Oh my, cool dude.
These guys suck at reason. Lol
Oh my, cool dude.
ONE....MSNBC contributor and Daily Beast editor Sam Stein discusses new reporting from the New York Timeswhich shows that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff lied to him about never having spoken to the Ukraine whistleblower during an appearance on "Morning Joe" on September 17 (below). Stein admitted Wednesday on "Morning Joe" (above) that Schiff.YOU THINK THAT'S AN ANSWER ??????????????????
RIGHT HERE - RIGHT NOW :
NAME ONE !!!
ONE ADAM SCHIFF LIE.
WAITING.
TWO....“Adam Schiff lied about having quote-unquote stone-cold evidence about Russia collusion,”YOU THINK THAT'S AN ANSWER ??????????????????
RIGHT HERE - RIGHT NOW :
NAME ONE !!!
ONE ADAM SCHIFF LIE.
WAITING.
THREE....YOU THINK THAT'S AN ANSWER ??????????????????
RIGHT HERE - RIGHT NOW :
NAME ONE !!!
ONE ADAM SCHIFF LIE.
WAITING.
When responding to Stein's questions about the "whistleblower", Schiff acknowledged that he didn't have complete certainty that the person his staff spoke with was IN FACT THE whistleblower, at that moment. Stein later defended Schiff, to a degree, although stating that Schiff "could have been more clear" in his answer to him.ONE....MSNBC contributor and Daily Beast editor Sam Stein discusses new reporting from the New York Timeswhich shows that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff lied to him about never having spoken to the Ukraine whistleblower during an appearance on "Morning Joe" on September 17 (below). Stein admitted Wednesday on "Morning Joe" (above) that Schiff.
1) This quote is attributed to WHOM ?? Let me guess !!TWO....“Adam Schiff lied about having quote-unquote stone-cold evidence about Russia collusion,”
Mr. Schiff gave a misinformed, wrong answer with regard to the memo in which the subject date relationship was mentioned. Intended to mislead ? No reprimand or action by the DOJ or I.G. that followed.THREE....
He wrote that Bruce Ohr, then a top Justice Department official, didn’t go to the FBI with dossier dirt until November 2016, so it would be impossible for him to have influence on the wiretaps application in October.
In fact, Mr. Ohr began feeding dossier information in August 2016, starting with Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and reaching deep inside the Justice Department.
I'd bury your computer with more, but that's enough for you to see the truth. Oop's, my bad I forgot who I was responding to.
If you could read, you'd have seen it was attributed to you liberal media giant, MSNBC.1) This quote is attributed to WHOM ?? Let me guess !!
2) Regardless, the above statement represents a characterization or an opinion of what constitutes "evidence"
and of what constitutes "stone-cold". The 12,000 misrepresentations and lies that have been fact-checked following Trump's statements do NOT include the limitless times he's referred to matters involving the same type of statement as the one you used.
If YOU could read YOUR OWN POSTS, you'd realize the quote in question was posted BY ITSELF, with no attribution to MSNBC !! (separately from the 1st post in which you claimed your 1st Adam Schiff " lie" )If you could read, you'd have seen it was attributed to you liberal media giant, MSNBC.
Yada yada yada.....Beautiful day on the course...no worry about libs, or my Bears losing, or Trump.....just a great day with wind at my back on every hole. Plus picked up my winnings today for the year.If YOU could read YOUR OWN POSTS, you'd realize the quote in question was posted BY ITSELF, with no attribution to MSNBC !! (separately from the 1st post in which you claimed your 1st Adam Schiff " lie" )
I gotta hand it to ya'...….Yada yada yada.....Beautiful day on the course...no worry about libs, or my Bears losing, or Trump.....just a great day with wind at my back on every hole. Plus picked up my winnings today for the year.
Not going back to read 15 pages. Let me tell you what keeps my LGBTQ friends up at night. President Pence.
If it makes you feel any better, the possibility of hearing the words "President Buttigieg" probably keeps Pence up at night.Not going back to read 15 pages. Let me tell you what keeps my LGBTQ friends up at night. President Pence.
Why?
This is like a televised card game where the camera and viewers catch a guy winning a pot by cheating and the guy says " No it's not cheating, the other players didn't know that I was cheating."
True, at least for it to be a major issue. However, to convince any Republican Senators to vote for removal would require such at the very least, and even then likely is insufficient.Let's all not forget that there doesn't even need to be a quid pro quo for this to be a major issue. We all watched the POTUS request foreign aid in investigating his political rival. There doesn't need to be anything else. All smoke.
Yes I watched that in amazement. I noticed his lips were moving and you know what that means.President is currently announcing the lifting of sanctions against Turkey for its intrusion to Syria and again claiming success in resolving the matter.
I was about to post a similar excerpt. Utterly amazing...the bar seems pretty high
"[Dunne cited the hypothetical example of Trump “if he did pull out a handgun and shoot someone on Fifth Avenue.” Shootings are normally prosecuted in New York by state prosecutors.
When he was asked if Trump could be prosecuted for such a blatant crime, Consovoy said, “This is not a permanent immunity.”
The lawyer said a president could be charged for a shooting after he left or was removed from office.
But Judge Denny Chin pressed Consovoy: “I’m talking about while in office.”
“Nothing could be done? That’s your position?” Chin asked.
Consovoy (trump's lawyer) replied: “That is correct.” ]"
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/23/trump-tax-return-subpoena-case-argued-in-federal-appeals-court.html
Truth told in this post..True, at least for it to be a major issue. However, to convince any Republican Senators to vote for removal would require such at the very least, and even then likely is insufficient.
I agree the QPP is needed to convince some pub senators.......but the Trump supporters will just move the goalpost again....like the tweet about the Ukrainians knowing about the aid.True, at least for it to be a major issue. However, to convince any Republican Senators to vote for removal would require such at the very least, and even then likely is insufficient.
And then we'll see the INsane arguments....I agree the QPP is needed to convince some pub senators.......but the Trump supporters will just move the goalpost again....like the tweet about the Ukrainians knowing about the aid.
But at some point the goalpost ends up in the freakin parking lot........ and there's no sane argument left.
I may be mistaken as to executive privilege, but all other privileges belong to the person whose conversation is legally entitled to protection, so I would strongly say the privilege belongs to the White House/President and can only be exercised at its/his direction ultimately, or at the very least acquiescence.I’m not an attorney but I’d assume that if you’re the President, you don’t want criminals invoking executive privilege because he says you were involved.
This NYT report demonstrates that the President's position that Ukraine was unaware is incorrect, pointing out that top Ukraine people were advised in early August.
I was about to post a similar excerpt. Utterly amazing...