It’s not my fault you don’t have the ability to read people’s body language. It’s not some hidden secret he hasn’t been happy this year. It’s been widely discussed on gold and black and here as well.
Colvin-MSU Post-Game
- Thread starter pubill
- Start date
Body language isn't evidence of immaturity. Where did you find such a definition of immaturity.
You and Andy? I agree. Two dumbasses that have resorted to literally making up comments I never said in some pathetic attempt to make me look bad, as if I care what you think anyway.
It absolutely can be evidence of a person’s maturity level. Where did you get the idea that it isn’t?
Do you know the kid? He is not an extrovert. He keeps to himself a LOT. Same “body language” at HC.
He’s had well documented issues on the court going back to high school. I don’t think he’s some bad kid nor have I ever said he was, just think he has some growing up to do. I also said I hope he puts it all together next year because he clearly has a lot of talent. If you disagree that’s fine, I’ll give you credit for not immediately resorting to insults like a few others in here, that’s what I take issue with.
You wrote that he has only been "on" twice this year when people pointed out his 27 points against Arizona and Tennessee. Are you really denying it?
You said that I commented loyer only had two good games this year. Go find that comment.
So your playing junior high level attorney now? That's lame, even for you.
Did you say he was only "on" twice this year when someone pointed out his two 27 point games?
And further in that thread was this retort. I asked for clarification -- does he need to score 27 to be "on"?
No response.
I’m struggling to see where I said he only had 2 good games in that comment?
I hate to jump in here, but I'm pretty sure a very high percentage of folks reading this thread will disagree with your stance. Maybe we should vote on it? Who here agrees with Johnny's position? I don’t.
Aren’t you a used a car dealer who never graduated from college, Andrew? I’d be mad at the world too if I were you.
And you’re in a profession that’s made fun of daily and is known to have slimy a-holes galore. Description fits you perfect, honestly.
You say he played over his talent level for those two games and they don’t reflect his true talent level. Are you saying he’s not as good as those two games? Can you tell us what games you think he had that he was good?
I think he’s had plenty of good games. That conversation was about a poster who said loyer can score 20 or more without breaking a sweat. I disagreed and showed that he has only scored 20 or more twice this year. I wouldn’t characterize only having two games with 20 or more as “being able to score 20 without breaking a sweat “. Anyways, maybe I am undervaluing him as a player? I don’t think he’s bad though and have never said he was, that’s why I can’t respect idiots like Andy who literally just make things up to start an argument.
"He has been on twice this year". Those are your words supporting your stand that he should be benched. You made the point multiple times in the same thread. And now you say I made it up? Talk about slimy.
Loyer was great against Illinois, but I think the issue has been mainly his defense. And his lack of strength where he gets knocked around. Heide actually was the difference, when he came in and shut Domask down and didn’t let him bully his way to the hoop ignited Purdue and then all 4 guys made big 3s during the decisive run. Loyer made a great play on that layup disrupting Domask but defensively he is weak
That was not the full quote and you’re taking it out of context to try and build a false narrative. Yeah, you are definitely a slimy used car salesman.
I think this is a good place to offer perspective and it has nothing to do with your post I'm quoting.
First, it is understandable that a player is not as happy as some when he doesn't see the court...especially one a bit younger. That doesn't mean that he is leaving a Purdue family. It could mean that, but I really doubt it. As Dave said...if he does Purdue will still be fine. I personally have seen improvement in his D since he started as some on the O side as well and hope and believe he will be in suit next year as a Boiler and so those that guess he could leave...I'm guessing he doesn't. Either could be correct. I have reason to believe it has been a hard year for him, but hope for some growth towards next year as a result.
I agree that I have noticed improvement on both individual and team D and team O .
Wrong again. The argument was about loyer being able to score 20 without breaking a sweat. Typical slimeball used car salesman move. Proven wrong over and over but you just continue to dig a deeper hole instead of just admitting you’re a troll looking to start an argument.
DwaynePurvis00 reposted this above. Let me guess. Someone hacked into your account. This wasn't you. It's been known to happen. lol
johnboiler123 said:
Honestly I’d like to see loyer get knocked out of the starting lineup. Other than Tennessee and Arizona, 2 games he played that are wayyyyy above where his talent level is, I just don’t think he’s dynamic enough for a top level team.
Last edited:
There was no argument about it. I posted my opinion and that was that. The argument was about something else.
But enough about me. Earlier you posted this:
“Same guy who said Loyer only had 2 good games this year? If he can't score 27 every game, he should be benched.”
Please go find where I said that loyer should be benched if doesn’t score 27 a game. Oh wait, I never did. More lies from the sleazy used car salesman. Typical.
Just re-watched the Illinois game. Colvin sat next to Brantley all game (he was the first player after all the coaches) and celebrated right the team on the huge 3s. He wasn’t jumping up and down, but neither did/does TKR. As i have stated before, he keeps to himself mostly, but he ain’t goin nowhere.
Where did I say loyer should be benched if he doesn’t score 27 a game? Or do you admit you’re a sleazy liar?
Also strikes me as a kid who will work his ass off and be motivated for next year.
