Video shows how Govt officials lied to American Public to influence election

[Boiler Buck]

Now that the Hunter Biden laptop has been introduced by the DOJ as evidence against Hunter Biden.....we can verify their was election interference by intelligence officials in the last election by lying about the laptop & it's contents to influence election results.

Of course the right new this all the time. Now the left can't even deny it anymore.

Here are a few of the liars.....
Former intelligence officials dismissed Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation

Former intelligence officials dismissed Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation | Fox News Video

Former DNI director James Clapper, former chief of staff for secretary of defense Jeremy Bash claimed Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation.

www.foxnews.com

 

[BoilerJS]

Now that the Hunter Biden laptop has been introduced by the DOJ as evidence against Hunter Biden.....we can verify their was election interference by intelligence officials in the last election by lying about the laptop & it's contents to influence election results.

Of course the right new this all the time. Now the left can't even deny it anymore.

Here are a few of the liars.....
Former intelligence officials dismissed Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation

Former intelligence officials dismissed Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation | Fox News Video

Former DNI director James Clapper, former chief of staff for secretary of defense Jeremy Bash claimed Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation.

www.foxnews.com

They should be charged except for one caveat.
They were careful to say the Laptop has all the Characteristics of Russian Disinformation.
Not that it was.
Of course the MSM took it from there!!

 

[BuilderBob6]

Breaking news.

 

[SKYDOG]

Breaking news.

Hunter is hoping daddy pardons him.

 

[BuilderBob6]

Hunter is hoping daddy pardons him.

He probably will if there’s jail time for lying on a federal gun form.

Joe should shut up with all his criticism of the judge, jury, and process.

 

[Boiler Buck]

More on how liberal media lies to their public. Not just one random bad report, like election machines, for an episode or at most a week, that happens on all networks. But long term intentionally lying ....continued for a long term period multiple times through whole election season to fool their easily manipulated audience.

Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as another lib media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.

www.foxnews.com

 

[BoilerBiker]

roses are red
violets are blue

people in government
lie and steal from you

 

[Riveting-]

Breaking news.

Do the bump, Bagram Bob.

 

[TheGunner]

Breaking news.

I find it amazing the party of “election interference” can stick their head in the sand when the FBI and DNP has such a coordinated effort to …..

 

[bonefish1]

They should be charged except for one caveat.
They were careful to say the Laptop has all the Characteristics of Russian Disinformation.
Not that it was.
Of course the MSM took it from there!!

"Russian Disinformation"
Translation: The answer that democrats give to any facts about anything that they can't refute or refuse to acknowledge (regardless of what the topic is).

 

[BuilderBob6]

I find it amazing the party of “election interference” can stick their head in the sand when the FBI and DNP has such a coordinated effort to …..

Who’s the party of election interference?

See, actual interference is trying to pressure and intimidate local officials to change the vote count. Or using fake electors to try and overturn an election. Or pressuring two AGs and firing one because they didn’t feel the election was rigged. Or allowing a mob to occupy the Capitol in an attempt to stop Pence from certifying sn election. Or actually considering having the military seize voting machines. Or pressuring the VP to disregard the Constitution.


What you call “interfering “ is all about information that had nothing to do with policy but rather about salacious stuff being made public.

You seem to believe the FBI should have come forward with the info on the laptop. All the Hunter dirt would do outrage the public so much that they would vote for trump.

I would counter that the FBI didn’t come forward with the investigation into trumps Russia involvement before the 2016 election. They didn’t want to affect the election, as is unwritten DOJ policy.

By the MAGA definition, trumps payoff to Stormy was election interference. He didn’t want the story to hurt him in the election.

Everything is EI with you guys. Hell one of you claimed a lie in a debate is EI lol.

 

[Riveting-]

Who’s the party of election interference?

I would counter that the FBI didn’t come forward with the investigation into trumps Russia involvement before the 2016 election. They didn’t want to affect the election, as is unwritten DOJ policy.

I would counter that your counter is inaccurate, as is your custom. The FBI didn't come forward because they knew the allegations about Trump and Russia were fake, and they didn't want the truth to be used to help Trump.

FBI offered Christopher Steele $1 million to prove dossier claims, senior FBI analyst testifies | CNN Politics

Shortly before the 2016 election, the FBI offered retired British spy Christopher Steele "up to $1 million" to prove the explosive allegations in his dossier about Donald Trump, a senior FBI analyst testified Tuesday.

www.cnn.com

 

[BuilderBob6]

I would counter that your counter is inaccurate, as is your custom. The FBI didn't come forward because they knew the allegations about Trump and Russia were fake, and they didn't want the truth to be used to help Trump.

FBI offered Christopher Steele $1 million to prove dossier claims, senior FBI analyst testifies | CNN Politics

Shortly before the 2016 election, the FBI offered retired British spy Christopher Steele "up to $1 million" to prove the explosive allegations in his dossier about Donald Trump, a senior FBI analyst testified Tuesday.

www.cnn.com

Your link says the FBI offered in October of 2016, right before the election, and never paid the money because Steele didn’t prove the allegations. That’s a month before the election. How long did the FBI give him to answer?

If Steele had the proof would the FBI have come forward and told the public about the investigation? No. It wouldn’t have mattered if Steele backed up his claims. The DOJ doesn’t do that. That’s the point.

You also fail to acknowledge that the dossier was only one part of the investigation. Your own link points out it wasn’t the cause for it. The FBI had many other leads to investigate.

The dossier has its own spacious place in your brain.

 

[JBoiler23]

The DOJ doesn’t do that. That’s the point.

Except when they DID do it in announcing the reopening of the Hillary Clinton investigation, but yes, generally I agree.

 

[Riveting-]

Your link says the FBI offered in October of 2016, right before the election, and never paid the money because Steele didn’t prove the allegations. That’s a month before the election. How long did the FBI give him to answer?

The cnn link says the testimony from Auten was that "Steele refused to provide the names of any of his sources during that meeting (in Oct. 2016), and that Steele didn’t give the FBI anything during that meeting that corroborated the claims in his explosive dossier." So you think the FBI, knowing that, did not have a basis for saying there was no evidence that the allegations in the dossier were true?

If Steele had the proof would the FBI have come forward and told the public about the investigation? No. It wouldn’t have mattered if Steele backed up his claims. The DOJ doesn’t do that. That’s the point.

The DOJ doesn't do that?? Thanks for the laugh.

You think that the DOJ would not cross such an ethical line even though you know they later used the dossier against Trump knowing it had not been verified? Was that news not mentioned on msnbc?

Or do you mean the FBI would not have announced the 'proof', but instead leaked it to NYT to publish? I could agree with that.

You also fail to acknowledge that the dossier was only one part of the investigation. Your own link points out it wasn’t the cause for it. The FBI had many other leads to investigate.

Many other fake leads to "investigate," but the dossier was the big one for which the HC campaign was busted by the FEC.

How corrupt does an agency have to be before you stop naively believing whatever they tell you?

 

[Telling The Truth]

The cnn link says the testimony from Auten was that "Steele refused to provide the names of any of his sources during that meeting (in Oct. 2016), and that Steele didn’t give the FBI anything during that meeting that corroborated the claims in his explosive dossier." So you think the FBI, knowing that, did not have a basis for saying there was no evidence that the allegations in the dossier were true?


The DOJ doesn't do that?? Thanks for the laugh.

You think that the DOJ would not cross such an ethical line even though you know they later used the dossier against Trump knowing it had not been verified? Was that news not mentioned on msnbc?

Or do you mean the FBI would not have announced the 'proof', but instead leaked it to NYT to publish? I could agree with that.



Many other fake leads to "investigate," but the dossier was the big one for which the HC campaign was busted by the FEC.

How corrupt does an agency have to be before you stop naively believing whatever they tell you?

 

[Riveting-]

Bob and JM can breathe on their own - or with each other.

 

[Telling The Truth]

Bob and JM can breathe on their own - or with each other.

 

[Riveting-]

Is that Bob or JM, displaying their white male privilege that they try to keep secret on this forum so they can pretend to be woke? Or is it bni, busted for being a fake black?

 

[TheGunner]

Who’s the party of election interference?

See, actual interference is trying to pressure and intimidate local officials to change the vote count. Or using fake electors to try and overturn an election. Or pressuring two AGs and firing one because they didn’t feel the election was rigged. Or allowing a mob to occupy the Capitol in an attempt to stop Pence from certifying sn election. Or actually considering having the military seize voting machines. Or pressuring the VP to disregard the Constitution.


What you call “interfering “ is all about information that had nothing to do with policy but rather about salacious stuff being made public.

You seem to believe the FBI should have come forward with the info on the laptop. All the Hunter dirt would do outrage the public so much that they would vote for trump.

I would counter that the FBI didn’t come forward with the investigation into trumps Russia involvement before the 2016 election. They didn’t want to affect the election, as is unwritten DOJ policy.

By the MAGA definition, trumps payoff to Stormy was election interference. He didn’t want the story to hurt him in the election.

Everything is EI with you guys. Hell one of you claimed a lie in a debate is EI lol.

🤔

I missed the segment in your post about paying a porn star.

🤪

 

[Telling The Truth]

Is that Bob or JM, displaying their white male privilege that they try to keep secret on this forum so they can pretend to be woke? Or is it bni, busted for being a fake black?

 

[Riveting-]

I doubt that would help them. But possibly strong psychotic drugs - although they may already be using them.

 

[Telling The Truth]

I doubt that would help them. But possibly strong psychotic drugs - although they may already be using them.

 

[bonefish1]

The cnn link says the testimony from Auten was that "Steele refused to provide the names of any of his sources during that meeting (in Oct. 2016), and that Steele didn’t give the FBI anything during that meeting that corroborated the claims in his explosive dossier." So you think the FBI, knowing that, did not have a basis for saying there was no evidence that the allegations in the dossier were true?


The DOJ doesn't do that?? Thanks for the laugh.

You think that the DOJ would not cross such an ethical line even though you know they later used the dossier against Trump knowing it had not been verified? Was that news not mentioned on msnbc?

Or do you mean the FBI would not have announced the 'proof', but instead leaked it to NYT to publish? I could agree with that.



Many other fake leads to "investigate," but the dossier was the big one for which the HC campaign was busted by the FEC.

How corrupt does an agency have to be before you stop naively believing whatever they tell you?

Keep in mind, you're dealing with people who also believe what Hamas and the Palestinians tell them over what Israel says.

 

[BuilderBob6]

Keep in mind, you're dealing with people who also believe what Hamas and the Palestinians tell them over what Israel says.

Really? Where do you get that?

 

[BuilderBob6]

The cnn link says the testimony from Auten was that "Steele refused to provide the names of any of his sources during that meeting (in Oct. 2016), and that Steele didn’t give the FBI anything during that meeting that corroborated the claims in his explosive dossier." So you think the FBI, knowing that, did not have a basis for saying there was no evidence that the allegations in the dossier were true?


The DOJ doesn't do that?? Thanks for the laugh.

You think that the DOJ would not cross such an ethical line even though you know they later used the dossier against Trump knowing it had not been verified? Was that news not mentioned on msnbc?

Or do you mean the FBI would not have announced the 'proof', but instead leaked it to NYT to publish? I could agree with that.



Many other fake leads to "investigate," but the dossier was the big one for which the HC campaign was busted by the FEC.

How corrupt does an agency have to be before you stop naively believing whatever they tell you?

Jfc. Your argument is the FBI should go public and say the dossier was fake……..when the public had no knowledge of it or the investigation at the time. ? Wtf.

Your reason for them not doing so was because they knew the dossier was fake and they would look stupid. Kinda putting the cart in front of the horse here aren’t you? Lol. “We haven’t completed our investigation yet……the one you know nothing about…….but we wanted to make sure you knew, before the election, that this one piece of it, which you also know nothing about, is not true.”


In October of 16, the FBI had barely begun to investigate the dossier. You’re assuming that because Steele refused to give up his sources it means the dossier was BS. The FBI was just starting its investigation.

How the FBI attempted to verify a salacious allegation in the Steele dossier

The Justice Department inspector general's report released Monday paints a more thorough picture than ever before on what the FBI found when it tried to verify information in Christopher Steele's dossier on Donald Trump and Russia -- including attempts to verify the existence of video tapes of...

amp.cnn.com

“Beginning in mid-November 2016, the effort to verify the dossier began, Horowitz said.”

You believe the evil DOJ is full of corrupt liberals who are out to get trump………because of the dossier. I expect your next theory to be the dossier killed JFK. How does anyone debate you intelligently when you are so locked in on that belief? Do you give them credit for the terrorist attacks they’ve thwarted, the drug organizations they’ve taken down, the DEMOCRATS they’ve indicted? You have no trust in them but you trust trump lol?

Why don’t you tell me all the times the FBI has went after political figures close to an election, besides Hillary.

 

[Riveting-]

Why don’t you tell me all the times the FBI has went after political figures close to an election, besides Hillary.

All the times the FBI has went after them?

According to Zuck and the released Twitter emails, the FBI went after Trump by covering up the laptop from Hunter that they knew was legit. Too far back for you to remember - or not covered on msnbc?

 

[BuilderBob6]

All the times the FBI has went after them?

According to Zuck and the released Twitter emails, the FBI went after Trump by covering up the laptop from Hunter that they knew was legit. Too far back for you to remember - or not covered on msnbc?

Lol. So you ignore 90% of the post contradicting you after jumping in with some hare-brained explanation about why the FBI didn’t go public with an investigation that was ongoing.

In the part of the post you did respond to, you deleted the words “close to an election”, completely changing the meaning.

You’re not serious, at all. It doesn’t bother you at all to be so disingenuous.

 

[bonefish1]

Really? Where do you get that?

Do you ever watch the news?

When a MSM new station like CNN reports something to the effect of
"Hamas and Palestinian authorities report that Israel bombed a children's hospital killing 18 and wounding 45....."
Do you really believe it? (well, I know you do, but I'm talking about someone who's not blinded by their liberal mindset).

Where are the reports that Hamas hides weapons and fires rockets from hospitals, schools and residential areas, uses civilians as human shields and then whines about the collateral damage which the liberal, anti-semtic MSM laps up like a thirsty camel.

The Latest | Israel bombs another UN-run school in Gaza, a day after strike on school killed 33

Israel’s military struck what it says was a Hamas position inside a U.N.-run school in northern Gaza.

apnews.com

 

[Telling The Truth]

All the times the FBI has went after them?

According to Zuck and the released Twitter emails, the FBI went after Trump by covering up the laptop from Hunter that they knew was legit. Too far back for you to remember - or not covered on msnbc?

 

[Riveting-]

Lol. So you ignore 90% of the post contradicting you after jumping in with some hare-brained explanation about why the FBI didn’t go public with an investigation that was ongoing.

I'll answer the rest of it in the next day or so. You're the one who hides, Bob.

In the part of the post you did respond to, you deleted the words “close to an election”, completely changing the meaning.

The example I gave was from right before the 2020 election. You comment here makes no sense, not that I expected it to.

You’re not serious, at all. It doesn’t bother you at all to be so disingenuous.

You know that is not true, Bob. It is your TDS impairing what little judgement you have.

 

[Riveting-]

Jfc. Your argument is the FBI should go public and say the dossier was fake……..when the public had no knowledge of it or the investigation at the time. ? Wtf.

My argument is always that the FBI should act honesty and not get involved in elections.

Your reason for them not doing so was because they knew the dossier was fake and they would look stupid.

They would have looked smart and honest, not stupid and corrupt like they ended up looking after they later used the dossier even knowing it was fake.

Kinda putting the cart in front of the horse here aren’t you? Lol. “We haven’t completed our investigation yet……the one you know nothing about…….but we wanted to make sure you knew, before the election, that this one piece of it, which you also know nothing about, is not true.”

They finished the investigation when the guy who provided the dossier couldn't verify it even for a 1 Mil bribe. They knew Clinton paid for the dossier. The honorable thing to do, not that that would be of interest to the FBI or a knee-jerk lib like you, would have been to say they had found no truth to a dossier that Clinton had been shopping to the press - along with a fake story about a server back channnel with a Russian bank that Clinton arranged for Slate to publish. The FBI knew the intent of the fake dossier - to make Trump look bad before the election. Once Trump surprised everyone and won the election, the dossier took on a new corrupt purpose.

In October of 16, the FBI had barely begun to investigate the dossier. You’re assuming that because Steele refused to give up his sources it means the dossier was BS. The FBI was just starting its investigation.

Baloney. It ended when Steele couldn't verify any of it even for $1 Mil. Any investigation after that was corruption to try to get Trump, the outsider they didn't like.

How the FBI attempted to verify a salacious allegation in the Steele dossier

The Justice Department inspector general's report released Monday paints a more thorough picture than ever before on what the FBI found when it tried to verify information in Christopher Steele's dossier on Donald Trump and Russia -- including attempts to verify the existence of video tapes of...

amp.cnn.com

“Beginning in mid-November 2016, the effort to verify the dossier began, Horowitz said.”

You believe the evil DOJ is full of corrupt liberals who are out to get trump………because of the dossier.

No, but I believe the top levels of the DOJ and FBI are full of corrupt insiders who are neither lib or conservative, but just interested in preserving and advancing their own positions by working on behalf of whichever candidate will be easiest to control.

I expect your next theory to be the dossier killed JFK. How does anyone debate you intelligently when you are so locked in on that belief? Do you give them credit for the terrorist attacks they’ve thwarted, the drug organizations they’ve taken down, the DEMOCRATS they’ve indicted? You have no trust in them but you trust trump lol?

Sure, I give them credit for the non-corrupt actions they have taken to protect the nation. Trying to take Trump down was not one of those actions, obviously, even if you can't see it because of your TDS rage.

Why don’t you tell me all the times the FBI has went after political figures close to an election, besides Hillary.

Trump in the 2020 election.

 

[Telling The Truth]

My argument is always that the FBI should act honesty and not get involved in elections.


They would have looked smart and honest, not stupid and corrupt like they ended up looking after they later used the dossier even knowing it was fake.


They finished the investigation when the guy who provided the dossier couldn't verify it even for a 1 Mil bribe. They knew Clinton paid for the dossier. The honorable thing to do, not that that would be of interest to the FBI or a knee-jerk lib like you, would have been to say they had found no truth to a dossier that Clinton had been shopping to the press - along with a fake story about a server back channnel with a Russian bank that Clinton arranged for Slate to publish. The FBI knew the intent of the fake dossier - to make Trump look bad before the election. Once Trump surprised everyone and won the election, the dossier took on a new corrupt purpose.


Baloney. It ended when Steele couldn't verify any of it even for $1 Mil. Any investigation after that was corruption to try to get Trump, the outsider they didn't like.

No, but I believe the top levels of the DOJ and FBI are full of corrupt insiders who are neither lib or conservative, but just interested in preserving and advancing their own positions by working on behalf of whichever candidate will be easiest to control.


Sure, I give them credit for the non-corrupt actions they have taken to protect the nation. Trying to take Trump down was not one of those actions, obviously, even if you can't see it because of your TDS rage.


Trump in the 2020 election.

 

[Riveting-]

Out of blatantly racist memes for the day, JM?

 

[Telling The Truth]

Out of blatantly racist memes for the day, JM?

Are you responding from federal custody in Fort Worth, Timothy?