After tonights commitment,Purdue is ranked 26th nationally and 5th in the BIG.A week ago,they were about 45th nationally and 10th or 11th in the conference.This is a huge jump in a few days!Boiler up!.
According to the composite (average rankings across Rivals, 247 & ESPN), IU has 2 guys committed rated under .8599. Purdue has 2 guys committed above that number. Quality > Quantity.
I'm sure Omar Cooper committing will help our rankingThat’s a random arbitrary number to pick lol.
Yes your class is better. Your worst player is ranked around our average according to 247. Brohm has lost recruiting momentum big time the last 2 classes and unless there is some diamonds in the rough, the future doesn’t look real brightI'm sure Omar Cooper committing will help our ranking
Good luck when your brittle QB gets hurt again. That would make it 4 seasons/4?I'm sure Omar Cooper committing will help our ranking
Yet your thread on line #41 was all about pu recruitingUntil high school recruits become college players and actually get in a game,we dont know how good they will be.
And both his comments in each post are true. I mean what was he thinking posting about Purdue recruiting on a Purdue forum right?Yet your thread on line #41 was all about pu recruiting
And you guys have a "pud" conference schedule every year and you still can't win. Go back to your own board.They have a pud schedule in non-conference basically every year.
This is a Purdue board, not an IU board, you clown.And you guys have a "pud" conference schedule every year and you still can't win. Go back to your own board.
What’s better than 0 bowl wins since 1991? Almost anything. Utah? L Tennessee? L Ole Miss? L. Ole Miss had a losing record coming into that game.IU - Whats better than 19-14?
Auburn - 63-14.
See ya in November.
Until then, love each other. (Cause it’s likely nobody else will.)
Uh oh. It’s another Loosier infestation……IU - Whats better than 19-14?
Auburn - 63-14.
See ya in November.
Until then, love each other. (Cause it’s likely nobody else will.)
seeking validation where there is none to be offered....IU - Whats better than 19-14?
Auburn - 63-14.
See ya in November.
Until then, love each other. (Cause it’s likely nobody else will.)
So what?Did I say on line 41 that everyone Purdue recruits turns out to be great?Yet your thread on line #41 was all about pu recruiting
Thanks.And both his comments in each post are true. I mean what was he thinking posting about Purdue recruiting on a Purdue forum right?
We have a very tough schedule. Plus each year we play OSU, PSU, and both Michigans.It should be interesting to see how Indianas season unfolds since they open at Iowa and play Cincy at IU in their third game.
We have a very tough schedule. Plus each year we play OSU, PSU, and both Michigans.
Barely beat Michigan...by 17This is a Purdue board, not an IU board, you clown.
You guys beat historically bad PSU teams (barely) and Michigan (barely) and now IU is a National powerhouse, huh? How many teams have you guys beaten with winning records since Coach LEO has been there? (0) How many bowl games have you won? (0) How many times have you beaten Purdue under Brohm? (1 and barely in OT against an injury-depleted roster). Brohm is 2-1 vs. Coach LEO.
IU will fall back to where it belongs soon enough. Even with your pud non-con schedule. Cinci is a good team. IU will likely lose to them. Your other games are garbage.
In non-conference? GTFOH, Loosier.We have a very tough schedule. Plus each year we play OSU, PSU, and both Michigans.
WIU and OSU were a combined 11-1 in conference, with IU having the only loss.
I was using math to illustrate a point. I thought Purdue was supposed to be good at math.W
T
H
?????
Lumping IU in with OSU... and counting it that way... LOL!
That has to be a parody post.
I was using math to illustrate a point. I thought Purdue was supposed to be good at math.
Let's break it down another way. IU, OSU, Northwestern, and Iowa were a combined 19 games above .500. Therefore the rest of the conference had to be an equal number of games below .500.
I never compared the programs, it's not my fault you can't understand math.you added your record to OSU's, and it made NO point.
This is a clownish attempt in searching for validation.
No. IU is no OSU. The two programs are nowhere close.
LOL! You posted the combined total of OSU and IU. Yeah... there was no comparison. It's like the IU home game vs OSU ... it's merely "picture day". Nothing more, nothing less.I never compared the programs, it's not my fault you can't understand math.
The following teams were this many games above .500
OSU +5
IU +5
Northwestern +5
Iowa +4
Therefore the rest of the conference had to be a corresponding number of games below .500
And here I thought I hit the sauce early sometimes. Go home champ, you're drunk.And you guys have a "pud" conference schedule every year and you still can't win. Go back to your own board.
How’s that basketball team of yours doing playing in Mackey South? Have you decided to opt for the flying P logo on your floor yet? You haven’t beaten Purdue in basketball in what 5+ yrs so you decide to post about Football???? MMMkkkk.Hate to burst the bubble here but theres this as of the 25th of this month.
https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/614/450/10450614.png
And the fact that when you look up the quality of recruits committed IU ranks 4th in the conference while purdue just out does illinois for last in the conference. Lets face it... Its gonna take along a$$ time for you all to catch up again. The last IU commit had 10 other P5 offers including auburn...ohhh damn sorry to bring that up...did they score again?![]()
They try really hard to get our approval and acceptance don't they? Most insecure fanbase I have ever seen.LOL! You posted the combined total of OSU and IU. Yeah... there was no comparison. It's like the IU home game vs OSU ... it's merely "picture day". Nothing more, nothing less.
You can be as condescending as you like, but you would be right in NOT comparing them. And, it would serve you well to not include the combination of the record of the two. It's not my fault if you can't understand that simple idea.
What the rest of the conference did is irrelevant. In no way does it reflect or elevate IU's status.
Did you just like your own post????Damn, getting validation from your own post is scary. Get help!I never compared the programs, it's not my fault you can't understand math.
The following teams were this many games above .500
OSU +5
IU +5
Northwestern +5
Iowa +4
Therefore the rest of the conference had to be a corresponding number of games below .500
So, we beat more end of the year ranked teams and it was your best year in recent history.Barely beat Michigan...by 17
Wisconsin had a winning record ,which is a stupid way to measure success in 2020. The BIG played a conference only schedule. The whole league was guaranteed to finish exactly
.500.
IU and OSU were a combined 11-1 in conference, with IU having the only loss. That's 10 games over .500 in a group of teams guaranteed to finish .500.
More like good luck winning at Michigan, Penn State and at home against Ohio State. Oh, and Iowa. 😂😂😂😂Good luck when your brittle QB gets hurt again. That would make it 4 seasons/4?
Dude. You're trying to hard.What the other Andy is pointing out with math is that due to the limited, conference only schedule last year, the record for the league as a whole was .500. Only 4 of the 14 teams had winning records in conference play, 2 in the East & 2 in the West. Those 4 teams dominated the league last year. They were a combined +19 wins. The other 10 B10 teams were a combined -19 (Wiscy was .500 so really 9 teams were -19). Since IU was one of the 4, at most, they could have played 3 teams with a winning B10 record. Of course, they didn't play Northwestern or Iowa. Of course, 3 of the times without losing records would have had winning records if they had beaten IU (Wiscy, Penn State & Maryland).
To simplify this a tad, IU was 6-1. That is a plus 5. OSU was 5-0. Another plus 5. As a result, there weren't as many wins to go around in the East. The other 5 teams in the East were combined -10 (PSU & MD -1 each, Michigan -2, Rutgers & MSU -3 each). The West was similar in that Northwestern & Iowa were a combined +9.
In normal seasons, there are 3 noncon games per team and a majority of those are not P5 teams.
Exactly. Andy06 = AndyW. This is an old Peegs board trick. The same Loosier uses different accounts to make it look like other people are coming here to agree with their dumb initial take.Dude. You're trying to hard.
Everyone understands the math. They got it when "the other Andy" made the post. They don't need you equating IU's record or performance with OSU's.
Since you are such a math whiz, how many days has it been since IU beat OSU ?I was using math to illustrate a point. I thought Purdue was supposed to be good at math.
Let's break it down another way. IU, OSU, Northwestern, and Iowa were a combined 19 games above .500. Therefore the rest of the conference had to be an equal number of games below .500.