Yep. Invites are resume based and both had suspect resumes. I could have seen them getting in over Virginia but nothing that has happened since validates that or disputes it.
Now, I'm a believer personally that it was a good thing that they got rid of the last 10 metric, but...... I think they should weight the latter part of the season more heavily when seeding teams. Candidly, if they did this, there was a viable argument that Purdue shouldn't have had a 1 seed last year.
Over the 5 weeks leading into the tournament (including our BTT run), Purdue was just 18th in efficiency margin. Gonzaga (1), Texas (5), Arizona (8), UCLA (9) and Marquette (10) were all playing better than us.