Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As long as we’re not killing these special needs children, I can live with it.How do you feel about paying for special education and all the special services for a “special needs” child? In the state where I live those services are provided
until the “ child” is 26 years old.
thats how the system is setup.Why should I have to pay for a practice that I personally find abhorrent?
I'm not necessarily suggesting a direct line, presidents probably have little impact here, but the correlation is clear. In general, democrats seem more likely to support comprehensive sex education and access to contraceptives whereas republicans are more likely to advocate for "abstinence-only" sex education, since having sex for fun (especially if unmarried) is a sin or whatever. Fact of life, people, including teenagers, are going to have sex. So, it stands to reason we should be teaching people how to do so safely and providing access to products that allow women to choose when they get pregnant. Promoting policies that reduce unwanted pregnancies reduces abortions.What would be the causality between Presidential party and number of abortions? I don't see any, do you?
As long as we’re not killing these special needs children, I can live with it.
Is it a living human baby?
Lol post the link to that.It is a fetus. President Trump was given a medication for Covid that used cell research from aborted “fetuses”. NOBODY said “from aborted babies” Not once did I read that or see that anywhere.
Lol post the link to that.
If it isn’t a baby, why does a murder get charged with two murders when killing a pregnant woman?
Trump did not take a cocktail containing cells from aborted fetuses. My goodness you crazy libs will believe anything.Sorry but I am not sure what you want me to post about? The medication? Or that Trump was given it or???
Trump did not take a cocktail containing cells from aborted fetuses. My goodness you crazy libs will believe anything.
Additionally, abortion is simply put, the murder or babies. Good news though, Roe v Wade may be overturned very soon .
You don’t see any difference between my tax money paying to kill babies versus paying for Viagra?Yes, so can I but I don’t complain about other places my taxes go. I must admit it does annoy me that my insurance company pays for Viagra.
Yep, crazy that some libs like Beth just spew whatever they read without any research.Was Trump's Regeneron 'Cure' Developed Using Stem Cells and Fetal Tissues?
U.S. President Donald Trump touted the “antibody cocktail” as a COVID-19 “cure” that he intended to make available to the American public.www.snopes.com
Trump did not take a cocktail containing cells from aborted fetuses. My goodness you crazy libs will believe anything.
Additionally, abortion is simply put, the murder or babies. Good news though, Roe v Wade may be overturned very soon .
Yeah, I was supporting Beth, here. It clearly says the drugs were derived from cells taken from a fetus that was aborted in the 1970s.Yep, crazy that some libs like Beth just spew whatever they read without any research.
You are delusional, and based on your omitting of the "What's False" section, you are also very dishonest. No, the cocktail didn't use cells from an aborted baby.Did you read the article you posted or just the headline?
It appears that it was made from embryonic kidney tissues obtained from aborted human fetuses or as you like to say killed human babies.
It was the regeneron that was developed from fetus cells. See articles below. Apparently, the makers of regeneron confirmed the origin of the cells.
What's True
The manufacturer of REGN-COV2 has stated that it employs stem cells in its research, most commonly mouse embryonic stem cells and human blood stem cells. The "antibody cocktail" given to Trump is a combination of two human-made proteins and was developed using a decades-old cell line derived from embryonic kidney tissues obtained from an aborted human fetus.
Trump's COVID-19 treatment developed using cells originally drawn from fetal tissue
The experimental Regeneron antibody treatment used to treat President Trump for COVID-19 was developed using cells originally derived from fetal tissue.abcnews.go.com
Covid drug given to Trump developed using cells derived from an abortion
Trump touts Regeneron antibody cocktail as a potential ‘cure’ while he has consistently sought to restrict abortion accesswww.theguardian.com
COVID treatment Trump touted as a "cure" was developed using cells derived from aborted fetal tissue
The antibody cocktail President Trump took and praised was developed using cells derived from kidney tissue of a fetus aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s.www.cbsnews.com
What's TrueYeah, I was supporting Beth, here. It clearly says the drugs were derived from cells taken from a fetus that was aborted in the 1970s.
You don’t see any difference between my tax money paying to kill babies versus paying for Viagra?
Oh, I did. It's simply clarifying which type of fetal cells were used (embryonic kidney tissues) and which kind weren't (embryonic stem cells) and that they were not recently acquired. It clearly does NOT say that "the cocktail didn't use cells from an aborted baby."What's True
The manufacturer of REGN-COV2 has stated that it employs stem cells in its research, most commonly mouse embryonic stem cells and human blood stem cells. The "antibody cocktail" given to Trump is a combination of two human-made proteins and was developed using a decades-old cell line derived from embryonic kidney tissues obtained from an aborted human fetus in 1973.
What's False
However, no human embryonic stem cells or recently harvested fetal tissues were used in the development of REGN-COV2, according to the manufacturer.
Read the "What's False" section again.
What's True
The manufacturer of REGN-COV2 has stated that it employs stem cells in its research, most commonly mouse embryonic stem cells and human blood stem cells. The "antibody cocktail" given to Trump is a combination of two human-made proteins and was developed using a decades-old cell line derived from embryonic kidney tissues obtained from an aborted human fetus in 1973.
What's False
However, no human embryonic stem cells or recently harvested fetal tissues were used in the development of REGN-COV2, according to the manufacturer.
It states that the "the antibody cocktail given to Trump . . . . was developed using a decades old cell line derived from embryonic kidney tissues obtained from an aborted fetus. So without the cells they would not have developed this drug that was used on Trump. They may have only used the research but the point is still clear. The actual drug did not contain stem cells, etc but I did not say it did. Reread my post - I clearly stated it was "developed" from cells from an aborted fetus.
Anyway you are missing the point of not using "killing babies". So Trump took a drug that was developed from "killing babies" I give up on you and am now blocking all posts from you.
I will call abortion what it is. Killing Babies.It states that the "the antibody cocktail given to Trump . . . . was developed using a decades old cell line derived from embryonic kidney tissues obtained from an aborted fetus. So without the cells they would not have developed this drug that was used on Trump. They may have only used the research but the point is still clear. The actual drug did not contain stem cells, etc but I did not say it did. Reread my post - I clearly stated it was "developed" from cells from an aborted fetus.
Anyway you are missing the point of not using "killing babies". So Trump took a drug that was developed from "killing babies" I give up on you and am now blocking all posts from you.
Oh, I did. It's simply clarifying which type of fetal cells were used (embryonic kidney tissues) and which kind weren't (embryonic stem cells) and that they were not recently acquired. It clearly does NOT say that "the cocktail didn't use cells from an aborted baby."
Women do not need abortions.Yes I do - women need things that men don't and insurance will not pay for those things but men do not need Viagra and insurance pays. The big difference is gender!
Women do not need abortions.
Do you mean not covered by private insurance or by ACA?I thought we were talking about Viagra and gender differences in what insurance companies pay for. I am not talking about abortions. I am talking about feminine needs that are not covered by insurance while Viagra is covered
Do you mean not covered by private insurance or by ACA?