ADVERTISEMENT

Rumblings that Bridges coming back to MSU

SqueakyClean

Redshirt Freshman
Feb 18, 2014
1,213
1,421
113
Lot of smoke popping up that Miles Bridges will return to MSU for his sophomore year. Announcement tonight on the MSU campus.

I was going to go with a "wait and see" approach as to how good they could be next year and where in the Big Ten they would end up, but if Bridges returns, I think that would pretty well guarantee that the media will pick them to win the Big Ten next year.
 
I was very impressed with Bridges shooting after he returned from his early injuries. Mixed with athleticism I can't imagine him not being a 1st round pick. If he doesn't come back he will be preseason B1G POY. Tillman or JJJ minutes will decrease.
 
He wasn't enough to make them great last year. Not sure what else they have coming in but they'll need more than just him to be great. Their guards were pathetic last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerGal74
He wasn't enough to make them great last year. Not sure what else they have coming in but they'll need more than just him to be great. Their guards were pathetic last season.

I thought their guards were good. Their bigs were the problem from what I saw. I really like a lot of their players.. especially Bridges and Winston.

I don't like Ward at all. And when he got into foul trouble, he had no backup.
 
I thought their guards were good. Their bigs were the problem from what I saw. I really like a lot of their players.. especially Bridges and Winston.

I don't like Ward at all. And when he got into foul trouble, he had no backup.

I thought just about the opposite. Outside of Bridges, Ward was their only decent player and he was just no match for our big men. I'd take our guards/wings from last season (other than Bridges) over theirs any day and it's not as if our perimeter play was the strength of our team. It was solid but I don't think we have any future NBA players there.
 
JJ is legit and will start at the 4 for them. It would have been nice if we could have landed him. Bridges will play the 3, and Tillmon at the 5. They also get alot of depth back up front with guys that were injured. They'll be pretty good if Miles stays. You would have two first draft picks essentially in your starting 5
 
He wasn't enough to make them great last year. Not sure what else they have coming in but they'll need more than just him to be great. Their guards were pathetic last season.
I'd have to double check, but they lost (I believe) 4 front court players to season-ending injuries last year, 3 or them in the last weeks of the preseason. I think I read that Ward was their only player over 6'5.
I don't think they will dominate the league, but I think they will be significantly better next year, especially if Bridges comes back.
 
I'd have to double check, but they lost (I believe) 4 front court players to season-ending injuries last year, 3 or them in the last weeks of the preseason. I think I read that Ward was their only player over 6'5.
I don't think they will dominate the league, but I think they will be significantly better next year, especially if Bridges comes back.

Well they should be better. If they have some impact players coming in they could be very good. I just don't have much of a clue what that is. I know they had the grad transfer (UNLV?) that got injured last year and Gavin Schilling who I don't think is all that great but probably could've been a big body for them anyway. They need some better guards imo. Winston is ok and he'll probably improve in his 2nd year. What else do they have coming in?
 
JJ is legit and will start at the 4 for them. It would have been nice if we could have landed him. Bridges will play the 3, and Tillmon at the 5. They also get alot of depth back up front with guys that were injured. They'll be pretty good if Miles stays. You would have two first draft picks essentially in your starting 5

They will be very very good if Bridges return for them, and if they continue to jell like they started to do near the end of the season. I believe they are also in the running for Brian Bowen (less likely now with Bridges returning). Either way they should be one or the favorites to win the B1G next season.
 
They will be very very good if Bridges return for them, and if they continue to jell like they started to do near the end of the season. I believe they are also in the running for Brian Bowen (less likely now with Bridges returning). Either way they should be one or the favorites to win the B1G next season.

I didn't see them jell last year. People kept saying it was going to happen because they think Izzo owns March but I didn't really see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mathboy
Minus the injury bug this team will be a top ten team, dammit. Hope bridges changes his mind and goes pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StickPurdue
There's no doubt their guard play improved late in season with experience. How much better next year and overall talent remains to be seen. They will be solid for sure next season though.
 
He wasn't enough to make them great last year. Not sure what else they have coming in but they'll need more than just him to be great. Their guards were pathetic last season.

MSU had ONE player on the active roster who was taller than 6'6" and he was a 6'8" true freshman. MSU not succeeding last year had more to do with that than Miles Bridges, who by everyone's estimation had an outstanding freshman season and would have been a lottery pick this summer had he declared for the draft.
 
Why would he not go pro? Am I missing something here? Flint kid, but come on..........helluva gamble IMO. Doesn't make sense.
I agree completely. He is a fabulous player and definitely a Top 20 pick. However, I love to see that he is taking a gamble to try and become a Top 5 pick the following year. Good for him and MSU. Bad for JJJ and the rest of the Big 10...
 
  • Like
Reactions: FleeTheScene
I agree completely. He is a fabulous player and definitely a Top 20 pick. However, I love to see that he is taking a gamble to try and become a Top 5 pick the following year. Good for him and MSU. Bad for JJJ and the rest of the Big 10...

Maybe he took out one of those insurance policies.....who knows, but all it takes is one bump and it could be over. He has guarantee $ by going pro now. I'm sure Izzo has the kid's best interest in mind....cough , cough. More power to him I guess.
 
Projected starting five for MSU:

5: Nick Ward
4: Jaren Jackson Jr. (Rivals #6)
3: Miles Bridges
2: Josh Langford
1: Cassius Winston

Lots of size and depth on the bench, unlike last season.
 
There's no doubt their guard play improved late in season with experience. How much better next year and overall talent remains to be seen. They will be solid for sure next season though.

I don't have any statistics to back this up but didn't feel like they really improved all that much over the course of the season. Losing Harris did hurt but they made very poor decisions with the ball the entire year. They will still be a fairly young team and making the jump from a fringe top 40 team to top 5 or 10 is pretty big after a single season. They add some high quality and elite recruits but it is still tough to make a jump like that. Weren't they preseason ranked in the top 15 or even 10 last year? They ended the year with 14 losses after being ranked so high early on. I'm sure they will be the Big Ten favorites because they are MSU. They'll get the Duke treatment next year and will hang around in the polls all year long even if they lose some very poor games and the second they get hot they will shoot up to a 2 or 3 seed. I do think they should be top 25 worthy but the media loves Izzo so they'll get a little more love than I think they deserve.


On Bridges staying I can't wrap my head around it. I don't think he will ever be a top 5 pick. He is really damn good but he's already shown he is ready for the NBA and is built like a tank yet can still play well above the rim. His outside shot was decent. He's taking a pretty significant risk in attempting to move up a few spots vs possibly dropping were he to get injured or play below expectations. Even if he gets drafted at the same spot he is projected to go this year that's a year of being delayed in getting paid and also a year delay before getting your 2nd contract which is far more important than your rookie contract. Staying is a big risk with very little to gain and a lot to lose. Izzo sure is a master of getting guys to hang around longer than they should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roeder
it would be unusual for a player to be a projected top ten draft pick and stay in school. as a boiler fan i would like to see him leave but maybe he is enjoying college and wants to gamble that he wont get hurt or fall down the list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FearTheTrain
I thought just about the opposite. Outside of Bridges, Ward was their only decent player and he was just no match for our big men. I'd take our guards/wings from last season (other than Bridges) over theirs any day and it's not as if our perimeter play was the strength of our team. It was solid but I don't think we have any future NBA players there.
They will be loaded with bigs next year.
 
I can't believe he stayed. But this makes Sparty the conference favorite. I'm not conceding but they will be a tough out. Bring it on.
 
I can't believe he stayed. But this makes Sparty the conference favorite. I'm not conceding but they will be a tough out. Bring it on.

I have absolutely no idea why he would return. he should have taken his cue from Bryant on staying. Risk injury and risk falling due to a lack of productivity. He could improve his stock and be a top five pick, or the incoming players will lower his role and reduce his numbers. Only time will tell.
 
Projected starting five for MSU:

5: Nick Ward
4: Jaren Jackson Jr. (Rivals #6)
3: Miles Bridges
2: Josh Langford
1: Cassius Winston

Lots of size and depth on the bench, unlike last season.

We'll see how good JJJ is as a frosh. I'm still not impressed with either starting guard whatsoever and I think that will ultimately limit if those are the 2 that start and play the most minutes. Langford is ok and Beetlejuice needs to improve a bunch if he's going to lead a top ten team.

If Swanigan were to come back to Purdue we would be better than them next year. That much I know. Without Swanigan, they'll probably jump us but it will be because of their front line. Our guards will be better.
 
Projected starting five for MSU:

5: Nick Ward
4: Jaren Jackson Jr. (Rivals #6)
3: Miles Bridges
2: Josh Langford
1: Cassius Winston

Lots of size and depth on the bench, unlike last season.

Don't see Bridges being able to play the 3 next season just becaus JJJ is there. I believe JJJ's decision mainly came down to he believed Bridges would be a one and done and that would free him up to start at the 4 and really be the focus of that offense with a good 5 and an experienced back court. If it truly was down to Purdue and MSU (as I have heard rumblings of), Purdue could definitely have offered that and about 30+ minutes per game. He easily could have stepped in to the role and minutes Biggie played last season.
 
it would be unusual for a player to be a projected top ten draft pick and stay in school. as a boiler fan i would like to see him leave but maybe he is enjoying college and wants to gamble that he wont get hurt or fall down the list.

Agreed. I actually like him to stay because that pushes Biggie up a spot. Could slide Biggie in to a top 20 pick now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FearTheTrain
I have absolutely no idea why he would return. he should have taken his cue from Bryant on staying. Risk injury and risk falling due to a lack of productivity. He could improve his stock and be a top five pick, or the incoming players will lower his role and reduce his numbers. Only time will tell.

Bryant is a whiny baby and Bridges does not seem like that at all. Always risk of injury, but he can take out an insurance policy and should only improve. MSU should be very good next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBG
Don't see Bridges being able to play the 3 next season just becaus JJJ is there. I believe JJJ's decision mainly came down to he believed Bridges would be a one and done and that would free him up to start at the 4 and really be the focus of that offense with a good 5 and an experienced back court. If it truly was down to Purdue and MSU (as I have heard rumblings of), Purdue could definitely have offered that and about 30+ minutes per game. He easily could have stepped in to the role and minutes Biggie played last season.
I agree. JJJ was counting on Bridges to go pro. This will suck for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daisyrail1619
We'll see how good JJJ is as a frosh. I'm still not impressed with either starting guard whatsoever and I think that will ultimately limit if those are the 2 that start and play the most minutes. Langford is ok and Beetlejuice needs to improve a bunch if he's going to lead a top ten team.

If Swanigan were to come back to Purdue we would be better than them next year. That much I know. Without Swanigan, they'll probably jump us but it will be because of their front line. Our guards will be better.
I admire the Purdue love/passion, but their guards are not only good players, but they are far more talented than any Purdue guard.

Carsen was very good for Purdue and has a bright future it would seem, but Langford was solid a year ago and will be much better with even more talent around him, and Winston was very good late in the year and also will benefit from the additional talent on hand.

MSU was shorthanded a year ago, and that will not be the case next year...they are hands down the most talented team in the B1G...and, it only points out yet again that the best coaches are able to recruit talent even when they already have talent on hand.
 
I admire the Purdue love/passion, but their guards are not only good players, but they are far more talented than any Purdue guard.

Carsen was very good for Purdue and has a bright future it would seem, but Langford was solid a year ago and will be much better with even more talent around him, and Winston was very good late in the year and also will benefit from the additional talent on hand.

MSU was shorthanded a year ago, and that will not be the case next year...they are hands down the most talented team in the B1G...and, it only points out yet again that the best coaches are able to recruit talent even when they already have talent on hand.


Really good post and spot on. I echoed earlier their guard play although horrendous early improved and will only get better. That team will be a handful next season. Both teams will be strong and looking forward to next season.
 
I admire the Purdue love/passion, but their guards are not only good players, but they are far more talented than any Purdue guard.

Carsen was very good for Purdue and has a bright future it would seem, but Langford was solid a year ago and will be much better with even more talent around him, and Winston was very good late in the year and also will benefit from the additional talent on hand.

MSU was shorthanded a year ago, and that will not be the case next year...they are hands down the most talented team in the B1G...and, it only points out yet again that the best coaches are able to recruit talent even when they already have talent on hand.

Their guards are more athletic. Don't mistake that for being more talented. Not the same thing at all. I'd take our guards next year over theirs next year and frankly it's not even close. Like I said, I don't have some inflated opinion of our guards either. That's a spot that we had to worry about whenever the other team had a decent guard who could score the basketball this year. Frankly, MSU was not a team that we had to worry about in that aspect and they are returning those same players. Langford and Beetlejuice better improve a ton, which could happen, if they are going to be a top ten team.
 
Really good post and spot on. I echoed earlier their guard play although horrendous early improved and will only get better. That team will be a handful next season. Both teams will be strong and looking forward to next season.

Their guard play had nowhere to go but up from where it started last season. The step up from mediocre to FF caliber is a much bigger step than the step up from atrocious to mediocre. I don't see those guard pulling it off. If you were to tell me they have some stud freshman guard coming in then I'd be pretty optimistic about them. If they are relying on Beetlejuice and Langford then I just can't see it.
 
Their guards are more athletic. Don't mistake that for being more talented. Not the same thing at all. I'd take our guards next year over theirs next year and frankly it's not even close. Like I said, I don't have some inflated opinion of our guards either. That's a spot that we had to worry about whenever the other team had a decent guard who could score the basketball this year. Frankly, MSU was not a team that we had to worry about in that aspect and they are returning those same players. Langford and Beetlejuice better improve a ton, which could happen, if they are going to be a top ten team.

CBS Sports has them as 3rd in their way too early 17/18 ranking. Purdue 24th.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.cbss...s-return-has-msu-third-in-top-25-and-one/amp/
 
MSU is still after PG Mark Smith I believe. He is advertised (IL MR. BB) as pretty good and could solve guard issues for them ...which I think was bad last year. Let's hope(for us) Mizzou pulls Smith in.
 
Their guards are more athletic. Don't mistake that for being more talented. Not the same thing at all. I'd take our guards next year over theirs next year and frankly it's not even close. Like I said, I don't have some inflated opinion of our guards either. That's a spot that we had to worry about whenever the other team had a decent guard who could score the basketball this year. Frankly, MSU was not a team that we had to worry about in that aspect and they are returning those same players. Langford and Beetlejuice better improve a ton, which could happen, if they are going to be a top ten team.
Langford is a tremendous player...he did not just stumble his way to being a McDonald's All-American...the kid was the 5-time...yes, 5-time...HS Player-Of-The-Year in Alabama. He was not only thrust into the line-up early on, but, without the aid of a solid post presence to aid him or a solid/experienced PG to aid him either...Carsen had both of those things at Purdue. I would be shocked if you don't see a totally different Langford next year with the experience that he gained and with the additional talent around him.

Winston was very good down the stretch as well...either broke or approached some record that Magic had held as the PG at MSU...and, again, he lacked what Langford did that did not help him and that will not be the case this year.

The issue was not a lack of ability...it was a lack of consistency, largely the result of a lack of experience and a lack of collective experienced talent around them.

The ONLY advantage Purdue has at the guard position, assuming you are comparing them to Carsen and PJ, is that PJ has more experience...as far as skill sets...it is not even close with respect to what the two guys at MSU provide relative to Purdue...and, that does not even account for McQuaid in the MSU backcourt who is solid as well.

With Bridges back, MSU is flat out loaded and they now have depth as well...last year was a blip on the radar for them, and they still weren't horrible...heck, they were more competitive short-handed and inexperienced with Kansas than Purdue was, and they are not losing their best player, while adding significant more talent at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlintTown
A Favorite Will Rogers quote: "College players ask me, 'when should I turn pro?', not until you've made all you can in college son."
 
Langford is a tremendous player...he did not just stumble his way to being a McDonald's All-American...the kid was the 5-time...yes, 5-time...HS Player-Of-The-Year in Alabama. He was not only thrust into the line-up early on, but, without the aid of a solid post presence to aid him or a solid/experienced PG to aid him either...Carsen had both of those things at Purdue. I would be shocked if you don't see a totally different Langford next year with the experience that he gained and with the additional talent around him.

Winston was very good down the stretch as well...either broke or approached some record that Magic had held as the PG at MSU...and, again, he lacked what Langford did that did not help him and that will not be the case this year.

The issue was not a lack of ability...it was a lack of consistency, largely the result of a lack of experience and a lack of collective experienced talent around them.

The ONLY advantage Purdue has at the guard position, assuming you are comparing them to Carsen and PJ, is that PJ has more experience...as far as skill sets...it is not even close with respect to what the two guys at MSU provide relative to Purdue...and, that does not even account for McQuaid in the MSU backcourt who is solid as well.

With Bridges back, MSU is flat out loaded and they now have depth as well...last year was a blip on the radar for them, and they still weren't horrible...heck, they were more competitive short-handed and inexperienced with Kansas than Purdue was, and they are not losing their best player, while adding significant more talent at the same time.

And you're judging based on potential and their rankings coming into college. That's fine but the further they get away from high school the less relevant those accolades are. At some point, the hype becomes completely irrelevant and the players just are what you see. What I saw last year from those two was not impressive in the least. Some players make a big jump from freshman to sophomore season like Swanigan did. I'll be paying close attention to see if those two show improvement as sophomores because they will need to if these top 5 and Final Four projections have any chance to come to fruition. I think many people are assuming substantial progression and frankly I'm not from those two.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT