ADVERTISEMENT

Cover up

Read this first.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/biden-ukrainian-gas-company
And......

"Hunter Biden's involvement with Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings was the subject of President Trump's July 25 phone call with the president of Ukraine, which sparked the Democrats' impeachment push."

Schweizer said that Biden's 2019 claims he had "never talked with [his] son or brother or anyone else -- even distant family -- about their business interest" were far from the case.

He told Hegseth that, in addition to taxpayer-backed loans and grants, the family also was granted access to the White House and then-president Barack Obama.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/peter-schweizer-how-biden-family-got-rich

How do you know who Trump has had investigate the Bidens? How do you know there aren't investigations going on now of Joe and his family? Why don't you explain how Hunter Biden got $1.5B deal in China (with the Chinese national bank) right after Joe was there on "official business"?

Lol so it just so happens that THE most egregious corruption in Ukraine happens to be Hunter Biden?

The FBI isn't equipped to investigate this? The GOP House wasn't? The GOP Senate?

Trump levered US taxpayer dollars, appropriated by a co-equal branch of government, to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political opponent.

This is not really even debatable at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
Lol so it just so happens that THE most egregious corruption in Ukraine happens to be Hunter Biden?

The FBI isn't equipped to investigate this? The GOP House wasn't? The GOP Senate?

Trump levered US taxpayer dollars, appropriated by a co-equal branch of government, to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political opponent.

This is not really even debatable at this point.
This is the fallacy of your argument. When all of this happened, Biden wasn’t the D nominee for 2020. He still isn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinDegrees2
This is the fallacy of your argument. When all of this happened, Biden wasn’t the D nominee for 2020. He still isn’t.
He was the frontrunner.

How is it that Hunter Biden was making millions from Burisma in 2017 and 2018 and most of 2019 and we heard no complaints from trump? But as the election season began, its suddenly an issue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
How is Sondland's testimony direct evidence? You didn't pay attention to his opinions?
Did you really just say it's not a BFD if trumps personal lawyer was doing a private investigation for him because it didn't cost us any money!!!!!!?

Sondland was on tape saying the president told him directly no QPQ. That's as direct as you can get.
The information obtained by Giuliani wasn't paid for by the tax payers, unlike the Steele Dossier.
Politics is politics and every candidate digs up dirt on the opposition.
No QPQ no Crime.
And any country has a right to investigate any US citizen for suspected wrong doing in their country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
1) Hey, JS...…..MUCH obliged for your link to the hit piece, on the Bidens, from the world-renowned PETER SCHWEITZER !!!! Fiercely independent, Mr. Schweitzer is...…...oh, wait....
Schweitzert is EDITOR-AT-LARGE OF BREITBART, ever'body………...Next !!
2) "Cause for concern" , on the part of Trump, regarding every single discredited conspiracy theory, emanating out of the Ukraine mess ?? Yeah,.....the country has ample evidence of how Trump addressed that "concern ", thank you very much.

But, But, But they are his opinions based on the research he has done.
And Schweitzer has been a very successful author.

Bolton's book should be gospel? He was canned by Trump.
 
Lol so it just so happens that THE most egregious corruption in Ukraine happens to be Hunter Biden?

The FBI isn't equipped to investigate this? The GOP House wasn't? The GOP Senate?

Trump levered US taxpayer dollars, appropriated by a co-equal branch of government, to pressure a foreign government into investigating a political opponent.

This is not really even debatable at this point.
You're right....it's the American way. You know...Daddy get's in power and the kid is an overnight millionaire who impregnates strippers, tries to dodge his duties of supporting the child and has to be forced by the courts to do so, and dates his dead brother's widow. Nice family.

Can the Dem's do no wrong in your eyes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
You're right....it's the American way. You know...Daddy get's in power and the kid is an overnight millionaire who impregnates strippers, tries to dodge his duties of supporting the child and has to be forced by the courts to do so, and dates his dead brother's widow. Nice family.

Can the Dem's do no wrong in your eyes?
Hunter Biden's personal issues have nothing to do with the impeachment. Trump's extortion of a foreign country to influence our election is the issue.
 
But, But, But they are his opinions based on the research he has done.
And Schweitzer has been a very successful author.

Bolton's book should be gospel? He was canned by Trump.
** General Kelly, and others, were "canned" by Trump ?? And the political world hardly considers that a NEGATIVE, as you know.
** Schweitzer has been a very successful author ? So has Sean Hannity. Credibility, not popularity, is the cornerstone for political opinion weight.
** John Bolton's credibility, over many years of service to the conservative/ GOP cause, will hold him in good stead with all but the most rabid of Trumpers. Of course, there's a gazillion Repub.'s that fit that description .
 
He was the frontrunner.

How is it that Hunter Biden was making millions from Burisma in 2017 and 2018 and most of 2019 and we heard no complaints from trump? But as the election season began, its suddenly an issue?
Eff that. This didn’t start late last year or this year. You must have no problem with Biden’s documented corruption? Of course not, he’s on the other side from Trump, so he must be ok. (Even if he’s corrupt to the core.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
Wrong. There were a instances when neither Rs nor Trump’s counsel were allowed to attend depositions. I didn’t say always. Ds claimed they were transparent - that was an absolute fabrication.
What instances were the Republicans not allowed to attend depositions? Did you find out yet? Or did you come to the realization you were lied to?
 
This is the fallacy of your argument. When all of this happened, Biden wasn’t the D nominee for 2020. He still isn’t.
Your weak ass argument that they weren't targeting Biden doesn't hold water.

  • December 6th 2018. Parnas and Fruman attend a private meeting with Trump and Giuliani where Trump tasks them to pressure the Ukranian government to investigate the Bidens.
  • Jan 23rd 2019. Giuliani along with Parnas and Fruman conduct an interview with Shokin in an attempt to gather more information on the Bidens.
  • February 2019. At Giuliani's behest, Parnas and Fruman press Poroshenko to initiate an investigation into the Bidens. They said the action would be rewarded by a White House visit.
  • March 2019. Nunes senior aide Harvey has a call arranged by Lev Parnas to speak with Kostiantyn Kulyk and Nazar Kholodnytsky. Kulyk and Kholodnytsky have been accused in Ukraine of corruption and pursuing politically motivated prosecutions. Kulyk had created a dossier of Biden disinformation and unproven theories.
  • March 28th 2019. Giuliani provided a packet to Pompeo that contains disinformation and unproven theories on the Bidens.
  • April 1st 2019. John Solomon has an article published that advances the disinformation on Biden that Giuliani had gathered.
  • April 7th 2019. John Solomon publishes an interview with Kulyk that airs the disinformation on Biden.
  • May 7th 2019. Ukranian Presidential advisors meet with Zelensky to discuss Trump and Giuliani's demands for investigations of the Bidens.
  • May 9th 2019. Giuliani tells the New York Times he plans to travel to Kyiv to meet with Zelensky and urge him to investigate the Bidens.
  • May 10th 2019. Trump interview with Politico where he says it would be an appropriate thing to have an investigation into Biden. He stated he saw Biden as the clear front runner in the Democratic race and that Trump would speak to Giuliani about his trip to Ukraine.
  • June 21st 2019. Giuliani tweets that the "new President of Ukraine is still silent on investigation of alleged Biden bribery on Proshenko. Time for leadership and investigation."
  • Late June 2019. At Giuliani's direction, Parnas and Fruman offer Dmitry Firtash help with the Justice Department in exchange for dirt on the Bidens.Giuliani also proposes that Firtash hire Toensing and diGenova as Firtash's lawyers, the two were also working on dirt on the Bidens.
  • July 2019. Firtash hires Toensing and diGenova, then uses his network of Ukranian contact to attempt to find damaging information on the Bidens.
  • July 10th 2019. Sondland meets with two of Zelensky's top advisors and encourages them that investigations that need to be started again, referencing Biden and Burisma. It was this meeting that Bolton became incensed and later referred to Sondland's suggestion as a "drug deal." After the meeting there was a debriefing which Vindman and Hill both attend, Sondland once again emphasizes the importance of Ukraine delivering an investigation of the Bidens.
  • July 19th 2019. Volker and Giuliani meet for breakfast with Lev Parnas. Volker texts that he had setup a call for Monday with Zelensky and that it was "most important for Zelensky to say that he will help with an investigation."
  • July 22 2019. Giuliani speaks with Yermak over the phone and discuss the Trump-Giuliani demands for investigations into the Bidens.
  • July 25th 2019. Trump has phone call with Zelensky in which he asks Zelensky to look into Biden and Biden's son.
  • July 25th 2019. Prior to the Trump/Zelensky phone call, Volker texts Yermak saying that he heard from the White House and assuming Zelensky can convince Trump he'll start an investigation, they'll setup a White House visit.
  • July 26th 2019. Volker, Sondland, Taylor, and Holmes meet with Zelensky. Zelensky states that Trump had raised some very sensitive issues on their call and Zelensky would have to follow up in person. Holmes testifies that after reading the call memo, that "sensitive issues" referred to the investigation of the Bidens.
  • August 2nd 2019. Giuliani and Parnas fly to Madrid to meet with Yermak. Giuliani presses Yermak to investigate the Bidens. Giuliani tweets on August 3rd from Madrid, additional disinformation about the Bidens.
  • August 9th 2019. Volker texts Sondland and Giuliani to suggest a phone call "to make sure I advise Zelensky correctly as to what he should be saying" for when Zelensky announced the Bidens investigations.Sondland texts that potus wants the deliverable. Sondland later testifies that the "deliverable" refers to the public statement announcing investigations into the Bidens.
  • August 10th 2019. Yermak texts Volker that Zelensky won't announce the investigations without a firm date for a White House visit. Sondland emails Pompeo to inform him about Zelensky's agreement to have a press conference to announce the investigation.
  • August 11th 2019. Volker texts Giuliani about a draft statement that they want Zelensky to read when announcing an investigation into the Bidens.
  • August 12th 2019 Whistleblower files a complaint to the ICIG
  • August 13th 2019. Volker and Sondland text Yermak urging him to include in the Zelensky draft, specific references to Burisma.
  • August 17th 2019. Sondland texts Volker asking if the US side still wants Zelensky to give them a draft on an announcement into the investigations of Biden. Volker responds that "that's the clear message so far...I'm hoping we can put something out there that causes him to respond."
 
He got it because his dad is Joe Biden. Period. No doubt about it.

Now you get to explain how that has anything to do with what trump apparently did.
Let me correct you a bit Bob...which I don't usually do but on rare occasion.

"What TRUMP allegedly did".

And with the Alan Dershowitz testimony last evening, it's now more clear than ever there is not now, nor has there ever been any impeachable offense or offenses.
 
Let me correct you a bit Bob...which I don't usually do but on rare occasion.

"What TRUMP allegedly did".

And with the Alan Dershowitz testimony last evening, it's now more clear than ever there is not now, nor has there ever been any impeachable offense or offenses.
Keep counting on Dershowitz’s compromised ass, that’ll go well for you I’m sure.
 
Keep counting on Dershowitz’s compromised ass, that’ll go well for you I’m sure.
I'm sitting here laughing my old ass off just thinking about how miserable you're going to be election night 2020.

You still think Trump is going to get impeached, or do agree with your twin brother Dubs that it's all for show because your boys know they can't beat him fairly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDBoiler1
I'm sitting here laughing my old ass off just thinking about how miserable you're going to be election night 2020.

You still think Trump is going to get impeached, or do agree with your twin brother Dubs that it's all for show because your boys know they can't beat him fairly.
More unhinged phony confidence about 2020, you’re nothing if not completely predictable.
 
Dude....you're so far out of touch. Do you ever get tired of posting the same post over and over and........
Out of touch like thinking Clinton only won 57 counties in the election, yeah that is out of touch from reality. Not a good look Twin, not good at all.
 
(ATTN: Indy35) Explain to us where Hunter's sudden wealth came from? And how he earned it as he self admitted that he knew nothing about oil or gas.
Perhaps no one on the Board of Directors at Burisma were Rhodes Scholar candidates....ask THEM why they included him on their Board @ 50k/mo...…...
 
Last edited:
Let me correct you a bit Bob...which I don't usually do but on rare occasion.

"What TRUMP allegedly did".

And with the Alan Dershowitz testimony last evening, it's now more clear than ever there is not now, nor has there ever been any impeachable offense or offenses.
Hold up. Before you move on, I said where I think Hunter got his money.
Now you get to explain how that has anything to do with what trump allegedly did.
 
OMG W and35 are cuddling on a couch somewhere Coming up with plots to kill me and come up with their schemes of delusions .
 
Your weak ass argument that they weren't targeting Biden doesn't hold water.

  • December 6th 2018. Parnas and Fruman attend a private meeting with Trump and Giuliani where Trump tasks them to pressure the Ukranian government to investigate the Bidens.
  • Jan 23rd 2019. Giuliani along with Parnas and Fruman conduct an interview with Shokin in an attempt to gather more information on the Bidens.
  • February 2019. At Giuliani's behest, Parnas and Fruman press Poroshenko to initiate an investigation into the Bidens. They said the action would be rewarded by a White House visit.
  • March 2019. Nunes senior aide Harvey has a call arranged by Lev Parnas to speak with Kostiantyn Kulyk and Nazar Kholodnytsky. Kulyk and Kholodnytsky have been accused in Ukraine of corruption and pursuing politically motivated prosecutions. Kulyk had created a dossier of Biden disinformation and unproven theories.
  • March 28th 2019. Giuliani provided a packet to Pompeo that contains disinformation and unproven theories on the Bidens.
  • April 1st 2019. John Solomon has an article published that advances the disinformation on Biden that Giuliani had gathered.
  • April 7th 2019. John Solomon publishes an interview with Kulyk that airs the disinformation on Biden.
  • May 7th 2019. Ukranian Presidential advisors meet with Zelensky to discuss Trump and Giuliani's demands for investigations of the Bidens.
  • May 9th 2019. Giuliani tells the New York Times he plans to travel to Kyiv to meet with Zelensky and urge him to investigate the Bidens.
  • May 10th 2019. Trump interview with Politico where he says it would be an appropriate thing to have an investigation into Biden. He stated he saw Biden as the clear front runner in the Democratic race and that Trump would speak to Giuliani about his trip to Ukraine.
  • June 21st 2019. Giuliani tweets that the "new President of Ukraine is still silent on investigation of alleged Biden bribery on Proshenko. Time for leadership and investigation."
  • Late June 2019. At Giuliani's direction, Parnas and Fruman offer Dmitry Firtash help with the Justice Department in exchange for dirt on the Bidens.Giuliani also proposes that Firtash hire Toensing and diGenova as Firtash's lawyers, the two were also working on dirt on the Bidens.
  • July 2019. Firtash hires Toensing and diGenova, then uses his network of Ukranian contact to attempt to find damaging information on the Bidens.
  • July 10th 2019. Sondland meets with two of Zelensky's top advisors and encourages them that investigations that need to be started again, referencing Biden and Burisma. It was this meeting that Bolton became incensed and later referred to Sondland's suggestion as a "drug deal." After the meeting there was a debriefing which Vindman and Hill both attend, Sondland once again emphasizes the importance of Ukraine delivering an investigation of the Bidens.
  • July 19th 2019. Volker and Giuliani meet for breakfast with Lev Parnas. Volker texts that he had setup a call for Monday with Zelensky and that it was "most important for Zelensky to say that he will help with an investigation."
  • July 22 2019. Giuliani speaks with Yermak over the phone and discuss the Trump-Giuliani demands for investigations into the Bidens.
  • July 25th 2019. Trump has phone call with Zelensky in which he asks Zelensky to look into Biden and Biden's son.
  • July 25th 2019. Prior to the Trump/Zelensky phone call, Volker texts Yermak saying that he heard from the White House and assuming Zelensky can convince Trump he'll start an investigation, they'll setup a White House visit.
  • July 26th 2019. Volker, Sondland, Taylor, and Holmes meet with Zelensky. Zelensky states that Trump had raised some very sensitive issues on their call and Zelensky would have to follow up in person. Holmes testifies that after reading the call memo, that "sensitive issues" referred to the investigation of the Bidens.
  • August 2nd 2019. Giuliani and Parnas fly to Madrid to meet with Yermak. Giuliani presses Yermak to investigate the Bidens. Giuliani tweets on August 3rd from Madrid, additional disinformation about the Bidens.
  • August 9th 2019. Volker texts Sondland and Giuliani to suggest a phone call "to make sure I advise Zelensky correctly as to what he should be saying" for when Zelensky announced the Bidens investigations.Sondland texts that potus wants the deliverable. Sondland later testifies that the "deliverable" refers to the public statement announcing investigations into the Bidens.
  • August 10th 2019. Yermak texts Volker that Zelensky won't announce the investigations without a firm date for a White House visit. Sondland emails Pompeo to inform him about Zelensky's agreement to have a press conference to announce the investigation.
  • August 11th 2019. Volker texts Giuliani about a draft statement that they want Zelensky to read when announcing an investigation into the Bidens.
  • August 12th 2019 Whistleblower files a complaint to the ICIG
  • August 13th 2019. Volker and Sondland text Yermak urging him to include in the Zelensky draft, specific references to Burisma.
  • August 17th 2019. Sondland texts Volker asking if the US side still wants Zelensky to give them a draft on an announcement into the investigations of Biden. Volker responds that "that's the clear message so far...I'm hoping we can put something out there that causes him to respond."
That’s the second time you did that cut-and-paste bullshite. God only knows what left-wing rag that came from. What you take for fact is a bunch of speculation and conjecture.
 
That’s the second time you did that cut-and-paste bullshite. God only knows what left-wing rag that came from. What you take for fact is a bunch of speculation and conjecture.
Every single one is documented by testimony, documents, or both. I know you avoid facts like you’re allergic to them, but it’s all available. You don’t have to live in ignorance, but I don’t think you’ll like what you see if you choose to step up.
 
Last edited:
You’re the unhinged one. Left-wing lunatic. Literally.
Did you find out yet which hearings Republicans weren’t allowed to attend? Saying things that are completely untrue would lead people to believe you may be demented, just an FYI as we’re speaking of unhinged lunatics.
 
Last edited:
Read this first.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/biden-ukrainian-gas-company
And......

"Hunter Biden's involvement with Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings was the subject of President Trump's July 25 phone call with the president of Ukraine, which sparked the Democrats' impeachment push."

Schweizer said that Biden's 2019 claims he had "never talked with [his] son or brother or anyone else -- even distant family -- about their business interest" were far from the case.

He told Hegseth that, in addition to taxpayer-backed loans and grants, the family also was granted access to the White House and then-president Barack Obama.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/peter-schweizer-how-biden-family-got-rich

How do you know who Trump has had investigate the Bidens? How do you know there aren't investigations going on now of Joe and his family? Why don't you explain how Hunter Biden got $1.5B deal in China (with the Chinese national bank) right after Joe was there on "official business"?
Ok, I read it. And?

You're actually saying Hunter got 1.5 billion?

Schweizer......like the Briebart Schweizer? He's the next John Solomon. Was telling you about him a year ago.

Back to my questions you didn't answer.

How do the Bidens prove or disprove the allegations against trump?

Are you saying if the accusations (what are they by the way) against the Bidens were actually true, that would mean that trump asking Ukraine to investigate his political rival and withholding the aid was fine? What does the guilt or innocence of the Bidens have to do with what trump did?

If trump suspected the Bidens of wrongdoing, why didn't he have the FBI investigate? Why did he put his personal lawyer on the case? Why aren't they investigating NOW?
 
Sondland was on tape saying the president told him directly no QPQ. That's as direct as you can get.
The information obtained by Giuliani wasn't paid for by the tax payers, unlike the Steele Dossier.
Politics is politics and every candidate digs up dirt on the opposition.
No QPQ no Crime.
And any country has a right to investigate any US citizen for suspected wrong doing in their country.
And Sondland told us. That's not as direct as you can get. Trump testifying under oath would be as direct and as ACCURATE as you can get.
So I guess you would naturally believe what Bolton said Trump told him right? Same situation as your "That's as direct as you can get" situation.

So trump's personal lawyer's investigation wasn't paid for by the taxpayers..........like that freakin means anything. Does that it more credible? How many more times are you going to post about Rudy's investigation being free of charge? Who GAF?
 
Eff that. This didn’t start late last year or this year. You must have no problem with Biden’s documented corruption? Of course not, he’s on the other side from Trump, so he must be ok. (Even if he’s corrupt to the core.)
The perfect phone call was July 25th. The first Democrat debate was June 26th. Biden was leading everybody during that time in national polls.

What documented corruption are you talking about? Show the documentation.

How is it that Hunter Biden was making millions from Burisma in 2017 and 2018 and most of 2019 and we heard no complaints from trump?
 
The perfect phone call was July 25th. The first Democrat debate was June 26th. Biden was leading everybody during that time in national polls.

What documented corruption are you talking about? Show the documentation.

How is it that Hunter Biden was making millions from Burisma in 2017 and 2018 and most of 2019 and we heard no complaints from trump?
Count us ALL in on the need to see the "DOCUMENTED CORRUPTION" you speak of, SD....
We know that - as you read this - you're loaded up with all of the links necessary to slap those "documents" in all of our faces !!
Those Bidens are in for it, now !!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT