ADVERTISEMENT

So here's a scary thought

You really should stop while you are behind.
I'm not user how you are missing the fact that even though Purdue was favored by three possessions. Three of the five starters produced basically zilch. Yet Purdue still won by more then double what they were favored by.

Take three starters out of your lineup and see what you get. Probably a huge loss against anybody.
Did they get their usual production out of their main guys?...39 points would likely indicate they didn't.
 
LOL.....HillbillySkie posted at 1 IN THE MORNING, and yet is back less than 10 hours later!!!

She creates a fake name, makes 20 posts ON A WEEKEND, posts in the wee hours of the morning, posts in the late hours of the morning, and obviously has no life.

GIrl, you're making yourself look pathetic. And you'remaking IU look pathetic.

I would check to see if you've posted any anti-IU diatribes on their board, but I think we both know better, yes?

Purdue......#1 Big Ten team in Sagarin and KenPom. LOL.
 
LOL.....HillbillySkie posted at 1 IN THE MORNING, and yet is back less than 10 hours later!!!

She creates a fake name, makes 20 posts ON A WEEKEND, posts in the wee hours of the morning, posts in the late hours of the morning, and obviously has no life.

GIrl, you're making yourself look pathetic. And you'remaking IU look pathetic.

I would check to see if you've posted any anti-IU diatribes on their board, but I think we both know better, yes?

Purdue......#1 Big Ten team in Sagarin and KenPom. LOL.
The prowess continues. How do you think of this on your own?
 
Only in your mind. You seem to be responding to your own posts a bit here, arguing with yourself. Not clever.
Can you explain where I have argued with myself , or changed my argument during this thread?

That's an open question to anyone, but mainly to the people that have suggested I changed my tune at some point
 
Last edited:
LOL.....HillbillySkie posted at 1 IN THE MORNING, and yet is back less than 10 hours later!!!

She creates a fake name, makes 20 posts ON A WEEKEND, posts in the wee hours of the morning, posts in the late hours of the morning, and obviously has no life.

GIrl, you're making yourself look pathetic. And you'remaking IU look pathetic.

I would check to see if you've posted any anti-IU diatribes on their board, but I think we both know better, yes?

Purdue......#1 Big Ten team in Sagarin and KenPom. LOL.

I looked up "obsessed" on Dictionary.com. It said, "See hbilskie."
 
I looked up "obsessed" on Dictionary.com. It said, "See hbilskie."
If I were you I would stop responding to this troll. There is nothing basketball related to these posts he/she/it is posting. All that is happening is he/she/it making a general challenge to our feel-good-about-our-team postings. If you think about it, it is just as stupid as the MSU trolls coming on here to try to temper our spirits. No reason to do it other than fear.

:cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: purdue4sure
Oh, sorry, obviously this is my fault. You must want the IU board, not the Purdue board.

It's IU who played a comparable team to Ole D (Creighton, No. 82).

And IU played at home, whereas Purdue played away.

And yet IU only scored 1.2 points for every point their opponent scored. Purdue scored 1.6 points for every point their opponent scored.

And yet IU fans (and their announcer Fischer) are crowing about how good (!!!!) IU looked.

Whereas Purdue fans are saying their team didn't play that well.

Soooo.....IU played a comparable team, at home, scored less per point that Purdue, and yet is ecstatic over their teams play.....yet you're here on this board whining like a four year-old girl.

You MUST mean the IU board....otherwise you're just a clueless hypocrite.
I am impressed that you listen to IU games on the radio. DonF is the best radio announcer in the business. IU also scored 86 points, and Purdue scored 61. A win is a win. IU fans agree to a person that IU must improve on turnovers and defense, there is no evidence of an ecstatic fan base that I have seen. Evidently, we aspire to score like Purdue does.
 
I am impressed that you listen to IU games on the radio. DonF is the best radio announcer in the business. IU also scored 86 points, and Purdue scored 61. A win is a win. IU fans agree to a person that IU must improve on turnovers and defense, there is no evidence of an ecstatic fan base that I have seen. Evidently, we aspire to score like Purdue does.
Once Fischer scrapes all the peanut butter off the roof of his mouth, he will be listenable.
Too much thom brennaman-esque phony broadcast school intonation for me....
 
