ADVERTISEMENT

Darrell Brooks (Waukesha) was found guilty of intentional homicide

Oct 27, 2022
18
43
13
But you’d never know if you lap up corporate Democrat media. They didn’t want to report on it because it was an African American very guilty of a gruesome crime. Now, if Darrell was a Trump supporter, it’s all we would have heard about from the corporate Democrat media. It would have been labeled a hate crime and liberals would have been hysterical.

Why didn’t the media report more on this story? Why do Democrats protect criminals?
 
Last edited:
But you’d never know if you lap up corporate Democrat media. They didn’t want to report on it because it was an African American very guilty of a gruesome crime. Now, if Darrell was a Trump supporter, it’s all we would have heard about from the corporate Democrat media. It would have been labeled a hate crime and liberals would have been hysterical.

Why didn’t the media report more on this story? Why do Democrats protect criminals?
Too busy reporting on the Tom Brady - Gisele Bundhen split! I honestly think it is what sells papers that is their focus. The media, including respected papers, has never ending reporting on celebrities, et al because it is easy and cheap just to use copy supplied by hired Public Relations firms. For example: Prince Harry and/or his wife are on the news every single day. Even The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times are guilty of printing these pointless PR puff pieces.
 
Last edited:
But you’d never know if you lap up corporate Democrat media. They didn’t want to report on it because it was an African American very guilty of a gruesome crime. Now, if Darrell was a Trump supporter, it’s all we would have heard about from the corporate Democrat media. It would have been labeled a hate crime and liberals would have been hysterical.

Why didn’t the media report more on this story? Why do Democrats protect criminals?
MSM didn't report on it because it doesn't fit their narrative. Purely political
 
  • Like
Reactions: AndysHamster
Too busy reporting on the Tom Brady - Gisele Bundhen split! I honestly think it is what sells papers that is their focus. The media, including respected papers, has never ending reporting on celebrities, et al because it is easy and cheap just to use copy supplied by hired Public Relations firms. For example: Prince Harry and/or his wife are on the news every single day. Even The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times are guilty of printing these pointless PR puff pieces.
Sure, sex sells, but the MSM has been given strict instructions not to report on anything that goes against the dem/libby narrative, especially when race is involved.
 
ADVERTISEMENT