OMFG dude, no it isn't. There weren't issues on the resolutions for the other two. JHC man, you see only what you want to see.
Can someone give examples of the Left legislators trying to enact laws to silent the Right?
- Thread starter charlespig
- Start date
What are you talking about as far as resolutions? The simply voted to remove 3 people for doing the same thing. 2 got voted out and one remained. What was Barrett’s vote on the 2 that was removed?What issues on the resolutions are you talking about?
You haven't been a student in 50 years. Sit down and watch Matlock.
You took a lot of words to say "my head is lodged permanently in Ben Shapiro's anus." Take it out and you can learn something.
Data shows a surprising campus free speech problem: left-wingers being fired for their opinions
Does “political correctness” really crush conservative speech on campus? The data suggests no.
www.vox.com
43 years if you count my Purdue years as a student.
I never watched Matlock.
Was he trans?
You know, I was responding to you in a constructive and respectful manner. No name calling or derogatory comments. Why is it so difficult for you to give me the same courtesy? Because this is the same treatment people you disagree with get everywhere any more. The only free speech for people like you is total agreement- nothing more, nothing less.You took a lot of words to say "my head is lodged permanently in Ben Shapiro's anus." Take it out and you can learn something.
Data shows a surprising campus free speech problem: left-wingers being fired for their opinions
Does “political correctness” really crush conservative speech on campus? The data suggests no.
Two thoughts and I am done with you (yeah, spare me the crocodile tears- huh?). You are not looking for discussion, are you? Just anything to try to make Ted look tough and in charge.
Different people have different opinions as to what is "offensive and racially charged". The raison d'etre for this thread is that very point, which you are proving every day on this board. Instead of talk we get blasted as racists- which according to Mr BNI we all are on here, except for you select few correct thinkers. You know who you are. And as racists, anything we say or do is beyond suspect- it convicts us and confirm our status as white supremacists and race mongers. I would tend to think my definition of offensive and racially charged would be somewhat at variance with a professor at Georgetown U.
Then the concept that conservatives being mistreated on college campuses is covered thoroughly by the MSM and similar issues of liberal speakers and professors being punished or discharged not being covered- does that raise a red flag anywhere in your mind? Conservative malfeasance is an accepted trope by the MSM- we are targeted everyday and every way. Reporting conservative speakers being shouted down is considered letting people know how despicable these guys are and look, these courageous students are standing up to them. Not covering the woke wing getting their angel wings clipped is perhaps because the things they say and do might ring warning bells in the minds of many middle of the road voters who might think they are not comfortable with those kind of opinions running universities and educating their kids. Tell these folks only what they need to know.
So maybe more libs do get punished (but there are so many more of them to begin with it is a much smaller %-age of the whole) but the conservatives get more coverage, making us more aware of it, for the above reasons.
No response is necessary. I wrote this for others on this thread who might read it in the spirit in which I wrote it. I realize I am still way up the an*s of Ben Shapiro as you so quaintly put it, which all these many words do not dispel. I would never credit you as flexible, Ted, except I can not explain in any other fashion how you are able to get your head so far up your own an*s. You are truly a wonder! (see, always finish with a compliment- that is how you win friends and influence people)
Wrong. There were three separate resolutions written up as to why each should have been expelled. They tacked on to her resolution things that she didn't do that the other two did do. THAT'S why Barrett didn't vote her out. He did vote the others out because there were no issues on their documents. They broke with decorum in a major way and they voted on removal.
BTW have you ever looked at a photo of the Tennessee house representatives? It's VERY diverse, so this idea that it was a racist removal also doesn't hold water from that front. This is what we mean by you being indoctrinated. They have you seeing racism where it doesn't exist.
Memphis lawmaker honored as oldest serving legislator in Tennessee recorded history
At 92, St. Rep. Barbara Cooper is also the second oldest state legislator currently serving in the entire country, and the oldest serving Democrat.
www.localmemphis.com
Last edited:
Huh? They have power to pass laws that get speakers in jail. I am looking at other countries like China. They can legally arrest anyone who speaks against the government on the ground of harming national security. I'd think those kind of power are more dangerous than "cancelling a speaker."
Agreed.
But while you are at it, can you give me some examples of Democratic legislators using their power to silence the opposition? Thanks.
Dude, that is one of the most amount of BS that I ever heard. Y'all can twist yourselves into knots to avoid being labeled racist. The mere fact that they had a vote for removal was racist in of itself. Censure would have been the best punishment FOR ALL 3 than what they attempted to do.Wrong. There were three separate resolutions written up as to why each should have been expelled. They tacked on to her resolution things that she didn't do that the other two did do. THAT'S why Barrett didn't vote her out. He did vote the others out because there were no issues on their documents. They broke with decorum in a major way and they voted on removal.
BTW have you ever looked at a photo of the Tennessee house representatives? It's VERY diverse, so this idea that it was a racist removal also doesn't hold water from that front. This is what we mean by you being indoctrinated. They have you seeing racism where it doesn't exist.
Memphis lawmaker honored as oldest serving legislator in Tennessee recorded history
At 92, St. Rep. Barbara Cooper is also the second oldest state legislator currently serving in the entire country, and the oldest serving Democrat.
As far as diverse. Tennessee is no different than most states as far as a diverse state legislature. I can puck any midwestern state and find similar diversity. Here in Indiana and like most states, they will have black, Hispanic or any other people of color representing the larger metropolitan cities. These folks will be mostly Democrats. Tennesse is no different. The 2 Tennessee legislators in question are from Nashville and Memphis which have a large black population. Not to mention Knoxville, Chattanooga, etc. So of course it's going to be diverse. What do you want a cookie?
I did a quick check to see. With the caveats that:
- I think the Tennessee expulsion was horrendous, and
- Every instance is different and can be debated on it's own terms,
Profanity, followed by Republicans on mute: Welcome to California’s last night of session
I didn't claim that they were more dangerous. Just pointing out that your claim that they have no power is incorrect.
So the simple fact that it only took one extra vote to remove the woman and she wasn't removed because they attributed things to her that she didn't do, is racism.
The only person getting twisted into knots is YOU. You have NO evidence that this was an act of racism other than the two that were expelled were black. NONE. I pointed out actual documents AND voice recordings that prove that it had nothing to do with racism, and you're response is to say I'm twisted in knots. **** off if you want to remain this dumb.
Last edited:
I’m in the 90% of the Dems. I’ll put it to you this way, I ain’t no racist. Or as Chump would say, “I’m the least racist”.
Nobody is going to let you talk to their kids, creep.
Says a guy who's been conditioned to think Biden isn't racist when he obviously is.
If you don't think Biden is a racist, then you ain't black, Jack.
So what is your estimation of the percentage of democrats that are racist? And I’m not taking about racial biases.Can’t believe you said that.
I really don’t know, but it’s a lot higher than 10%. The percentage is most likely to be about the same for either party.
We're not the ones fed lies about racism in this country night in and night out.
Well, you and others should be counting your blessings that in your world that racism doesn't exist.
Dude, a straight white male probably endures more racism today in this country than a black person.
Wow.
Taking lack of self-awareness to an extraordinary, whole new level.
That is an incredibly ignorant statement.
A perfect example of how the echo chambers on both sides cause people to reach mind boggling conclusions. The constant arguments cause people to entrench themselves so deeply into their position they have nowhere to go but more extreme.
Says the oblivious lib who exercised his white male dem privilege to speak on behalf of a black man - with no understanding or acknowledgement that he had done so.
Likewise, Bob.
Rather than re-cycle the same trite, uniformed, insults you throw out in many posts, tell us--do you agree with his statement:
"Dude, a straight white male probably endures more racism today in this country than a black person."
Last edited:
No more than I agree with the total lack of self-awareness in your pompous, totally self-unaware statement, "Taking lack of self-awareness to an extraordinary, whole new level."
Last edited:
Is "feefee" the type of talk you use on other people's kids, creep?
You did not answer the very straightforward question I'll repeat it for you:
Do you agree with his statement?
"Dude, a straight white male probably endures more racism today in this country than a black person."
I can answer it in a straightforward way for you as an example: "No, I do not agree with that statement."
You did not answer the very straightforward question I'll repeat it for you:
Do you agree with his statement?
"Dude, a straight white male probably endures more racism today in this country than a black person."
I can answer it in a straightforward way for you as an example: "No, I do not agree with that statement."
Still waiting for you to answer the question, are you an attorney?
The question was:
Do you agree with his statement?
"Dude, a straight white male probably endures more racism today in this country than a black person."
I can answer it in a straightforward way for you as an example: "No, I do not agree with that statement."
An earlier question was, Are you an attorney?
The question was:
Do you agree with his statement?
"Dude, a straight white male probably endures more racism today in this country than a black person."
I can answer it in a straightforward way for you as an example: "No, I do not agree with that statement."
You can answer it in a straightforward way as an example to yourself by saying either yes or no.
