I guess I’m confused by the Tylenol bit because it’s based on what people who believe in anecdotes over scientific study pin their hopes on. Using that logic, you can say that dose of Tylenol the patient got before death must have killed him or, that dose of Tylenol they got before waking from their coma must have saved them. Or, I took a dose of HCQ, and within hours I was better. Or, I’ve given HCQ/Azi/Zn to hundreds of people and they’ve all lived. Are you more influenced by anecdotal evidence or scientific evidence?
Hydroxychloroquine as COVID-19 Treatment Update
- Thread starter LSLBoiler
- Start date
There have been no scientific studies on tylenol and Covid 19. It is assumed safe because it's long term safety record. It isn't being used as a potential cure, rather to lessen pain.
Hydroxy has been used in United States since 1955. Like tylenol.....It has a very safe track record....especially when given for short term.
I don't have any idea if Hydroxy is effective for Covid 19. There is anecdotal evidence when given early to high risk Covid 19 patients....it has helped.
Last I read it was the most prescribed drug around the world for Covid 19. The focus in scientific trials for hydroxy or any treatment should be,....is it safe and effective when given early on for Covid 19?
Instead the observational trials in US so far that have released results....have been for late stage treatment. If we waited until late stage to treat any disease ....we wouldn't have many treatments that work. When given early we have a lot of drug treatments that help with a lot of diseases.
I’m not the smartest pharmacist on the block, but I do know that Tylenol is not used to cure COVID 19, but thanks for pointing that out, I guess. Here’s hoping HCQ will be of some use, maybe to help patients post exposure, maybe prevent mild symptoms from getting worse. I think these studies are ongoing at the university of Minnesota right now
does your wife still confirm this? Sucker.
Study: Hydroxychloroquine no better than placebo for hospitalized COVID-19 patients - UPI.com
COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine showed no signs of significant improvement in "clinical status" compared with those given a placebo, a study published Monday by JAMA found.
www.upi.com
My quack doctor prescribed me a medicine cabinet full of it, I’m just biding my time, waiting for that proper moment to chug a bottle. Maybe one of the armchair docs on here can refresh me on that one precise moment when HCQ therapy is optimal
I'm guessing they banned you from the clown pants forum for being too intelligent for them, but you really can't keep up here. Please do go south with Coach Geese for the winter, and then stay there.
Still senate hearings about this? Just to make Donald (who didn't take this shit by the way when he was sick) feel better about this.
www.newsweek.com
Top Scientist Left Stunned by 'Very Odd' Hydroxychloroquine Senate Hearing
The drug was touted by President Donald Trump earlier in the pandemic.
www.newsweek.com
Wasn't it also touted by a number of medical doctors who used it successfully on covid patients? Think they were lying to make Trump look good?Still senate hearings about this? Just to make Donald (who didn't take this shit by the way when he was sick) feel better about this.
Top Scientist Left Stunned by 'Very Odd' Hydroxychloroquine Senate Hearing
The drug was touted by President Donald Trump earlier in the pandemic.
Not surprising that you don't understand anecdotal evidence vs. actual research. Where did you get your GED?
I was referring to anecdotal evidence. You couldn't understand that from my first sentence - the part about doctors using it successfully on covid patients, with no mention of research results? How could that have confused you so much that you resorted to a childish insult?
The point being that some people of science were agreeing with him based on their experience in using it.
You better call a lid on it for the day. I am sure Joe has.
Scientific data vs Fox prime time hosts. Gosh if you want to believe all those liberal scientists with their fancy experiments and data, you go right ahead.
Truth comes from all knowing people like Ingraham and Hannity.
Here is something in late March from all those liberal scientists at Oxford, showing there was a basis for what Trump was saying at the time. The FDA did not revoke emergency use authorization until June 15.
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: Current evidence for their effectiveness in treating COVID-19
Further research is now urgently needed to better understand the effectiveness of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19
www.cebm.net
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safe...oroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or
Where is the connection to Fox prime time that you are claiming, because it sounds like you are once more just spewing forth groupthink propaganda? Are you?
Going to pretend that Fox wasn’t talking about the drug constantly?Here is something in late March from all those liberal scientists at Oxford, showing there was a basis for what Trump was saying at the time. The FDA did not revoke emergency use authorization until June 15.
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: Current evidence for their effectiveness in treating COVID-19
Further research is now urgently needed to better understand the effectiveness of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safe...oroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or
Where is the connection to Fox prime time that you are claiming, because it sounds like you are once more just spewing forth groupthink propaganda? Are you?
No, but what if Fox was doing that? What does it matter in light of info like the Oxford and FDA links I gave you? Do you not believe what Oxford and FDA were saying?
Sounds like you might be watching Fox too much, or else the airport channel and NBC-Weinstein and their constant bashing of Fox.
Here is something in late March from all those liberal scientists at Oxford, showing there was a basis for what Trump was saying at the time. The FDA did not revoke emergency use authorization until June 15.
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: Current evidence for their effectiveness in treating COVID-19
Further research is now urgently needed to better understand the effectiveness of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safe...oroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or
Here is something in late March from all those liberal scientists at Oxford, showing there was a basis for what Trump was saying at the time. The FDA did not revoke emergency use authorization until June 15.
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: Current evidence for their effectiveness in treating COVID-19
Further research is now urgently needed to better understand the effectiveness of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safe...oroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or
nice non peer reviewed commentary from 2 authors that doesn’t necessarily represent the views from the institution per the little ole disclaimer at the end of the article
So what? The point was that some medical professionals were using the stuff and thus Trump was not making claims without some justification. And, the FDA did not revoke emergency use authorization until June 15.
You knee-jerks are going to miss Trump, but it is time to let TDS go and move on to BDS, Biden Dementia Syndrome.
You knee-jerks are going to miss Trump, but it is time to let TDS go and move on to BDS, Biden Dementia Syndrome.
