Keep trying. Someday you'll get there.No twisting here. Pat admitted to it. Creepy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep trying. Someday you'll get there.No twisting here. Pat admitted to it. Creepy.
The only creepy thing is a 70+ year old man that likes to sniff other women's hair...Oh even better, a 50+ year old admitting to searching for “Biden sniffing photos”. That’s not creepy at all.
And little kid's hair and pinching their nipples. The list goes on.The only creepy thing is a 70+ year old man that likes to sniff other women's hair...
Yes, you're so right. I ripped it from a meme. Instead of Googling Biden sniffing photos, I spent the time looking for a meme and then cropping the photo out of the meme. Gosh, you're just so smart for calling me out on that...
You still don't seem to get it. There will always be morons in this world that do unnecessary things that put others at risk. When they put other innocent people at risk, and things happen to the morons, we don't just decide to not give them medical care despite their behavior. It's that simple. I'm sorry about what happened to your grandmother, but the human beings who weren't vaccinated were in the hospital first. Would you like to be the person who makes a decision to kick a human being out of ICU so your grandmother gets their spot? Sorry, but life isn't always fair.
He could of done worse, like these:I just find it interesting that you'd bother using that photo as a profile picture. I guess the hatred runs deep and taking over.
I mean, yes, it is creepy. But public figures can easily have a ton of creepy or weird photos. For example,
But usually people won't bother to make it their profile picture.
Anyway, it's a free country. You are obviously entitled to do choose whatever profile picture. It just seems to say more about you than about the politician you are targeting.
It's more of a joke than anything. I find the picture funny, just like someone else has a photo of Hunter Biden as their profile pick. You just seem to be upset that it's a joke at the expense of Biden. Funny how some on here and other social media platforms called Trump "Cheeto" and "Agent Orange" which was essentially targeting his appearance. But I doubt you had an issue with that, just like the normal hypocrisy of liberals...I just find it interesting that you'd bother using that photo as a profile picture. I guess the hatred runs deep and taking over.
I mean, yes, it is creepy. But public figures can easily have a ton of creepy or weird photos. For example,
But usually people won't bother to make it their profile picture.
Anyway, it's a free country. You are obviously entitled to do choose whatever profile picture. It just seems to say more about you than about the politician you are targeting.
It's more of a joke than anything. I find the picture funny, just like someone else has a photo of Hunter Biden as their profile pick. You just seem to be upset that it's a joke at the expense of Biden. Funny how some on here and other social media platforms called Trump "Cheeto" and "Agent Orange" which was essentially targeting his appearance. But I doubt you had an issue with that, just like the normal hypocrisy of liberals...
It's more of a joke than anything. I find the picture funny, just like someone else has a photo of Hunter Biden as their profile pick. You just seem to be upset that it's a joke at the expense of Biden. Funny how some on here and other social media platforms called Trump "Cheeto" and "Agent Orange" which was essentially targeting his appearance. But I doubt you had an issue with that, just like the normal hypocrisy of liberals...
I've seen some of the stuff you've posted on this board. You're no innocent soul...I don't have an issue with you using Biden's pix. I just find it interesting and thought that said a lot more about you than Biden. Same with the guy who uses an unflattering Hunter Biden's pix, or for that matter, anyone who uses a creepy Trump pix as profile.
So no, I am not upset at all. I just find it interesting that profile pix is not used for ourselves, or someone we support, but would rather choose an unflattering picture of a rival politician. The implicit message seems to be that a desire to pull others down than to promote what one believes. It isn't about building something up, it's about tearing something down.
BTW, I wouldn't even consider myself a liberal when I agree with Reagan when he said, "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help". I have friends on the left that think I am way too conservative, and I have folks on this forum who keep accusing me as a socialist. The thing I notice, once again, is that it speaks more about them than about me. They think they can read a person's mind, when they live in a binary world where anyone who doesn't fully agree with them must be for the other side.
Your policy positions on here put you squarely in the left-of-center (and approaching Progressive) camp. That’s just my inference based on your posts.I don't have an issue with you using Biden's pix. I just find it interesting and thought that said a lot more about you than Biden. Same with the guy who uses an unflattering Hunter Biden's pix, or for that matter, anyone who uses a creepy Trump pix as profile.
So no, I am not upset at all. I just find it interesting that profile pix is not used for ourselves, or someone we support, but would rather choose an unflattering picture of a rival politician. The implicit message seems to be that a desire to pull others down than to promote what one believes. It isn't about building something up, it's about tearing something down.
BTW, I wouldn't even consider myself a liberal when I agree with Reagan when he said, "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help". I have friends on the left that think I am way too conservative, and I have folks on this forum who keep accusing me as a socialist. The thing I notice, once again, is that it speaks more about them than about me. They think they can read a person's mind, when they live in a binary world where anyone who doesn't fully agree with them must be for the other side.
I've seen some of the stuff you've posted on this board. You're no innocent soul...
Your policy positions on here put you squarely in the left-of-center (and approaching Progressive) camp. That’s just my inference based on your posts.
For sure, I am a Republican, but neither a Tea Partier nor a Neo-con.
I wouldn’t exactly call Democrats harbingers of truth, especially Progressives. They develop a narrative, typically one that is radical and overreaching. Then they use their lackies in the media and celebrities to propagandize their views into submission. If you don’t agree you’re a Luddite, you’re uninformed, stupid, uncouth, uneducated…..I suppose it is not too far outrageous to say I am "left-of-center." That said, I absolutely believe in personal responsibility. I think most social programs backfire, hence I agree with Reagan when he said "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help." And I am certainly fiscal conservative.
Furthermore, I also very much agree with Jonathan Heidt when he said in the Righteous Mind, "Liberals’ zeal to help victims, combined with their low scores on the Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity foundations, often lead them to push for changes that weaken groups, traditions, institutions, and moral capital. On issues after issues, it’s as though liberals are trying to help a subset of bees (which really does need help) even if doing so damages the hive. Such 'reforms' may lower the overall welfare of a society, and sometimes they even hurt the very victims liberals were trying to help ... Liberals tends to overreach, change too many things too quickly, and reduce the stock of moral capital inadvertently. Conversely, while conservatives do a better job of preserving moral capital, they often fail to notice certain classes of victims, fail to limit the predations of certain powerful interests, and fail to see the need to change or update institutions as time changes."
Therefore, I don't really identify myself with either group. Well, there used to be a time when I was leaning a lot more Republican (circa Reagan / Bush Sr). But like the chart shows, college-educated people increasingly move towards Dems. The Republican Party today is not what it used to. It no longer respects science and other knowledge-producing institutions. Since Karl Rove it also stopped caring about Truth. I'll say the acts from the Republican side disgusts me more, and hence my shift away from them.
Not you. Even though your post makes yourself out to be...What's an "innocent soul"?
Who's an example of an "innocent soul"? Are you?
What's an "innocent soul"?
Who's an example of an "innocent soul"? Are you?
Not you. Even though your post makes yourself out to be...
Now back to the subject of this thread.
@BleedinGold, would you support if hospital prioritizes ICU beds based on vaccination status?
Vaccination Status May Be Considered To Get ICU Beds At Dallas-Area Hospitals If Covid Spread Worsens
Covid cases are skyrocketing with no signs of a slowdown there.www.forbes.com
Corporations eliminate non profitable products all the time. It's profit, profit, profit.As I said, you are talking about the health care system which is not a free market system.
Basic economics says that in a free market system, the participants seek to maximize revenue and market share, not maximize profit, as profit is not guaranteed without market share. That why competition LOWERS prices. The lowest price wins, you dont get to low prices by maximizing profit.