WTF are you talking about? Please give examples for Trump. As I said before, I don't think you can because you're talking out of your media master's asses.
Calling someone a racist because you have a different opinion of how they think or believe is pretty offensive. Just my opinion, you seem to have a very inclusive interpretation of what a racist person is.
Having a different opinion of how people think or believe is not racist. What are you talking about? If it offends you, perhaps. But it ain't racism.
I figured that you would think LBJ was a racist. I knew that you would. Are there any racist republicans in your mind? If so who?
Are you insinuating he is a black gay because (a) he is a conservative or (b) because you are against gays - or (c) both?
I hesitate to call the man gay. But a dude well into his 50s that is not married raises flags. Nobody has seen him on public with a woman. Same goes for Lindsey Graham.
Yeah I don’t go for that gay stuff.
So LBJ using the N word all the time doesn't make him racist? Jesus, you yourself just called the man a stone cold racist. Now you're trying to play as if he's not? Try to get your story straight.
Where did you even get the idea to question these things about Scott? This has never crossed my mind and never would have until I read it from you. First of all because I do not give a rip about the dude's personal life. If he's married or not. Gay or not. I don't care. He's a good man. That's all I care about.
I've always said that LBJ was a racist. Not sure how you interpret my post that I'm playing as if he is not.
Just simple and obvious observations of both Tim Scott and Lindsey Graham for that matter over the years. Tim Scott is 58 and Lindsey Graham is 69. Don't you think that is odd for both of them not to be married? No one has seen them attend functions with any significant others. Then all of a sudden Tim Scott is greeted by this woman seemingly out of nowhere at the repub presidential nominee debate. Even though being married is not a requirement to be president, there is an image of a family that gets attention for candidates. Obviously if they are in love and it is a real engagement the wedding next month will go on as planned. If their union is not real I don't see how the engagement can go on.
And what are you doing for the kids "that do want to learn"? You are forcing them to stay in that same classroom with the kids that are distractions. You don't see it?
Seperate schools? lol
If the Republicans were just as racist as the Democrats then why did Republicans fight and die to free the slaves? I swear sometimes I wonder if you ever stop and think about what you're saying.
claremontreviewofbooks.com
No I don't think it's odd. Why? Because I don't care. Their private life is their private life. I don't care and neither should you, or anyone for that matter.
I told y'all several times that the republicans didn't become the party of racism until the mid 1960s when Barry Goldwater evicted blacks from the republican party in 1964, that you failed to believe, not during the civil war. The racist dixiecrats loved Goldwater and passed the racist torch over to the republicans. Even prior to the 60s, the republicans was just as complicit in Jim Crow as much as the dixicrats.If the Republicans were just as racist as the Democrats then why did Republicans fight and die to free the slaves? I swear sometimes I wonder if you ever stop and think about what you're saying.
The methods like separate water fountains and bathrooms was only in the South. So no, the entire country isn't liable for it happening. Like it or not, right or wrong, it was a state by state issue because that's how our government was designed to perform. Not at the federal level.
Racists didn't go underground. They still did what they were going to do in the open while they were alive. But what people tend to not remember is that the people that lived and committed most of these atrocities are no longer alive. Their youth, and the youth of non racist people that had moved to these ares are the one's that moved the South toward Republicans. Yes, some racists did too because they had no home to in which to vote for their racist wants, but not as many as you'd think. That's why the South took decades to finally flip red.
This article will explain a lot, although I'm 100% certain you will either not read it or dismiss it because you're too entrenched into the lie.
The Myth of the Racist Republicans - Claremont Review of Books
He certainly did. Where do you get your vast collection of incorrect information?
Yeah, that’s what we were taught in K-12. However, when you take college level history class you get into more detail. You will learn that the Emancipation Proclamation was only a military document. This document allowed the slaves in the south to come fight for the Union army. The slaves in the northern states were still slaves.
www.archives.gov
I'm new to this whole site and made the clear mistake of finding this board, and while I have a whole host of issues with most of what's being said in this thread, I do have to ask how you think you're making any kind of point here.
Your statement was, "Lincoln, the so called emancipator did not free any slave during this Emancipation Proclamation."Yeah, that’s what we were taught in K-12. However, when you take college level history class you get into more detail. You will learn that the Emancipation Proclamation was only a military document. This document allowed the slaves in the south to come fight for the Union army. The slaves in the northern states were still slaves.
Emancipation Proclamation (1863)
EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863; Presidential Proclamations, 1791-1991; Record Group 11; General Records of the United States Government; National Archives.
"As the U.S. army advanced and expanded its reach, more enslaved people came into its lines. In fact, historian and author William Harris estimates that more than one million enslaved people had been freed by the war’s end."
acwm.org
Bni has some fellow libs on here from time to time, but several have fled recently in shame at having been duped about Biden by the regime media.
Again y’all call me racist or in your case a bigot without saying how. What did I say that is bigotry?
The problem is that you're wrong. This is a made up narrative by the progressive left with little supporting evidence. Did you even take the time to read the link I gave you? My guess is no by your repeated non-factual response here.
Once again, like you do with EVERYTHING. You're looking at things from a surface level. Lincoln wanted to ship the blacks back because he knew that even when they were free, there would be contention over it. Lincoln didn't hate blacks, but he didn't want a divided country either.
Let me rephrase it a bit then, because I don’t know you and apologize for calling you a bigot.
Like I said, he’s wasting his time. No one is saying anything substantive in this thread anyway.
You better believe the gay lifestyle is jacked up. God says in the Bible that it is an abomination. Then add in that transgender crap. So you don’t mind if a biological dude calls himself a chick and participate in woman’s sports? I side with the conservatives on this topic.
So you are a bigot. You’re literally no different than when someone yells the n word, which also makes you a hypocrite. Kind of wild that you spend most of your time in this thread talking about racism and then toss out some bigotry and stand behind it while failing to recognize the irony. Keep screaming into the void.
Were the slaves in the northern states free due to the Emancipation Proclamation?
I did. You just don’t think you’re a bigot. Rest assured that with your statements, you are.
That article you posted basically corroborates, perhaps it’s a matter semantics. The EP did not free the alaves in the north."As the U.S. army advanced and expanded its reach, more enslaved people came into its lines. In fact, historian and author William Harris estimates that more than one million enslaved people had been freed by the war’s end."
Myths & Misunderstandings: The Emancipation Proclamation Archives- American Civil War Museum
Earlier this summer, comments on one of our Facebook posts sparked a larger conversation about recurring debates about the Civil War. We …
If you say that I’m a bigot for saying that the gay lifestyle is jacked up then you must be part of that lifestyle and got offended. I can’t believe that I’m arguing with someone about homosexuality and bigotry. You are just an old troll with your at least 6 forum handles now.
You can think what you want, I don’t care. It’s lazy thinking on your part but you do you.
That’s the problem that I have with that gay stuff. Not only is it wrong in the eyes of God, but I don’t like it when the LGTQ community hijacked civil rights. Seem to have started back in the 90s. So no it’s not okay for you to call me the n-word as I said no derogatory name labeling the gay community. So that’s a false equivalent. If I did say any gay derogatory names then yes that would be bigotry and I did not. That’s all I’m going to say about this jacked discussion you started.
You actually started it with your initial comments, but semantics I guess. I’m just calling you out on it. The religion cop out is also laughable. I’m not religious but doesn’t Jesus preach about the golden rule and treating others as you want to be treated? Pick a lane.
