ADVERTISEMENT

Gicarri Harris

There’s talk on the other board about how good Harris is already. Brian has gone as far as to say he will probably start and that he is a great defender, possibly one of the best we have seen at Purdue.
Some people (IU fans) are saying it’s a bad sign that a frosh is starting over Heide/Colvin but Brian has explained it as Painter wanting a second ball handler next to Smith and not a knock on the two sophomores.

My question is, for you, is it a bad sign or is it a good sign that a frosh is possibly winning a starters role out of the gate?

For me it’s a good sign. We are incredibly deep with talent and we all know that Heide and Colvin are solid players. It’s going to be tough for Painter to manage the minutes with this much talent. Harris being BigDogs son makes this turn of events even more reasonable to me. We knew he was good but to see him win a starters spot right out of the gate is a very good sign that we indeed have a ton of talent on this years team.
Not worried at all about Heide and Colvin. Whether they start or not, they will get plenty of minutes.

Trump and Eisenhower were right about NATO

“Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, NATO’s first supreme allied commander Europe, felt strongly that his mission was to get Europeans “back on their military feet” — not for American troops to become the permanent bodyguard for Brussels and Berlin.

“If in 10 years, all American troops stationed in Europe for national defense purposes have not been returned to the United States,” he wrote of NATO in 1951, “then this whole project will have failed.”

“But as leaders of NATO allies gather in Washington on Tuesday for the alliance’s 75th anniversary, some 90,000 U.S. troops are stationed in Germany, Italy, Britain and elsewhere, making up a significant portion of the 500,000 NATO troops on high readiness.”

  • Like
Reactions: Indy_Rider

You reap what you sow

It's all Covid and climate change driving this. Unfortunately it will be spread to all other science as well.

Science is sometimes wrong but they always get to the right answer.

If you eliminated the Bible and all knowledge of it, in a thousand years it wouldn't come back just as it was. However, if you destroy all science, in a thousand years all of it would come back just as it was........because all the tests would yield the same results.

I'm sorry all of you are so triggered because all the scientists didn't come to all the right conclusions about an unknown, deadly disease in a few months.
If anyone is triggered, it’s the sheep like you, when anyone has the audacity to think for themselves, or protest against draconian government overreaches based on bad or corrupt science.
  • Like
Reactions: Joetboiler

You reap what you sow

It's all Covid and climate change driving this. Unfortunately it will be spread to all other science as well.

Science is sometimes wrong but they always get to the right answer.

If you eliminated the Bible and all knowledge of it, in a thousand years it wouldn't come back just as it was. However, if you destroy all science, in a thousand years all of it would come back just as it was........because all the tests would yield the same results.

I'm sorry all of you are so triggered because all the scientists didn't come to all the right conclusions about an unknown, deadly disease in a few months.

Commitment and what it would mean now

Revenue sharing has nothing to do with iu being good this year. Donors don’t just drop money off to the AD and say win. At least not for players. The AD cannot give money to players.

NIL will also likely take a back seat, meaning the recruiting of rosters will decrease, depending on how schools allocate collective bargaining. Schools can’t just dump NIL at players as all deals will have to be approved.
No I know revenue sharing doesn’t have anything to do with IU sigh. Revenue sharing is what can’t come fast enough for Purdue.

Word on on3 was that donors went to the AD and said here is 50 mill, do what needs to be done. I doubt that means donors gave him the money to write checks from IU to players sigh

If IU pulls off this class of Sisley/ Mullins/Haralson/Reibe.....

Berg has put in the work. He’ll see the floor more that Jacobson at least the first 1/4th of the season. After that he’ll start over Berg. Jacobson is way too talented, IMO. His rebounding, scoring touch, calm demeanor and blocking will be too important for Painter to discount. Get him used to the grind, petty-fouling and get some of the “dumb-freshman” turnover stuff out of the way. Berg will be a great back-up IMO.
That non con being so crazy should help everyone…especially the Frosh and Berg

Commitment and what it would mean now

Posters who pointed to Brian’s amount and said Jenkins got what Scourton turned down for Tamu. Again, posters who were plugged in and would tend to have info a bit before it was public.

Collectives are one thing. Some schools have big money donors who just drop off big donations and tell IUs AD to do what needs to be done. IU is 6-0 and everything good about their team is transfers. Because in between NIL mobilizing and revenue sharing, these kind of short term results are possible.

Now you think I’m trying to tell you Purdue is permanently doomed … I’m not. I agree. When revenue sharing kicks in, the top programs will still be able to bribe the Rondale Moore’s, but schools like Purdue will have the internal money to keep really good players who are at Purdue for the right reasons.

Where I’m actually going with this is the fact that it’s dumbfounding to me that fans expect stuff from any coach who has no money and very few quality home grown veterans. That said, I still expected 4-8 from Walters, so 1-11 should not keep his job. But these same fans are going to expect stuff from the next coach. And it’s delusional.

If Purdue had spent 2.0 million more than it did, Purdue could have kept Scourton and got playmakers at MLB, corner and slot receiver. And even with all the bs they’d probably be 3-3.

A big problem too of course is that cars appears to be a lot of money wasted
Revenue sharing has nothing to do with iu being good this year. Donors don’t just drop money off to the AD and say win. At least not for players. The AD cannot give money to players.

NIL will also likely take a back seat, meaning the recruiting of rosters will decrease, depending on how schools allocate collective bargaining. Schools can’t just dump NIL at players as all deals will have to be approved.
  • Like
Reactions: pboiler18

Gicarri Harris

I am going with 2025 Elite 8 and 2026 NC in Indy. That's like a home game!
For sure if we can get to the Midwest regional (Indianapolis) this year as whatever seed, I’d feel that’d be very much to our advantage.

Next year for the Midwest bracket, it’s St. Louis first weekend, Chicago second weekend and then Indy for the finals. That’d be an excellent route. Hope it all can happen.

Purdue picked to win Big Ten

This is from the IU board.

“Mgbako is a better outside shooter than anyone on Purdue's roster.”

Just thought we all needed a good laugh today.
Ahhh so this is this year’s “X is the better PG than Smith” and “Cupps is going to be better than Smith”.

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

Similar to woody’s recruiting strategy, the more you times you true, eventually you’ll be right 😂 😂

BennettVirginia

I am sorry to see this first-class coach and individual go; one less white hat in the Wild West of intercollegiate athletics.

Every season that Painter remains is a bonus. But I think he has cooked up the right formula for operating in this new environment without, as he puts it, "losing your soul", and has the acumen and attitude to keep the momentum going.

You reap what you sow

.
@SKYDOG : "My grammama smoked two packs a day and lived until she was 98. And she died when a piano fell on her head while she was moving furniture. Therefore, smoking isn't dangerous. Dumb-ass scientists didn't know what they were talking about with smoking!'

You do realize that Americans were dying of COVID by the hundreds of thousands until the vaccine was widely distributed, and then the deaths faded to practically zero.

I mean, how anti-science, conspiracy theory-believing, naïve, and ignorant do you have to be to not believe that scientists come to conclusions based on objective evidence, and that vaccines are a godsend to the human species?

And when a doctor or scientist issues precautionary or preventative advice? That is exactly what it is; a best-practice based on best available evidence, not an infallible panacea.

Is this even a topic for discussion in America in 2024?!!? Is this in part because the MAGA mindset has inculcated a belief in their followers to look for a conspiracy theory behind every obvious and evidence-based conclusion?

Holy crap.
.

The COVID vaccine manufactures and the scientist have said from the get go that there is a certain percent effectiveness. Therefore, since that percent effectiveness is not 100% some folks will still get COVID. Similarly with the seasonal flu. Some folks that get vaccinated with the seasonal flu vaccine still get the seasonal flu.

This is not a ‘liberal vs conservative’ argument.

Science does not know nor declare a political philosophy.
Because you know more than the scientists. You dismiss science not because you understand the subject better than they do........obviously........but because it doesn't agree with your politics.

This sums up my thoughts on Big Science pretty well.

Login to view embedded media

If IU pulls off this class of Sisley/ Mullins/Haralson/Reibe.....

If Jacobsen makes the leap he did over the past 6-9 months for the next 6 months - it is highly likely that he over takes Berg in the starting lineup. It isn’t a knock on Berg but I think Jacobsen brings something more to the table.

Said it before but there might be some ups and downs to start the season as we dial in the rotations but think it will be a well oiled machine come February. Floor for me is S16 and a FF as our ceiling. Tourney is always a crapshoot depending on seeding.

Commitment and what it would mean now

It’s not unreasonable. Never said it was. I was just curious where you were getting your numbers. Do you know how much of the 9 or 10 mil the collective has goes to football?

Which, again, it’s all about to change. And probably benefits Purdue.
Posters who pointed to Brian’s amount and said Jenkins got what Scourton turned down for Tamu. Again, posters who were plugged in and would tend to have info a bit before it was public.

Collectives are one thing. Some schools have big money donors who just drop off big donations and tell IUs AD to do what needs to be done. IU is 6-0 and everything good about their team is transfers. Because in between NIL mobilizing and revenue sharing, these kind of short term results are possible.

Now you think I’m trying to tell you Purdue is permanently doomed … I’m not. I agree. When revenue sharing kicks in, the top programs will still be able to bribe the Rondale Moore’s, but schools like Purdue will have the internal money to keep really good players who are at Purdue for the right reasons.

Where I’m actually going with this is the fact that it’s dumbfounding to me that fans expect stuff from any coach who has no money and very few quality home grown veterans. That said, I still expected 4-8 from Walters, so 1-11 should not keep his job. But these same fans are going to expect stuff from the next coach. And it’s delusional.

If Purdue had spent 2.0 million more than it did, Purdue could have kept Scourton and got playmakers at MLB, corner and slot receiver. And even with all the bs they’d probably be 3-3.

A big problem too of course is that cars appears to be a lot of money wasted

Gicarri Harris

CBS Sports agrees this team is top 10 worthy. Braden & Fletch are committed to making it back to the FF and winning this time. This team can be special by March. My personal expectation is Sweet 16/Elite 8 this year and NC in Indy next year! Talent is already there and trust Painter/Staff to shore up any needs between now and next summer.
I am going with 2025 Elite 8 and 2026 NC in Indy. That's like a home game!

Good players Purdue has recruited, developed and retained by class

Scourton is a potential top ten pick in the NFL draft per some reports. Definitely a first rounder.

Burks would have been our top receiver and a potential game changer on offense. Those are big losses.
Re: Burks

He's got 201 yards on the year and 3tds (which all came in the first game). He's missed 2 or 3 games with injury. Seems OK used him kind of like Rondale in AZ, ie a lot of short passes.

Yes, good chance he would have been #1 on our team. But really more of just a guy on OK it appears.

Note, I really liked Burks and wish he were here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT