It matters. A lot. Because States run elections; even those with Federal candidates on the ballot. For instance, Texas AG Paxton tried to file on behalf of Texas that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin , and Arizona should be overturned. It was summarily dumped for lack of standing. (note, and to no help for Paxton, any state that Trump won in a close call was not said to be fraud ridden lol).
Anyway, the standing aside, a ton of these cases were dismissed as pure losers on their merits. You want the actual goods? A bunch of very, very high-level Republicans (Sen Danforth, R Party lawyer Ben Ginsburg, Sen Gordon Smith, Solicitor General Olson, App Judge Luttig) attempted to put an end to ALL of this. These are some of the finest conservative minds of the last century, and they did so in hopes that their study would resonate. Of course, with the Trump masses, Ron DeSantis is a child groomer, Trump is cognitively better than he was 25 years ago, etc., and this dispositive study was barely noticed.
But
@Boilermaker03 I'll give you credit; you tend to at least read stuff, so here's the source document:
LOST, NOT STOLEN: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election
FROM THE REPORT:
For this Report, we examined every count of every case brought in these six battleground states. We include both a narrative for each state and an accompanying Addendum listing each case and its disposition.
We conclude that Donald Trump and his supporters had their day in court and failed to
produce substantive evidence to make their case.
Of the 64 cases brought by Trump and his supporters, twenty were dismissed before a
hearing on the merits, fourteen were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his supporters before a hearing on the merits, and 30 cases included a hearing on the merits. Only in one Pennsylvania case involving far too few votes to overturn the results did Trump and his supporters prevail.