we knew who the other two were. When Edey came to Purdue, we all knew he was Psinter’s third choice and we knew who the other two were - Fickenson and the guy who went to Creighton.

When Jones came to Purdue, we all knew Painter was recruiting both players from SIU and the player who went to Illinois was actually Painter’s first choice of the two players.

All of this is factual in press conferences. Painter has never tried to hide who he was recruiting.

So to answer your question. Just ask what player who was in the portal was Painter actively recruiting last year? If you follow Purdue basketball, you would know Cox was another one of those players that was not on Painter’s original radar. Much like Carsen Edwards, painter was recruiting some one else . Painter was watching that other player, and saw that Cox outplayed him, so he signed Cox.

So Cox is basically the answer to your question. The player that Painter was recruiting at that game, went elsewhere . And Painter obviously liked Cox better than any portal player he was recruiting. Painter was looking at the portal for another shooting guard. And he choose Cox over who he was recruiting in the portal.

Wasn’t Painter also recruiting the player from Wisconsin that ended up going to Kansas? I believe if Painter really wanted him, Purdue could have found the NIL money he was asking for.

I’m beginning to believe Purdue basketball is a lot like Major League Baseball and free agents. The money is available, but Purdue doesn't want to pay a portal player more than their current starters receive. Purdue doesn’t overpay for anybody.
Come On What GIF by MOODMAN

Bucket Game: Each Team One Game Removed From A Perfect Season

Of course Painter was here, but he hired Brohm, which was a very good hire. Otherwise, what sports are you talking about?
He allowed women’s basketball to go further down the tubes and waited far too long to take action there. And basically his hand was forced given some of the behaviors that were occurring with the coaching staff.
Not very impressed yet with Coach Gearlds and the women’s basketball team. Perhaps the jury is still out, but recruiting doesn’t seem to be where it needs to be for the program to return to its glory days.
Still in wait-and-see mode relative to baseball, softball, soccer. But nothing stellar there yet.
I am hopeful for wrestling, but we seem to have regressed a bit there which could be a natural flow of teams.
Lost a very good head track coach.
Probably others if I would actually do a bit more research, but these are top of mind.
  • Like
Reactions: JeffBoiler

thought Purdue was the answer to the trivia ?

For all of you that love the strength of schedule and say that it actually matters, I’ll pose a question.

What if Walter’s and BoBo realized how tough the Purdue schedule was this year. And they use it as an excuse to bring back Walters. For another year? As it stands now, Iowa and Illinois will probably both end up in the top 25. Purdue’s schedule could end up as being the toughest in the NCAA this year. And maybe even the toughest ever.

And we almost won 4 games. As Walters would say……… We were so close.
So playing the bad we did why didn't we play better against them
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT