I believe the way it works in college is, if they're in the bonus, you take the free throws 1-1 or 2. If they're not, they just keep the ball. It's almost like the shot is a completely separate thing, and I'm not sure if I agree. Personally, if the foul occurs during a made basket, I think it should be considered an and-1. Flagrant is another story, but that's where I see that they could give them 1 shot and the ball in that case.
I think we all knew they were going to hit a 3. Great thing was we came back with back-to-back 3s to almost erase it.
Yeah - Gicarri Harris got half of it back right away. I hear you, Chi-Boiler, the NBA rule probably is better.....I would rather do something like "
continuing action" as well.
How many times have we seen fouls called on Purdue opponents underneath or on the wing infinitesimally before a Boiler nails a three-pt FG? Wipe it off the board, then either said player who was fouled misses a front end, or Purdue gets possession and fails to score or worse turns it over - too numerous to list. That basket would count, and award one FT - that would halt some of that stuff perhaps.
Remeber the insanity (not that long ago for us dinosaurs) when you could have an offensive foul/charge, but if it wasn't a player control foul (the ball had been released), score the goal! Then sometimes, if the other team was in the bonus - and missed the front end, that team gets another possession.....at least now, it's no goal and non-shooting foul......only it seems like they are calling a heavy percentage of "blocks" this conference season, outside of the restricted area, naturally.
I'll throw one more out there to consider - have another type of cylinder rule, where if a player is so far into the restricted area - it can't be an over-the-back call....if you are basically under the basket or too far in the paint, that's on you.....flagrants obviously still apply as applicable or if you've been illegally shoved into that - different scenario.
