You really should stop while you are behind.No not really. Nothing has changed the fact that ODU isn't very good. Nothing I've said has changed...
You really should stop while you are behind.No not really. Nothing has changed the fact that ODU isn't very good. Nothing I've said has changed...
If you can't connect the dots there's not much hope for you.LOL.....where in the world did it say THAT??? You need to work on your reading comprehension.
You really should stop while you are behind.
Did they get their usual production out of their main guys?...39 points would likely indicate they didn't.I'm not user how you are missing the fact that even though Purdue was favored by three possessions. Three of the five starters produced basically zilch. Yet Purdue still won by more then double what they were favored by.
Take three starters out of your lineup and see what you get. Probably a huge loss against anybody.
And our defense had something to do with it. Keep digging that hole sally.Did they get their usual production out of their main guys?...39 points would likely indicate they didn't.
No not really. Nothing has changed the fact that ODU isn't very good. Nothing I've said has changed...
The prowess continues. How do you think of this on your own?LOL.....HillbillySkie posted at 1 IN THE MORNING, and yet is back less than 10 hours later!!!
She creates a fake name, makes 20 posts ON A WEEKEND, posts in the wee hours of the morning, posts in the late hours of the morning, and obviously has no life.
GIrl, you're making yourself look pathetic. And you'remaking IU look pathetic.
I would check to see if you've posted any anti-IU diatribes on their board, but I think we both know better, yes?
Purdue......#1 Big Ten team in Sagarin and KenPom. LOL.
Can you explain where I have argued with myself , or changed my argument during this thread?Only in your mind. You seem to be responding to your own posts a bit here, arguing with yourself. Not clever.
LOL.....HillbillySkie posted at 1 IN THE MORNING, and yet is back less than 10 hours later!!!
She creates a fake name, makes 20 posts ON A WEEKEND, posts in the wee hours of the morning, posts in the late hours of the morning, and obviously has no life.
GIrl, you're making yourself look pathetic. And you'remaking IU look pathetic.
I would check to see if you've posted any anti-IU diatribes on their board, but I think we both know better, yes?
Purdue......#1 Big Ten team in Sagarin and KenPom. LOL.
If I were you I would stop responding to this troll. There is nothing basketball related to these posts he/she/it is posting. All that is happening is he/she/it making a general challenge to our feel-good-about-our-team postings. If you think about it, it is just as stupid as the MSU trolls coming on here to try to temper our spirits. No reason to do it other than fear.I looked up "obsessed" on Dictionary.com. It said, "See hbilskie."
Only in your mind. You seem to be responding to your own posts a bit here, arguing with yourself. Not clever.
Only in your mind. You seem to be responding to your own posts a bit here, arguing with yourself. Not clever.
I am impressed that you listen to IU games on the radio. DonF is the best radio announcer in the business. IU also scored 86 points, and Purdue scored 61. A win is a win. IU fans agree to a person that IU must improve on turnovers and defense, there is no evidence of an ecstatic fan base that I have seen. Evidently, we aspire to score like Purdue does.Oh, sorry, obviously this is my fault. You must want the IU board, not the Purdue board.
It's IU who played a comparable team to Ole D (Creighton, No. 82).
And IU played at home, whereas Purdue played away.
And yet IU only scored 1.2 points for every point their opponent scored. Purdue scored 1.6 points for every point their opponent scored.
And yet IU fans (and their announcer Fischer) are crowing about how good (!!!!) IU looked.
Whereas Purdue fans are saying their team didn't play that well.
Soooo.....IU played a comparable team, at home, scored less per point that Purdue, and yet is ecstatic over their teams play.....yet you're here on this board whining like a four year-old girl.
You MUST mean the IU board....otherwise you're just a clueless hypocrite.
Once Fischer scrapes all the peanut butter off the roof of his mouth, he will be listenable.I am impressed that you listen to IU games on the radio. DonF is the best radio announcer in the business. IU also scored 86 points, and Purdue scored 61. A win is a win. IU fans agree to a person that IU must improve on turnovers and defense, there is no evidence of an ecstatic fan base that I have seen. Evidently, we aspire to score like Purdue does.
Well when you hold a team to less then 40 points, even while playing scrubs. There is no need to score 80 points.I am impressed that you listen to IU games on the radio. DonF is the best radio announcer in the business. IU also scored 86 points, and Purdue scored 61. A win is a win. IU fans agree to a person that IU must improve on turnovers and defense, there is no evidence of an ecstatic fan base that I have seen. Evidently, we aspire to score like Purdue does.
And old dominion gave st Joes all they could handle i think tooJust beat another lousy team!!! Lol
They sure did. Lost on a last second shot. I left the room with like 15 seconds left to put a baby to sleep and came back expecting to watch overtime. Nothin doin. St. Joe squeaked it out.And old dominion gave st Joes all they could handle i think too
Stil waiting on that explanationNailed it....
my 4-year old has a better grasp of logic.
Don't you work the Monday breakfast rush at McDonalds???Stil waiting on that explanation
I think that is a good idea. Sit here and wait for someone to hold your hand and "splain it" to you.Stil waiting on that explanation
Probably because we could explain it to you. But we can't make you understand.I asked a question. No one has answered it.
Ok. Well give it your best shot big guy.Probably because we could explain it to you. But we can't make you understand.
I asked a question. No one has answered it.
Just go back through the posts again.Ok. Well give it your best shot big guy.
Can't share a coloring book explaining reading comprehension on here. So it's a lost cause.thats what I thought
We get about 3 people saying that Im "arguing with myself" and "changing my argument"
And no one can explain where those comments come from. I mean it's a thread, all my posts are right in front of you. if I was changing my position it should be pretty easy to just quote a contradiction from the thread. But of course you can't do that, because it's not there.
It's been explained to you. You're just too dense to comprehend what you were told. Even how you are not comprehending it has been explained.thats what I thought
We get about 3 people saying that Im "arguing with myself" and "changing my argument"
And no one can explain where those comments come from. I mean it's a thread, all my posts are right in front of you. if I was changing my position it should be pretty easy to just quote a contradiction from the thread. But of course you can't do that, because it's not there.
Can you explain where I have argued with myself , or changed my argument during this thread?
That's an open question to anyone, but mainly to the people that have suggested I changed my tune at some point
You guys realize ODU isn't very good, right?
Ummmm......they're around 60th in the rankings (ahead of Michigan and Ohio State), Purdue was favored by 9, and yet was up by 26 until the bench cleared.
You do realize that, right?
They returned basically everyone from a 27 win team. They are a NCAA tournament team. That was a very good win for Purdue.
Good enough to have votes in both the AP and coaches poll this week...
I don't think you understand the meaning of "prove" either.Every post made that says "oh yeah we could explain it but we won't" further proves that you can't explain it.
Well it's confirmed. You're both trolling AND stupid.Hahahahahahhahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha
Do you understand the question, bro?
The question is where did I argue with myself!? Or change MY argument !!!
You posted responses from OTHER PEOPLE to my post.
Yeah yeah my reading comprehension is flawed though.
At this point you're just proving that you lack reading comprehension skills.So, just for the record, bbg, do you think that last post from top secret boiler answers my question ?