Not that I watch a lot of postgame interviews/press conferences of other teams, but I notice our guys pay very close attention to stats (not their own, but as a team). Matt Haarms studying it prior to his interview. It's pretty clear they look at what is and isn't working.
By all accounts, Painter is really big on analytics. I would imagine there are statistical "goals" each game that would indicate Purdue has a better chance of winning. Maybe it's a certain % of defensive or offensive rebounds or a certain amount of points off TOs, etc.
You really see this in individual sports like tennis. Pregame they have stats like: Player ABC is favored to win the match X% of the time if he can win Z% of his 2nd serves.