Do you think he'll be arrested? Do you think he'll do jail time?
You've proven over and over you don't know wtf you're talking about. You can't even get the basic facts straight.
Probably not. Does that mean it shouldn't even be investigated?
Guiliani said it himself that "the truth isn't the truth". These crazy right wingers on here can twist things in knots like I have never seen. Particularly when it comes to defending their cult hero, Chump.
Ok. You want to interpret that video in a different context than the facts clearly showed.....have at it. Idc. It's been best to death
I think the issue of classification will resolve itself quickly. There are protocols that if they are not followed, the information is classified. There are records of this, particularly for the TS and SCI. That part won’t be up for debate by lawyers in court. They won’t have access to it. The classifying authority (DOD, NSA, CIA, etc) will make that determination.
I generally agree with most of what you said, but the haphazard packing thing makes less sense in the fact they’ve had 2 subpoenas and then the raid.
You are kidding right?
Yeah, but I don’t think Trump gives a shit. Like he doesn’t think anything matters and thinks he’s above the law. He’s not involved in the details. Some schmuck tells him “It’s all good.”
www.politico.com
Here’s why i think Trump was involved (personally) …. anybody else working below him would probably just give the stuff over when they asked for it. I’m sure there are buffers though .. I’m guessing some lawyer takes the hit.
Lol. You said Russia has been interfering since '46. That's what I was referring too.
Do you think we all get smarter reading and responding to your emotional posts about Trump?
Lol this is the kiddy board, Bob. Read your posts once in a while. You’re like an emotional teenaged girl most of the time. How do you not recognize that?
But surely you're not too dumb to trust the FBI despite its disgraceful record of corruption, right Bob?
Well that seems like a reputable source.
Even if the report is accurate …
I don’t disagree with either of your points. But IF the report is true, and that’s a big if considering todays political climate, it is more of an indictment against the FBI and AG than it would be Trump, in my opinion.
The burden of proof isn’t on me. This is the problem: dumb ****s like you read shit like that and say, “Prove it wrong!!”
There’s the usual short man syndrome infected dick I’m used to seeing on here. Figured that’s how this would go. And if you consider yourself a measure of intelligence, then I consider that a compliment.
Thought you would have learned a lesson about your sources of information after the whole pillow salesman and Italian satellites thing. Thought the Italian satellites evidence was going to blow the whole thing wide open. LOL.
Except it doesn’t pass an even basic common sense test.
I don’t understand why some folks are arguing that Trump has been wronged here. He mishandled classified information. The information he has belongs to the country, not to him, once he leaves office. This isn’t that hard to understand.
Yes that’s exactly what I said and thought! You got me, momma’s boy.
Not much that’s been reported the last 5 years has passed the common sense test, but that hasn’t stopped many, including many on these boards, from blindly believing them and running with them as gospel (Chinese Wet Markets, Russian Hoax, Hunters laptop disinformation to name just a few).
You referring to me? If so, please point to where I ever made that claim. If not referring to me then disregard
It's an interesting link with very interesting substance. But there is a 'story within the story'!
Okay, as I’ve never once argued that if Trump mishandled classified info or broke the law that he shouldn’t be held accountable. I just have my doubts about the veracity of the FBI and its investigations after what we all know about the last 5-7 years.
Careful, some people around here don't appreciate having to read the word shit.
The double standard comes in the way the Clintons’ and the Bidens’ get treated by the federal apparatus vs. the way Trump and many other Rs do.
That's a pretty freakin' reasonable take jrcrist.
Yep, I think it’s entertaining watching so many people jumping to conclusions, one way or the other, when we know very little about the actual facts or evidence of the investigation. I think the only reasonable take is to sit back and wait for the facts to come out, while also being skeptical of the fbi based on their recent track record. That doesn’t mean this investigation isn’t above board or won’t prove wrongdoing by trump, but someone would have to have had their head up their ass the last 5 years to not question the veracity of the fbi top brass or their willingness to politicize an investigation.
Speaking of burden of proof, you’re right, it’s not on you to prove the story true, it’s on the fbi to prove trump guilty, but that didn’t stop you and many others from seeing initial reports and jumping to the conclusion Trump is guilty of wrongdoing. Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t, time will tell as the facts come out, but it’s awful hypocritical of you to preach about the burden of proof after you concluded Trump mishandled classified documents before that’s been proven.
