ADVERTISEMENT

Where’s the Democrat media in mentioning the race of Darrell Brooks?

FreedomWins

Junior
Jun 29, 2021
2,445
2,398
113
Is this black privilege? Just THINK about if this person were a white person who once took a picture with a Trump hat on. It’s ALLLLLLL we’d hear about! This is what the poisonous Democrat media does tho, ignore things when it’s convenient and hurts the narrative.

 
Is this black privilege? Just THINK about if this person were a white person who once took a picture with a Trump hat on. It’s ALLLLLLL we’d hear about! This is what the poisonous Democrat media does tho, ignore things when it’s convenient and hurts the narrative.


Yes - This is black privilege, they get to kill people and the law doesn't apply.

He was out on $500 bail for reckless homicide! Dude was a murderer walking the damn streets!
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreedomWins
Yes - This is black privilege, they get to kill people and the law doesn't apply.

He was out on $500 bail for reckless homicide! Dude was a murderer walking the damn streets!
There is no such thing as black privilege.
 
If it's not a white male, it's doesn't do the MSM any good to mention it. And especially if it's a black guy who's creating the problem, there's no way in hell race gets mentioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreedomWins
If it's not a white male, it's doesn't do the MSM any good to mention it. And especially if it's a black guy who's creating the problem, there's no way in hell race gets mentioned.
Yes! Because blacks committing crimes don’t do anything to help the Democrat Party/narrative that all white males who don’t vote Democrat are Trump supporting RACISTS.
 
If it's not a white male, it's doesn't do the MSM any good to mention it. And especially if it's a black guy who's creating the problem, there's no way in hell race gets mentioned.
Exactly. Just like they are completely ignoring the current case of self-defense where a young black woman kills her captor/molester in self defense. Yet it's the 'right' side that is donating to her defense fund and giving her exposure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreedomWins
Junior illegally had a fire arm, had prior felony charges and was in a household known for dealing illegal drugs.
And this compares how to the Rittenhouse case?
A fire arms loop hole? There is a difference between a hand gun and a rifle. What loop hole.
Rittenhouse legally had a fire arm.
If Junior was following the law, didn't have an illegal fire arm, he would have had a broken window and his girl friend would still be alive.
 
Then how do you explain this murderer walking the streets ?
Don’t know about this case. Perhaps the justice system worked for this dude. Just because the system worked for this dude, doesn’t mean that he benefited from black privilege, which there is no such a thing. Did the judge dismiss prosecution evidence that would have done him in? Did the judge allow evidence that would have benefitted him?
stuff like that is where any privilege will come into play. Say for the sake of argument he did benefit from some sort of privilege, that is just one out millions of cases that whites have benefitted from white privilege and blacks have endured trumped up evidence, coerced confessions, witness intimidation etc. in US history.
 
Don’t know about this case. Perhaps the justice system worked for this dude. Just because the system worked for this dude, doesn’t mean that he benefited from black privilege, which there is no such a thing. Did the judge dismiss prosecution evidence that would have done him in? Did the judge allow evidence that would have benefitted him?
stuff like that is where any privilege will come into play. Say for the sake of argument he did benefit from some sort of privilege, that is just one out millions of cases that whites have benefitted from white privilege and blacks have endured trumped up evidence, coerced confessions, witness intimidation etc. in US history.
Did OJ benefit from privilege?
 
Did OJ benefit from privilege?
Man, you don't quit do you? No, OJ did not benefit from privilege. He benefited from a a racist LA police department that was exposed. He benefited from sloppy police forensic crime scene work, again by the LA police department. He hired the the best lawyers money can by. Who wouldn't. Again the judge never ruled anything in favor of OJ because of some so called privilege. If the LA police wasn't so sloppy at the crime scene, perhaps he would have been convicted.
 
Man, you don't quit do you? No, OJ did not benefit from privilege. He benefited from a a racist LA police department that was exposed. He benefited from sloppy police forensic crime scene work, again by the LA police department. He hired the the best lawyers money can by. Who wouldn't. Again the judge never ruled anything in favor of OJ because of some so called privilege. If the LA police wasn't so sloppy at the crime scene, perhaps he would have been convicted.
Your stupidity reaches new levels every day. But keep on going with your white rage, it's all entertainment at this point.
 
Did OJ benefit from privilege?
Of course he did. Just like recently how Brooks did and a host of other privileged black people that were either released immediately or had their bonds set so low, the change in their pocket got them out. Meanwhile, other races, including white people, have bonds set so high that Hunter Biden can't even afford to pay them.
 
Of course he did. Just like recently how Brooks did and a host of other privileged black people that were either released immediately or had their bonds set so low, the change in their pocket got them out. Meanwhile, other races, including white people, have bonds set so high that Hunter Biden can't even afford to pay them.
What did the judge do to facilitate OJ’s alleged privilege?
 
Man, you don't quit do you? No, OJ did not benefit from privilege. He benefited from a a racist LA police department that was exposed. He benefited from sloppy police forensic crime scene work, again by the LA police department. He hired the the best lawyers money can by. Who wouldn't. Again the judge never ruled anything in favor of OJ because of some so called privilege. If the LA police wasn't so sloppy at the crime scene, perhaps he would have been convicted.
So, despite what happened in the OJ trial, do you believe he murdered his wife and her friend?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Level 42
@BNi, there’s been a huge increase in smash n grab crimes at high end luxury good retailers across the country. When you see the videos, a vast, vast majority of those committing these crimes are black. Yet, LE has been told not to chase or apprehend.
Is this black privilege?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Level 42
So, despite what happened in the OJ trial, do you believe he murdered his wife and her friend?
I don’t think OJ killed them by himself. I think he may have hired someone. I don’t it was enough evidence to convict him. The timeline between the killings and when he had to catch the cab to the airport didn’t jive. Plus the sloppiness of the LA police forensic team and the racist elements were exposed by the defense. The jury had no choice but to acquit. Remember, if it doesn’t fit. You must acquit.
 
@BNi, there’s been a huge increase in smash n grab crimes at high end luxury good retailers across the country. When you see the videos, a vast, vast majority of those committing these crimes are black. Yet, LE has been told not to chase or apprehend.
Is this black privilege?
Nope no such thing as black privilege.
 
I don’t think OJ killed them by himself. I think he may have hired someone. I don’t it was enough evidence to convict him. The timeline between the killings and when he had to catch the cab to the airport didn’t jive. Plus the sloppiness of the LA police forensic team and the racist elements were exposed by the defense. The jury had no choice but to acquit. Remember, if it doesn’t fit. You must acquit.
There were footprints with shoes that OJ said he didn’t own, then there were pictures of him in an NFL broadcast wearing the exact same shoes he said he didn’t own, essentially refuting his statements. But yeah, he probably hired someone named Orenthal James to kill his wife.

Several of the jurors have come out since saying they now believe he did it after reading his book, “If I Did It”

 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
There were footprints with shoes that OJ said he didn’t own, then there were pictures of him in an NFL broadcast wearing the exact same shoes he said he didn’t own, essentially refuting his statements. But yeah, he probably hired someone named Orenthal James to kill his wife.

Several of the jurors have come out since saying they now believe he did it after reading his book, “If I Did It”

That’s what I’m saying. Perhaps he was at the scene to make sure the job was done.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT