ADVERTISEMENT

Majority of House GOP, including 3 Black Republican grifters voted to reinstate confederate monument at Arlington National Cemetary

There is nothing that you can do to take away single mothers from having kids. When consigliere, Rudy Guiliani was mayor of NYC, did the numbers of single mothers decline, no, Gangs were still gangbanging. Stop and harass only found a small percentage of guns on the people that they harassed. We've been through this over and over. It's not as simple as just replacing one regime with another. Cultures has to be changed.
So you're saying the problem only goes one way? You're saying that having babies out of wedlock is a black culture thing? If that's the case, then why was single parenthood of blacks lower than most other races in the 20's and 30's?
 
It continues to happen today because it’s a vicious cycle lasting generations. The Native Americans have had it bad but in a different way. But Jim Crow was aimed only towards black Americans was the biggest detriment to blacks in America that we are still feeling the affects of it. The water fountains during that time said “White” and “Colored”. No other ethnic groups were targeted like that during Jim Crow. The US that many would like just deny and water down has done horrible stuff to different ethnic groups. During WW2 Japanese Americans were out into internment camps. The US did not put any German Americans or Italian Americans into interment camps. Boilermaker03, Boiler Buck, and tjreese will probably have some lame excuse or denial of why.
Oh, no German or Italian Americans?

Oops!

"The detainees were not only people of Japanese ancestry, they also included a relatively small number—though still totaling well over ten thousand—of people of German and Italian ancestry as well as Germans who were expelled from Latin America and deported to the U.S. Approximately 5,000 Japanese Americans relocated ..."

It's not a lot, but over 10,000 isn't none.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: mediaexpert
As long as you'd also be in favor for stop and frisk for all white males and females between 40 and 70 near the U.S. Capitol.
  1. That's where the attempted insurrections take place.
  2. That's who is doing the insurrecting.
I would also then be in favor of stop and frisk for all white males with orange bronzing makeup between 75 and 80 near Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.
  1. That's where the unauthorized relocation and hiding of classified national security documents takes place.
  2. That is who is doing the unauthorized hiding of classified national security documents.
For perspective, you are also in favor of ridiculing grieving Goldstar families for being offended by an incompetent political hack that you support.
 
As long as you'd also be in favor for stop and frisk for all white males and females between 40 and 70 near the U.S. Capitol.
  1. That's where the attempted insurrections take place.
  2. That's who is doing the insurrecting.
I would also then be in favor of stop and frisk for all white males with orange bronzing makeup between 75 and 80 near Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.
  1. That's where the unauthorized relocation and hiding of classified national security documents takes place.
  2. That is who is doing the unauthorized hiding of classified national security documents.
How about stop and frisk for all white males between the ages of 15 to 18 years old since they like to shoot up schools. Stop and frisk them prior to them entering the school building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
How about stop and frisk for all white males between the ages of 15 to 18 years old since they like to shoot up schools. Stop and frisk them prior to them entering the school building.
How about stop and frisk/ or metal detectors for everyone before they enter a school building?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
How about stop and frisk/ or metal detectors for everyone before they enter a school building?
Some schools in the urban areas have them already. There bags get sent through the conveyor and the security officer or resource office waves a wand like they do in the airports.
 
Some schools in the urban areas have them already. There bags get sent through the conveyor and the security officer or resource office waves a wand like they do in the airports. Of course not so prevalent in the white suburban schools where most of these school shootings occur. I wonder why.
 
Only if you stop them for just cause. Not people just walking down the street minding there on business. People on the south and west side of Chicago still go to church, work. shop, etc. Still does not stop single mothers.
You and I could drive through the hood and probably have a high % of agreement on who looked like gang bangers and who was going to church, work, shop, etc. It ain't that hard. If they look like they're up to no good, then check them out.

Is it profiling. Yeh, but if that's what's needed, then so be it.
 
As long as you'd also be in favor for stop and frisk for all white males and females between 40 and 70 near the U.S. Capitol.
  1. That's where the attempted insurrections take place.
  2. That's who is doing the insurrecting.
I would also then be in favor of stop and frisk for all white males with orange bronzing makeup between 75 and 80 near Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.
  1. That's where the unauthorized relocation and hiding of classified national security documents takes place.
  2. That is who is doing the unauthorized hiding of classified national security documents.
You're so cute. Typical lefty lib. Don't want to tackle the problem for fear of upsetting the delicate sensibilities of a few.
This is why Trump will win. You're feelings don't matter.
But, when Lincoln Park has a gun violence issue like the Southside, and you know who's doing the shooting, then yeh, go ahead and SnF all the white males between 15-45 if that's who's causing the problem.
 
Some schools in the urban areas have them already. There bags get sent through the conveyor and the security officer or resource office waves a wand like they do in the airports. Of course not so prevalent in the white suburban schools where most of these school shootings occur. I wonder why.
Obviously because the decision makers place a higher value on the lives of the kids in urban schools than on kids in white suburban schools.

Does even that offend you?
 
I've told him this many times, but he refuses to listen.

He waits for urban radio to tell him what the convenient current excuse for these bad DEM policies....and he runs with that without a thought of how stupid the excuse sounds.

Like his inflation/corporate greed take, his take on welfare/single mothers of all races is just way off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
For perspective, you are also in favor of ridiculing grieving Goldstar families for being offended by an incompetent political hack that you support.
I have been consistently saying Biden is waaaaaay too old for years. That turned out pretty… spot on But me saying that Biden looking at a watch during a ceremony isn’t a big deal? That’s still true.

A question for you; how does looking at a watch during a ceremony compare to TRUMP CALLING AMERICAN WAR DEAD “LOSERS AND SUCKERS!”

Here comes the Diverting in 3…2…1…
 
You're so cute. Typical lefty lib. Don't want to tackle the problem for fear of upsetting the delicate sensibilities of a few.
This is why Trump will win. You're feelings don't matter.
But, when Lincoln Park has a gun violence issue like the Southside, and you know who's doing the shooting, then yeh, go ahead and SnF all the white males between 15-45 if that's who's causing the problem.
Awwww…….you’re cute too! I’m a registered Republican who believes in the rule of law. The only reason Trump will likely win is because Biden is completely gone. If they switch away from Biden, Trump loses. But if Trump strokes out and the Republicans replace him? They win over any Democrat and get my vote.

But you didn’t answer the question…how do you feel about stop and frisk for any old, white, red hat that gets near the US Capitol? After all……..

It ain't that hard. If they look like they're up to no good, then check them out.

Is it profiling. Yeh, but if that's what's needed, then so be it.”
 
Last edited:
You and I could drive through the hood and probably have a high % of agreement on who looked like gang bangers and who was going to church, work, shop, etc. It ain't that hard. If they look like they're up to no good, then check them out.

Is it profiling. Yeh, but if that's what's needed, then so be it.
You still don’t get it. The police in NYC know who the gangbangers are also but they decided to stop and harass any black person that they could find instead of the obvious troublemakers. No just cause to stop them. Stop and harass even says that the police need just cause.

Well it’s no need discussing this as stop and harass was deemed unconstitutional in NY. Mostly will be in IL.
 
Meanwhile, in the f***ing bonkers, stirring up the crazy and mentally ill, never learn a lesson or try to improve mind of Donald Trump this week:

“On Truth Social, Trump shared an image of himself and Melania Trump at the White House, superimposed with the QAnon catchphrase, “Where We Go One We Go All.”
 
Obviously because the decision makers place a higher value on the lives of the kids in urban schools than on kids in white suburban schools.

Does even that offend you?
It obviously offends white suburbia as most of those school do not have metal detectors. They ain’t havin’ it.
 
He waits for urban radio to tell him what the convenient current excuse for these bad DEM policies....and he runs with that without a thought of how stupid the excuse sounds.

Like his inflation/corporate greed take, his take on welfare/single mothers of all races is just way off.
Dems in Chicago typically blame places like IN and WI for providing easy access to guns. They never blame the actual action or behaviors of the people pulling the trigger. Always someone else's fault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
Dems in Chicago typically blame places like IN and WI for providing easy access to guns. They never blame the actual action or behaviors of the people pulling the trigger. Always someone else's fault.

Nor blame the DAs and courts revolving door for criminals....instead of permanent lock up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
Awwww…….you’re cute too! I’m a registered Republican who believes in the rule of law. The only reason Trump will likely win is because Biden is completely gone. If they switch away from Biden, Trump loses. But if Trump strokes out and the Republicans replace him? They win over any Democrat and get my vote.

But you didn’t answer the question…how do you feel about stop and frisk for any old, white, red hat that gets near the US Capitol? After all……..

It ain't that hard. If they look like they're up to no good, then check them out.

Is it profiling. Yeh, but if that's what's needed, then so be it.”
So, because of a single incident on a single day, in which a gun was never used or even brandished, you think anyone old, white guy in a red hat should be frisked? That's a pretty big leap, especially when black males are shooting eachother at a high rate on every single weekend in Chicago.
While this upcoming weekend is only 2 days, I still predict 42 shot, 8 kilt.
 
You still don’t get it. The police in NYC know who the gangbangers are also but they decided to stop and harass any black person that they could find instead of the obvious troublemakers. No just cause to stop them. Stop and harass even says that the police need just cause.

Well it’s no need discussing this as stop and harass was deemed unconstitutional in NY. Mostly will be in IL.
So again, I'll ask: What % decrease in gun violence would you have to see to accept the good and bad of SnF in Chicago?
 
So again, I'll ask: What % decrease in gun violence would you have to see to accept the good and bad of SnF in Chicago?
The police are not and never will do the right thing, follow proper procedures for just cause and only stop and frisk the obvious perpetrators. Law abiding black citizens will be stopped and harassed like in NYC. Again the courts will deem it unconstitutional.
 
So, because of a single incident on a single day, in which a gun was never used or even brandished, you think anyone old, white guy in a red hat should be frisked? That's a pretty big leap, especially when black males are shooting eachother at a high rate on every single weekend in Chicago.
While this upcoming weekend is only 2 days, I still predict 42 shot, 8 kilt.
Hey, to your credit, you didn't say that every young black male should be stopped and frisked! You limited it to a specific look in a specific location.

So I did the same thing - a particular location where thousands of people who fit a certain profile committed the most serious of crimes - trespassing the closed halls of Congress in an attempt to stop the United States Presidential election, and if you believe them, to hang the Vice President of the united States!

"A single incident on a single day ..." makes it sound like one guy got out of hand once. Here is a picture of your "single incident":

3500.jpg
 
So, because of a single incident on a single day, in which a gun was never used or even brandished, you think anyone old, white guy in a red hat should be frisked? That's a pretty big leap, especially when black males are shooting eachother at a high rate on every single weekend in Chicago.
While this upcoming weekend is only 2 days, I still predict 42 shot, 8 kilt.
Tons of weapons in and around the Capitol that day. People arrested who were in the Capitol and armed.

Over 100 injured officers. Officers hit with metal flagpoles and bear spray. Pipe bombs that malfunctioned at DNC and RNC Headquarters. The Oath Keepers with a huge cache of weapons nearby.

But surely you're not suggesting that guns are the only way to kill and that we should only profile based on guns?!!?
After all, guns don't kill people -- people kill people.

So if under your theory, if we're going to profile based on location and numbers of people that "look a certain way," what better location and "look" to have a go with than MAGA hatted old white guys near the U.S. Capitol!
 
Hey, to your credit, you didn't say that every young black male should be stopped and frisked! You limited it to a specific look in a specific location.

So I did the same thing - a particular location where thousands of people who fit a certain profile committed the most serious of crimes - trespassing the closed halls of Congress in an attempt to stop the United States Presidential election, and if you believe them, to hang the Vice President of the united States!

"A single incident on a single day ..." makes it sound like one guy got out of hand once. Here is a picture of your "single incident":

3500.jpg


??.....And hundreds we're locked up.

Unlike most big cities where both criminals & rioters alike are/were quickly released back on the streets. Thus, this is an extremely poor comparison you have attempted.
 
The police are not and never will do the right thing, follow proper procedures for just cause and only stop and frisk the obvious perpetrators. Law abiding black citizens will be stopped and harassed like in NYC. Again the courts will deem it unconstitutional.
Quit avoiding the question.
Let's assume the cops are well trained and the 'harassment' is kept to a minimum.
What % decrease in shootings justifies it's use?
 
Hey, to your credit, you didn't say that every young black male should be stopped and frisked! You limited it to a specific look in a specific location.

So I did the same thing - a particular location where thousands of people who fit a certain profile committed the most serious of crimes - trespassing the closed halls of Congress in an attempt to stop the United States Presidential election, and if you believe them, to hang the Vice President of the united States!

"A single incident on a single day ..." makes it sound like one guy got out of hand once. Here is a picture of your "single incident":

3500.jpg

You mean the incident where the capitol police were literally escorting people through the capitol building and providing a tour?

I still don't see any guns being brandished or used in the protest. As BLM would say, it's "mostly peaceful"
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerHuff3
Tons of weapons in and around the Capitol that day. People arrested who were in the Capitol and armed.

Over 100 injured officers. Officers hit with metal flagpoles and bear spray. Pipe bombs that malfunctioned at DNC and RNC Headquarters. The Oath Keepers with a huge cache of weapons nearby.

But surely you're not suggesting that guns are the only way to kill and that we should only profile based on guns?!!?
After all, guns don't kill people -- people kill people.

So if under your theory, if we're going to profile based on location and numbers of people that "look a certain way," what better location and "look" to have a go with than MAGA hatted old white guys near the U.S. Capitol!
I know it makes your clutch your pearls to hear that 99% of the people doing the shooting in Chicago are black guys, but it is what it is. Sometimes the truth hurts.
 
You mean the incident where the capitol police were literally escorting people through the capitol building and providing a tour?

I still don't see any guns being brandished or used in the protest. As BLM would say, it's "mostly peaceful"
Hey did those 100+ officer injuries occur before, during, or after your "tour?" And I assume that you have seen the interviews with all of those officers who told their first hand accounts, yet you mock them?

I hate people who mock law enforcement. Shame on you.
 
Quit avoiding the question.
Let's assume the cops are well trained and the 'harassment' is kept to a minimum.
What % decrease in shootings justifies it's use?
It's a good thing that you don't raise horses.

I'm not avoiding your question. I just know reality. If they have just cause to stop people that they suspect committed a crime, then any drop in percentage is worth it. However, I believe that has always been police policy though depending on the police force and policy enforcement.
 
Hey did those 100+ officer injuries occur before, during, or after your "tour?" And I assume that you have seen the interviews with all of those officers who told their first hand accounts, yet you mock them?

I hate people who mock law enforcement. Shame on you.
These MAGA cult members still saying that BS about the Jan 6 participants having a "tour". Then they say the BS that since these folks did not use any guns, we know now that there were guns onsite, that they did not have any weapons. Any object used to inflict harm on someone else is a weapon. These cult members try to have it both ways. They either say that these folks were on a tour. Or, when they acknowledge the violence it was Antifa causing the havoc. Unbelievable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Telling The Truth
These MAGA cult members still saying that BS about the Jan 6 participants having a "tour". Then they say the BS that since these folks did not use any guns, we know now that there were guns onsite, that they did not have any weapons. Any object used to inflict harm on someone else is a weapon. These cult members try to have it both ways. They either say that these folks were on a tour. Or, when they acknowledge the violence it was Antifa causing the havoc. Unbelievable.
MAGA Nation: "Guns don't kill people. People kill people. More guns protect people from crime."

also

MAGA Nation: "January 6th wasn't that bad because No one got killed with a gun. Assaulting over 100 officers with bear spray and metal objects? Not a big deal because guns are the problem."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


MAGA Nation: Black gangbangers shooting each other in Chicago? Profile them.

also

MAGA Nation: "White guys with red hats violently storming the Capitol? That's a tour.
 
I hate liars who mock grieving Goldstar families. Shame on you.
So you really think that oldddd Joe Biden checking his watch during a ceremony is that bad? Okay! I mean, it’s not optimal but that bad?!!? And how do you feel about a President wearing a tan suit?

Now that we’ve established that the watch checking is horrible in your opinion, let’s try one more question that you haven’t answered—PLEASE no Diverting:

How bad is it when a President tours a veterans cemetery and calls our war deceased “Losers and suckers.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
So you really think that oldddd Joe Biden checking his watch during a ceremony is that bad? Okay! I mean, it’s not optimal but that bad?!!? And how do you feel about a President wearing a tan suit?

Now that we’ve established that the watch checking is horrible in your opinion, let’s try one more question that you haven’t answered—PLEASE no Diverting:

How bad is it when a President tours a veterans cemetery and calls our war deceased “Losers and suckers.”
I’ve been through this over and over with these Flavor Aid drinkers. They’ll dismiss or say it was debunked. Which it wasn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Telling The Truth
I’ve been through this over and over with these Flavor Aid drinkers. They’ll dismiss or say it was debunked. Which it wasn’t.
It was stated unequivocally by Trump’s Chief of Staff, who is also a four star general.

The only “debunking “ is by people who weren’t with Trump and Kelley. Those people say they didn’t hear it! :)
Ps: the tan suit and watch check are real :oops:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
So you really think that oldddd Joe Biden checking his watch during a ceremony is that bad? Okay! I mean, it’s not optimal but that bad?!!? And how do you feel about a President wearing a tan suit?

Now that we’ve established that the watch checking is horrible in your opinion, let’s try one more question that you haven’t answered—
Let's not until we straighten out more of your lies.

It does not matter if I think or you think Crow's behavior was horrible, it matters that the grieving Goldstar families thought it was. I am pretty sure you understand that but you are lying to try to squirm out of your own shameful words.

The Goldstar families were offended, and you mocked those families with these words on this forum:

Checked his watch!??! OH THE HORROR!!"​

The issue is the disgusting words you posted to mock those families, but you are not man or woman enough to own up to it. No surprise.
 
I’ve been through this over and over with these Flavor Aid drinkers. They’ll dismiss or say it was debunked. Which it wasn’t.
Then tell us, what do you think of JM's mocking of grieving Goldstar families? Are you disgusted by it like any decent person would be?

Speak for yourself and tell us.
 
Let's not until we straighten out more of your lies.

It does not matter if I think or you think Crow's behavior was horrible, it matters that the grieving Goldstar families thought it was. I am pretty sure you understand that but you are lying to try to squirm out of your own shameful words.

The Goldstar families were offended, and you mocked those families with these words on this forum:

Checked his watch!??! OH THE HORROR!!"​

The issue is the disgusting words you posted to mock those families, but you are not man or woman enough to own up to it. No surprise.
Those words were for you, ya dunce.

You still don’t get it—you are so offended by watch checking, yet when Trump calls our military deceased “losers and suckers”

You morph from Riveting to Diverting.

And BNI called it 100%!on the money. When you’re boxed in you divert and pretend to be obtuse; you absolutely know that the mocking was for you, for being upset over watch checking. Hell, watch check during a solemn ceremony would be a “best behaved day ever” for Trump. It might distract him from sharing QAnon memes.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT