Final Four

[collegehoopsfan123]

Do you believe Coach Painter can still get us there?

I want to be optimistic, but I say no. Hope I am wrong.

If he can't, how long does Purdue wait to pursue a

new coach? He has 18 years in the books, and Coach

Keady went to his 2nd Elite 8 in his 20th year at Purdue.

I personally think Coach Painter has been given a fair

chance. This question has to be addressed at some point.

Thoughts?

 

[Gemini95]

You don't have to post

A separate thread

For every thought.

That pops into your head.

 

[Boiler Buck]

You don't have to post

A separate thread

For every thought.

That pops into your head.

Especially when it is the

same thought

over & over

again

 

[collegehoopsfan123]

You don't have to post

A separate thread

For every thought.

That pops into your head.

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thoughts on the topic?

 

[Emartin70287]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

How many stop signs are in this picture?

 

[bonefish1]

I've made my opinion on this topic pretty well known. I think Painter has been given ample time.
His lack or wllingness to fully engage in the new NIL era will put the program at a disadvantage.
I think Purdue needs a complete cultural overhaul of the bball program.

 

[northside100]

Thanks for adding to the discussion.

Thanks for judging me, too.

Do you have anything to say on this topic?

I HAVE

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

SOMETHING

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

TO

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

SAY

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

I LIKE

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

THIS STYLE

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

OF

 

[northside100]

None of the threads at the top

mention Final Four specifically.

Sorry it bothers you. Do you have

any thought's on the topic?

POSTING

 

[typeviic]

The next coach Purdue hires MUST be a coach that uses a modern style of offense that attracts the athletic types of players.

 

[pubill]

I've made my opinion on this topic pretty well known. I think Painter has been given ample time.
His lack or wllingness to fully engage in the new NIL era will put the program at a disadvantage.
I think Purdue needs a complete cultural overhaul of the bball program

 

[pubill]

A coach is to have and take no part in NIL or discussion of and Matt has stated he does not talk to recruits about NIL.

 

[pubill]

Do you believe Coach Painter can still get us there?

I want to be optimistic, but I say no. Hope I am wrong.

If he can't, how long does Purdue wait to pursue a

new coach? He has 18 years in the books, and Coach

Keady went to his 2nd Elite 8 in his 20th year at Purdue.

I personally think Coach Painter has been given a fair

chance. This question has to be addressed at some point.

Thoughts?

Yes he will get us there, was within a FT of getting us there in 19. If we continue to perform as we have I would give Matt another 20 years.

 

[pubill]

The next coach Purdue hires MUST be a coach that uses a modern style of offense that attracts the athletic types of players.

We attracted Carsen and Jaden with our offense. what type offense are you talking about?

 

[collegehoopsfan123]

Yes he will get us there, was within a FT of getting us there in 19. If we continue to perform as we have I would give Matt another 20 years.

Hope you are right. That 2019 team was not

low-post center dominant. And Matt Haarms

was fairly athletic. 2010 also had an athletic

center JaJaun Johnson that would have made

Final Four with Hummel. History under Painter

says a Final Four is more likely with such centers.

 

[Gemini95]

Thanks for adding to the discussion.

Thanks for judging me, too.

Do you have anything to say on this topic?

I do not judge

I just observe

I'm sorry if

That strikes a nerve

 

[collegehoopsfan123]

We attracted Carsen and Jaden with our offense. what type offense are you talking about?

I think he means more than 1 on a team.

 

[indyogb]

You don't have to post

A separate thread

For every thought.

That pops into your head.

There's a haiku in this, somewhere.

No need to post thread
For every thought that pops in
The brain in your head

Meh... needs some work.

 

[Purdue0023]

Well in my opinion we have a solid group of current players and some very elite recruits coming in, in the next few years if all goes well. So, if I was the AD, I would stay the course for the next 5 years and see how it all turns out. If major success does not come in the next 5 years, then perhaps a different direction is what is best.

 

[Gemini95]

I said that to Boiler Buck.

Read what I said to you above.

This topic like many

Has run its full course

I see know more reason

To beat this dead horse

 

[Poprudy]

We attracted Carsen and Jaden with our offense. what type offense are you talking about?