Last edited:
I am impressed that you listen to IU games on the radio. DonF is the best radio announcer in the business. IU also scored 86 points, and Purdue scored 61. A win is a win. IU fans agree to a person that IU must improve on turnovers and defense, there is no evidence of an ecstatic fan base that I have seen. Evidently, we aspire to score like Purdue does.
Well when you hold a team to less then 40 points, even while playing scrubs. There is no need to score 80 points.

You'll figure that out when you have your first cold night shooting.
 
Another look at the box and wtf.....We had 5 guys with 6 or more rebounds???
Now I didn't see it but that alone must have been impressive, W or L. I mean come on...I'll look for the replay but in the meantime I can't wait for today's game vs. Fla.
 
Stil waiting on that explanation
moron.jpg.jpeg
 
Stil waiting on that explanation
I think that is a good idea. Sit here and wait for someone to hold your hand and "splain it" to you.

Please check back every half hour or so for more details. Perhaps set your alarm clock to continue checking through the night. I am sure you will be rewarded, if you just hang in there....

:cool:
 
thats what I thought
We get about 3 people saying that Im "arguing with myself" and "changing my argument"
And no one can explain where those comments come from. I mean it's a thread, all my posts are right in front of you. if I was changing my position it should be pretty easy to just quote a contradiction from the thread. But of course you can't do that, because it's not there.
 
thats what I thought
We get about 3 people saying that Im "arguing with myself" and "changing my argument"
And no one can explain where those comments come from. I mean it's a thread, all my posts are right in front of you. if I was changing my position it should be pretty easy to just quote a contradiction from the thread. But of course you can't do that, because it's not there.
Can't share a coloring book explaining reading comprehension on here. So it's a lost cause.
Hope you enjoyed the game last night.
 
Every post made that says "oh yeah we could explain it but we won't" further proves that you can't explain it.
 
thats what I thought
We get about 3 people saying that Im "arguing with myself" and "changing my argument"
And no one can explain where those comments come from. I mean it's a thread, all my posts are right in front of you. if I was changing my position it should be pretty easy to just quote a contradiction from the thread. But of course you can't do that, because it's not there.
It's been explained to you. You're just too dense to comprehend what you were told. Even how you are not comprehending it has been explained.

At this point you are trolling or just really stupid. There is no other explanation.
 
Can you explain where I have argued with myself , or changed my argument during this thread?

That's an open question to anyone, but mainly to the people that have suggested I changed my tune at some point

You can scroll down from where this post is and point out the answer to me. Well I mean you could if there was one.
 
You guys realize ODU isn't very good, right?

Ummmm......they're around 60th in the rankings (ahead of Michigan and Ohio State), Purdue was favored by 9, and yet was up by 26 until the bench cleared.

You do realize that, right?

They returned basically everyone from a 27 win team. They are a NCAA tournament team. That was a very good win for Purdue.

Good enough to have votes in both the AP and coaches poll this week...

now shut the **** up.
 
Hahahahahahhahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha
Do you understand the question, bro?

The question is where did I argue with myself!? Or change MY argument !!!
You posted responses from OTHER PEOPLE to my post.

Yeah yeah my reading comprehension is flawed though.
 
Hahahahahahhahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha
Do you understand the question, bro?

The question is where did I argue with myself!? Or change MY argument !!!
You posted responses from OTHER PEOPLE to my post.

Yeah yeah my reading comprehension is flawed though.
Well it's confirmed. You're both trolling AND stupid.

Case closed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bodog57
So, just for the record, bbg, do you think that last post from top secret boiler answers my question ?
At this point you're just proving that you lack reading comprehension skills.

Hell even the question you asked here has been answered already...

Just put the troll on ignore people... he is just going in an endless circle that he doesn't understand and has nothing of substance to add.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT