Tie breaking vote that allows US agents to remove razor wire along Texas border with Mexico allowing more illegals and terrorists free access to America.
Bush screwed the pooch with Roberts.
Bush screwed the pooch with Roberts.
Justice Roberts sells out Texas and US.....
- Thread starter TwinDegrees2
- Start date
yes, that was a bigger letdown than Roberts who allowed the Obamacare to happen and have come to expect such from him. Then you have the diversity appointments (plural)...
It’s so disgusting that the Republicans or even a few Democrats can’t bring themselves to do the right thing for the country. The evil almighty dollar has sold out these people in power.yes, that was a bigger letdown than Roberts who allowed the Obamacare to happen and have come to expect such from him. Then you have the diversity appointments (plural)...
Silly Amy. She probably thought her job was to interpret the law and the Constitution.
The host didn’t mention Texas installed the wire. Probably didn’t even know it. Too busy freaking out about all the terrorists coming in.
Last edited:
Right! If the president you voted for would uphold the law already on the books, the country would not have this issue.
BuilderBobby, seeing a chance to use all of that rotten OSB he was hoarding and build housing for illegals so he can make money as long as he cant see them from his window. Mexicans from 9-3 doing his yard work cheap is OK too
The money is a short term effect. The much bigger problem is the long term effect or voting which will lead to more government control for a variety of desired reasons and consequently less liberty
The mean the supremacy clause in the constitution? That law?
What immigration law is the president I voted for not upholding ?
Amy just went on the MAGA sh!tlist. Aren’t judges supposed to do the bidding of the president who appoints them? Threats coming her way.
Right B2.
Why would anyone be concerned about terrorists (and drug, slave and sex traffickers) coming across an open border? Don't those types have anything important to worry about?
The SC made an accurate decision based on the Constitution.
The Biden adm (Executive Branch) has complete control over the border.
The SC didn't say the wire had to be removed, only that it may be removed at the discretion of the POTUS.
Abbott should send every one of these migrants to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave starting today. No reason for the citizens of Texas should have to continue to deal with this crisis after three years.
It is an absolute travesty to the Nation and may take decades to overcome.
A good start would be the next POTUS to expand the review courts and send those packing that don't qualify for asylum.
Let those know, that have extended court cases, that they need to show up early.
If they don't show up, find them and deport them.
A lot of time and money to fix Bidens major fk up.
you have more faith than me in that you believe the travesty can be overcome...even if decades. It was a desire by the current administration and many democrats before. It is not an accident or a fk up as you say in their minds. It was and is a desired outcome to grow the government and its control down the road.
Stop the free stuff for doing absolutely nothing aside from stepping over the border. Many might leave on their own.
its time for the Red states to take responsibility for themselves
and say good bye to dangerous D.C.
and say good bye to dangerous D.C.
It's okay Rivet...Bob could give two chits about 4 & 5 year old girls getting raped.
I think Bob simply is not aware because his news sources are extremely narrow and slanted - which is the reason he seems to be afraid to tells us what they are.
Take the other day. He asked what immigration laws Joe Crow was not enforcing, and seemed to really be oblivious. I posted two links and he slunk away into hiding.
Am I right, @BuilderBob6 ?
This is correct. Interesting that the Biden administration argument was that they said the razor wire was hindering CPB’s job - yet the CPB union came out in support of Gov. Abbott. And good luck finding federal agents to cut it down.
And I don’t fault ACB’s opinion. But it’s important to know that the ruling doesn’t prohibit Texas from putting it right back up. 80% of the country supports Texas. Bad optics for Biden to remove barriers when people are having their lives greatly impacted and some unfortunately ruined by the open border.
Last edited:
The one where people must enter the country legally. You know, the illegal immigrants that are flooding in. You know this. Why are you playing dumb?
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
Lol. I know that Title 8 is the law that governs illegal entry at the border. You posted one part of it. You completely ignored most of it, including how asylum requests are handled. You either are ignorant of the law or are willfully ignoring what it says to win an argument.The one where people must enter the country legally. You know, the illegal immigrants that are flooding in. You know this. Why are you playing dumb?
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
www.law.cornell.edu
Btw, if you don’t like the law, CHANGE IT………which is what congress is trying to do.
Also you need to understand trump mostly governed the border through executive orders……..which you want Biden to do……except on the issues you don’t want him to.
99.99% of the people coming across do not have a legit claim of asylum. OTHERWISE they'd be coming in the ports of entry where they can make such claim.
Stop calling people ignorant of something when you clearly do not understand it yourself.
I'm fine with the use of executive orders if it's within the purview of the office. The president is in charge of our security and the boarder is a big part of that.
Yes, just like Bob didn't know the difference between stay in Mexico and Title 42 he is struggling to understand the meanings of legal and illegal immigration and how the immigration laws apply to each.The one where people must enter the country legally. You know, the illegal immigrants that are flooding in. You know this. Why are you playing dumb?
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
The US currently has an immigration policy that works as long as you have a POTUS willing to enforce the law.
They ARE making asylum claims at the ports of entry. Have you not heard of the backlog of asylum cases?
By August 20, 2023, the number of pending affirmative asylum cases alone had reached a whopping 974,571. With so many asylum seekers stuck in backlogs, delays can be long. If someone is before USCIS, their estimated wait time is more than 6 years.7 days ago
https://immigrationforum.org › article
Explainer: Asylum Backlogs - National Immigration Forum
You pull a number out of your ass…….99.9%…….that fits your narrative and then makes conclusions on it. Lol. Where do you get that number from?
People that think they have a legitimate claim for asylum will be more likely to go to the ports of entry. Why would they try to sneak across? The criminals and rapists and drug dealers……..that republicans argue are all the illegals, aren’t going through the ports for obvious reasons. Do you even think about what you’re posting?
EVERYBODY who is apprehended goes through this process. EVERYBODY. I suggest you read it
Loading…
bipartisanpolicy.org
People who come in and are processed at the ports of entry are not entering the country illegally as most of you idiots seem to think. People crossing between ports are doing so illegally. They still can claim immunity and be evaluated. But many of them get sent back across the border because they have a criminal record or have been caught before or for a hundred other reasons.
As for calling people ignorant, you claimed I was playing dumb while you posted ONLY ONE SMALL PART of Title 8……COMPLETELY ignoring the asylum laws, among others. So yeah, you are either ignorant or purposefully ignoring the mass volume of other laws contained in title 8. You’re also a freakin hypocrite for crying about others doing exactly what you just did one post before.
I'm talking about those coming across the boarder illegally. NOT the ones trying to come in legally at the ports of entry. That isn't considered illegal immigration. WTF is wrong with you?
The vast majority of people pouring across our boarder are not coming through the ports of entry. They just aren't. So it's time for you to wake up.
He claims to have an issue with the border, yet he defends this invasion.
Mexico? Yes. By crossing the boarder? Some, but many via visa overstays. Here's a pretty good read on the topic, which directly cites and links the 2022 DHS report:
DHS Reports Record Number of Overstays in 2022
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has published an overdue overstay report showing that more than 850,000 foreign visitors overstayed their authorized stay in FY2022, which is a record high. A more detailed analysis of the numbers is forthcoming, but here are the highlights:
DHS Reports Record Number of Overstays in 2022
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has published an overdue overstay report showing that more than 850,000 foreign visitors overstayed their authorized stay in FY2022, which is a record high. A more detailed analysis of the numbers is forthcoming, but here are the highlights:
- The total overstay rate for 2022 was 3.64 percent, which is more than double the rate of recent years.
- Approximately 98,000 visitors who entered under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), which allows visa-free travel for short-term visitors from low-risk countries, overstayed in 2022. The country with both the largest number and highest rate of VWP overstayers was Spain, with 28,356 overstays and a rate of 5.6 percent, which could trigger corrective measures.
- The largest number of short-term visitor overstays from non-VWP countries came from Venezuela. About 173,000 Venezuelans overstayed during the year -- which is about 94 percent of the visitors. This is because the Biden administration has allowed Venezuelans to enter and receive Temporary Protected Status, a designation that includes a work permit.
- The next largest number of overstays by short-term visitors are citizens of Mexico, with approximately 124,000 overstays, at a rate of 3.5 percent.
- For the first time, DHS broke down the overstay rates for the three sub-categories of student/exchange visas. Vocational school students had the highest overstay rate of the three (9.1 percent). Exchange visitors overstayed at a rate of 5.6 percent, and university and other traditional students overstayed at a rate of 4.1 percent.
- Just over 9,000 citizens of China overstayed on student or exchange visitor visas, representing more than 16 percent of all student/exchange overstays.
- The largest number of overstays in the category that includes temporary workers came from Mexico (131,000) and India (5,800).
Data from the Center for Migration Studies shows that two-thirds of the nation’s 10.2 million unauthorized immigrants (from all combined years that are still in the US) entered legally, either with a visa or a permit, but overstayed.
That's not to say both methods of illegal entry (boarder crossing and overstay) don't matter -- both do and both need to be addressed.
But it's also true that ignoring or downplaying the primary method of illegal entry is disingenuous.
That's not to say both methods of illegal entry (boarder crossing and overstay) don't matter -- both do and both need to be addressed.
But it's also true that ignoring or downplaying the primary method of illegal entry is disingenuous.
wrote back on Oct 5 2023
a reasonable guess...which probably does not account for flood last three years. US birthrate has not been 2.1 since 1995. Don’t you need 2.1 birthrate to maintain a population? Yes
https://www.dad.info/article/fatherhood/being-dad/what-birth-rate-is-needed-to-sustain-a-population/
Can't without a lot of effort post the graph, but if you go here and put 1995 to 2023 you can see the birth rate decline and percentage change
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/birth-rate
If we had 2.1 birth rate which we don’t we would have 260M people in the USA. We have had about 1M year legal immigration
That would give you 28M. So 260M + 28M = 288M legal people which is over estimate since we do not have 2.1 birthrate.
now if you go here
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/population
and use 1995 to 2023 you can see the graph (and 340 million). Maybe if I get time I'll try to get the graphs out on the web so I can link them? Now it appears there are many more illegals that came into the country than what most want to believe. How do we explain this large of a gap and are some of the gap voting????
340M – 288M = 52M something closer to # illegals in the USA?????