Was thinking the exact same... don't forget Myles and potentially Catchings

 

[New Pal Boiler]

Do you believe Coach Painter can still get us there?

I want to be optimistic, but I say no. Hope I am wrong.

If he can't, how long does Purdue wait to pursue a

new coach? He has 18 years in the books, and Coach

Keady went to his 2nd Elite 8 in his 20th year at Purdue.

I personally think Coach Painter has been given a fair

chance. This question has to be addressed at some point.

Thoughts?

Please God, make it stop.

 

[New Pal Boiler]

I've made my opinion on this topic pretty well known. I think Painter has been given ample time.
His lack or wllingness to fully engage in the new NIL era will put the program at a disadvantage.
I think Purdue needs a complete cultural overhaul of the bball program.

Until I hear that we have NIL money that we’re not spending, I’m not blaming the coaches.

Walters was just talking about this on 1070 this week. He’s been asking the boosters to quit writing checks to the school for facilities and instead to “give to the Alliance so we can go get some players”.

 

[Poprudy]

Until I hear that we have NIL money that we’re not spending, I’m not blaming the coaches.

Walters was just talking about this on 1070 this week. He’s been asking the boosters to quit writing checks to the school for facilities and instead to “give to the Alliance so we can go get some players”.

Crazy that Fletch a freshman makes 7k a month, but we don't have NIL money??

 

[Gemini95]

Do you think Purdue's next Final Four

will be with Painter or another coach?

If he doesn't change

I don't like our chances

This year or next year

Or all future dances

 

[bonefish1]

The next coach Purdue hires MUST be a coach that uses a modern style of offense that attracts the athletic types of players.

I’d like to see someone from outside the Purdue family and definitely not from the Keady/Painter coaching tree.

 

[bonefish1]

A coach is to have and take no part in NIL or discussion of and Matt has stated he does not talk to recruits about NIL.

Again, to the detriment of the program.

It’s also complete BS if you believe HCs aren’t talking to the NIL donors about who needs what. You think they’re acting independently of one another? Come on…..

 

[bonefish1]

This topic like many

Has run its full course

I see know more reason

To beat this dead horse

Then quit responding. Super simple.

 

[Poprudy]

Again, to the detriment of the program.

It’s also complete BS if you believe HCs aren’t talking to the NIL donors about who needs what. You think they’re acting independently of one another? Come on…..

Yes, 100%! If you don't think so, you aren't paying attention. Schools can oversee the NIL deals and object to them and if you don't feel the coach has interactions with these deals you're being flat out naive.

It's the coaches that get involve are the ones benefiting. Paint might not want to get dirty, but he also knows his surroundings. He better get more acclimated with them or we will continue the same NCAA trend as of late.

 

[New Pal Boiler]

The next coach Purdue hires MUST be a coach that uses a modern style of offense that attracts the athletic types of players.

It’s not the offense that attracts top players… duh…

 

[Gemini95]

Then quit responding. Super simple.

This can't really be

What goes through your head

When reading my posting

Throughout this whole thread

 

[New Pal Boiler]

Yes, 100%! If you don't think so, you aren't paying attention. Schools can oversee the NIL deals and object to them and if you don't feel the coach has interactions with these deals you're being flat out naive.

It's the coaches that get involve are the ones benefiting. Paint might not want to get dirty, but he also knows his surroundings. He better get more acclimated with them or we will continue the same NCAA trend as of late.

Yeah Walters is pretty open about needing more NIL money to “go get some players”.

 

[pubill]

Again, to the detriment of the program.

It’s also complete BS if you believe HCs aren’t talking to the NIL donors about who needs what. You think they’re acting independently of one another? Come on…..

Oh I know Head Coaches are involved, but don't believe Matt is and I am very good with that.

 

[New Pal Boiler]

Oh I know Head Coaches are involved, but don't believe Matt is and I am very good with that.

I’m not. That’s like an NFL GM “not being involved” in free agency.

 

[bonefish1]

Oh I know Head Coaches are involved, but don't believe Matt is and I am very good with that.

Why would you not believe Matt is? That’s naive. If he’s not, then he’s hurting the program.

Do you think Walters is? It sure sounds like he is.