ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

Ohio State at Purdue: MASTER DISCUSSION THREAD

P
jdbrees922 said:
my point was we quit running the offense that has been a staple since the Dakota days. We get into the dump the ball down and stand around , and Renn will not pass the ball back out
Click to expand...
We ran an offense that took us to Natl Champ game. We are getting good shots for our best 2 players. That is what every team wants. You don’t scheme so your 4th or 5th best players to get shots.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Do Dah Day and BBG

Two seed talk

qazplm
Wolegib said:
If you read an earlier post of mine, you would have seen I said ratings and bracket predictions in January were a bit premature. I went on to say a 6 seed was as good as a 2 seed. That was after the Oregon win and before the OSU loss. And there were comments about me being a blind squirrel gathering nuts. I hate to be the barer of bad news but this blind squirrel you keep dissing is more accurate than the majority of this board. You don’t don’t understand why and that’s why you love to diss me!

But since you don’t believe my words, just carry on and look stupid!

Oh yeah, I can see us being a #2 seed. Oh sure! It’s time some of you came back down to Earth. Purdue’s chances of being a 2 seed are about the same as Edey making rookie of the year. It’s possible but I’m not going to put money down and bet on it.

As losses go, this was not a quality one. We looked too far into the future. And kind of took OSU at home as a given. I’ve seen this too often from Purdue teams, especially in the tourney when they look ahead to the second game and forget to take care of business against the easy opponent.

Purdue’s basketball history is filled with broken records. You come off a big win, receive personal awards, talk about painter being a hall of famer deserving of a lifetime contract and then the team lays an egg against an easy team
Click to expand...
There's two reasons I stopped reading after you said a 2 seed is as good as a 6 seed.

The first is because I'm not reading all of that.
Click to expand...
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Do Dah Day and DwaynePurvis00

"And will, to the best of my ability"

Q
BB62 said:
But the amendment has been interpreted the same way for over 150 years.
Click to expand...
The 14th has been challenged repeatedly over the 249-year history of our nation, example below:

www.cbsnews.com

U.S. birthright citizenship established by 1898 San Francisco case involving Chinatown resident

Universal birthright citizenship has long been considered a constitutional right that got its start in San Francisco, thanks to a gutsy young man in Chinatown.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...

"And will, to the best of my ability"

BB62
Quix0te said:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." Here is the key phrase: " . . . and subject to the jurisdiction thereof . . ."

Now, if Costa Ricans Jose and Juanita cross our border illegally and Juanita has a kid drop out of crotch, is that kid "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US? Are the non-citizen parents subject to the jurisdiction of the US? This is why we have a Judicial Dept. They interpret the law. You don't decide the issue, the courts do.
Click to expand...
Didn't say I decided anything Rambo. But the amendment has been interpreted the same way for over 150 years.

You'd lose your freakin mind if a president put out an executive order trying to change the 2nd amendment.........which is a hell of a lot more vague than the 14th.

Where was this during trumps first term? I guess it wasn't a priority until trump realized it made all you goose steppers giddy.
Click to expand...

"I was saved by God to make America great again"

SKYDOG
BB62 said:
And also to ruthlessly attack an Episcopalian Bishop daring to talk about mercy for God's children in my presence.

Login to view embedded media
Click to expand...
She was wrong to bring up political issues in that setting. There’s a time and place to do such and a mass with the newly elected president attending is not it. Obviously you disagree.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: TwinDegrees2, Boilermaker03, Indy_Rider and 2 others

"And will, to the best of my ability"

TopSecretBoiler
Quix0te said:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." Here is the key phrase: " . . . and subject to the jurisdiction thereof . . ."

Now, if Costa Ricans Jose and Juanita cross our border illegally and Juanita has a kid drop out of crotch, is that kid "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US? Are the non-citizen parents subject to the jurisdiction of the US? This is why we have a Judicial Dept. They interpret the law. You don't decide the issue, the courts do.
Click to expand...
Yes the legal challenge is the very point of this EO. You keep playing checkers and leave this to the adults.
Click to expand...
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Riveting and Boiler Buck

"And will, to the best of my ability"

Q
BB62 said:
Seriously? You guys float through life accepting everything trump does is fine without question?

Read the 14th amendment to the CONSTITUTION. You know, that document you guys bring up all the time but apparently are unaware of what it says.
Click to expand...
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." Here is the key phrase: " . . . and subject to the jurisdiction thereof . . ."

Now, if Costa Ricans Jose and Juanita cross our border illegally and Juanita has a kid drop out of crotch, is that kid "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US? Are the non-citizen parents subject to the jurisdiction of the US? This is why we have a Judicial Dept. They interpret the law. You don't decide the issue, the courts do.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Joetboiler, bonefish1 and SKYDOG

No time to wallow

P
jdbrees922 said:
If we were exhausted from the west coast trip, why did Painter play Renn and Loyer the whole game and Smith the entire 2nd half. Obviously we needed to sub and he refused , someone needs to ask him why? If Smith didn’t have foul trouble he would have played 40 as well. I thought our bench was pretty good but Painter obviously didn’t think so
Click to expand...
after Smith went out, the team played well in the first half, also Colvin, Heide, and Furst combined for 4 shot attempts, gotta get more out of them
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: BBG and Schnelk

"And will, to the best of my ability"

BB62
I guess I have to explain to the MAGA elite.

Trump takes the oath of office, swearing before his God (like he knows something about his work) to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.

A few hours later, he signs an EO that is intended to take away a right laid out in a constitutional amendment whose meaning has never changed.

In case you still haven't read the info in my post this is about birthright citizenship.

Stop trying to change the argument. My point is clear.
Click to expand...
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back