ADVERTISEMENT

Joe Biden stole CLASSIFIED docs when he was VP!

You've completely missed the point again.
  • You did not, nor have you ever hurt my feelings.
  • You admit that you only respond to insults, and only respond with insults.
  • You readily admit that when there is substance you do not respond with substance. Ever.
That is pathetic.
2 and 3 are not accurate, as you know. You're just lashing out because I hurt your feelings, showing that 1 also is not accurate.

Please, do you and many of us a favor and return to your clownpants roots, where you will no doubt be appreciated and maybe even honored for what will appear to them to be your wisdom, plagiarized or otherwise.
 
2 and 3 are not accurate, as you know. You're just lashing out because I hurt your feelings, showing that 1 also is not accurate.

Please, do you and many of us a favor and return to your clownpants roots, where you will no doubt be appreciated and maybe even honored for what will appear to them to be your wisdom, plagiarized or otherwise.
Nice self-own by solely responding in the form of insults.

CrackeyHunterGuySelfOwnsAgain
 
More than one location. They shouldn't have been in his garage and they shouldn't have been in an unsecured university office. I thought I heard of a 3rd location, but I don't have info on that.

He had top secret documents.

Agree entirely!

Again, all of the credible reporting that I have seen on this said that the documents at Mar A Lago were in an approved locked area.

Simply not true. The whole kerfuffle about Mar A Lago is that the feds were told of some documents, and were not told of the others, even when they asked.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fo...-june-no-classified-material-remains-mar-lago

Those undisclosed materials were SCI docs, which are a whole 'nother thing. Merely locking up SCI docs - in a pool house no less, is in no way enough.

https://www.dni.gov/files/NCSC/documents/Regulations/ICS-705-1.pdf


Finally, and this is my opinion. While they should, I have no confidence that these very old, "make up rules as I go along" politicians necessarily have any idea of what materials are stacked in storage or what the requirements and ramifications are for having them. Maybe they do in certain situations, but I doubt it.
 
Well the obstruction part of the Trump story is a stretch, but that's just not something we are going to agree on.

Biden not only had classified documents in unsecured areas (unlike Trump), he had TOP secret documents in unsecured areas.
Why is it a stretch?
So, are you saying you’re not concerned about Hunters business relationships that clearly involve Joe?
They don’t clearly involve Biden. Are you simply going off what Bobulinski has said? You have any evidence?

You’re no different than the dems that said Trump was guilty on Russian collusion before the investigation was complete. You’re doing the same thing they did. Shocking.
 
Why is it a stretch?

They don’t clearly involve Biden. Are you simply going off what Bobulinski has said? You have any evidence?

You’re no different than the dems that said Trump was guilty on Russian collusion before the investigation was complete. You’re doing the same thing they did. Shocking.
What Bobulinski said is evidence, backed up with the evidence of the emails he received from Hunter and others that match emails send from Hunter's laptop.

That is quite a bit different from the Russian collusion hoax because we know now that some of the "evidence' being claimed by schiff and others was fake or nonexistent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Agree entirely!



Simply not true.
The whole kerfuffle about Mar A Lago is that the feds were told of some documents, and were not told of the others, even when they asked.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fo...-june-no-classified-material-remains-mar-lago

Those undisclosed materials were SCI docs, which are a whole 'nother thing. Merely locking up SCI docs - in a pool house no less, is in no way enough.

https://www.dni.gov/files/NCSC/documents/Regulations/ICS-705-1.pdf


Finally, and this is my opinion. While they should, I have no confidence that these very old, "make up rules as I go along" politicians necessarily have any idea of what materials are stacked in storage or what the requirements and ramifications are for having them. Maybe they do in certain situations, but I doubt it.
They were still in a locked container with a specified lock per the request of the FBI.
 
They don’t clearly involve Biden. Are you simply going off what Bobulinski has said? You have any evidence?

You’re no different than the dems that said Trump was guilty on Russian collusion before the investigation was complete. You’re doing the same thing they did. Shocking.
You are simply ignoring the evidence if you don't know that Hunter's business dealings included Joe. Bobulinski didn't just say he did. He provided evidence. Then there's the evidence on Hunter's laptop. I'm sure there's more.
 
You are simply ignoring the evidence if you don't know that Hunter's business dealings included Joe. Bobulinski didn't just say he did. He provided evidence. Then there's the evidence on Hunter's laptop. I'm sure there's more.
ugh, this may seem weird and old, but for anyone to vote for Biden, he or she had to ignore the evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
What Bobulinski said is evidence, backed up with the evidence of the emails he received from Hunter and others that match emails send from Hunter's laptop.

That is quite a bit different from the Russian collusion hoax because we know now that some of the "evidence' being claimed by schiff and others was fake or nonexistent.
And you've seen and verified the veracity and credibility of this "evidence?"

No. You have not.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
ugh, this may seem weird and old, but for anyone to vote for Biden, he or she had to ignore the evidence.
Well, you voted for this.


And the guy who wants to arrest members of the media.

 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
And you've seen and verified the veracity and credibility of this "evidence?"

No. You have not.
You sound confused again about the difference between evidence and proof.

Tony was interviewed by the FBI. He has copies of emails that came from Hunter's laptop. All of this is evidence, but not proof.

Ray Epps is on video from Jan 5 and Jan 6 calling for protestors to go "into the Capitol." He later sent a text to a nephew bragging that he 'orchestrated' Jan. 6. Again, this is evidence but not proof.

No need to get hysterical yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Well, you voted for this.


And the guy who wants to arrest members of the media.

Yes, I did Bob. Do you really think you have a winning hand to play when comparing the Big Guy with Trump. Is that a road that will take you where you wish? Like Trump or not and even ignoring his successes without him we would never have learned just how corrupt things are...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Well, you voted for this.


And the guy who wants to arrest members of the media.



That has to be a parody video.

I cannot tell whether that video or the following is the fake, although I think it's more likely it's the first, not this one:

Trump Press Conference
 
Last edited:
What Bobulinski said is evidence, backed up with the evidence of the emails he received from Hunter and others that match emails send from Hunter's laptop.

That is quite a bit different from the Russian collusion hoax because we know now that some of the "evidence' being claimed by schiff and others was fake or nonexistent.
What he said is an accusation. I’m not going to into a word game that you love so much, but an accusation without any corroboration doesn’t amount to evidence. But since you refer to hunters emails bring evidence, why don’t you provide a link to them and point out the evidence of Biden taking money from Hunter’s deals? Or is the reference to the big guy your evidence?

Why don’t read what the WSJ said about Bobo and his evidence? If you don’t pay for it, read what others had to say about it.




I wasn’t making any claims about the evidence of the Hunter saga vs Russia……although I would be happy to have that discussion.

If you would learn to freakin read you’ll see that I was making comparisons of idiotic trump lemmings like you who are quick to believe the Hunter story with no investigation, no facts, no independent conclusions just like the idiotic dem lemmings who believed trump was guilty before the facts were presented and investigated. You’re doing the same thing as the people you attack regularly. All of you here. But somehow it’s different when you’re doing it. It’s completely obvious. What’s that you all say? For thee but not for me?
 
Yes, I did Bob. Do you really think you have a winning hand to play when comparing the Big Guy with Trump. Is that a road that will take you where you wish? Like Trump or not and even ignoring his successes without him we would never have learned just how corrupt things are...
I don’t know about a winning hand, but it isn’t a losing one. I’m not for arresting journalists, are you? What do they call leaders in other countries who do that? But you either don’t think that’s a problem in a free country or you are for it…….which wouldn’t surprise me at all.

That’s just one of the ridiculous authoritarian statements trump has made, not to mention his actions.

Now is when you write a page full of wandering BS that will not mention arresting journalists at all. Or was he just joking?
 
I don’t know about a winning hand, but it isn’t a losing one. I’m not for arresting journalists, are you? What do they call leaders in other countries who do that? But you either don’t think that’s a problem in a free country or you are for it…….which wouldn’t surprise me at all.

That’s just one of the ridiculous authoritarian statements trump has made, not to mention his actions.

Now is when you write a page full of wandering BS that will not mention arresting journalists at all. Or was he just joking?
.
The 'glass is half full' part is that
  1. The electorate is largely over Donnie J Trump. In fact, he's the only candidate that Biden would have a strong chance of beating. Biden is one for one against Trump, and the American exhaustion with Trump has notably accelerated since he left office. Donald J. Trumpykins is <><><> a laughing stock of an angry, despicable, imbalanced, narcissistic, idiot. Most people (though apparently not CrackeyHunterGuy or WeirdOldTJ) strongly agree.
  2. No other Democrat or Republican considering the Presidency would dare say anything so completely fascist/dictator-ish.
.
 
What he said is an accusation. I’m not going to into a word game that you love so much, but an accusation without any corroboration doesn’t amount to evidence. But since you refer to hunters emails bring evidence, why don’t you provide a link to them and point out the evidence of Biden taking money from Hunter’s deals? Or is the reference to the big guy your evidence?

Why don’t read what the WSJ said about Bobo and his evidence? If you don’t pay for it, read what others had to say about it.




I wasn’t making any claims about the evidence of the Hunter saga vs Russia……although I would be happy to have that discussion.

If you would learn to freakin read you’ll see that I was making comparisons of idiotic trump lemmings like you who are quick to believe the Hunter story with no investigation, no facts, no independent conclusions just like the idiotic dem lemmings who believed trump was guilty before the facts were presented and investigated. You’re doing the same thing as the people you attack regularly. All of you here. But somehow it’s different when you’re doing it. It’s completely obvious. What’s that you all say? For thee but not for me?
I think I see your problem (one of many). You haven't caught up with the news since those three 2020 refs .

Here is something to help bring you up to speed:

 
Last edited:
I don’t know about a winning hand, but it isn’t a losing one. I’m not for arresting journalists, are you? What do they call leaders in other countries who do that? But you either don’t think that’s a problem in a free country or you are for it…….which wouldn’t surprise me at all.

That’s just one of the ridiculous authoritarian statements trump has made, not to mention his actions.

Now is when you write a page full of wandering BS that will not mention arresting journalists at all. Or was he just joking?
of course bob...arrest them and then put them in jail with the unarmed insurrectionists for "the horrible attack on our democracy". Then once a month bring them out and tar and feather them and every two weeks force them to write something explaining what Biden said the previous two weeks...that should teach them! ;) (Reading further undermines the criteria of which you allow me to do in "your authoritarian" desires which is somewhat ironic.) That way maybe they can have some new conversations and card games. The leaking out of the SCOTUS and subsequent house protests are much more damaging that those little old ladies and men whose unlawful entry even under the encouragement of Epps was for a couple of hours.

Then go back and use the same cell phone mapping used to locate the Jan6 insurrectionist, on the election mules and the black lives matter that went on for months and the SCOTUS house protests....and that authoritarian "Donald" that wants to curb free speech and relentless attacks on the 2nd that vowed to put a woman on the SCOTUS even though he and she couldn't define what a woman was...yes that authoritarian who appointed the unbiased DOJ that attacked parents or ignored the pleas of so many to stop all the illegals. Yes Donald was soooooooo much of an authoritarian affecting John Q Public like the nice, no mean tweet ole Joe we all know....
 
What he said is an accusation. I’m not going to into a word game that you love so much, but an accusation without any corroboration doesn’t amount to evidence. But since you refer to hunters emails bring evidence, why don’t you provide a link to them and point out the evidence of Biden taking money from Hunter’s deals? Or is the reference to the big guy your evidence?

Why don’t read what the WSJ said about Bobo and his evidence? If you don’t pay for it, read what others had to say about it.




I wasn’t making any claims about the evidence of the Hunter saga vs Russia……although I would be happy to have that discussion.

If you would learn to freakin read you’ll see that I was making comparisons of idiotic trump lemmings like you who are quick to believe the Hunter story with no investigation, no facts, no independent conclusions just like the idiotic dem lemmings who believed trump was guilty before the facts were presented and investigated. You’re doing the same thing as the people you attack regularly. All of you here. But somehow it’s different when you’re doing it. It’s completely obvious. What’s that you all say? For thee but not for me?
You’re conflating evidence and proof.
 
insurrectionists for "the horrible attack on our democracy". Then once a month bring them out and tar and feather them and every two weeks force them to write something explaining what Biden said the previous two weeks...that should teach them! ;) (Reading further undermines the criteria of which you allow me to do in "your authoritarian" desires which is somewhat ironic.) That way maybe they can have some new conversations and card games. The leaking out of the SCOTUS and subsequent house protests are much more damaging that those little old ladies and men whose unlawful entry even under the encouragement of Epps was for a couple of hours.

Then go back and use the same cell phone mapping used to locate the Jan6 insurrectionist, on the election mules and the black lives matter that went on for months and the SCOTUS house protests....and that authoritarian "Donald" that wants to curb free speech and relentless attacks on the 2nd that vowed to put a woman on the SCOTUS even though he and she couldn't define what a woman was...yes that authoritarian who appointed the unbiased DOJ that attacked parents or ignored the pleas of so many to stop all the illegals. Yes Donald was soooooooo much of an authoritarian affecting John Q Public like the nice, no mean tweet ole Joe we all know....
Let's analyze your post:
  1. "insurrectionists for the horrible attack on our democracy." True. That they were and are (from their federal prison cells lol).
  2. "leaking out of the SCOTUS and subsequent house protests are much damaging" Yes, they are.
  3. "use the cell phone mapping used to locate the Jan6 insurrectionist" I would hope so. Continue to use legally accepted techniques as part of the evidence against people who are enemies of our nation.
  4. "that authoritarian Donald that wants to curb free speech. Well stated!
  5. "Donald was soooooooo much of an authoritarian" Well, you may think so, but in my opinion he is far more of a narcissistic, intellectually uncurious, dangerous idiot.
These are some of the first moments of clarity your WeirdOldTJ brain has produced. Congrats!
 
Let's analyze your post:
  1. "insurrectionists for the horrible attack on our democracy." True. That they were and are (from their federal prison cells lol).
  2. "leaking out of the SCOTUS and subsequent house protests are much damaging" Yes, they are.
  3. "use the cell phone mapping used to locate the Jan6 insurrectionist" I would hope so. Continue to use legally accepted techniques as part of the evidence against people who are enemies of our nation.
  4. "that authoritarian Donald that wants to curb free speech. Well stated!
  5. "Donald was soooooooo much of an authoritarian" Well, you may think so, but in my opinion he is far more of a narcissistic, intellectually uncurious, dangerous idiot.
These are some of the first moments of clarity your WeirdOldTJ brain has produced. Congrats!
Well I don't know who the "us" is in the let's, but more than one analyzing the post is fine and acutally quite a help for my studies. It is but another data point in my quest for further examples for my future contributions to abnormal psychology. Most seems to fall under the umbrella of extreme neurosis and fear of lack of control in dealing with reality. Then there are some that lack the requisite understandings to discern that which is not true even if something tells them different...all too often due to the voids in data available to extract. Every so often one will come on here and the other forums that appears to be an only child that was probably made fun of in school. I wish I could help him.

Anyway, this is the mother lode for interesting takes...of things people tell us to believe...
 
Well I don't know who the "us" is in the let's, but more than one analyzing the post is fine and acutally quite a help for my studies. It is but another data point in my quest for further examples for my future contributions to abnormal psychology. Most seems to fall under the umbrella of extreme neurosis and fear of lack of control in dealing with reality. Then there are some that lack the requisite understandings to discern that which is not true even if something tells them different...all too often due to the voids in data available to extract. Every so often one will come on here and the other forums that appears to be an only child that was probably made fun of in school. I wish I could help him.

Anyway, this is the mother lode for interesting takes...of things people tell us to believe...
#WeirdOldTJGuy
 
  • Love
Reactions: tjreese
#WeirdOldTJGuy
You have no idea the inadvertent compliment you gave for one that strives hard to not be normal by a host of various measures which are mostly qualitative and fewer quantitative through much discrete data evaluated by a rubric of some unknown measure and opinion, but fascinating nonetheless. Years ago it might have mattered, but with the nonsense of today being normal is not the same and hence my history book on abnormal psychology today as compared to years ago, while trying hard to have a line of demarcation that separates parties so clearly on the nonsense that needs blurred for greater acceptance and for some a lower reading level. Perhaps the media can help with that?
 
You have no idea the inadvertent compliment you gave for one that strives hard to not be normal by a host of various measures which are mostly qualitative and fewer quantitative through much discrete data evaluated by a rubric of some unknown measure and opinion, but fascinating nonetheless. Years ago it might have mattered, but with the nonsense of today being normal is not the same and hence my history book on abnormal psychology today as compared to years ago, while trying hard to have a line of demarcation that separates parties so clearly on the nonsense that needs blurred for greater acceptance and for some a lower reading level. Perhaps the media can help with that?
You must be a laugh a minute at QAnon conventio… err, I mean, parties.
 
Last edited:
.
The 'glass is half full' part is that
  1. The electorate is largely over Donnie J Trump. In fact, he's the only candidate that Biden would have a strong chance of beating. Biden is one for one against Trump, and the American exhaustion with Trump has notably accelerated since he left office. Donald J. Trumpykins is <><><> a laughing stock of an angry, despicable, imbalanced, narcissistic, idiot. Most people (though apparently not CrackeyHunterGuy or WeirdOldTJ) strongly agree.
  2. No other Democrat or Republican considering the Presidency would dare say anything so completely fascist/dictator-ish.
.
Yet despite all his misgivings, Trump was unquestionably a better POTUS than Biden, and it's not even debatable.
 
Yet despite all his misgivings, Trump was unquestionably a better POTUS than Biden, and it's not even debatable.
Another day in the horrendous life of DonJ Trump. From a Federal US District Court Judge’s ruling, today:

Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries. He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer.

Consider the incendiary charge that Mr. Comey, the Director of the FBI, conspired with Ms. Clinton to maliciously prosecute him. Leaving aside the fact that Mr. Trump was never prosecuted, examine the allegations in the Amended Complaint pertaining to Mr. Comey. …

[They] do not allege that Mr. Comey initiated an investigation of Mr. Trump, much less a prosecution. And the implausible claim that Mr. Comey conspired with Ms. Clinton, given the impact of his announcements on her 2016 campaign, not only lacks substance but is categorically absurd.

The plaintiff consistently misrepresented and cherry-picked portions of public reports and filings to support a false factual narrative. Often the report or filing actually contradicted his allegations. It happened too often to be accidental; its purpose was political, not legal. Factual allegations were made without any evidentiary support in circumstances where falsity is evident.


The court’s ruling also addressed…

…false allegations of “Russian collision.”

This nonsense happens all the time because of the worst, biggest embarrassment of a President ever (except maybe Buchanan), Donaldo Jay Trumpaorooney.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Wtf are you talking about?

Most crimes require actual intent. You know that right?
My weekly check in and you are still foolish. Did Alec Baldwin intend to kill somebody? No. But he was the biggest news this week except President “No Regrets.” And Baldwin is facing several years in prison for involuntary manslaughter and criminal negligence. Neither requires intent. As do many crimes. Should I list them?

Again. Mishandling of classified documents associated with Biden’s actions DOES NOT require intent. At minimum this is neglect and spillage. And god knows who had access to this stuff in multiple locations for 6 years.

I am required to annually certify my understanding of the handling of classified docs and PII. If I an accidentally took this stuff home I would at minimally be fired. And I wouldn’t be allowed to have my personal lawyers tell the government “yep that looks like everything.”
 
You must be a laugh a minute at QAnon conventio… err, I mean, parties.
actually, I don't wait for those conventions. Every now and then I'll listen to mumbling Joe for laughs, but mostly come here to gather more data on projection, control, and hysteria in trying to determine when lack of relevent knowledge is at play or another mental illness?

Some of the symptoms align with previous ecstasy use, but then again it could be at least partially isolation from reality through excessive time in 4 walls with captive kids, not yet into maturity? Discernment absent medical history (not yet read since I don't want biased leanings) does make the two more difficult, but with enough data I won't need the medical history. As of now I can't agree or disagree with the suggestions of immaturity, isolation and a dominant mother.
 
actually, I don't wait for those conventions. Every now and then I'll listen to mumbling Joe for laughs, but mostly come here to gather more data on projection, control, and hysteria in trying to determine when lack of relevent knowledge is at play or another mental illness?

Some of the symptoms align with previous ecstasy use, but then again it could be at least partially isolation from reality through excessive time in 4 walls with captive kids, not yet into maturity? Discernment absent medical history (not yet read since I don't want biased leanings) does make the two more difficult, but with enough data I won't need the medical history. As of now I can't agree or disagree with the suggestions of immaturity, isolation and a dominant mother.

IMG_3053-ANIMATION_large.gif
 
  • Love
Reactions: tjreese
What’s Biden’s most significant policy accomplishment?
How do you think he’s doing with the economy?
Inflation?
Ukraine?
Southern Border?
Provide a question that would pose hundreds of questions to sort...like what thing has mumbling Joe phucked up the least, and then for laughs ask how that choice was made...
 
What’s Biden’s most significant policy accomplishment?
How do you think he’s doing with the economy?
Inflation?
Ukraine?
Southern Border?
You asked me that as if you think I’m a fan of Joe Biden! I’m not and have never said anything to imply that I am.

That having been said, his most significant accomplishment is that he’s not the motivation and engine behind people storming the Capitol, trying to hang the vice president and speaker of the house, and who are actively trying to overthrow democracy in the United States of America.

In other words, his finest accomplishment is that while he’s a mediocre at best and potentially lousy president, he’s not a desperate, dangerous, anti-American idiot. Sadly that makes me him an improvement.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: SKYDOG
You asked me that as if you think I’m a fan of Joe Biden! I’m not and have never said anything to imply that I am.

That having been said, his most significant accomplishment is that he’s not the motivation and engine behind people storming the Capitol, trying to hang the vice president and speaker of the house, and who are actively trying to overthrow democracy in the United States of America.

In other words, his finest accomplishment is that while he’s a mediocre at best and potentially lousy president, he’s not a desperate, dangerous, anti-American idiot. Sadly that makes me him an improvement.
More left/lib policy from HoosierHysteriaJM.

The "engine" has not been determined yet given the massive volume of information the gov is sitting on, but it is left/lib policy to claim it has, right HH?

Even more classified docs found in the Wilmington home, btw, by the FBI. Joe's value as a useful idiot for the deep state is in rapid decline, Klain is bailing, and a new useful idiot will have to be elevated soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT