Considering you start off asking about someone that doesn't exist in the first place and the rest was next to decipherable as to what you meant, I can only assume you are stupid.
Then they count them in front of everybody at the caucus.
@BNIBoiler Hey jerk you have something you would like to talk about? I won't do it on the basketball board but I will here. You are the one that makes up racist names to call every one. You want to start that sh*t up on the other board? All you talk about is racism constantly when you are the problem
This is definitely not a good way to do it. This is also the first I've ever heard of it.
www.newsweek.com
In the Iowa Democratic caucus, you can change your vote by the end of the night if I'm not mistaken.This is definitely not a good way to do it. This is also the first I've ever heard of it.
As far as the vote by mail issue, I'll state again. There's a reason why most civilized countries have banned it.
The judge in a vote-rigging trial has criticised the postal voting system as "hopelessly insecure" and "wide open to fraud".
Voting Fraud Is a Real Concern. Just Look Around the World
If concern about voter fraud with mail-in ballots is delusional, it is a delusion that is shared by most of the world.
"Liberals and progressives often try to model the U.S. on Western European countries, but you never hear them arguing that we should adopt their voting rules. There is a reason for that. Banning mail-in voting or requiring people to use photo IDs to obtain a mail-in ballot is quite common in developed countries, especially in Europe."
Why Do Most Countries Ban Mail-In Ballots?: They Have Seen Massive Vote Fraud Problems
Thirty-seven states have so far changed their mail-in voting procedures this year in response to the Coronavirus. Despite frequent claims that President Trump’spapers.ssrn.com
Auntie Riveting. He falsely claims cheating when he loses. Chump claims cheating leading up to the actual election.
There was cheating in 2016 and 2020, Uncle. It has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt in each case.
Uncle bni I love it! It goes with his obvious y'all racial remarks to white people and making up names for people he doesnt like.
Proven by whom? 60 judges, most appointed by Chump says otherwise. State recount after recount says otherwise. State audits after audits say otherwise. After 2020, Chumps own cyber security chief said publicly that the 2020 election was the most secure election in history. Where is your proof, Auntie Riveting, that there were cheating in 2016 and 2020? Widespread cheating. Throughout the history of voting in America there is only 0.0001% voter fraud.
You've bought into the bullshit. I've pointed out many times, there were only maybe 5 cases that actually had decisions made against them. There was a case won also, but you probably don't know about that.
Did your main grift ever mention the Durham report, the Horowitz report, the Mueller investigation, and former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell's congressional testimony?
The judges threw the cases out because Chump could not provide any evidence of cheating.
Wrong! Lack of standing means that the person bringing the case wasn't the person that should have been.
True.
Perhaps some was lack of standing. Perhaps if this so called voter fraud was real and important, maybe having the correct person present to file would have been warranted. That's on Chump and his minions. However, most of the cases were thrown out because of lack of proof provided by the cult.
How is he supposed to be in 60 places at once? The left knew this was an issue and used it to their advantage.
| Totals | 14 | 33 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 59 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Dropped | Dismissed | Trial ongoing | Ruled (against) | Ruled (for) | Total |
| Arizona | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Georgia | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Michigan | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Nevada | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| New Mexico | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Others | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
For the 'lack of standing' matters, it's very likely that theyw ere tossed a voter effected by the outcome did not file; nothing to do with whther Trump himself was involved with the lawsuit.
I can't say I'm familiar with all of the cases and who brought them, but I would have to disagree in this instance with the courts. Doesn't matter if they were out of state. It was a federal election. It effects everyone.
Did Kelley immediately stand up and resign, which as a General he should have if these stories are true?
It matters. A lot. Because States run elections; even those with Federal candidates on the ballot. For instance, Texas AG Paxton tried to file on behalf of Texas that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin , and Arizona should be overturned. It was summarily dumped for lack of standing. (note, and to no help for Paxton, any state that Trump won in a close call was not said to be fraud ridden lol).
That's a good take.
Those guys have (mostly) had 40 year careers. And yes, the US has largely been removed from active military involvement during that time.
Talking with a good friend of mine, a retired Judge, in his opinion the SC didn't take up the cases, not because they didn't have merit, as determined by the lower courts but the election was over by the time they would have gotten involved.
1) How old was that retired judge? Not against seniors; but if that retired judge was a 95 year old former traffic court judge that's very different than a 72 year old retired federal judge.
That's diverting. Would be better if you'd respond to the point; that Biden has been an isolationist.
Yes!
Not to mention trump’s military and logistical support of Saudi Arabia in the civil war in Yemen. He even vetoed a bipartisan resolution to end US involvement in the war.
And that's okay!
