Now wait a minute. I heard this before with the Lander discussion. How'd that turn out or Kaufman not playing with Furst and Ivey is just a chucker.
Last edited:
Twitter says Braden Smith just committed to Purdue
- Thread starter GemstateBoiler
- Start date
- Status
Waddell is a walk-on level player. Smith is close to that as well. After landing two top 75 players, you follow it up with Loyer, Waddell, and Smith. I hope the trend continues. You will be back to 2013 Purdue before you know it.
Now what a minute. I heard this before with the Lander discussion. How'd that turn out or Kaufman not playing with Furst and Ivey is just a chucker. Seems we recruit Champs!
Hey since Woody was out of coaching for a couple years, did he decide to go ahead and take early Social Security?
inefficient chucker. gotta quote correctly for full effect.
Only so much PT bro. I know you don't have that problem haha
This is hilarious seeing as Indiana has all 13 scholarships filled for next season (same problem) yet not a single player was ranked anywhere near as low as Waddell or Smith.
That will really help you against us when we play 13-on-13 games.
Lander won't be at IU in two years. Woody is going to immediately turn him into a pro.
Do you think any of your guards have played to their rankings? Seems ours have out played yours as of late.
You really are dumber than Courtsense. Waddell is a legit recruit as is Smith. It is far better to shut your mouth and let the world believe your ignorant than it is to keep posting this shit you're putting out and proving it to be true.
If you want something even more hilarious you should look at your end of season team ranking.
and Vidiot is definitely a Clownpants name.
Will be hilarious watching him trying to guard someone who is 6’4 with more strength, speed, etc.
You honestly think Purdue just snuck up on all other high majors for a 22 recruit?
But Gonzaga called... lmao
When Ryan Cline was offered by Purdue several years ago, I looked at his list of mid-major offers and wondered what Painter was thinking, but then I watched him play and understood.
Fast forward the Smith offer and I get it. The young man is a much better athlete than some on here think and he is a complete point guard, who can handle, shoot, and pass at a very high level. I think he’ll be a good player for Purdue. I am not saying that he has the ceiling of Ivey, Furst, or Kaufman, but he can be a great compliment to those guys, like Cline was a great compliment to Carsen.
Fast forward the Smith offer and I get it. The young man is a much better athlete than some on here think and he is a complete point guard, who can handle, shoot, and pass at a very high level. I think he’ll be a good player for Purdue. I am not saying that he has the ceiling of Ivey, Furst, or Kaufman, but he can be a great compliment to those guys, like Cline was a great compliment to Carsen.
Wasn’t Cline around 6’6?
Not a bad deep bench player with the current transfer rule, but if he ever starts, PU is in trouble. Who’s he going to guard in the B1G? It’s great he can knock down threes at Westfield.
This is really an ignorant, homer perspective. It reeks of either dishonesty or true stupidity. Honestly, after this post I am no longer going to debate or discuss basketball with you. Not worth the typing or effort. No reason to cast pearls...
Lol Mathgirl, how many times are you going to say you are going to stop responding to me? You can’t help yourself.
No one played to their ranking under Archie. Guards can show off their skill in transition, creating things off the dribble and when they have the freedom to make plays. Unfortunately, Archie's idea of offense was walking the ball up and alternating between 1 of 5 set plays until someone had to jack up a shot at the end of the shot clock. Fortunately, Archie is not the head coach anymore.
Isn't Archie the same guy all you basketball savants were touting as the guy to turn your program around for his first couple seasons? Maybe you guys just don't understand basketball? Something to consider.
Lander was supposed to be a senior in HS last year lol, seems purdue fans had higher expectations for him as a 17 year old freshman in the big ten than anyone else.
I didnt go back and watch Archies dayton career, all the national writers loved the hire so ya most went along with it and had optimism, I realized he was terrible in year 2.
Hey - how’s your $2 million a year contract for Archie working out? Is he holding out for an NBA gig?
Given how horribly wrong the mass freaks on your board have been the past 5 years, we're THRILLED that you wouldn't want him. (opposite George)
Well, you guys brought him in as a 17-year old. So it seems someone....hopefully.....had expectations for him last season beyond how he looked when he played. Kid shot more air balls than anyone else I saw in the Big Ten last year.
At least we get TOO the tournament........... man you just can't help it..
We had a mass freak out about Kaufman, so given your logic, you don’t think he will be very good...
Loyer is top 100 lol and will likely move up even more.
I thought someone posted him and Ivey were both 18 when the season started.
Yeah who would expect a 5* guy to average more than 2.1 PPG and shoot better than 25% from the field. He’s only 3 months younger than Jaden Ivey lol.
- Status
Similar threads
Purdue men's basketball Angry Braden Smith enters the title game
