What he said is an accusation. I’m not going to into a word game that you love so much, but an accusation without any corroboration doesn’t amount to evidence. But since you refer to hunters emails bring evidence, why don’t you provide a link to them and point out the evidence of Biden taking money from Hunter’s deals? Or is the reference to the big guy your evidence?
Why don’t read what the WSJ said about Bobo and his evidence? If you don’t pay for it, read what others had to say about it.
An ex-business partner of Hunter Biden said he consulted his father about a planned venture with a Chinese oil company. Joe Biden denied any involvement in the venture and corporate records reviewed by The Journal show no role for him.
www.wsj.com
"The venture never received proposed funds from the Chinese company or completed any deals," the WSJ reports. "Corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden."
www.newsweek.com
A former associate of Hunter Biden has televised his grievances about former Vice President Joe Biden, telling Fox News
www.politifact.com
I wasn’t making any claims about the evidence of the Hunter saga vs Russia……although I would be happy to have that discussion.
If you would learn to freakin read you’ll see that I was making comparisons of idiotic trump lemmings like you who are quick to believe the Hunter story with no investigation, no facts, no independent conclusions just like the idiotic dem lemmings who believed trump was guilty before the facts were presented and investigated. You’re doing the same thing as the people you attack regularly. All of you here. But somehow it’s different when you’re doing it. It’s completely obvious. What’s that you all say? For thee but not for me?