ADVERTISEMENT

This is the battlefield of the future.

This is the future of fighter planes. Those "Top Gun" fighter pilots will be extinct, just like horseback cavalry soldiers.
Might it be that traditional battlefields themselves where forces clash will become obsolete?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese
Might it be that traditional battlefields themselves where forces clash will become obsolete?
The is a circa 1955 science fiction story called "The Defenders" in which an American army composed entirely of robots fights a Soviet Union army composed entirely of robots on earth's surface. All of the humans are hiding in underground bunkers. Kinda spooky that we are getting ever closer to that scenario.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting-
lol we been doing drones for years...
Stupid boy, we all know that. The next generation will be 3D-printed by AI and guided by AI rather than remote control. The Chinese are years ahead of us.

 
Stupid boy, we all know that. The next generation will be 3D-printed by AI and guided by AI rather than remote control. The Chinese are years ahead of us.

You don't know shit.
 
You don't know shit.
Ukraine has been doing this for two years. It is clearly the future of warfare.

"Instead of the hulking craft used by nations like the US — which cost hundreds of millions of dollars — many of Ukraine’s aerial attacks against Russian forces are conducted with simple kamikaze drones worth between $300 and $1,000."

 
Ukraine has been doing this for two years. It is clearly the future of warfare.

We've been doing it for more than 12. Drones are tough in denied environments. The Russians run theirs off huge spools of fiber optic to harden them against jamming. We used to own the night, but now the most expensive drones come out at night. The Ukrainians can't move at night anymore.
 
The transition is underway. Army combat units are getting drones and getting rid on vulnerable vehicles like humvees and light tanks.

Quite interesting, but might drones be becoming obsolete already?

 
Quite interesting, but might drones be becoming obsolete already?
Agree, that is quite interesting. It would seem the way to counter that is AI self-guided drones, which can seek, find and target enemy locations without external guidance. These drones would be shielded against outside radiowaves. We have Javelin "fire-and-forget" missiles right now. They could even target the radiofrequency directed energy weapons.
 
Agree, that is quite interesting. It would seem the way to counter that is AI self-guided drones, which can seek, find and target enemy locations without external guidance. These drones would be shielded against outside radiowaves. We have Javelin "fire-and-forget" missiles right now. They could even target the radiofrequency directed energy weapons.
I have to hope and trust DARPA is working on this stuff and more.
 
I have to hope and trust DARPA is working on this stuff and more.
As I mentioned before, I was a US Army officer for 28 years. I wasn't a combat hero like Tim Walz, I was in procurement. I don't have one campaign ribbon, I was a REMF.

The Javelin’s predecessor was the TOW. The TOW was an effective anti-tank weapon but it was wire-guided. It required two soldiers, one to hold the missile before launching and one at the control panel to guide it to the enemy tank.

Here’s what happened. The guy holding the missile had a huge plumb of smoke as the TOW launched. The guider next to him guided the missile to the enemy tank. Tanks are almost always followed by infantry, so the tank crew and the surrounding infantry saw the smoke plumb. Nonetheless the guy with the controls had to stand there while he guided the missile to the target. I think we agree that this guy needed a large pair of cajoles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting-
As I mentioned before, I was a US Army officer for 28 years. I wasn't a combat hero like Tim Walz, I was in procurement. I don't have one campaign ribbon, I was a REMF.

The Javelin’s predecessor was the TOW. The TOW was an effective anti-tank weapon but it was wire-guided. It required two soldiers, one to hold the missile before launching and one at the control panel to guide it to the enemy tank.

Here’s what happened. The guy holding the missile had a huge plumb of smoke as the TOW launched. The guider next to him guided the missile to the enemy tank. Tanks are almost always followed by infantry, so the tank crew and the surrounding infantry saw the smoke plumb. Nonetheless the guy with the controls had to stand there while he guided the missile to the target. I think we agree that this guy needed a large pair of cajoles.
Col. Meyer, allow me to thank you again for your 28 years of service to this great nation.
 
I just looked up REMF. It seems to me that as a general rule, the smartest people would be REMF because you need them to continue to plan and be smart.

I think I read several times during the early months of the Ukraine war that Russia was losing quite a few generals because they didn't follow that rule - which was just one indication of many of how inept the Russian army really is. On the other hand, maybe the Generals are not necessarily all that smart in the Russian army.
 
Speaking of incompetent armies, this is no surprise, assuming it is accurate. Nato depended on the US for its defense and this is where they are.

"Today, all of European NATO couldn't put a peacekeeping force in Ukraine of half that size without wheezing like an asthmatic with a sinus infection hiking up Kilimanjaro."

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT