ADVERTISEMENT

Time to shorten the rotation….

Yeah it's been clear Hunter is this years whipping boy and next year it will be someone else. Par for the course for this forum.

Here is the rub, not one of us on here knows the 'work' he has or hasn't put in because we are basing it on just our own perception and no first hand knowledge. Maybe he works out all the time but doesn't eat right or doesn't have the metabolism to build the muscle you are expecting to see. Look at JJ as an example, he was skinny his entire time here.

He has something mental going on. Whether it's confidence or what, I don't know but he has shown in the past that he is capable, he just needs to find that groove again. If he does or not, that it up to him.
Agreed we don’t know how much work he has put in. Hunter was one of the most prolific scorers in Indiana high school basketball history. His expectations were pretty high when he committed to Purdue. It’s certainly hard to understand why he can’t score or handle the ball when pressed as a senior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
I agree, but we also look for the post WayTo Much. Put ball in Iveys hands, Coach Gard did with his best player. Trevion didn't get enough minutes tonight, at least he is willing to keep offense moving with a pass. We get too stagnet.
They clogged the lane when Jaden had the ball trying to prevent him from getting to the rim. Could you imagine the score had Purdue went to Zach early in the game? He was 10/17 and 10 rebounds. He and Trevion who was somewhat MIA shot 50% from the line...THAT has to improve. Zach 4/8 and Trevion 2/4 and how many were front ends? Anyone on the team match those (Zach's) numbers or come close? Purdue got off to a bad start with hurried shots and not looking inside enough...and of course it wasn't Trevions finest game. When the offense stalls it is usually due to players not doing the little things concerning screens and timing, but even with the poorer offense...everyone can defend which didn't happen IMO
 
Agreed we don’t know how much work he has put in. Hunter was one of the most prolific scorers in Indiana high school basketball history. His expectations were pretty high when he committed to Purdue. It’s certainly hard to understand why he can’t score or handle the ball when pressed as a senior.
I "wonder" if he is just trying to be that coach on the floor and forgetting to play. No question he IS capable of more and I hope he figures it out soon...
 
Hunter is flat killing Purdue...he provides absolutely nothing at either end. Matt has indeed tried and tried and tried, but, at this point, it is time to quit trying...or, at least quit forcefully trying...having him on the floor last night for 20 minutes made absolutely no sense at all. It is a Hunter issue at this point...nothing anybody else can do to resolve it, and, he has not been able to resolve it either unfortunately...it truly is mystifying, but, at this point, it is time to just accept it for what it is.

Painter is still trying to find a lineup that works defensively, and, said as much after the game...but, it is just not there unfortunately with this team...this team is going to win games at the offensive end and not at the defensive end. That does not mean that they don't continue to work at/on that obviously, and, if somehow things got better there, it would be a bonus and very much welcomed...but, he needs to have guys that can score on the floor...having guys that can't defend AND can't score is a recipe for exactly what happened last night.
Ya know, I think had Purdue had good effort in feeding the post with focus and scoring early it would have helped with the 3 ball and the two together would open up some driving lanes. With all the warts most think Purdue is talented enough to go far in the tourney, but they must understand they are marked and be ready to play with focus on both ends from the start. Not allowed to trade players and so they have to do what they can...which if the do will beat enough teams this team will be remembered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Do Dah Day
Best point made here, and a very valid one at that....this team is essentially the same team as last year right now. When it played well early, it was largely because of Furst, offense from Newman, and, because Ivey was much more under control...Furst has been noticeably different as you noted...Newman is AWOL completely...and Ivey is on some self-promotion tour of sorts.

Furst is simply too good...and, he needs to play...for that matter, I would have him back in the starting rotation...that was where he flourished, and, Purdue was better as well. That is not a knock on Gillis in any way, as, he is more than capable and played well also...but, Furst does some different things (namely, run the floor and get easy baskets around the rim as a result or off of rebounds), and, he played with such comfort in that role. His "troubles" seemed to start with some alleged foot injury...then he missed time due to Covid protocol...but, for this team to be its best, he will be a big part of that (just as he was at the start of the year).

Newman got 6 minutes last night...that simply can't happen...not when Morton and Hunter got 20 each. He is a streaky guy for sure, but, he can score, and, as already stated here or in other threads, THIS team is going to win by scoring, and, that is something Newman can excel at. He is no worse defensively than other guys getting minutes, and, frankly, there is nobody on this team that is so good at that end that they need to be getting more minutes as a result.

Ivey...special talent/special player IF he plays under control and as part of a team opposed to an individual, and, that was totally not the case last night...it dissolved REALLY quickly into a personal matter with Davis, and, Davis simply could not have been more superior in literally EVERY single way.

Painter is a tremendous coach, but, he had a tough night last night...and, I had alluded to it previously, but, last night was the first time that it stood out to me at least that Johnson is not near what Shrewsberry was...or maybe even Gary.

I appreciate Painter's defensive philosophy and it has served him/Purdue well way more often than not, but, there have been two games now where a guy more or less single-handedly beat Purdue (and a third if you include Nicholls where a guy single handedly kept them in it)...and, if he is not willing to adjust in those types of situations, it won't be the last time that happens...and, I can almost guarantee it will happen in March. I mean there was a play late last night after Davis had already scored 30 where he hit a WIDE open and uncontested 3...that is just ridiculous...frankly, I would have been fine if Purdue had 5 guys on him and somebody else scored a wide open layup as a result, as, I at least could have respected the fact that they knew that the only guy that could not be left open was the guy that instead was indeed left wide open.
like the comments on Jaden and Brandon...and especially like the comments on defending Davis. Much of that I discussed here and this video at .03 shows the defensive lapse of Ethan...who no way more at fault than any other name on the team. Not only is he down too low, but he has no idea where Davis is as Davis is walking up the arc holding his hands up to say...nobody is defending me.
 
Last edited:
Hunter in his senior year is a career 37.9 percent FG shooter....29.8 from 3!!! He needs less minutes....It's been four years of him being an offensive liability....At this point if rather of given Waddell a chance
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChoiceBeef
Hunter in his senior year is a career 37.9 percent FG shooter....29.8 from 3!!! He needs less minutes....It's been four years of him being an offensive liability....At this point if rather of given Waddell a chance
Waddell is not a point guard.
 
Yeah it's been clear Hunter is this years whipping boy and next year it will be someone else. Par for the course for this forum.

Here is the rub, not one of us on here knows the 'work' he has or hasn't put in because we are basing it on just our own perception and no first hand knowledge. Maybe he works out all the time but doesn't eat right or doesn't have the metabolism to build the muscle you are expecting to see. Look at JJ as an example, he was skinny his entire time here.

He has something mental going on. Whether it's confidence or what, I don't know but he has shown in the past that he is capable, he just needs to find that groove again. If he does or not, that it up to him.
I'll agree we don't know the work he's put in. It just appears he hasn't. And not sure talking about his lack of production would constitute him being a "whipping boy".
 
  • Like
Reactions: mathboy
On the positive side, if we're going to have a slump, I guess now is better than March. Much like a few years ago, this team could still be very dangerous in the tournament because it has a guard capable of exploding (Ivey, like Edwards before him). There's still a long way to go, but we're kind of behind the eight ball now in the Big Ten with a home loss to Wisconsin and a loss to Rutgers.

Also I #$%!ing hate Wisconsin. We owe them some serious retribution for all the bad memories over the years. :D
Agree about Pissconsin. ****ing hate that school too.
 
Nope but we shall see. I am happy to be wrong. Hopefully we don't draw N. Texas again or a team with an athletic shooting guard like Nichols.
Clearly you aren't watching the games or you would know we beat them. You've been outed, go back to peegs.
 
Clearly you aren't watching the games or you would know we beat them. You've been outed, go back to peegs.
The point is they scored 90 points. WI is not an elite offense by any means and had they been halfway capable shooting 3s they would have scored 90. Have watched games since the 1960s which is why I laugh when folks began to call this one of the best Purdue teams ever. Before Keady and Painter we actually did make it to a couple of FFs. I think you have been outed. When you don't have a decent argument just resort to name calling. I don't question anyone's loyalty to Purdue. It is not a program for bandwagon fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnboiler123
No it is a scapegoat. Every year this forums singles someone out. Been going on forever and will just continue. Hunter is capable of playing well as he has done it before, he just needs to figure out and fix whatever is holding him back.

But we can just agree to disagree. I appreciate the exchange as you see the bigger picture compared to others.

IT was the forum whipping boy, until he shot 3's at 50%.
I dont' agree EH is one. Not many are trashing him, most are still hoping he turns it around.
But no mistaking the slippage that is now
It just seems like Painter doesn't believe Morton is the answer as the primary ball handler. Morton is doing some really nice things on the floor but I haven't seen him bring the ball up the court more than once or twice the whole year. Makes me wonder if he truly can play that role. I know he played the point in high school but there aren't a lot of 6'6" guys playing the point in the B10.

If he was having any kind of success in practice doing it, I would think we would at least seen a little bit of it by now given the struggles that Hunter has had and IT's inconsistency.
Crap, those are very good points..... but... When do we ever apply the kind of pressure that would show that? in practice? Or games? If we don't play that way, we probably don't practice that way. And it's often quickness, length and athleticism that makes pressure work. If you don't have it, how do you practice against it? What works against avg speed/length guys in practice doesn't fly against burners and freakish athletes.
 
It just seems like Painter doesn't believe Morton is the answer as the primary ball handler. Morton is doing some really nice things on the floor but I haven't seen him bring the ball up the court more than once or twice the whole year. Makes me wonder if he truly can play that role. I know he played the point in high school but there aren't a lot of 6'6" guys playing the point in the B10.

If he was having any kind of success in practice doing it, I would think we would at least seen a little bit of it by now given the struggles that Hunter has had and IT's inconsistency.
didn't I just see that Purdue offered a 6'7" pg freshman in Indy a few days ago?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B and TX4GB
Yeah it's been clear Hunter is this years whipping boy and next year it will be someone else. Par for the course for this forum.

Here is the rub, not one of us on here knows the 'work' he has or hasn't put in because we are basing it on just our own perception and no first hand knowledge. Maybe he works out all the time but doesn't eat right or doesn't have the metabolism to build the muscle you are expecting to see. Look at JJ as an example, he was skinny his entire time here.

He has something mental going on. Whether it's confidence or what, I don't know but he has shown in the past that he is capable, he just needs to find that groove again. If he does or not, that it up to him.
I agree. I suspect Hunter will have at least a few 'moments' this year where he saves our asses. No one wants to win more than the guys on the team busting their asses in practice everyday.
 
My take is that Wisconsin was not denying the post and was not leaving Purdue’s better perimeter shooters, but was defending the post by fouling just about every time Purdue’s centers caught the ball, both before and during the shot. This strategy worked for a while, but as the game went on they were getting away with it less and less. The Boilers needed to go through the post every possession down the stretch as it was working very well at that point, but there were some bad decisions that basically amounted to wasted possessions including an out of control drive by Ivey and a three point attempt by Hunter that Wisconsin was glad to give up. I felt like that was the difference.

On defense, this team has the ability to be good, but they aren’t connected. It comes down to attention to detail and the players with the most physical ability appear to really struggle in this respect.
 
My take is that Wisconsin was not denying the post and was not leaving Purdue’s better perimeter shooters, but was defending the post by fouling just about every time Purdue’s centers caught the ball, both before and during the shot. This strategy worked for a while, but as the game went on they were getting away with it less and less. The Boilers needed to go through the post every possession down the stretch as it was working very well at that point, but there were some bad decisions that basically amounted to wasted possessions including an out of control drive by Ivey and a three point attempt by Hunter that Wisconsin was glad to give up. I felt like that was the difference.

On defense, this team has the ability to be good, but they aren’t connected. It comes down to attention to detail and the players with the most physical ability appear to really struggle in this respect.
Add in Ivey missing 10 minutes of the first half, 2 pick six turnovers, Sasha being off, meh FT shooting, and some “disconnectedness” on defense, and you have a loss.
 
Add in Ivey missing 10 minutes of the first half, 2 pick six turnovers, Sasha being off, meh FT shooting, and some “disconnectedness” on defense, and you have a loss.
Bottom line is Ivey needs to play 35 minutes like any other lottery pick and Williams and Edey need to play as much as they can, People like to call this the deepest Purdue team ever but there really is a big drop-off after these three guys. Sasha is good when he's on but the rest of the guys are just role players and aren't any better (some even worse) than other B10 teams 4 through 8 guys.
 
Bottom line is Ivey needs to play 35 minutes like any other lottery pick and Williams and Edey need to play as much as they can, People like to call this the deepest Purdue team ever but there really is a big drop-off after these three guys. Sasha is good when he's on but the rest of the guys are just role players and aren't any better (some even worse) than other B10 teams 4 through 8 guys.
Furst is a role player? What a ridiculous thought.
 
Furst is a role player? What a ridiculous thought.
In three B10 games he's made one basket and has 7 rebounds and has no assist in 35 minutes. In the last 6 games he's scored a total of 10 points and has 16 rebounds, 2 assist and 6 turnovers. From all indications he's lost his starting role to Gillis whose totally outplayed him as of late.

I'm not picking on him because he'll be good player for Purdue but you brought him up.
 
In three B10 games he's made one basket and has 7 rebounds and has no assist in 35 minutes. In the last 6 games he's scored a total of 10 points and has 16 rebounds, 2 assist and 6 turnovers. From all indications he's lost his starting role to Gillis whose totally outplayed him as of late.

I'm not picking on him because he'll be good player for Purdue but you brought him up.
You do understand he had a foot injury and then Covid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Level 42
Newman is more than capable...he is just lost right now, and, getting more lost seemingly given the lack of minutes.

Newman's game regressed last year when he came out of the lineup and he struggled the rest of the year. He was good this year with his role, but, that has changed as well unfortunately. Regardless, he simply has to play more than 6 minutes...he is too good (or capable of it at least) to not be on the floor more than that, especially if/when Purdue is struggling to score.

And, personally, you hit on what I would like to see...I want to see Newman on the floor WITH Ivey...it does not happen often and has not happened often, but, I would like to see it...those two guys are close and I think would play well together potentially. At this point, nothing to be lost with trying it at least I would contend. I would like to see the two of them on the floor with Williams in particular (as he does not bog down the middle as much as Edey does, and, he is so much better at passing out of the post as well).
Newmans minutes are dropping because he's getting lost on D and taking bad shots.
NOT a recipe for more minutes regardless of what you think his potential is.
At this point he seems to have lost more minutes than anyone else on the team.
That's on him.
 
That's on him.
Yes! Once the player gets on the court it is on them to do what is asked and capable or not, they are the ones responsible, not Painter. They need to make the shots, put in the effort, get the 50/50 balls and play with some determination.

And I think top to bottom every player on the team is capable of all of that, they just need to execute when given the opportunity.
 
Newmans minutes are dropping because he's getting lost on D and taking bad shots.
NOT a recipe for more minutes regardless of what you think his potential is.
At this point he seems to have lost more minutes than anyone else on the team.
That's on him.
He's also being extremely careless with the ball. I think it was the NC State game, where he was in the weave and literally handed the ball to the defender for a wide open dunk.

He looks disinterested out there and that's not what we need when the teams struggling. I think everyone would love to see him play more and to take the pressure off Ivey and Sasha as the main outside threats but he's not shown it so far this season
 
Newmans minutes are dropping because he's getting lost on D and taking bad shots.
NOT a recipe for more minutes regardless of what you think his potential is.
At this point he seems to have lost more minutes than anyone else on the team.
That's on him.
While true in part, not entirely...in fact, crazy (if not craziest) of all things, he subbed twice simply for defense the other night to guard Davis while Ivey was in foul trouble.

His "bad shot" label is overblown...incredibly so relative to Ivey (or Hunter).

He has the "instant offense" label or what not coming off of the bench...or did...which, played a part in his trying to get shots up...then, as minutes were harder to come by, it only led to his trying to score even more in less minutes which is what ultimately translated to "bad shot selection".

If indeed it was a case of just hunting shots and not playing defense (which, ironically, could be the assertion made for Ivey), I would agree...but, that has not been the case going back to Butler for Newman...and, his not getting minutes in spite of it has to raise some questions (even if only to him).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChoiceBeef
He's also being extremely careless with the ball. I think it was the NC State game, where he was in the weave and literally handed the ball to the defender for a wide open dunk.

He looks disinterested out there and that's not what we need when the teams struggling. I think everyone would love to see him play more and to take the pressure off Ivey and Sasha as the main outside threats but he's not shown it so far this season
It might be true to an extent with respect to carelessness with the ball, but, he pales in comparison in that regard to Hunter (who has played 4 years), and, there are others that are as careless or more as well.

I just know this...the kid is talented (he has shown it a number of times in two years), and, for Purdue to be as good as it can be, it will need him to contribute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerMaker P
Bottom line is Ivey needs to play 35 minutes like any other lottery pick and Williams and Edey need to play as much as they can, People like to call this the deepest Purdue team ever but there really is a big drop-off after these three guys. Sasha is good when he's on but the rest of the guys are just role players and aren't any better (some even worse) than other B10 teams 4 through 8 guys.
Which B1G teams have guys at 5-8 that in your mind are better than Purdue's options (keeping in mind that Edey or Williams is essentially "6" for Purdue, and, Furst or Gillis in turn is "7")?
 
Which B1G teams have guys at 5-8 that in your mind are better than Purdue's options (keeping in mind that Edey or Williams is essentially "6" for Purdue, and, Furst or Gillis in turn is "7")?
First of all I said other teams 4 through 8. Secondly I said Purdue's three best players Williams, Edey and Ivey need to be on the court as much as possible. I also said Sasha needs minutes. I'm not going through team by team and look at stats to see whose getting what from their 4-8 guys but I would assume a lot of teams are getting production from their 4 through 8 guys equal to these numbers from Purdue's 5-10 guys (B10 stats)

Gillis 7ppg and 2.7 Rebounds
Hunter shooting 29% overall, 38% from 3. 4 ppg.
Newman shooting 17% overall, 20% from 3. 2.7 ppg.
Morton shooting 33% overall, 67% from 3 (2/3). 2.3 ppg.
Thompson shooting 0% overall 1.7 ppg.
Furst shooting 50% overall (1/2), 0.7 ppg.

Gillis is at least giving us some points and Morton has played a decent floor game but the rest of the guys aren't giving us much.

My point is I'd like to see Ivey (and Sasha) get close to 35 minutes per game because his play has been far superior to the alternatives. Carson Edwards payed over 35 minutes a game in 2018-2019 and Cline played 34. E. Moore did it and even Eric Hunter averaged over 30 minutes a game the last two years.

Ivey is currently averaging 28 and Sasha 27. You could argue the Sasha thing but Ivey needs to play more.
 
While true in part, not entirely...in fact, crazy (if not craziest) of all things, he subbed twice simply for defense the other night to guard Davis while Ivey was in foul trouble.

His "bad shot" label is overblown...incredibly so relative to Ivey (or Hunter).

He has the "instant offense" label or what not coming off of the bench...or did...which, played a part in his trying to get shots up...then, as minutes were harder to come by, it only led to his trying to score even more in less minutes which is what ultimately translated to "bad shot selection".

If indeed it was a case of just hunting shots and not playing defense (which, ironically, could be the assertion made for Ivey), I would agree...but, that has not been the case going back to Butler for Newman...and, his not getting minutes in spite of it has to raise some questions (even if only to him).
I"ve WATCHED Matt giving him grief as he's getting benched for HUNTING SHOTS, so not sure where you are getting your ideas.
And you can't compare a role player (shooter) who's not making his shots to your star that has the ball in his hands a lot against the best defender they have.
are you?
 
First of all I said other teams 4 through 8. Secondly I said Purdue's three best players Williams, Edey and Ivey need to be on the court as much as possible. I also said Sasha needs minutes. I'm not going through team by team and look at stats to see whose getting what from their 4-8 guys but I would assume a lot of teams are getting production from their 4 through 8 guys equal to these numbers from Purdue's 5-10 guys (B10 stats)

Gillis 7ppg and 2.7 Rebounds
Hunter shooting 29% overall, 38% from 3. 4 ppg.
Newman shooting 17% overall, 20% from 3. 2.7 ppg.
Morton shooting 33% overall, 67% from 3 (2/3). 2.3 ppg.
Thompson shooting 0% overall 1.7 ppg.
Furst shooting 50% overall (1/2), 0.7 ppg.

Gillis is at least giving us some points and Morton has played a decent floor game but the rest of the guys aren't giving us much.

My point is I'd like to see Ivey (and Sasha) get close to 35 minutes per game because his play has been far superior to the alternatives. Carson Edwards payed over 35 minutes a game in 2018-2019 and Cline played 34. E. Moore did it and even Eric Hunter averaged over 30 minutes a game the last two years.

Ivey is currently averaging 28 and Sasha 27. You could argue the Sasha thing but Ivey needs to play more.
Your assertion, at least as I took it, was that Purdue's depth was overrated...and, if so...we don't agree on that point...in Purdue's own case, or, relative to other teams in the conference...and, while you did include Edey and Williams as two of the best 3 players (accurately), only one of the 2 is on the floor at a time, so, one is not in the top 5...and, either is better than just about any other team's 6th guy as such.

Isaiah was hurt in the Iowa game (and, based on what happened in that game and since, I would contend he is not healed), but, his numbers for that and the Rutgers game can be thrown out...does not mean that Purdue does not need more from him, but, it is not a coincidence that his numbers are bad in light of the circumstances and started with the Iowa game/injury.

The same more or less for Furst...his foot injury was noted for the Rutgers game...and, his numbers from that point on (including it), are incredibly different than before...and, throw out Rutgers and Wisconsin in that he did not play enough in either to do anything (due to injury/illness).

Gillis...to your point...has been at least fine, if not better, but even at that...he barely played the last 20 minutes on Monday after a very solid first half.

Morton is never going to generate numbers (at least this year)...he does not look to score, and, is not a threat to do so...nor is he a guy that is going to distribute or rebound (probably greatest detriment given he is playing the 4) in the role that he has.

That leaves Hunter and Newman...Newman has not delivered...not fair to include Wisconsin in that he was given no chance to do so, but, he has not in the other games.

Thus, the primary guy not performing is indeed the guy that has been referenced any number of times in this thread or others, and, it is the guy that is holding Purdue back the most in light of it, more so in light of Isaiah's injury and situation. But, he and Newman together are indeed where Purdue is really suffering with respect to not getting production from the guys deeper in the rotation.

I am absolutely in agreement that Ivey should indeed be playing more minutes (although, it comes with the issue of his not playing any defense virtually, which, is a huge issue right now), and, had he not picked up two fouls in pretty quick fashion on Monday, I can only assume that he would have...and, that Sasha could be, but, only if he is contributing as he is not very helpful otherwise (and, lacks the ability to score that Newman does in ways other than just floating around the perimeter).

I could very well be wrong, but, I don't feel like Ivey's or Sasha's overall minutes are why Purdue did not beat Rutgers or Wisconsin, struggled mightily against NC St., and, struggled with Iowa...I admittedly did not look to see what they played in those games (I know Ivey was limited as I had just said above against Wisconsin due to fouls), but, I don't think their minutes were the key factors in those games...like say, I may very well be wrong.
 
I"ve WATCHED Matt giving him grief as he's getting benched for HUNTING SHOTS, so not sure where you are getting your ideas.
And you can't compare a role player (shooter) who's not making his shots to your star that has the ball in his hands a lot against the best defender they have.
are you?
I am not trying to literally compare anyone, but, if the problem is allegedly handling the ball or hunting shots, I am simply pointing out that there is a double standard is all...to some extent, that makes sense, but, certainly not entirely.

I did say that Newman was having an issue with respect to hunting shots...but, it has not been the case since the Butler game and forward...thus, that issue was seemingly addressed...and, I explained why I felt it was happening before that.

We can agree to disagree, but, Newman was in no way why what happened the other night did...his lack of minutes may have been as impactful from a negative fashion, or, potential positive one.
 
Not sure why some of these players are getting playing time.
I do not think Matt wants to shorten the rotation. I believe he thinks the rotation is capable of producing wins with the full rotation. I think he believes the difference between winning and losing with a long rotation is on the defensive side of the ball and probably considers "focus", "connected", and "playing hard" something they all can do...and do well enough to win and probably thinks the less minutes each player has the more likely that opportunity on D.

We as fans also want a longer rotation. (I'm not disagreeing with being better with fewer equality of minutes might immediately improve.) The reason we fans want a longer rotation is that it provides for better competition in practice and better legs later in the season "WHEN" the rotation does get shortened at some time. The last thing Purdue fans should want is Purdue peaking early. We need struggles....wins, but struggles. You want to win, but you want players hungry and competitive and "IF" you can win while playing 10 at THIS point in time...you want that. Course, you have to win...but if you shorten the rotation and don't win it is even worse.

I think Purdue can and should win and "hope" for the next two months it does so with a longer bench and then "turn them loose" to make a run in the Big Tourney and NCAA...but you have to win before turning them loose...
 
Morton is never going to generate numbers (at least this year)...he does not look to score, and, is not a threat to do so...nor is he a guy that is going to distribute or rebound (probably greatest detriment given he is playing the 4) in the role that he has.
I agree that Morton should look to score more, especially because he's shooting 50%+ from 3 this season. He is, in my eyes top 3 on the team in passing ability. He's got the second highest assists per 40 rate on the team and the second lowest turnovers per 40 (only behind Gillis by .1). And he's only 1 total assist behind Ivey, despite playing 100 fewer minutes

Personally, I'd like to see him play the 1 over IT and Hunter and let Gillis/Furst play the 4 more often. If he's playing the 1, he rebounds better than the other two PGs and lets Gillis/Furst show off their rebounding from the 4
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B and DAG10
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT