Really? Then why didn't you answer me earlier in this thread when I asked you to confirm your statement that Biden "actually believes in the rule of law".
I think generally yes, but he’s a (very very old) politician, so he weasels at times. As you must know, I am NOT a fan of Biden. I just think that there is one choice that’s exponentially worse.
thehill.com
I think generally yes, but he’s a (very very old) politician, so he weasels at times. As you must know, I am NOT a fan of Biden. I just think that there is one choice that’s exponentially worse.
Here’s the link to the dinner the “worst choice” had this week when he invited Kanye West and noted white supremacist and anti-Semite Fuentes into his home:
Trump met with white supremacist Nick Fuentes alongside Ye at Mar-a-Lago
Former President Trump had dinner with white nationalist Nick Fuentes this week at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida, Axios first reported on Friday. The dinner happened on Tuesday night alongside…
Hard to tell if you are more obsessed with Trump or with gaining our approval to boost your iu inferiority complex under your other pathetic user name.
So you're either:
These folks consistently accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being the same person with alternate accounts. Because they literally can't conceive of people disagreeing with their regurgitated Daily Wire pablum
It's kinda crazy. But while I have been accused of so many things, until this I haven't been accused of posting under an alias or being a liar. I hope that I am remarkably consistent. My consistency is that I am NOT a Biden fan, I'm a registered R who votes for and prefers Republicans who believe in the rule of law and are not cult worshipping sycophants, and that I believe that Trump is pathetic, horrible, and one of the pre-eminent threats to the United States of America.
They can’t do it. They will dodge and weave but never address the elephant in the room. Why? Because the need to “own the libs” is so strong that they will still happily vote for him again if that’s what it comes down to. I mean look at the last two years: instead of ridding itself of Trump once and for all and focusing on moderates who actually want to work across the aisle, a good chunk of the party has doubled down on the ridiculous rhetoric and nonsense. And while the midterms were a pretty strong message that a lot of this country is tired of said nonsense, when push comes to shove, the party itself collectively shrugs.
Still waiting for you to say the Colorado Springs murders were horrible, like I did, and not merely disgusting.
I condemn Fuentes if what is said about him is true. I had never heard of him.
Oh, you accused me of posting under aliases while pretending to have only one handle. While you didn't use the exact word "liar" you described it completely.
As 'cool' as I was with Obama being seen with Jeremiah Wright and Lous Farrakhan. In fact, more cool.
Come on man, it's not like when Obama invited BLM Terrorists to the White House for a meal.
Pretending to have only one handle? What does that mean, or is it just more hysteria blurting forth?
I try, but it is not easy when I see your hypocrisy in refusing to admit those murders were horrible as I have.
Obviously I didn't say that, but your hoosier hysteria is clouding your thinking again.
If you really believe this post and are not completely trolling? I am praying for your soul and your recovery from whatever happened in your life to get you to this point.
If he hasn't denounced Fuentes, it is reprehensible on Trump's part.
Care to back up your condescending post, or are you just looking for a way to back out of the corner you have painted yourself into?
You have no idea why Obama chose to come out forcefully against both. It could have been strictly political…….but he did it. If it was political, he wasn’t afraid of alienating any voters……. and he was smart enough to do it.
I already did. Not sure what else you want there. But you’re good at whataboutism so congrats I guess?
I don't know why, but it seems pretty stupid to me on his part.
If you accept this definition of "terrorist", then it should be obvious:
During those riots you had several things going on. The looting of the stores were mostly done by the local Negroes who are in no way affiliated with the BLM organization that y’all hate so much. The destruction of the city buildings and attacking police from what I saw were from a lot of white folks dressed in black. Antifa of course. Some black folks of course. Even the white dudes, your hero, Whittenhouse shot and killed, were there up to no good. Many like them throughout the the different cities of the riots causing havoc. Then there were the peaceful protestors marching with signs about the situation at hand, police brutality.
Sorry, it’s a package deal.
Obama’s association with Wright was bad. It ended before he became President and he denounced it.
The ones that were terrorizing people at restaurants, burning businesses, destroying our national heritage by destroying statues and burning historical churches and assaulting federal buildings.
You still did not name any so called BLM "terrorists" that Obama invited to the White House.
At the very least, they were his policies in that he ordered them to be implemented.
