Anyone think NK troops
- By BB62
- Free Board: General Discussion Forum
- 70 Replies
Could you possibly be less specific.We have 4 years of data that say you're wrong.
Could you possibly be less specific.We have 4 years of data that say you're wrong.
I think pooping his pants is Slow Joe’s go-to move now, in the presence of foreign leaders.Biden would be pissing in his pants in the presence of any of those foreign leaders.
I haven’t confirmed or denied. That wasn’t the topic.Are you saying I’m wrong that BoBo hired the worst coach in all of CFB? ADs are only as successful as their network of people and that includes potential coaches. He may have reached out to other coaches, but he was unprepared for Brohms departure. His lack of preparation means that he hadn't done the networking necessary to recruit a B1G coach, or he would have gone with someone other than CRW - which everyone (even those quick to jump onboard) acknowledged at the time was a risky hire due to his lack of HC experience. And we were sold that CRW is a defensive genius (fail), and further Bielema over the winter said that the defensive scheme was a collaborative effort that he personally led, not CRW. How does this not come out in the reference checks for CRW?
We have 4 years of data that say you're wrong.No, I don't seem to agree. Tactical nukes are not certain to be used but even if they are, you still have to secure territory and hold it with armor and infantry.
"Thus, you seem to agree that fighting them in Ukraine does the US no good and will not matter to the security of NATO countries because any further Russia invasions will involve tactical nukes."
You seem to be assuming that if Russia uses tactical nukes it's all over. NATO won't respond? Nukes haven't been used in Ukraine but we just assume Russia would use them when they go into Poland? The first one to use nukes puts themselves in serious diplomatic, economic, and political peril.
I'm stating the views expressed by trump. He has talked about how NATO is obsolete. He has said he wouldn't help our allies attacked by Russia if they weren't spending their 2%..........directly undermining Article 5 that has been in place for 75 years.
Trump is going to spend as much if not more than any democrat on the military, funneling taxpayer money to big arms suppliers. You need to let that one go or admit trump will do the same or more.
No, I don't seem to agree. Tactical nukes are not certain to be used but even if they are, you still have to secure territory and hold it with armor and infantry.Agree on tactical nukes, which France and UK have. Thus, you seem to agree that fighting them in Ukraine does the US no good and will not matter to the security of NATO countries because any further Russia invasions, as unlikely as that would be given the proven ineptitude of the Russian army, will involve tactical nukes.
You are misstating my views. I didn't say we should leave NATO, only that NATO countries should be paying for the Ukraine war if they think it is worth it to them. Collectively they have 17x the GDP of Russia, so they are wealthy - but happy to take advantage of US taxpayers for a non-NATO operation, courtesy of a Biden admin that wants to channel taxpayer money to big arms suppliers. That is the establishment at work even if you cannot understand it.
If there were no safeguards in place to prevent someone from taking advantage I would agree. But there is.Again, are you actually saying it is a good situation to have more people registered to vote, than actual voters?
Surely not??
Well, they do like to come here pumping their chest out of the NIL dealings. They some how equate this into recruiting (investment into a player before they hit a college floor) and they have failed miserably at it.why do we give a shat who iu signs or doesnt'?
Well then you won’t be seeing the player you described, because they’re all in the NBA.I don't watch the NBA unless I'm flipping channels and come across a game with a Purdue guy playing.
Because we play them twice a year. Just like we give a shit who MSU, Michigan, Illinois, etc.....sign.why do we give a shat who iu signs or doesnt'?
I'd say that's very relative. Smith scored 12 points and had 8 assists against 1 turnover with 2 steals. Shooting percentage wasn't great from 2 but was 50% from 3 and 75% from FT line.Uconn
I mean, we are talking about the same guy who gave Clappy Junior a 7 year, $35 million extension…No shit? Lol
no worse talent than brohm, I’ll take 4-7 win talent with a 7 win coach!You clearly don’t read the board much.
This team has 4-7 win talent and a 1 win coach!
Or we just need to get a stupid rich alum who can elevate us. Oregon was not an elite program until Phil knight fixed that.Are you serious,....there are coaches out there that can atleast not make us a laughing stock.... We will never be a top tier big ten team....but damn we can find somebody to make us competitive in games and give us a 7-5 type program
You clearly don’t read the board much.I hope this is TIC because the issue isn’t the roster. The lack of discipline and giving up games. We’ve seen 4-5 star talent in teams that stink and we’ve seen indinia thrive under the right coach and culture.
I hope this is TIC because the issue isn’t the roster. The lack of discipline and giving up games. We’ve seen 4-5 star talent in teams that stink and we’ve seen indinia thrive under the right coach and culture.We’ll look, if we just had $20mil to put together a roster none of this would be an issue
of course he will be.I personally think Furst gets the nod to start to begin the season. He plays well alongside TKR and as a senior, I think Painter gives him a chance to prove his worth.
Now things may change by time Bigten season comes around but I could honestly see Furst as an asset this season.
No kidding I came so this thread to see if we still had a head coach….Those seeking more suppressed info and fake news can always tune into MSNBC, log into Google…….meanwhile back to football Boilers, sad state of affairs
Yea and he did fine last game, so same can be said.Welcome to the NBA…