A point guard is only as good as the team he's surrounded by
Thinking about the upcoming season and all the point guard talk, it got me thinking. Hill's historical numbers aren't eye popping by any means, but I doubt he's been surround by the level of talent that he will be here at Purdue in the coming season.
I have heard the PG be compared to the QB on a football team. I think about Etling and wonder what he could have been here if he had an offensive line And some wide receivers his freshman season.
So my question to the group is, do you think Hill will be better than his statistics have indicated? And if he is as good as JO, will be as good as many of us think we'll be.
Thinking about the upcoming season and all the point guard talk, it got me thinking. Hill's historical numbers aren't eye popping by any means, but I doubt he's been surround by the level of talent that he will be here at Purdue in the coming season.
I have heard the PG be compared to the QB on a football team. I think about Etling and wonder what he could have been here if he had an offensive line And some wide receivers his freshman season.
So my question to the group is, do you think Hill will be better than his statistics have indicated? And if he is as good as JO, will be as good as many of us think we'll be.