Certify the 2024 election that hasn’t happened yet? Not sure it’s possible to be any dumber than you are. You are the poster Democrat and the only reason they ever win elections. They prey on the stupid like you.
Trumps Florida Home Raided by the FBI
- Thread starter BoilerJS
- Start date
Already ramping up your hatred for Ron before he becomes president? You’ll need to be outraged again after whichever Democrat loses in 2024, I suppose.
Every time he posts, everyone’s IQ drops by 10 points. He’s mentally challenged if you weren’t aware.
Sounds like your mind is closed (if it were ever open). Period. Nothing else.
“He is, was, and ever shall be unfit for public office” declared the lord of bad talking points.
Who knew somebody “unfit for public office” could head up an economy that he did? Are you just blabbering out Washington Post talking points again after telling people to think for themselves?
Institutional knowledge is not bad in itself, it is the long-time hacks like Brandon who use it for partisan purposes. Is he performing to your standards?
That's fine. Just like yesterday when you jumped in to make the claim that the IUnitwit didn't directly contradict himself, even when the nitwit appeared to understand it himself and slunk away back to leonation. I knew you were not serious (as shown by your comical 'rebuttals", which I enjoyed) but just looking for a joust.
You'll no doubt take pride in knowing that you are currently at the top of my jousting ratings. In fact, you are the only one in the ratings at this time as chuckpig has completely dropped out, and other pretenders, like gr8nt, have taken to resorting to the banal "they are told what to say by so-and-so conservative hack" when he cannot maintain a debate. (I try to be easy on him because of his self-inflicted disability, but he can be so annoying at times. )
I view it more as the entrenched military-arms dealers-intelligence-foreign policy-msm establishment than repubs v. dems. Trump is obviously not part of that permanent ruling caste, so he was and is a threat that must be eliminated.
PS, any progress in coming up with a dignified screen name?
My choice of words was based on your choice of words. Saying one side doesn't know what women are, calling out right wing violence vs violence from "other races" (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you intended to say something else on that one, because if not it's pretty cringey) and many other things that are quite clearly heavily right leaning talking points. Those are dog whistles. Maybe you don't recognize that, but that doesn't make it any less true.
I'm not here to hate on anyone whether they are Purdue grads, Cary residents, or anything else, I'm just constantly blown away over the lengths at which people will go in order to defend this man. If Biden does this, then he deserves the same treatment. If it was determined Obama had done it, he should have gotten the same treatment. End of story.
I don’t think people necessarily defend the man, they may just miss how good things were when he was president, notably before the global pandemic. His presidency was a net positive for the normal American.
You serious? This thread is full of people defending him lol. I think there are a lot of normal Americans that would disagree with your sentiment, but frankly as I said to another person earlier in this thread, that really has no bearing on how the current situation should be handled. They are unrelated. Best president, worst president, it truly makes no difference.
Did you take a class on how to look stupid on a message board or does it just come naturally to you?
Yes, I meant that they defend him because they mainly miss the way things were with him as president. He was the standard slimy politician, even though he was new to being a politician, certainly not new to being slimy. However, things were good when he was president when you take out the never ending cycle of media driven outrage and fabricated stories most of which were fueled by “sources”.
He got results, people were making money, employed and the world was peaceful for the most part. Again, he was a net positive for the country if you look at it objectively and take emotion out of it.
Again, I think many people would disagree with you that things were as great as you say but it really doesn't matter at all. Defending him because they liked what he did as president is pretty gross imo. And that's not emotion speaking, that's being a decent, respectable human being.
What’s “pretty gross” about it in your opinion? Yes, that’s emotion speaking as you seem to (incorrectly) think you’re better than his defenders with the “decent, respectable human being” line.
Why do libs always go to the morality play btw? They’re politicians and we’re all Americans. I’d never think I’m more “decent” or “respectable” than anybody who defends Biden. Take emotion out of politics.
Sigh, because as I've said MANY times already, it does not matter to me who the subject of the investigation is. What they did before has no bearing on this. Morality doesn't change based on the subject. What's hard to understand about that? Defending him because you think he was a good president is gross. I can't speak to what other "libs" would do, I can only speak for myself. I would want a thorough investigation regardless of who was involved.
What’s “gross” about it? You didn’t answer my question but instead chose to babble.
The hell do you mean what's gross? Is this really confusing for you? His past successes or failures have nothing to do with this situation. What he supposedly did, if true, was wrong. I'm glad they are investigating it and I hope they punish him if it's true. Just as I would if it were Obama, Biden, or anyone else. It's gross that you and others think there shouldn't be consequences because you feel he did a good job as president. That. Is. Not. Relevant.
And I chose to "babble" because apparently you have a hard time with comprehension since you accused me of being emotional and only feeling this way because I didn't like him as president when I've said many times that has nothing to do with it.
So you think it’s gross to defend somebody who hasn’t been convicted of anything at all? “If true” is what you said, correct? And when did I say I didn’t think there should be consequences because he did a good job as president? Your outrage is rooted in something that hasn’t even been proven yet. You’re. Upset. About. Something. You. Don’t. Know. Is. True.
You are emotional. You’re upset at a hypothetical and you’re putting words into my mouth. All of the libs here are the same, you’ll see. When they get a little upset, they default to babbling like you are.
Lol, no what I'm upset about is the absurd number of people who:
- Felt a former president should be above having a legal search performed at their home
- Felt that the DOJ was being shady by not releasing the warrant
- Have now shifted to either the FBI planting evidence or all of the documents were already declassified or it was "only" one box or Obama had documents shipped to Chicago
I'm sorry that your idol is in trouble, it happens. We will all get through this.
Oh, ok and thanks for the bullet points. I’m not in the camp of feeling any of those feels in those bullet points so it’s good you’re getting that off your chest to whoever it may apply to.
You’re now at the point you’re asking yourself questions with the “Pathological liar says what?” and then saying if I disagree with you, there’s nothing to discuss before telling me to have a good night. I told you earlier what libs do around here which is babble and I must say, you’re babbling at a pretty high level here. May be time to head back to the quad.
I don’t have an idol but thanks? And you tried so hard to be level headed and not get emotional but you couldn’t help it. You’re a lib. It’s what you all do.
No, I was saying if you disagree with the current process playing out in a legal manner then we have nothing more to talk about. For all your talk of babble, you sure do an awful lot of it yourself.
Arrest the guy and throw him in jail forever if he broke the law. It’s not really that complicated. I just choose to not get emotional about any and all hypotheticals regarding Trump. I’m not a lib.
Also, just to set the record straight, you started responding to me. I didn't seek out any conversation with you. And I never said you specifically felt any of those things. I said it's annoying to see all the people who do.
You're right, those damn snowflake libs. They're the only ones who ever get emotional lol. You people are hilarious.
You really are amazing entertainment. Thanks for this.
You people are funnier. “Sorry your idol is in trouble! You don’t hate Trump so he’s gotta be your idol! Supposedly, if true, he’s in big trouble!” You people are so emotional and so hilarious.
Now, don’t sell yourself short on the entertainment scale. It’s always a joy to see another Trump hater join the fray and get upset about hypotheticals. Thanks for that.
Anytime, I'm just sorry I won't be around long. Typically I don't dip my toes into this cesspool but I couldn't help myself this time (because I'm so emotional).
Yeah, I mean how can you pass up an opportunity to get emotional and lash out about a man who hurt you in so many hypothetical ways?
I'll give it to you, you've got a schtick and you stick to it. Well done. I'm going to go do something valuable with my time now. Have a good one!
Is my shtick making you feel stupid? Thank you if that’s what you mean. It wasn’t too difficult since you emotional Trump haters upset about hypotheticals are all the same.
Interviewed lawyers and law enforcement officials this weekend, on various news shows,
claim it is the norm for the accused lawyer to be on site, have over sight of and even help the agents find what they are looking for.
Trumps lawyer signed the inventory form of items taken. I would refuse to sign anything unless I knew what I was signing. Wierd situation.
Yes, Secret Service guards were on the property not CIA.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Question to ponder about recruiting in the NIL era......- Latest: BoilerMaker P
-
-
-
-