ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

Big Ten

W
Bank Shot Podcast said:
Indeed. Oregon looks good. But we will see how they shake out in the B1G schedule. This has been an ongoing problem for the Big Ten. Over the years the amount of elite talent has started to drop off. A lot of it going to the SEC. The thing about the Big Ten is that coaches are good at game planning against other Big Ten schools. It isn't like Big Ten schools aren't good, they just aren't elite. Like the past two years there was Purdue. There have been great years throughout the 2010s where you had Michigan State who was nationally elite. Ohio State. Purdue. Wisconsin. Illinois a couple of years. Indiana a couple of years. Maryland a couple of years. Michigan. Just don't have that elite talent and nationally elite teams. Oregon, UCLA and Michigan State look like the best. Michigan and Purdue right behind that or even in that group.
Click to expand...
Washington over Maryland. Good battle between Osobor and Reese. Queen not ready to mix it up with the big boys. Looks like Illinois will blow out Oregon out west.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Fighter of the Nightman and DwaynePurvis00

We need.......................

northside100
bonefish1 said:
Do you think Painter would have a 1 on 1 with Smith and say "What do you need me to get you from the portal?". (meaning, what does Painter need to go get in the portal to makes Smiths job easier and build a NC team)
Click to expand...
That's a great question. My guess is that's not the type of conversation Painter is having with players but I agree that it makes sense to illicit feedback from your senior star point guard.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: DwaynePurvis00

Big Ten

DwaynePurvis00
Bank Shot Podcast said:
Indeed. Oregon looks good. But we will see how they shake out in the B1G schedule. This has been an ongoing problem for the Big Ten. Over the years the amount of elite talent has started to drop off. A lot of it going to the SEC. The thing about the Big Ten is that coaches are good at game planning against other Big Ten schools. It isn't like Big Ten schools aren't good, they just aren't elite. Like the past two years there was Purdue. There have been great years throughout the 2010s where you had Michigan State who was nationally elite. Ohio State. Purdue. Wisconsin. Illinois a couple of years. Indiana a couple of years. Maryland a couple of years. Michigan. Just don't have that elite talent and nationally elite teams. Oregon, UCLA and Michigan State look like the best. Michigan and Purdue right behind that or even in that group.
Click to expand...
You sure about that? Cuz All that SEC talent has resulted in only 2 appearances in the F4 the last 5 tourneys
Click to expand...

IU did not deserve to be in CFP. Great article by USA Today

K
awthomps said:
IU sucks, now STFU
Click to expand...

POTFHBTFU said:
You are an idiot. Georgia actually looked like the better team, just made some mistakes, largely by their backup qb. Indiana was dominated by ND.
Click to expand...

Since you don’t seem to be willing to answer, I will:

Indiana lost to ND by 10. At Notre Dame.
Georgia lost to ND by 13. At a neutral site.

I’m not a Purdue STEM guy, but I am sure that losing by 13 at a neutral site is a larger loss than losing by 10 at a team’s home stadium.

To not understand that you’d have to either have trouble counting, or be Paul Finebaum or Herbstreit level delusional.
Click to expand...
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back