ADVERTISEMENT

Majority of House GOP, including 3 Black Republican grifters voted to reinstate confederate monument at Arlington National Cemetary

Then tell us, what do you think of JM's mocking of grieving Goldstar families? Are you disgusted by it like any decent person would be?

Speak for yourself and tell us.
I don’t know anything about this mocking of gold star families. Who is JM? I don’t watch Faux News hardly anymore so enlighten me.
 
Those words were for you, ya dunce.

You still don’t get it—you are so offended by watch checking, yet when Trump calls our military deceased “losers and suckers”

You morph from Riveting to Diverting.

And BNI called it 100%!on the money. When you’re boxed in you divert and pretend mocking you for being upset over watch checking is somehow notable. 🤣
I posted a link showing Crow offended the families, and now you say your mocking words were for me but did not apply to the offended families? Is that your new story?

Why don't you man or woman up and admit you are ashamed (if you are capable of shame) and apologize?

Have you come up with a new story to explain your lie about Ashley Biden?
 
It was stated unequivocally by Trump’s Chief of Staff, who is also a four star general.

The only “debunking “ is by people who weren’t with Trump and Kelley. Those people say they didn’t hear it! :)
Ps: the tan suit and watch check are real :oops:
So only the four-star General heard this, and I agree that others nearby may not have heard it if it was said softly. But do you think they may have heard or seen the four-star General's reaction to it? Or do you think he was too meek to say anything? Do you think that as a meek man he said that he understands and agrees that the President should have made the tough decision and fire him? Personally, I think he knew the rag made up the story and figured this was how he could get some revenge.
 
I hate liars who mock grieving Goldstar families. Shame on you.
So you HATE Donald Trump. Because he mocked a Gold Star mother. Said she wasn't allowed to speak because that Gold Star mother was Muslim: "If you look at his wife, she was standing there." "She had nothing to say... Maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say. You tell me."
  • Do you also hate people who call American military heroes "Losers and suckers."
  • Do you hate people who say about American POWs “He’s not a war hero.” “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.” Donald Trump wasn't captured because he spent that war at Studio 54 chasing young, drugged up women.
Tell us ... do you hate the denigration of our nations heroes? Do you hate someone who thinks that five years at the Hanoi Hilton is something to be mocked?

Or is it more offensive to you that someone checked their watch at a Gold Star ceremony?

You are embarrassing yourself and you really should stop. All of the true Trumpers want no part of you here. Mocking you for getting so upset that old man Biden checked his watch when he shouldn't have pales compared to what Trump did, and you won't condemn that. And the reason you won't condemn what Trump said? Because you are a widdle angwy at some message board poster.

Your credibility is absolutely shredded.
 
Last edited:
So you HATE Donald Trump. Because he mocked a Gold Star mother. Said she wasn't allowed to speak because that Gold Star mother was Muslim: "If you look at his wife, she was standing there." "She had nothing to say... Maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say. You tell me."
Yes, I hate Trump for many reasons, and that is one of them.

  • Do you also hate people who call American military heroes "Losers and suckers."
Yes.
  • Do you hate people who say about American POWs “He’s not a war hero.” “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.” Donald Trump wasn't captured because he spent that war at Studio 54 chasing young, drugged up women.
Yes.
Tell us ... do you hate the denigration of our nations heroes? Do you hate someone who thinks that five years at the Hanoi Hilton is something to be mocked?
Yes.
Or is it more offensive to you that someone checked their watch at a Gold Star ceremony?
Highly offensive to me that you mocked Goldstar families for being offended.

Waiting to see if you will mock them again for being offended Crow claimed no American soldiers have died under his watch - in fact, not only did they die under his watch, but because of his incompetence.

You are embarrassing yourself and you really should stop. All of the true Trumpers want no part of you here. Mocking you for getting so upset that old man Biden checked his watch when he shouldn't have pales compared to what Trump did, and you won't condemn that. And the reason you won't condemn what Trump said? Because you are a widdle angwy at some message board poster.
I am not angry at you, but disgusted by you and your despicable words against grieving Goldstar families and your lie about Ashley Biden.
Your credibility is absolutely shredded.
You of all despicable poster thinking you are even remotely qualified to judge 'credibility' is like Crow saying he is saving the soul of the nation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Telling The Truth
Yes, I hate Trump for many reasons, and that is one of them.


Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Highly offensive to me that you mocked Goldstar families for being offended.

Waiting to see if you will mock them again for being offended Crow claimed no American soldiers have died under his watch - in fact, not only did they die under his watch, but because of his incompetence.


I am not angry at you, but disgusted by you and your despicable words against grieving Goldstar families and your lie about Ashley Biden.

You of all despicable poster thinking you are even remotely qualified to judge 'credibility' is like Crow saying he is saving the soul of the nation.
So so SO much better!

You are still mad at me, but you just unequivocally came out against Trump's nonsense? With no veering away from the issues raised?

Major kudos. Probably the best post I have ever seen from you. I am a message board poster -- be mad at me all you want.


Biden would be 86 during the next term if he were re-elected. And he's already mentally gone. He also has had some awful liberal policies, some really questionable (at best) family ties, and has no business running for a second term. Blecchh.

And Trump? There are many Republicans that have a moral compass and actual conservative policies. Not perfect, but either good or at least reasonable choices. Trump isn't very conservative and has the lowest moral compass of anyone ever to hold the office. The effects of his soullessness weren't fully realized during his first term (though J6 was an evocative almost-disaster), but give that guy four more years with his self-perceived impunity? Whoo boy that's a complete disaster powder keg waiting to explode.
 
Last edited:
So you really think that oldddd Joe Biden checking his watch during a ceremony is that bad? Okay! I mean, it’s not optimal but that bad?!!? And how do you feel about a President wearing a tan suit?

Now that we’ve established that the watch checking is horrible in your opinion, let’s try one more question that you haven’t answered—PLEASE no Diverting:

How bad is it when a President tours a veterans cemetery and calls our war deceased “Losers and suckers.”
Is there any actual video of Trump saying this or is it just anonymous sources?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Neither actual video nor anonymous:

It is a direct statement from General John Kelley, who was Trump's Chief of Staff at the time (he resigned that position--was not fired). Kelley states that he and Trump were walking through a French cemetery visiting WWII American war dead when Trump called Marines who died at Belleau Wood “suckers.” Kelley also says that Trump called fallen soldiers at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" as justification for not wanting to visit that cemetery because it was raining.
 
Last edited:
So so SO much better!

You are still mad at me, but you just unequivocally came out against Trump's nonsense? With no veering away from the issues raised?

Major kudos. Probably the best post I have ever seen from you. I am a message board poster -- be mad at me all you want.
You don't get it, predictably. I hate Trump, but I hate Crow even more. Both are horrible people, but unlike Trump, Crow's policies have been damaging to the US and the world.

I have never said I liked Trump on this board, but this is the first time anyone asked me if I hate him. But my vote is always for the good of the nation, as I see it, given the choices.
 
You don't get it, predictably. I hate Trump, but I hate Crow even more. Both are horrible people, but unlike Trump, Crow's policies have been damaging to the US and the world.

I have never said I liked Trump on this board, but this is the first time anyone asked me if I hate him. But my vote is always for the good of the nation, as I see it, given the choices.
No I get it. And I really like ^this^ post too. Your opinion amongst which severely flawed candidate is worse? That's absolutely valid.
 
You don't get it, predictably. I hate Trump, but I hate Crow even more. Both are horrible people, but unlike Trump, Crow's policies have been damaging to the US and the world.

I have never said I liked Trump on this board, but this is the first time anyone asked me if I hate him. But my vote is always for the good of the nation, as I see it, given the choices.
Here's your 'canary in the coal mine' moment that is signaling the end the of your hated Joe Biden:

When a national Democratic candidate loses the backing of George Clooney? That's a really bad day for that candidate.
 
You just applaud and support those who want to eliminate them by defunding them. Very conflicted.
Excuse me? Name me one person who I "applaud and support" who wants to eliminate or defund law enforcement.

Name. Me. One! I cannot stand idiots like Pressley, Talib (maybe the worst of all), Cori Bush, and AOC.

You know who else I can't stand on this issue? (because there's a direct Trump self-owning quote for almost everything) That idiot Trump who (and I quote) typed this, caps and all:

"REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS SHOULD DEFUND THE DOJ AND FBI UNTIL THEY COME TO THEIR SENSES"
 
"REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS SHOULD DEFUND THE DOJ AND FBI UNTIL THEY COME TO THEIR SENSES"

Lol....Don't stop there! Defund most of these agencies by a managed firing of them all one agency at a time. Then reboot any of few essentials of ech agency under conservative leadership.

After all, do-gooders have created 2200 handout programs through wasteful 438 agencies and sub-agencies.

(I will admit a few like FBI and others would & should survive.....but with 438.....a few definitely could go or be rebooted.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Lol....Don't stop there! Defund most of these agencies by a managed firing of them all one agency at a time. Then reboot any of few essentials of ech agency under conservative leadership.

After all, do-gooders have created 2200 handout programs through wasteful 438 agencies and sub-agencies.

(I will admit a few like FBI and others would & should survive.....but with 438.....a few definitely could go or be rebooted.)
1. Government is bloated.
2. That would be complete third world country chaos. Though the line "a few definitely could go or be rebooted" is spot-on.
 
1. Government is bloated.
2. That would be complete third world country chaos. Though the line "a few definitely could go or be rebooted" is spot-on.

Perhaps some feel the spending, bloated size and out of control regs are beyond chaos now???

I do.

Besides with 438 agencies, anyone could point to a handful of needed functions like Fed Parks, Fed Transit, Fed Quality control of Food, drug, VA, SS, Medicare and the few agencies in charge of Security & Defense.......who knows?....does that leave maybe 200 - 400 or so agencies & sub agencies that could be retooled/dismantled and likely few in America would even notice.
 
Context is important. Do you think it was the Russian Collusion Hoax, the destruction of Hillary's hard drives, or the handling of the Hunter evidence that sparked the comment?
No.

I think it is the federal felonies that a grand jury was about to indict him on back then.

That’s how he reacts when he feels put-upon; by screaming to defund law enforcement. Just like an idiot like Rashida Talib acts when she feels put upon.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
No.

I think it is the federal felonies that a grand jury was about to indict him on back then.

That’s how he reacts when he feels put-upon; by screaming to defund law enforcement. Just like an idiot like Rashida Talib acts when she feels put upon.
You think? What were the federal felonies?

But those things I mentioned had already happened, as a backdrop to what you think triggered the comment?
 
You think? What were the federal felonies?

But those things I mentioned had already happened, as a backdrop to what you think triggered the comment?
What were the federal felonies?

Pretty sure you can find them pretty easily online.

The Grand Juries were bearing down on him bigly when he proposed defunding federal law enforcement and the DOJ.

What a pig.
 
What were the federal felonies?

Pretty sure you can find them pretty easily online.

The Grand Juries were bearing down on him bigly when he proposed defunding federal law enforcement and the DOJ.

What a pig.
"Bigly"? lol
So you can't support that statement.

And it was indeed after the FBI's 4-year witch hunt for Russian Collusion, Hillary's laptops, and the Hunter cover-up. If the Dems need their own anti-democracy enforcement arm to pair with Antifa, don't make taxpayers fund it.
 
There . It took all of a 30 second Google search to find both source docs. I included the superseding indictment for the classified documents case.

Are you really that far down the rabbit hole to where you don’t believe these federal charges exist?

Kinda sad/ridiculous.
 
There . It took all of a 30 second Google search to find both source docs. I included the superseding indictment for the classified documents case.

Are you really that far down the rabbit hole to where you don’t believe these federal charges exist?

Kinda sad/ridiculous.
Congrats!!! The topic was when Trump supposedly suggested defunding the FBI and Justice Department. It was after they tried to bring him down with false charges and protected Hillary and Biden from prosecution. Keep up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Congrats!!! The topic was when Trump supposedly suggested defunding the FBI and Justice Department. It was after they tried to bring him down with false charges and protected Hillary and Biden from prosecution. Keep up.
Okay my turn! “You can’t support that statement.”

What were the statues that Clinton and Biden should have been prosecuted for. Show me the prosecution memos from the Trump DOJ which discussed them, and any FOIPA from the Grand Juries which is relevant to the decision that charges would not have been appropriate.

Ready? GO! (This oughta be funny and a VERY long wait 🤣)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Okay my turn! “You can’t support that statement.”

What were the statues that Clinton and Biden should have been prosecuted for. Show me the prosecution memos from the Trump DOJ which discussed them, and any FOIPA from the Grand Juries which is relevant to the decision that charges would not have been appropriate.

Ready? GO! (This oughta be funny and a VERY long wait 🤣)
Are you really that far down the rabbit hole? lol

When the people who are responsible for requesting the grand jury destroyed the evidence to avoid any indictment, how can there be an indictment?

I'm beginning to think your feigned ignorance is not feigned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Are you really that far down the rabbit hole? lol

When the people who are responsible for requesting the grand jury destroyed the evidence to avoid any indictment, how can there be an indictment?

I'm beginning to think your feigned ignorance is not feigned.
Probably a good day to cool the vitriol.

A good idea for all.
 
Last edited:
What were the federal felonies?

Pretty sure you can find them pretty easily online.

The Grand Juries were bearing down on him bigly when he proposed defunding federal law enforcement and the DOJ.

What a pig.
You must be referring to the book keeping error that was past the statute of limitations, was resurrected by a political prosecutor who managed to stretch some federal campaign fund rules and manipulate this into 34 felonies.
FYI this prosecutor has had previous cases dismissed by the SCOTUS for complete lack of merit.
That wasn't the purpose of the charges or trial however.
The real purpose was to defame Trump. I mean paying off a porn star that claims you had sex with her.

Of course there is this. I wonder why this never made it to the trial.


Or this.


And of course the defenses expert witness, that was to testify that the payment wasn't a campaign fund management violation, wasn't allowed to testify by the liberal Judge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT