ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

Braun Eliminates DEI

S
BNIBoiler said:
Bingo. "Most got to those positions because of a form of DEI called butt kissing and playing golf with the eight guys." That is exactly what I'm talking about and why DEI, or previously affirmative action, was put in place in the first place. DEI does not say hire any negro off of the street you can find. DEI is to give blacks and other minorities a chance that otherwise would not have been available. Not just about race. These folks have to be qualified. Race sure means a lot to y'all as y'all call folks DEI hires of folks that are or more qualified as their predecessors. Like Dept. of Defense LLoyd Austin for example.
Click to expand...
Tell me how racism has hindered your personal employment experience.
Click to expand...

Braun Eliminates DEI

BNIBoiler
SIBoiler2 said:
You, sir, are full of crap. Racist this, racist that. I don't give a damn what color or sex a person is if they are the most qualified for the job, and continue to do it at that level after selection. In my many occupations over 50 years of employment I worked with and for both great and terrible people. Some of the least qualified were white. Most got to those positions because of a form of DEI called butt kissing and playing golf with the eight guys. I had male and female supervisors. Some were good. Some were bad. Good leaders are good leaders, and no amount of social engineering can change that. Much like the military or a sports team, good leaders produce more contented and productive employees. DEI only looks at race and sex without regard for ability and ambition. I don't care what sex or race you are. I want you to be productive and fulfilled in life. No amount of feel-good legislation can make that happen.
Click to expand...
Bingo. "Most got to those positions because of a form of DEI called butt kissing and playing golf with the eight guys." That is exactly what I'm talking about and why DEI, or previously affirmative action, was put in place in the first place. DEI does not say hire any negro off of the street you can find. DEI is to give blacks and other minorities a chance that otherwise would not have been available. Not just about race. These folks have to be qualified. Race sure means a lot to y'all as y'all call folks DEI hires of folks that are or more qualified as their predecessors. Like Dept. of Defense LLoyd Austin for example.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: fayncbolier

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

qazplm
proudopete said:
Jones relegated Morton to the bench so I agree that he was offered to upgrade a position that he felt wasn’t improving.
Click to expand...
Even if Morton had been "improving," Jones was a better player than him, and offered something no one else on the team had like him, athleticism.

It's about the team. Folks are too focused on individual players. If a big man comes in that Painter thinks is the next Edey, do you think he will say, no, I'm not going to take him because all my players are improving?
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

northside100
proudopete said:
Perhaps they can but for this year, there is a set amount as it’s already been paid out. The problem is, as you add more players, the players who are already here are gonna want more money. How are you going to give a new guy a million is Loyer is only making $800,000 without making waves?

We know retention is Painters strategy so I really don’t see him dropping a bag to a new player or players without taking care of current guys first.
Click to expand...
Of course, it's set for this year, that's not the argument. I don't think MP is going to throw around big money to bring in new players but if he did, I agree that you'd have to account for the need to 'top off' your existing core. I'm not saying what moves Matt can or should make, I'm just saying that it's unlikely to me that Matt wants to make a move next year and can't do it because he doesn't have the funds.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerDaddy

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

proudopete
qazplm said:
lol He did not go looking for Jones to fill the shoes of two players who didn't contribute a ton at the end. He went looking for Jones because he saw that he needed another player who could hit some shots and initiate some offense while playing great defense. Something neither of those guys did, and something that he knew he didn't have enough of on a team that needed that to make a run at a F4. If he had one more spot and BOTH of those guys were still here he'd have still gone after Jones.
Click to expand...
Jones relegated Morton to the bench so I agree that he was offered to upgrade a position that he felt wasn’t improving.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

proudopete
northside100 said:
Why do you think that the total is a fixed amount? I agree that it's not unlimited but as stated previously, Matt and the athletic department have enough connections with deep pockets that if they said 'we think we can add x,y,z for an incremental $2M and it will really help our FF chances', I'd be shocked if they couldn't raise additional funds.
Click to expand...
Perhaps they can but for this year, there is a set amount as it’s already been paid out. The problem is, as you add more players, the players who are already here are gonna want more money. How are you going to give a new guy a million is Loyer is only making $800,000 without making waves?

We know retention is Painters strategy so I really don’t see him dropping a bag to a new player or players without taking care of current guys first.
Click to expand...

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

qazplm
BoilerAndy said:
Yep. Painter went looking for a seasoned guard after 2 veterans, Newman and Jenkins, left.
Click to expand...
lol He did not go looking for Jones to fill the shoes of two players who didn't contribute a ton at the end. He went looking for Jones because he saw that he needed another player who could hit some shots and initiate some offense while playing great defense. Something neither of those guys did, and something that he knew he didn't have enough of on a team that needed that to make a run at a F4. If he had one more spot and BOTH of those guys were still here he'd have still gone after Jones.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerDaddy and bonefish1

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

B
qazplm said:
3. Painter sees a player that is a helpful addition to a team just this close to making a run, like last season.
4. Painter wants a depth piece. Like say next season when we will only have three bigs.
5. A unique player emerges that's near NBA or NBA talent that would instantly elevate the team and he thinks he would also be a cultural and team fit.
Click to expand...
Yep. Painter went looking for a seasoned guard after 2 veterans, Newman and Jenkins, left.
Click to expand...

Any idea who Coach Painter is talking about?

northside100
proudopete said:
Okay, let’s say it’s $4mil. Now how much of that do you think the big 3 are gobbling up? I would say >50%.
Click to expand...
Why do you think that the total is a fixed amount? I agree that it's not unlimited but as stated previously, Matt and the athletic department have enough connections with deep pockets that if they said 'we think we can add x,y,z for an incremental $2M and it will really help our FF chances', I'd be shocked if they couldn't raise additional funds.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1

Trump flexed, Hamas caved.. Shocker

bonefish1
BNIBoiler said:
Dude, I don't know what your call it. But saying tough words ain't going to move foreign governments or terrorist organizations. What about the tough words Chump said a few years ago that Mexico was going to pay for the wall? The US is till waiting on a $20 Billion check. Chump couldn't even get the republican controlled House and Senate to build a wall.
Click to expand...
Keep telling yourself that. I supposed Trudeau's resignation had nothing to do with Trump either?
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03

Wacko Dems still don't get the message......

bonefish1
Boiler Buck said:
Amazingly, 145 House Dems vote against bill to deport ILLEGAL migrants who commit sexual assault & domestic abuse.

They still don't get it and are hard wired to their far extremist left positions......can you imagine finding the mental gymnastics it must take to say ...... "NO, we want illegal migrant sex abusers to stay in America." "Beat your wife? Sure, we are good with that too".
LOL. They are still NUTS!

www.foxnews.com

145 House Dems vote against bill to deport migrants who commit sexual assault

A bill to deport illegal immigrants accused of sexual assault or domestic violence passed the House on Thursday.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...

Dems are like the person who keeps committing crimes but then complains about ending up in jail. They simply don't learn.
You'd think that after the ass whoppin they took in Nov, that they'd reflect on some of their positions. Apparently not.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and Boiler Buck

Braun Eliminates DEI

bonefish1
BNIBoiler said:
By you calling that "Winning", you sir are a racist. You and others that support that MAGA anti-DEI BS all want white men to control everything regardless of qualifications. You and other supporters of this crap should be ashamed.

That is one of the dumbest moves possible. This is why this MAGA cult is BS. Getting rid of Office of Chief Equity, Inclusion and Opportunity does not make America great. What makes America great is embracing diversity in the workplace and schools. Mike Braun is an idiot. Even though Holcomb was republican, he seemed to be a decent dude. Non-MAGA for the most part. He made quite a few trips up to the "Da Region" from time to time. I bet in four years, Braun won't make it up to my area once. Red states like FL and others have done the same but Holcomb never succumbed to that BS of getting rid of DEI programs in the state unless I missed something.
Click to expand...
Wow, you pulled the race card in like, 9 words. That's quick even for your standards.

DEI is inherently racist. Why? Because it purports that you treat someone differently simply because of the color of their skin. It's hard to believe that the people back in the day, who fought for civil rights, for equal and fair treatment, would support DEI initiatives.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese and Boiler Buck

Braun Eliminates DEI

bonefish1
Bank Shot Podcast said:
Mike Braun signs executive order eliminating DEI from the state government. Along with closing down the Office of Chief Equity, Inclusion and Opportunity.

Winning.
Click to expand...
Having a chief DEI officer might be the most woke DEI move any company could ever make. Ironic isn't it.
I bet a lot of them are updating their resumes.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Bank Shot Podcast
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back