Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let’s start with the Illini.Lets discuss the conference here
Well played... hahaLet’s start with the Illini.
You guys have a tough game today Michigan is rolling right now...
That Iowa Wisconsin game last night was realllllllyyyy great basketball. The conference is shaping up to be extremely competitive this year.
Indiana NW game looked like 2 NIT teams.
I would say he is a better athlete, specifically laterally. But yeah I'm starting to think he was/is overrated. His shot doesn't even look that good.I've now seen Romeo Langford twice. He's good, for sure, but doesn't he look like Vince Edwards with a slightly quicker shot? I definitely don't see a top 5 national player.
The difference between his skills and the 3 freshmen at Duke are night and day. Again, nice player but.........
I've now seen Romeo Langford twice. He's good, for sure, but doesn't he look like Vince Edwards with a slightly quicker shot? I definitely don't see a top 5 national player.
The difference between his skills and the 3 freshmen at Duke are night and day. Again, nice player but.........
Indiana NW game looked like 2 NIT teams.
But, but, but ........ It's IU!!!I've now seen Romeo Langford twice. He's good, for sure, but doesn't he look like Vince Edwards with a slightly quicker shot? I definitely don't see a top 5 national player.
The difference between his skills and the 3 freshmen at Duke are night and day. Again, nice player but.........
Salty because IU wasn’t great, but Green and Langford were?
Uhhh.Vince Edwards was vastly superior in skill to Romeo. Vince was a career 40ish% 3point shooter on high volume. Romeos shot is absolutely broken.
Lol no.... he and Vince arent even close to the same players.I've now seen Romeo Langford twice. He's good, for sure, but doesn't he look like Vince Edwards with a slightly quicker shot? I definitely don't see a top 5 national player.
The difference between his skills and the 3 freshmen at Duke are night and day. Again, nice player but.........
Yet Romeo is the better player...Vince Edwards was vastly superior in skill to Romeo. Vince was a career 40ish% 3point shooter on high volume. Romeos shot is absolutely broken.
Yet Romeo is the better player...
Lol no.... he and Vince arent even close to the same players.
Lololol no. He is a better 3pt shooter, but that's it. Romeo will be a lottery pick next year. Has Vince even gotten a real NBA minute yet?Lolwhat? Youre a funny troll. Vince is vastly superior.
That statement just makes you look dumb. Yogi had almost no impact as a freshman. He was a guy that could only get assists. Couldn't score and couldn't play defense.I understand he's just a freshman but, at Duke and vs. NW, he looked like Vince Edwards with a quicker shot. Sorry.
If he's a top 5 talent then this is a very weak class. Now, don't get me wrong. He's very good but, to me, Yogi Ferrell had much more impact as a freshman than Langford.
That statement just makes you look dumb. Yogi had almost no impact as a freshman. He was a guy that could only get assists. Couldn't score and couldn't play defense.
Laughable comparison.
You better hope Romeo is a lottery pick, or he will come back. You certainly dont want that.To you, which makes no difference to me.
And your memory about the importance of Yogi as freshman sucks.
You better hope Romeo is a lottery pick, or he will come back. You certainly dont want that.
Lololol no. He is a better 3pt shooter, but that's it. Romeo will be a lottery pick next year. Has Vince even gotten a real NBA minute yet?
Go look at RJ Barrett's stats and get back to me.I'm sure he will be. I'm simply stating that I don't see the skills you typically see from a lottery pick and the difference between the Duke freshmen and what I've seen is vast. Maybe it's because of the transition to bigger games, bigger bodies, more talented opposition but I haven't seen "it" yet.
Haha you seem angry. Seems like Purdue could use a Romeo Langford right now.Youre such a huge dumbass. Lol you.
Go look at RJ Barrett's stats and get back to me.
Then they look fairly close to me.I'm not speaking about stats. I'm speaking about abilities.
To most IU Fans.
It's just a bad take. Averaging 19 pts and 6 rebs. Shooting 50% from the field. What more do you want from a freshman?FIFY. Most people know of the Duke freshmen and Gonzaga so far.
I'm sorry you're having such a hard time with one person's opinion that Romeo Langford has not LOOKED like a, typical, top 5 national talent against the best teams he's faced........so far.
He's really good. Barring injury, he'll be a lottery pick and I'm sure he'll have some amazing conference games. Jeez.........
It's just a bad take. Averaging 19 pts and 6 rebs. Shooting 50% from the field. What more do you want from a freshman?
For a freshman, that's awesome. For a lottery pick, I want top 20 in scoring abilities from a slashing guard like him. He's not top 100 in scoring at 17.7ppg........but it's early.
You guys obviously dont know how the NBA draft works.And is shooting like 25% from 3 after 8 games and only 2 games from a significant set by your own definition. Those NBA GMs are going to be all over a 2 guard that is a bad shooter from a closer point than he would see in the pros. That makes sense to me. (Dws)
You guys obviously dont know how the NBA draft works..
I'm guessing you both would love to have romeo on your team right now given your offensive deficiencies.