ADVERTISEMENT

IU Star says CFB fell in love with Rev Coach Leo and his message of love...

After tonights commitment,Purdue is ranked 26th nationally and 5th in the BIG.A week ago,they were about 45th nationally and 10th or 11th in the conference.This is a huge jump in a few days!Boiler up!.
 
According to the composite (average rankings across Rivals, 247 & ESPN), IU has 2 guys committed rated under .8599. Purdue has 2 guys committed above that number. Quality > Quantity.
 
According to the composite (average rankings across Rivals, 247 & ESPN), IU has 2 guys committed rated under .8599. Purdue has 2 guys committed above that number. Quality > Quantity.

That’s a random arbitrary number to pick lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purdue80
I'm sure Omar Cooper committing will help our ranking
Yes your class is better. Your worst player is ranked around our average according to 247. Brohm has lost recruiting momentum big time the last 2 classes and unless there is some diamonds in the rough, the future doesn’t look real bright
 
  • Like
Reactions: HoosierJmb
There was a Purdue Player that wore the No.15 that was part of a last place recruiting class... It never looks good but means nothing.....
 
Until high school recruits become college players and actually get in a game,we dont know how good they will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLAG HUNTER
I haven't given up on Brohm yet. Odd that after the first 2 years for both coaches our fan base wanted to give a raise and another wanted a high school coach fired.
 
And you guys have a "pud" conference schedule every year and you still can't win. Go back to your own board.
This is a Purdue board, not an IU board, you clown.

You guys beat historically bad PSU teams (barely) and Michigan (barely) and now IU is a National powerhouse, huh? How many teams have you guys beaten with winning records since Coach LEO has been there? (0) How many bowl games have you won? (0) How many times have you beaten Purdue under Brohm? (1 and barely in OT against an injury-depleted roster). Brohm is 2-1 vs. Coach LEO.

IU will fall back to where it belongs soon enough. Even with your pud non-con schedule. Cinci is a good team. IU will likely lose to them. Your other games are garbage.
 
IU - Whats better than 19-14?

Auburn - 63-14.

See ya in November.

Until then, love each other. (Cause it’s likely nobody else will.)
What’s better than 0 bowl wins since 1991? Almost anything. Utah? L Tennessee? L Ole Miss? L. Ole Miss had a losing record coming into that game.
 
This is a Purdue board, not an IU board, you clown.

You guys beat historically bad PSU teams (barely) and Michigan (barely) and now IU is a National powerhouse, huh? How many teams have you guys beaten with winning records since Coach LEO has been there? (0) How many bowl games have you won? (0) How many times have you beaten Purdue under Brohm? (1 and barely in OT against an injury-depleted roster). Brohm is 2-1 vs. Coach LEO.

IU will fall back to where it belongs soon enough. Even with your pud non-con schedule. Cinci is a good team. IU will likely lose to them. Your other games are garbage.
Barely beat Michigan...by 17
Wisconsin had a winning record ,which is a stupid way to measure success in 2020. The BIG played a conference only schedule. The whole league was guaranteed to finish exactly
.500.

IU and OSU were a combined 11-1 in conference, with IU having the only loss. That's 10 games over .500 in a group of teams guaranteed to finish .500.
 
W

T

H​


?????

Lumping IU in with OSU... and counting it that way... LOL!

That has to be a parody post.
I was using math to illustrate a point. I thought Purdue was supposed to be good at math.

Let's break it down another way. IU, OSU, Northwestern, and Iowa were a combined 19 games above .500. Therefore the rest of the conference had to be an equal number of games below .500.
 
I was using math to illustrate a point. I thought Purdue was supposed to be good at math.

Let's break it down another way. IU, OSU, Northwestern, and Iowa were a combined 19 games above .500. Therefore the rest of the conference had to be an equal number of games below .500.

you added your record to OSU's, and it made NO point.

This is a clownish attempt in searching for validation.

No. IU is no OSU. The two programs are nowhere close.
 
you added your record to OSU's, and it made NO point.

This is a clownish attempt in searching for validation.

No. IU is no OSU. The two programs are nowhere close.
I never compared the programs, it's not my fault you can't understand math.
The following teams were this many games above .500
OSU +5
IU +5
Northwestern +5
Iowa +4

Therefore the rest of the conference had to be a corresponding number of games below .500
 
I never compared the programs, it's not my fault you can't understand math.
The following teams were this many games above .500
OSU +5
IU +5
Northwestern +5
Iowa +4

Therefore the rest of the conference had to be a corresponding number of games below .500
LOL! You posted the combined total of OSU and IU. Yeah... there was no comparison. It's like the IU home game vs OSU ... it's merely "picture day". Nothing more, nothing less.

You can be as condescending as you like, but you would be right in NOT comparing them. And, it would serve you well to not include the combination of the record of the two. It's not my fault if you can't understand that simple idea.

What the rest of the conference did is irrelevant. In no way does it reflect or elevate IU's status.
 
Hate to burst the bubble here but theres this as of the 25th of this month.

https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/614/450/10450614.png

And the fact that when you look up the quality of recruits committed IU ranks 4th in the conference while purdue just out does illinois for last in the conference. Lets face it... Its gonna take along a$$ time for you all to catch up again. The last IU commit had 10 other P5 offers including auburn...ohhh damn sorry to bring that up...did they score again?
10450614.png
How’s that basketball team of yours doing playing in Mackey South? Have you decided to opt for the flying P logo on your floor yet? You haven’t beaten Purdue in basketball in what 5+ yrs so you decide to post about Football???? MMMkkkk.

I’ll wager you this, Purdue will beat IU in football before IU beats Purdue in basketball.

Parting thoughts. Ole Miss…..😂😂😂😂😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt Tiger and BBG
LOL! You posted the combined total of OSU and IU. Yeah... there was no comparison. It's like the IU home game vs OSU ... it's merely "picture day". Nothing more, nothing less.

You can be as condescending as you like, but you would be right in NOT comparing them. And, it would serve you well to not include the combination of the record of the two. It's not my fault if you can't understand that simple idea.

What the rest of the conference did is irrelevant. In no way does it reflect or elevate IU's status.
They try really hard to get our approval and acceptance don't they? Most insecure fanbase I have ever seen.
 
I never compared the programs, it's not my fault you can't understand math.
The following teams were this many games above .500
OSU +5
IU +5
Northwestern +5
Iowa +4

Therefore the rest of the conference had to be a corresponding number of games below .500
Did you just like your own post????Damn, getting validation from your own post is scary. Get help!
 
Barely beat Michigan...by 17
Wisconsin had a winning record ,which is a stupid way to measure success in 2020. The BIG played a conference only schedule. The whole league was guaranteed to finish exactly
.500.

IU and OSU were a combined 11-1 in conference, with IU having the only loss. That's 10 games over .500 in a group of teams guaranteed to finish .500.
So, we beat more end of the year ranked teams and it was your best year in recent history.
 
What the other Andy is pointing out with math is that due to the limited, conference only schedule last year, the record for the league as a whole was .500. Only 4 of the 14 teams had winning records in conference play, 2 in the East & 2 in the West. Those 4 teams dominated the league last year. They were a combined +19 wins. The other 10 B10 teams were a combined -19 (Wiscy was .500 so really 9 teams were -19). Since IU was one of the 4, at most, they could have played 3 teams with a winning B10 record. Of course, they didn't play Northwestern or Iowa. Of course, 3 of the times without losing records would have had winning records if they had beaten IU (Wiscy, Penn State & Maryland).

To simplify this a tad, IU was 6-1. That is a plus 5. OSU was 5-0. Another plus 5. As a result, there weren't as many wins to go around in the East. The other 5 teams in the East were combined -10 (PSU & MD -1 each, Michigan -2, Rutgers & MSU -3 each). The West was similar in that Northwestern & Iowa were a combined +9.

In normal seasons, there are 3 noncon games per team and a majority of those are not P5 teams.
 
What the other Andy is pointing out with math is that due to the limited, conference only schedule last year, the record for the league as a whole was .500. Only 4 of the 14 teams had winning records in conference play, 2 in the East & 2 in the West. Those 4 teams dominated the league last year. They were a combined +19 wins. The other 10 B10 teams were a combined -19 (Wiscy was .500 so really 9 teams were -19). Since IU was one of the 4, at most, they could have played 3 teams with a winning B10 record. Of course, they didn't play Northwestern or Iowa. Of course, 3 of the times without losing records would have had winning records if they had beaten IU (Wiscy, Penn State & Maryland).

To simplify this a tad, IU was 6-1. That is a plus 5. OSU was 5-0. Another plus 5. As a result, there weren't as many wins to go around in the East. The other 5 teams in the East were combined -10 (PSU & MD -1 each, Michigan -2, Rutgers & MSU -3 each). The West was similar in that Northwestern & Iowa were a combined +9.

In normal seasons, there are 3 noncon games per team and a majority of those are not P5 teams.
Dude. You're trying to hard.

Everyone understands the math. They got it when "the other Andy" made the post. They don't need you equating IU's record or performance with OSU's.
 
Dude. You're trying to hard.

Everyone understands the math. They got it when "the other Andy" made the post. They don't need you equating IU's record or performance with OSU's.
Exactly. Andy06 = AndyW. This is an old Peegs board trick. The same Loosier uses different accounts to make it look like other people are coming here to agree with their dumb initial take.
 
Good luck to you guys this season! I am always rooting for both teams success so that the Thanksgiving weekend matchup means a little more than just bragging rights. I look forward to watching David Bell torch some defenses.
 
I was using math to illustrate a point. I thought Purdue was supposed to be good at math.

Let's break it down another way. IU, OSU, Northwestern, and Iowa were a combined 19 games above .500. Therefore the rest of the conference had to be an equal number of games below .500.
Since you are such a math whiz, how many days has it been since IU beat OSU ?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT