Tie breaking vote that allows US agents to remove razor wire along Texas border with Mexico allowing more illegals and terrorists free access to America.
Bush screwed the pooch with Roberts.
Bush screwed the pooch with Roberts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe Amy Coney Barrett also sided with the democrats. Disgusting!Tie breaking vote that allows US agents to remove razor wire along Texas border with Mexico allowing more illegals and terrorists free access to America.
Bush screwed the pooch with Roberts.
yes, that was a bigger letdown than Roberts who allowed the Obamacare to happen and have come to expect such from him. Then you have the diversity appointments (plural)...I believe Amy Coney Barrett also sided with the democrats. Disgusting!
It’s so disgusting that the Republicans or even a few Democrats can’t bring themselves to do the right thing for the country. The evil almighty dollar has sold out these people in power.yes, that was a bigger letdown than Roberts who allowed the Obamacare to happen and have come to expect such from him. Then you have the diversity appointments (plural)...
Silly Amy. She probably thought her job was to interpret the law and the Constitution.I believe Amy Coney Barrett also sided with the democrats. Disgusting!
Right! If the president you voted for would uphold the law already on the books, the country would not have this issue.Silly Amy. She probably thought her job was to interpret the law and the Constitution.
The host didn’t mention Texas installed the wire. Probably didn’t even know it. Too busy freaking out about all the terrorists coming in.
BuilderBobby, seeing a chance to use all of that rotten OSB he was hoarding and build housing for illegals so he can make money as long as he cant see them from his window. Mexicans from 9-3 doing his yard work cheap is OK tooSilly Amy. She probably thought her job was to interpret the law and the Constitution.
The host didn’t mention Texas installed the wire. Probably didn’t even know it. Too busy freaking out about all the terrorists coming in.
The money is a short term effect. The much bigger problem is the long term effect or voting which will lead to more government control for a variety of desired reasons and consequently less libertyIt’s so disgusting that the Republicans or even a few Democrats can’t bring themselves to do the right thing for the country. The evil almighty dollar has sold out these people in power.
The mean the supremacy clause in the constitution? That law?Right! If the president you voted for would uphold the law already on the books, the country would not have this issue.
Right B2.Silly Amy. She probably thought her job was to interpret the law and the Constitution.
The host didn’t mention Texas installed the wire. Probably didn’t even know it. Too busy freaking out about all the terrorists coming in.
The SC made an accurate decision based on the Constitution.Tie breaking vote that allows US agents to remove razor wire along Texas border with Mexico allowing more illegals and terrorists free access to America.
Bush screwed the pooch with Roberts.
Clauses C and D3.The mean the supremacy clause in the constitution? That law?
What immigration law is the president I voted for not upholding ?
Abbott should send every one of these migrants to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave starting today. No reason for the citizens of Texas should have to continue to deal with this crisis after three years.The SC made an accurate decision based on the Constitution.
The Biden adm (Executive Branch) has complete control over the border.
The SC didn't say the wire had to be removed, only that it may be removed at the discretion of the POTUS.
It is an absolute travesty to the Nation and may take decades to overcome.Abbott should send every one of these migrants to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave starting today. No reason for the citizens of Texas should have to continue to deal with this crisis after three years.
you have more faith than me in that you believe the travesty can be overcome...even if decades. It was a desire by the current administration and many democrats before. It is not an accident or a fk up as you say in their minds. It was and is a desired outcome to grow the government and its control down the road.It is an absolute travesty to the Nation and may take decades to overcome.
A good start would be the next POTUS to expand the review courts and send those packing that don't qualify for asylum.
Let those know, that have extended court cases, that they need to show up early.
If they don't show up, find them and deport them.
A lot of time and money to fix Bidens major fk up.
Stop the free stuff for doing absolutely nothing aside from stepping over the border. Many might leave on their own.It is an absolute travesty to the Nation and may take decades to overcome.
A good start would be the next POTUS to expand the review courts and send those packing that don't qualify for asylum.
Let those know, that have extended court cases, that they need to show up early.
If they don't show up, find them and deport them.
A lot of time and money to fix Bidens major fk up.
If President Trump gets elected, many will certainly leave on their own.Stop the free stuff for doing absolutely nothing aside from stepping over the border. Many might leave on their own.
Right B2.
Why would anyone be concerned about terrorists (and drug, slave and sex traffickers) coming across an open border? Don't those types have anything important to worry about?
I think Bob simply is not aware because his news sources are extremely narrow and slanted - which is the reason he seems to be afraid to tells us what they are.It's okay Rivet...Bob could give two chits about 4 & 5 year old girls getting raped.
This is correct. Interesting that the Biden administration argument was that they said the razor wire was hindering CPB’s job - yet the CPB union came out in support of Gov. Abbott. And good luck finding federal agents to cut it down.The SC made an accurate decision based on the Constitution.
The Biden adm (Executive Branch) has complete control over the border.
The SC didn't say the wire had to be removed, only that it may be removed at the discretion of the POTUS.
The one where people must enter the country legally. You know, the illegal immigrants that are flooding in. You know this. Why are you playing dumb?The mean the supremacy clause in the constitution? That law?
What immigration law is the president I voted for not upholding ?
Lol. I know that Title 8 is the law that governs illegal entry at the border. You posted one part of it. You completely ignored most of it, including how asylum requests are handled. You either are ignorant of the law or are willfully ignoring what it says to win an argument.The one where people must enter the country legally. You know, the illegal immigrants that are flooding in. You know this. Why are you playing dumb?
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
www.law.cornell.edu
99.99% of the people coming across do not have a legit claim of asylum. OTHERWISE they'd be coming in the ports of entry where they can make such claim.Lol. I know that Title 8 is the law that governs illegal entry at the border. You posted one part of it. You completely ignored most of it, including how asylum requests are handled. You either are ignorant of the law or are willfully ignoring what it says to win an argument.
Btw, if you don’t like the law, CHANGE IT………which is what congress is trying to do.
Also you need to understand trump mostly governed the border through executive orders……..which you want Biden to do……except on the issues you don’t want him to.
Yes, just like Bob didn't know the difference between stay in Mexico and Title 42 he is struggling to understand the meanings of legal and illegal immigration and how the immigration laws apply to each.The one where people must enter the country legally. You know, the illegal immigrants that are flooding in. You know this. Why are you playing dumb?
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
www.law.cornell.edu
They ARE making asylum claims at the ports of entry. Have you not heard of the backlog of asylum cases?99.99% of the people coming across do not have a legit claim of asylum. OTHERWISE they'd be coming in the ports of entry where they can make such claim.
Stop calling people ignorant of something when you clearly do not understand it yourself.
I'm fine with the use of executive orders if it's within the purview of the office. The president is in charge of our security and the boarder is a big part of that.
I'm talking about those coming across the boarder illegally. NOT the ones trying to come in legally at the ports of entry. That isn't considered illegal immigration. WTF is wrong with you?They ARE making asylum claims at the ports of entry. Have you not heard of the backlog of asylum cases?
By August 20, 2023, the number of pending affirmative asylum cases alone had reached a whopping 974,571. With so many asylum seekers stuck in backlogs, delays can be long. If someone is before USCIS, their estimated wait time is more than 6 years.7 days ago
https://immigrationforum.org › article
Explainer: Asylum Backlogs - National Immigration Forum
You pull a number out of your ass…….99.9%…….that fits your narrative and then makes conclusions on it. Lol. Where do you get that number from?
The vast majority of people pouring across our boarder are not coming through the ports of entry. They just aren't. So it's time for you to wake up.People that think they have a legitimate claim for asylum will be more likely to go to the ports of entry. Why would they try to sneak across? The criminals and rapists and drug dealers……..that republicans argue are all the illegals, aren’t going through the ports for obvious reasons. Do you even think about what you’re posting?
EVERYBODY who is apprehended goes through this process. EVERYBODY. I suggest you read it
People who come in and are processed at the ports of entry are not entering the country illegally as most of you idiots seem to think. People crossing between ports are doing so illegally. They still can claim immunity and be evaluated. But many of them get sent back across the border because they have a criminal record or have been caught before or for a hundred other reasons.
As for calling people ignorant, you claimed I was playing dumb while you posted ONLY ONE SMALL PART of Title 8……COMPLETELY ignoring the asylum laws, among others. So yeah, you are either ignorant or purposefully ignoring the mass volume of other laws contained in title 8. You’re also a freakin hypocrite for crying about others doing exactly what you just did one post before.
He claims to have an issue with the border, yet he defends this invasion.I'm talking about those coming across the boarder illegally. NOT the ones trying to come in legally at the ports of entry. That isn't considered illegal immigration. WTF is wrong with you?
The vast majority of people pouring across our boarder are not coming through the ports of entry. They just aren't. So it's time for you to wake up.
wrote back on Oct 5 2023I'm talking about those coming across the boarder illegally. NOT the ones trying to come in legally at the ports of entry. That isn't considered illegal immigration. WTF is wrong with you?
The vast majority of people pouring across our boarder are not coming through the ports of entry. They just aren't. So it's time for you to wake up.