ADVERTISEMENT

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

Again, you keep bringing that up. For one thing that was in Jamaica where I do not live. Harris' ancestors in Jamaica were white and Irish. That's what was done in Jamaica in the 1700s and 1800s. I have no concern about Harris' ancestors owning slaves in Jamaica no more than anyone else here in the US that had ancestors owning slaves. Someone today that had ancestors that owned slaves is no big deal. I may have some if I do some research. A large portion of black Americans have white ancestry that may owned slaves. Or, the much smaller percentage that have black ancestors that owned slaves. Take a history class at a local community college. It'll do you some good.
Well here's a loaded "Riveting-style" question for you:

Forget about some Irish guy in Jamaica in the 1700's, what would be your reaction if a top Deputy appointee in the State Department said in 2024 that "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

And what do you think of someone that appointed him - with a long history of statements by this appointee that are congruent with the 2024 statement?

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

You are not concerned that your ancestors may have been slaveowners and/or slaves in Africa?

I wanted you to see that economics really was a major factor in slavery as opposed to just "white supremacy", as bone said.

US slavery was heading toward extinction until the cotton gin made it much more profitable to own slaves. As a student of history, you know that, right?
Oh yeah, I do know that the invention of the cotton gin increased the demand for slaves. And? There were slaves in the US prior to the invention of the cotton gin. Of course economics was a factor, slavery was cheap labor, duh. It's white supremacy and pseudo-science that they chose the Africans for this cheap labor. Then continued the racial hatred with Jim Crow when slavery ended for another 100 years. Now this anti-DEI bs is a slap in the face of all of the hard work that the civil rights folks died for.

Shocker - Braden Smith named Cousy Finalist

I believe Brandon will have some great opportunities to prove his skills against some very good teams. And that is what it will take to win the award.

As I look at the Big 10, There are some teams like UW, Maryland, Illinois, OSU, Nebraska that are starting to get some national attention. And then you add teams like Oregon and MSU with teams like Iowa and IU lurking in the shadows. unlike many others, Purdue and Brandon will have a lot of opportunities ahead to prove they are worthy.

Just take care of business and win as a team and the individual awards will follow. I’d rather have Purdue win as a team than have players being selfish going after individual awards.
Braden should as well

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

Also, I'm not concerned with slavery prior to US existence. I said earlier, I live here in America with ancestors that were enslaved and went through the Jim Crow era. We have the so-called founding fathers like Washington, Jefferson and others that owned hundreds of human beings each relatively recent history. I don't put them on a high pedestal like y'all do. Slave owners in the state of Maryland even got reparations for losing their "property" after the Civil War.
You are not concerned that your ancestors may have been slaveowners and/or slaves in Africa?

I wanted you to see that economics really was a major factor in slavery as opposed to just "white supremacy", as bone said.

US slavery was heading toward extinction until the cotton gin made it much more profitable to own slaves. As a student of history, you know that, right?

Mid Year Big Ten Teams

Purdue is going to need to win the Big Ten outright, and Trey is going to need to garner some national attention for him to make the first team. Same for the duo from Michigan. Braden is a lock, and Vlad is close to it. Trey and Wolf have an uphill battle and I'd be shocked if four of the first team players come from two teams.
it's going to be interesting to see what they do with MSU players if they win the B1G. Can you win the B1G and have no more than a single 3rd team pick? I've thought that impossible in the past but think MSU may test that theory this year. I could see Akins sneaking onto the 2nd team but the are so balanced:


RkPlayerPosGGSMPFGFGAFG%3P3PA3P%2P2PA2P%eFG%FTFTAFT%ORBDRBTRBASTSTLBLKTOVPFPTSAwards
1Jaden AkinsG212126.04.911.5.4271.45.0.2883.56.5.533.4902.22.6.8700.73.23.91.60.90.31.11.213.5
2Jase RichardsonG20022.03.46.1.5490.92.1.4292.54.0.613.6232.02.3.8480.42.22.52.10.80.31.01.59.6
3Coen CarrF21021.43.25.3.6070.10.4.3753.15.0.625.6212.13.2.6721.42.23.60.40.70.71.01.08.8
4Tre HollomanG211422.32.77.3.3731.33.9.3461.43.4.403.4641.41.5.9380.21.71.93.70.90.31.61.98.2
5Frankie FidlerF21717.52.46.2.3850.42.3.1882.03.9.500.4193.03.2.9121.02.53.51.00.70.30.80.98.1
6Jeremy Fears Jr.G212123.62.15.0.4330.30.8.4121.84.1.437.4663.24.2.7610.11.71.86.21.00.12.02.47.8
7Jaxon KohlerF211819.42.85.9.4800.31.4.2332.54.4.559.5081.41.7.8292.45.27.61.40.40.81.31.67.3
8Xavier BookerF21315.82.45.5.4350.52.7.1961.92.8.661.4831.01.2.8081.01.92.90.30.00.91.01.56.3
9Szymon ZapalaC212115.32.23.2.6870.00.1.0002.23.1.708.6871.11.7.6572.02.54.50.80.20.81.02.15.5
10Carson CooperC21015.01.72.8.6210.00.01.72.8.621.6211.31.7.7711.13.24.30.60.10.80.62.04.7

As someone who lives in SEC country

I do not think we have much to talk about when talking down Notre Dame being a prestigious football program….we won 1 damn football game in 2024…and could have won two games if Purdue had scheduled Earlham College in Richmond, Indiana. The Quackers in Richmond would have given us all we could handle. We were bottom 5 …worst Division 1 programs in 2024. So…shut up! Notre Dame put an ass-whooping on us in September!
Might want to re-check the subject of this thread there, Slick…

You’re clearly lost— this isn’t about Purdue.

Iowa

CJ Cox during that 5-game span is 1-5 (no attempts against Oregon nor Indiana)..... would like to see a few more attempts from him in a perfect world.

I agree about trying to getting CJ a look or 2...especially early in the game just to see if he's in flame thrower mode. If he makes his first you go to him again, but if he doesn't then you just let the opportunities come within the normal framework of the offense.

For those that praise Chump’s tariffs

Ffs. You were talking about tariffs and the effect of them. Short term long term. Then you said "How all these things work out is much more important that knee jerk response based on fear told by msnbc and it's ilk."

I'm saying it's more than the liberal media who are talking about the negative effects of tariffs. That's my point.

Trump wants to go back to 1890 and institute tariffs. He thinks they are good. Economists think they're bad.

Why are you now posting about the politics of tariffs? Copy and paste. I read the news.
I listed some of the good and assume you will now list what was bad?

Mid Year Big Ten Teams

I would easily take Brice Williams over Tre Donaldson. Probably Claude too.

My fear is voters see 18 teams and figure they need to spread the vote, causing TKR to drop to the 2nd team (I don't think Wolf makes 1st team regardless...he's been bad lately).
Purdue is going to need to win the Big Ten outright, and Trey is going to need to garner some national attention for him to make the first team. Same for the duo from Michigan. Braden is a lock, and Vlad is close to it. Trey and Wolf have an uphill battle and I'd be shocked if four of the first team players come from two teams.
  • Like
Reactions: boilerzz

Canada

You never answered the question: Can men get pregnant?
I would give an answer, but Bob and he believe scientists, rather than me and so whatever scientists say it would follow that would be their belief if consistent. Course we know about science with the Chinese virus transmission, gain of function and so forth...dangers of climate change and the overthrow of the government on J6.
  • Haha
Reactions: bonefish1

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

And Kamala Harris' family in Jamaica where very prominent slave owners there. Why does that not concern you?
Again, you keep bringing that up. For one thing that was in Jamaica where I do not live. Harris' ancestors in Jamaica were white and Irish. That's what was done in Jamaica in the 1700s and 1800s. I have no concern about Harris' ancestors owning slaves in Jamaica no more than anyone else here in the US that had ancestors owning slaves. Someone today that had ancestors that owned slaves is no big deal. I may have some if I do some research. A large portion of black Americans have white ancestry that may owned slaves. Or, the much smaller percentage that have black ancestors that owned slaves. Take a history class at a local community college. It'll do you some good.

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

Since it never happened I cannot answer for certain. I would guestimate it would be similar. Racist FDR sure enough put Japanese AMERICANS into internment camps after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The number of German Americans interned during WW2 was relatively small compared to the Japanese Americans.
and I believe there would be no difference

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

And i told you, slavery was more of an economic issue than a race issue. Black Africans just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when cheap labor was needed. The conquering African tribes who sold their fellow black Africans into slavery didn't do it because they were black. They did it because it was a source of money.
And as far as blacks suddenly being free to go their marry way in 1865, be realistic. You really think slave owners running huge plantations were just going to give up their livelihood without a fight?

Your being black has to do as about knowing slavery as me being white has to do with owning slaves. You didn't know any slaves. No one you knew or anyone they knew were slaves.
Like I said earlier, stay in your lane. You keep harping on the Africans that sold the other African captives. You have very little to say about the Americans that sailed to Africa, bought and picked them up in order to be sold in the US like grain. The Africans sold their war captives to the Europeans for money. You are correct about that. However, the American bought the slaves for chattel slavery, which is race based for labor.

DOGE has already cancelled over $1 BILLION in government DEI contracts.

Provided for those of you who dont know that 'USAID' is a CIA (deep state) front-group. On the outside, its a so-called "aid organization". Its REAL purpose is to work behind the scenes to overthrow democratically elected governments in Central and South America (staging/sponsoring coups, installing a puppet dictator). Trump is making very dangerous enemies.
Now I know this may come as a surprise to some of you that get your news from corporate media like cnn or fox.
relative to the government spending I have a Libertarian lean . A little diddy below-

Officials are shutting down a federal agency called the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) with President Donald Trump’s blessing, Elon Musk said today.

“He agreed we should shut it down,” Musk said during a live session on the social media platform X, after saying he had spoken with Trump about the agency.

“It became apparent that its not an apple with a worm it in,” Musk said. “What we have is just a ball of worms. You’ve got to basically get rid of the whole thing. It’s beyond repair.”

Musk added in a post on X: “We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.”

Here’s what to know about Trump’s unfolding shake-up at USAID.

What Is USAID?

Established in 1961, USAID manages the distribution of U.S. aid and other financial assistance to foreign nations.

The agency’s initiatives include humanitarian response to natural disasters worldwide, global health initiatives, climate and environmental programs, and an array of others related to economics, governance, and education.

In 2023, the most recent year with full data available, USAID distributed around $36.8 billion in global aid, roughly half of all foreign aid the U.S. distributed.

For Republicans, USAID is a prime example of government waste; many criticize it for lacking transparency and oversight in how it spends its nearly $50 billion budget.

Democrats are more supportive of the agency, championing it as a life-saving source of international assistance.

Its international objectives put USAID as an institution in direct contradiction to Trump’s foreign policy aims—which emphasize focusing taxpayer spending domestically.

What’s Happening at the Agency?

On day one, Trump signed an executive order placing a 90-day moratorium on all U.S. foreign aid disbursements to allow for a reevaluation of whether those payments align with U.S. interests.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio later allowed certain humanitarian aid to continue in the interim.

Between 800 and 900 contractors from the Global Health and Humanitarian Assistance bureaus have already been fired.

Other employees have been laid off as well, with the administration citing efforts by these employees “designed to circumvent the president’s executive orders.”

Trump said on Feb. 2 that the agency “has been run by a bunch of RADICAL LUNATICS and we’re getting them out … and then we’ll make a decision.” [delete]

Additionally, the agency’s website has gone dark, while USAID’s official X account was also deleted.

Republicans have long been critical of USAID. Now, Trump’s allies are making a dedicated push to dismantle the agency.

“USAID is a criminal organization,” said Elon Musk, a top political ally to Trump, in a post on X. “Time for it to die.”

Others, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), have pointed to its grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is at the center of theories about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Others simply see the foreign aid as largely a waste of taxpayer money with too little oversight.

Merger With State

Outlets are reporting that USAID is on track to be rolled into the State Department, in a significantly scaled-down capacity.

Trump is reported to be planning an executive order that would do just that, but Trump and his allies have been tight-lipped about specifics.

Conservatives in Washington have long discussed the idea of merging the two organizations, with the idea being presented in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025.

House Foreign Affairs Chairman Brian Mast (R-Fla.) seemed to verify that Trump was inclined to go in this direction, saying in a Feb. 2 appearance on CBS that USAID “is likely to be going to be rolled more closely under Secretary Rubio.”

He said he would support getting rid of USAID entirely, but made clear that the Trump administration had not made a final decision on how to go about it.

Thus, specifics about this merger remain uncertain.

Democrats Raise Legal Challenges

Democrats, longtime supporters of the agency, have already pushed back against Trump’s reported plan, saying that such an executive order would be illegal.

While it was created in 1961 via an executive order by President John F. Kennedy, the agency has been codified into law through Congress—raising constitutional questions about whether Trump has the legal power to dissolve the agency unilaterally without an act of Congress.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a Jan. 31 post on X that the agency was “established in law to further our national security and spread hope.”

He said that dissolving USAID would be “illegal and against our national interests.”

Others referenced the ongoing fight for the developing world between the U.S., China, and Russia, arguing that aid disbursements handled by USAID serve U.S. geopolitical interests.

—Joseph Lord and Zachary Stieber

BOOKMARKS

Panama President José Raúl Mulino said on Sunday that his country will not renew its memorandum of understanding with China to be a part of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Algdra Fredley reported. It comes amid escalating threats from Trump to assert a claim over the Panama Canal.

Trump pushed back on criticisms of his tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico, calling them a “necessary solution.” Emel Akan reported on the administration’s response to criticisms of tariff policies, which Trump has positioned as essential to restoring U.S. industry and manufacturing.

Even after being given the green light to return to their homes after fire hazards, many Los Angeles residents face difficult decisions on whether to do so, Beige Luciano-Adams reported. Many family’s homes lie in safe zones—but are surrounded by devastation, including dangerous ash.

Undersea cables crisscross the world’s waterways, connecting nations with power, natural gas, and ready internet access. They’re also endangered by China.

Andrew Thornebrooke covered four major incidents involving China cutting these undersea cables.
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG

Canada

Trump here, overall, seems to have won an agreement, where Canada is really going to do what it was already going to do. The Prime Minister saying this $1.3 billion border plan that he announced, back in December, is going to go into place.

And as for Mexico, this is how President Trump explained that result.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: They have agreed to put in 10,000 soldiers, permanently, like forever, 10,000 soldiers at their side of the border, and stop fentanyl and illegal aliens from coming into our country.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COLLINS: According to Mexico’s Defense Ministry, there are already 15,000 troops, nearly, there on the border. It’s a deployment that started in 2019.
You never answered the question: Can men get pregnant?

For those that praise Chump’s tariffs

Bob, what is this that I'm saying that the economist and WSJ disagree? My comments covered short term long term and things that can be done by the government to compensate or subsidize if you will? Here is a short list of the immediate situation with the big three that we hear about?

The governments of Mexico and Canada agreed to conditions set forth by President Donald Trump on Feb. 3, just hours before 25 percent tariffs were set to take effect on products imported from the two countries.

Executive orders signed Feb. 1 by the president are meant to force the nations’ leaders to strengthen their border policies and stop the flow of fentanyl into the U.S.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced that she had spoken with Trump and negotiated a one-month pause on the tariffs, which were set for implementation on Feb. 4.

Mexico is sending 10,000 National Guard troops to its northern border to counter narcotics trafficking activities.

The White House reports approximately 500,000 pounds of fentanyl was seized at the border in each of the past three years.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans have died as a result of fentanyl poisoning since 2020.

Thousands of illegal immigrants have been pouring through the border daily in recent years, and Trump has ordered a halt to what he describes as an “invasion.”

He confirmed a deal with Mexico, saying, “They’re very strong now on the border. They want to protect it also. They don’t want people coming through Mexico to come into our country.”

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau later announced a similar deal after speaking with Trump.

In exchange for a 30-day temporary pause on the tariffs, Canada will spend $1.3 billion to combat fentanyl trafficking by purchasing new technology and helicopters and hiring more personnel to keep an eye on the border “24/7.”

Cooperation with U.S. law enforcement will strengthen operational capacity, and 10,000 Canadian personnel will be sent to the border.

Canada is also investing $200 million and appointing a fentanyl czar to investigate cartels, which both the U.S. and Canadian governments have now designated as terrorist organizations.

Trump remarked that Canada should become part of the U.S., saying he’d like to see it “become our 51st state.”

The president talked with Trudeau about what he sees as problematic trade policies, like those that keep American banks from doing business in Canada.

He said, “We’re not treated well by Canada, and we have to be treated well.” Highlighting a trade imbalance that he’d like to recalibrate, the president said, “We can’t let them take advantage of the U.S. “We don’t need them for anything.”

China

10 percent tariffs on China started today, in addition to hefty fees already placed on goods from the country during Trump’s first term in office.

China hit back overnight with a raft of retaliatory measures.

It said it would implement a 15 percent tariff on coal and liquefied natural gas products as well as a 10 percent tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and large-engine cars imported from the U.S. Those tariffs will take effect next Monday.

China also announced export controls on several elements critical to the production of modern high-tech products.

The Chinese regulator said it was investigating Google on suspicion of violating antitrust laws. The announcement did not mention the tariffs but came just minutes after Trump’s 10% tariffs on China were to take effect.

Calling the Chinese Communist Party responsible for allowing the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals that ultimately result in the deaths of Americans, Trump has ordered tariffs to increase if China does not follow his orders.

He said the country “will be dealt with,” and a call with Chinese President Xi Jinping is expected in the coming days, according to White House officials.
The president suggested his policies are proving effective because “tariffs are very powerful, both economically and in getting everything else you want.”

—Travis Gillmore and The Associated Press
Ffs. You were talking about tariffs and the effect of them. Short term long term. Then you said "How all these things work out is much more important that knee jerk response based on fear told by msnbc and it's ilk."

I'm saying it's more than the liberal media who are talking about the negative effects of tariffs. That's my point.

Trump wants to go back to 1890 and institute tariffs. He thinks they are good. Economists think they're bad.

Why are you now posting about the politics of tariffs? Copy and paste. I read the news.

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

Also, I'm not concerned with slavery prior to US existence. I said earlier, I live here in America with ancestors that were enslaved and went through the Jim Crow era. We have the so-called founding fathers like Washington, Jefferson and others that owned hundreds of human beings each relatively recent history. I don't put them on a high pedestal like y'all do. Slave owners in the state of Maryland even got reparations for losing their "property" after the Civil War.
And Kamala Harris' family in Jamaica where very prominent slave owners there. Why does that not concern you?
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

Slavery within Africa existed long before the US existed. What was African slavery the result of?
Also, I'm not concerned with slavery prior to US existence. I said earlier, I live here in America with ancestors that were enslaved and went through the Jim Crow era. We have the so-called founding fathers like Washington, Jefferson and others that owned hundreds of human beings each relatively recent history. I don't put them on a high pedestal like y'all do. Slave owners in the state of Maryland even got reparations for losing their "property" after the Civil War.

For those that praise Chump’s tariffs

We aren't even talking about the same thing. I'm talking about tariffs that are actually implemented. Not the threats of them. Not the victory lap for getting things from our good neighbors that was already promised. You're in such a rush to praise trump you aren't paying attention.

Do you believe tariffs are good for the economy? Do you believe, like trump, that the cost of tariffs aren't passed on to the consumer?

This isn't the politics of tariffs. It's the effect of implementing them.
You do realize that Trump was using the threat of tariffs as a negotiating tool, right? He doesn't have to implement to get what he wants.
Canada and Mexico caving in 12 hours are good examples of that.

POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash

Dude. No. I told you US slavery was the result of white supremacy sparked by pseudo-science. US slavery was raced based slavery called chattel slavery. The black Africans selling the other Africans was just part of the 3 headed snake of the slave trade. We've been through too many times. It it was pure economics, when slavery was over in 1865, blacks would have been on their merry way free to live and thrive. By the late 1870s that came to an end as the white supremacists enacted Jim Crow. Plus all of the racial hatred til to this day. Hence the topic of this thread. Getting rid of and blaming DEI.

You are the last person to be talking about this as you have absolutely no concept of history. You need to stay in your lane. Next thing you going to tell us that the slaves didn't have it as bad. I've had that argument here already.
And i told you, slavery was more of an economic issue than a race issue. Black Africans just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when cheap labor was needed. The conquering African tribes who sold their fellow black Africans into slavery didn't do it because they were black. They did it because it was a source of money.
And as far as blacks suddenly being free to go their marry way in 1865, be realistic. You really think slave owners running huge plantations were just going to give up their livelihood without a fight?

Your being black has to do as about knowing slavery as me being white has to do with owning slaves. You didn't know any slaves. No one you knew or anyone they knew were slaves.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT