I 100% disagree with them leaving.
I want them all to stay. They are Boilers everyone.
But essential to keep are the big 3 obviously......then DJ and Cox. Hope CMP adds a couple starter quality to that core base.
Last edited:
I 100% disagree with them leaving.
Both have family ties to Purdue, but I would not rule out them testing the market as I feel they probably believe that they could be much more effective in a different offensive scheme. That’s just my take on the situation. Wouldn’t be completely taken aback if there was a departure.I 100% disagree with them leaving.
Maybe it’s less about pulling scholarships now than it is about pulling NIL $ ?Yes all can and add 2 more since scholarships go from 13 to 15.
Oh for sure but also two spots open up next yearMaybe it’s less about pulling scholarships now than it is about pulling NIL $ ?
I’d be pretty disappointed tbh. Don’t think it happens, especially with schools able to pay directly next year.Both have family ties to Purdue, but I would not rule out them testing the market as I feel they probably believe that they could be much more effective in a different offensive scheme. That’s just my take on the situation. Wouldn’t be completely taken aback if there was a departure.
I hope they stay as well, but if Painter decides to hit the portal, those are the two positions of need. The comparisons with Newman are spot on. Flashes of brilliance followed by long stretches of 'meh'.I 100% disagree with them leaving.
I think we as fans put a little too much into the loyalty aspect of college players. It's a different game now with the portal, ease of transfer, NIL, etc. For some players, these are as much business decisions as they are about where a player dreamed of playing or where his parents/relatives played.Both have family ties to Purdue, but I would not rule out them testing the market as I feel they probably believe that they could be much more effective in a different offensive scheme. That’s just my take on the situation. Wouldn’t be completely taken aback if there was a departure.
Colvin was pretty damn good yesterday on defense and his offense came alive a bit. Heide looks very timid and back to his first of the season ways. Not sure why and maybe that’s just who he is.I hope they stay as well, but if Painter decides to hit the portal, those are the two positions of need. The comparisons with Newman are spot on. Flashes of brilliance followed by long stretches of 'meh'.
If you have a Boiler background (watch the games), I don't see how you could think this won't be a top 10 team next year. Including team members.I think Purdue will have to put together a competitive offer, just like they did this year. I think Braden recognizes what he has at Purdue and wouldn’t look to go elsewhere unless the money were so much greater that he couldn’t say no.
This is all based on the assumption that Purdue has a decent season. If they’re not winning, Braden may be tempted to go somewhere where he has a chance to make it back to the final four.
I hope MC stays, but if he and his family have pro hopes, (whether realistic or not), that could factor into his decision.Colvin was pretty damn good yesterday on defense and his offense came alive a bit. Heide looks very timid and back to his first of the season ways. Not sure why and maybe that’s just who he is.
Colvin isn’t leaving. Heide…I’d give 20%
I think they can be a FF team next year, but Painter needs to add a couple of pieces from the portal.If you have a Boiler background (watch the games), I don't see how you could think this won't be a top 10 team next year. Including team members.
If you have a Boiler background (watch the games), I don't see how you could think this won't be a top 10 team next year. Including team members.
Then you better start paying attention to the quality (and number) of picks you are setting since that's the only way to get open looks against better athletes.Our problem is when it's Smith, Loyer, Heide and Colvin on the floor, you have 4 jump shooters. Only Smith has proven his ability to either create or get his own shot (with some limited success but struggles against bigger defenders), which means you have 3 other guys hoping to get an open look. When the shots aren't falling, you need to find other ways to get buckets and we don't have that.
Or maybe you just don't project so well.I've watched games for 50+ years. Too many unknowns to say who is where next year.
So all conjecture, but if our big 3 stay, and no additional players added.....we still are not a FF type team.....8th or 20th. NC/FF should be the goal with a senior Braden as the cornerstone.
I think with a generational player, & senior in Braden, I would hope player(s) are added like the staff did with the generational player Edey was in his projected last year Get the right guys and we increase our chances. Get no one and the %es likely go closer to zero..
Still need to add an experienced 5 as a backup/potential starter and/or 1/2 guys who can create and get their own shot while Smith is either on or off the floor.Or maybe you just don't project so well.
Nothing personal but if you can't see the potential of this team with a 7'3" shot blocker and Trey at 4 then that's on you.
Or maybe you just don't project so well.
Nothing personal but if you can't see the potential of this team with a 7'3" shot blocker and Trey at 4 then that's on you.
Comparions with Newman are not spot on. Newman had at least 1 boneheaded play each game. He might produce at times but he was always going to throw the ball to the other team for a breakaway layup or similar play. Neither of the new guys are doing that much, they just don't show up enough at this point.I hope they stay as well, but if Painter decides to hit the portal, those are the two positions of need. The comparisons with Newman are spot on. Flashes of brilliance followed by long stretches of 'meh'.
Good thing starting Smith and Loyer worked out their Freshmen years, without any previous game experience.
This is the same thing we heard about Heide and Colvin coming into this year. Unfortunately, they're incredibly inconsistent and sometimes disappear completely.I think people are really underestimating how much development we are likely to see from Harris, Cox and Burgess. All three are trending favorably and another season working with Braden will really help them.
Do we need another player or two? Perhaps. But it's far from a given. Personally, I'd like to see a wing who can break people down as that's the most pressing need. I think we can cover the 4/5 with TKR/Berg/Jacobsen/Heide/Burgess. If someone in that group leaves, obviously you need to add a body.
It is true that not all develop at the same rate or magnitude. Part of Myles slower development was just due to a really poor high school background and another part for him and Cam was that having Zach hindered the need for them to develop indirectly as a result of Zach. Bottom line Purdue has at least 8 weeks or half a season to witness any growth and by March it may not only reveal a bit about Cam or Myles, buy also any particular deficiencies that need addressed. I do like this freshman class a lot, but we will know more in a few weeks even if what we know carries no weight.This is the same thing we heard about Heide and Colvin coming into this year. Unfortunately, they're incredibly inconsistent and sometimes disappear completely.
The hope is that guys develop and improve on their weaknesses, but it's definitely not a guarantee.
2, potentially 3 players (not necessarily all starters) from the portal and Painter can build a FF team.
I know I'm a broken record on the portal view, but any projection as to what any of the freshmen or sophomores will look like by the end of the year is an educated guess at best. I'm coming around to the view that MP will need to hit the portal in some way in the offseason but I don't think we have a clue as to how each of these young guys will develop over the next three months.This is the same thing we heard about Heide and Colvin coming into this year. Unfortunately, they're incredibly inconsistent and sometimes disappear completely.
The hope is that guys develop and improve on their weaknesses, but it's definitely not a guarantee.
2, potentially 3 players (not necessarily all starters) from the portal and Painter can build a FF team.
I think people are really underestimating how much development we are likely to see from Harris, Cox and Burgess. All three are trending favorably and another season working with Braden will really help them.
Do we need another player or two? Perhaps. But it's far from a given. Personally, I'd like to see a wing who can break people down as that's the most pressing need. I think we can cover the 4/5 with TKR/Berg/Jacobsen/Heide/Burgess. If someone in that group leaves, obviously you need to add a body.
I had serious questions about how ready Colvin and Heide would be. Both showed to be very one dimensional last year. Not seeing that with the current frosh.This is the same thing we heard about Heide and Colvin coming into this year. Unfortunately, they're incredibly inconsistent and sometimes disappear completely.
The hope is that guys develop and improve on their weaknesses, but it's definitely not a guarantee.
2, potentially 3 players (not necessarily all starters) from the portal and Painter can build a FF team.
Cam has been in the program for what, 3 years now, and he still hasn't developed his ball handling skills to the point where he's confident using it in a game with any consistency. I know ball handling is tough and takes years of work to develop, but if they haven't done it by now, not sure they will.It is true that not all develop at the same rate or magnitude. Part of Myles slower development was just due to a really poor high school background and another part for him and Cam was that having Zach hindered the need for them to develop indirectly as a result of Zach. Bottom line Purdue has at least 8 weeks or half a season to witness any growth and by March it may not only reveal a bit about Cam or Myles, buy also any particular deficiencies that need addressed. I do like this freshman class a lot, but we will know more in a few weeks even if what we know carries no weight.
But ask yourself: what is the biggest jump MC and CH need to make from a development standpoint and do you expect to see that in the next 3 months?I know I'm a broken record on the portal view, but any projection as to what any of the freshmen or sophomores will look like by the end of the year is an educated guess at best. I'm coming around to the view that MP will need to hit the portal in some way in the offseason but I don't think we have a clue as to how each of these young guys will develop over the next three months.
Yep. I think you can get away with one guy on the floor like that but not two. I know some will say we have three but Loyer is a better ballhandler than some give credit. He's not breaking guys down off the dribble but if he gets a step, he can at least get to the rim and draw fouls or finish thru contact. I haven't even seen that from Colvin or Heide. The only time they get to the rim off the dribble in the halfcourt is if there is a complete breakdown defensively.Cam has been in the program for what, 3 years now, and he still hasn't developed his ball handling skills to the point where he's confident using it in a game with any consistency. I know ball handling is tough and takes years of work to develop, but if they haven't done it by now, not sure they will.
There's nothing wrong with having 6'5-6'6 guys who can jump and shoot like MC and CH, it's just that their lack of ball handling does hold this teams offense back some.
To say that Cam and Myles have seen it all is inaccurate, IMO. I think Cam has played more than 20 minutes something like 8 times in his career and Myles has about the same. In the vast majority of games last year each played fewer than 15 minutes. I'm not advocating for more minutes at this point, particularly if they're not shooting well, but both are pretty green from a development standpoint.But ask yourself: what is the biggest jump MC and CH need to make from a development standpoint and do you expect to see that in the next 3 months?
These guys have both played about 50 college games, so they've seen it all.
This is why Painter is tinkering with the starting lineup. He got the productions from CH and MC for a game or two but then it went away.
I don't know how tough it is to be able to dribble two dribbles and get in the lane. I also don't know that ball handling was as important to Myles and Cam as it is today. It is human nature to want to do what is easy and do that. It takes a special dedication to work on the weak areas that someone is not successful. No question if they were to provide another area of scoring it would help them and the team...and I'm not even expecting them to get to the rim off the dribble, just enough to counter a hard closeout with an easy jumper in the lane...which I do think they can do...even if I don't think they can start out at the arc and get to the rim...just getting into the lane for a soft jumper would help make them a threat and possibly draw help and enhance offensive rebounding as well. Still, like I said...nothing is going to happen in the next 8-10 weeks and they either will or will not show improvement. Nothing urgent today...Cam has been in the program for what, 3 years now, and he still hasn't developed his ball handling skills to the point where he's confident using it in a game with any consistency. I know ball handling is tough and takes years of work to develop, but if they haven't done it by now, not sure they will.
There's nothing wrong with having 6'5-6'6 guys who can jump and shoot like MC and CH, it's just that their lack of ball handling does hold this teams offense back some.
We have seen that before with players with very little chance of making the pros. However, in this case the dad was a pro athlete .I would hope he can see that Myles likely is not going that route. If Myles goes to a better program, he gets buried behind great talents. If he goes down a notch, he could show better, but the NBA will look at his lower level competition and how he did versus higher level teams with Purdue.I hope MC stays, but if he and his family have pro hopes, (whether realistic or not), that could factor into his decision.
I don't know how tough it is to be able to dribble two dribbles and get in the lane. I also don't know that ball handling was as important to Myles and Cam as it is today. It is human nature to want to do what is easy and do that. It takes a special dedication to work on the weak areas that someone is not successful. No question if they were to provide another area of scoring it would help them and the team...and I'm not even expecting them to get to the rim off the dribble, just enough to counter a hard closeout with an easy jumper in the lane...which I do think they can do...even if I don't think they can start out at the arc and get to the rim...just getting into the lane for a soft jumper would help make them a threat and possibly draw help and enhance offensive rebounding as well. Still, like I said...nothing is going to happen in the next 8-10 weeks and they either will or will not show improvement. Nothing urgent today...
Yes I made comments about Myles doing exactly that after it happened. I suspect that isn't something he practices though or hasn't in the past at game speed. Not being primary ball handlers and playing with Zach those players didn't have the need to break the pressure for a mid range jumper with Lance, Fletch and Braden handling the ball. This year it would be helpful if they could do that.Myles Colvin did do that recently - well you and I may have disagreed on the "easy" aspect of the jumper, but he dribbled to the top of the key and hit a jumper against Toledo - was the possession after Fletch turned him down for the lob opportunity, IIRC.
I think both he and Cam Heide have the skills and definitely the "hops" to drive and take a pull-up, but it also takes some getting used to and being comfortable in the flow of the offense. Hey, if 'Ol Man Fletch can do it, they can.
We all sometimes forget about patience......they are also not anywhere near half-way done with thier eligibility.
Colvin took a big step defensively and with the way he approaches the game plan - was in a shooting slump, but maybe that's over now with seeing a few go down against Northwestern.
JMHO
Let's also not forget this about Mr. Heide:
• Posted the best effective field goal percentage (.682) of any high-major freshman with a minimum of 75 field goal attempts.
• Was 1-of-2 players nationally to shoot at least 65.0 percent from 2-point range and 45.0 percent from 3-point range (Hofstra's German Platnikov the other).
Both can get there. Myles has made big improvement in his D, but the last few games players are blowing by him and so he might need to give a bit more ground. I actually thought and it still can happen that Myles would be a better player "at Purdue" than Jaden with his shooting looking better when coming to Purdue. Giccari is well rounded as a player...just needs that perimeter shot to dropPoor Myles” He will start from day one” Colvin. He is a victim of high expectations based on him dunking over slow six four centers and shooting over five ten guards in high school. Others have gotten this treatment including Harris this year. And there is “ he is ready” Berg who “ has held his own against the top player in the country in one on one drills” turning out not so ready. I laugh at this stuff when I see it and think let’s wait and see. Some will be fine players over time, some may just not be more than a mop up player. In the case of Myles, I think he could become a fine player and start regularly at some point. His defense is already there. Harris too can be a contributor.
That was two dribbles and included Myles going wide which allowed the D to catch back up some. I would prefer Myles to drive closer to the defender, but enough that the defender had to move to catch a charge and if Myles does that he gains an advantage on the D for a better shot. I think that is the most common thing for players of all ages to go "wide" and shy away from contact. Once Myles is moving and has the D going sideways...the foul is on the D if Myles doesn't push off or go perpendicular into the D "once" moving...keep taking up the slack Myles... Watch Myles feet pointed towards the sideline. Dick addresses this around the 6:17 minute markMyles Colvin did do that recently - well you and I may have disagreed on the "easy" aspect of the jumper, but he dribbled to the top of the key and hit a jumper against Toledo - was the possession after Fletch turned him down for the lob opportunity, IIRC.
I think both he and Cam Heide have the skills and definitely the "hops" to drive and take a pull-up, but it also takes some getting used to and being comfortable in the flow of the offense. Hey, if 'Ol Man Fletch can do it, they can.
We all sometimes forget about patience......they are also not anywhere near half-way done with thier eligibility.
Colvin took a big step defensively and with the way he approaches the game plan - was in a shooting slump, but maybe that's over now with seeing a few go down against Northwestern.
JMHO
Let's also not forget this about Mr. Heide:
• Posted the best effective field goal percentage (.682) of any high-major freshman with a minimum of 75 field goal attempts.
• Was 1-of-2 players nationally to shoot at least 65.0 percent from 2-point range and 45.0 percent from 3-point range (Hofstra's German Platnikov the other).
EDIT - TJ, it was actually one game later I was thinking - late in the first half against Minnesota. Another New Year's resolution broken....oh well.
I agree, I think if Myles was in the position of being given the opportunity in the offense that Jaden was or Fletcher has we might see a different Myles. I believe he’s playing his expected role he’s been given within the current Purdue offensive scheme. I guess what I’m saying is that if he was put in fletches roll with motions being run for him I believe he could be highly effective. Maybe I’m wrong 🤷🏼♂️Both can get there. Myles has made big improvement in his D, but the last few games players are blowing by him and so he might need to give a bit more ground. I actually thought and it still can happen that Myles would be a better player "at Purdue" than Jaden with his shooting looking better when coming to Purdue. Giccari is well rounded as a player...just needs that perimeter shot to drop
he would be better, but Fletch came in with better ball handling and understanding of the game. That said Myles is limited in experience with a bit of game understanding and skills outside of shooting in a quicker shot. I have hope he gets there. Go look at the video I posted "after" looking at the Minny video of Myles GRad in TExas posted relative to my comments on that video as far as going wide and Myles feet positioning...and review in dicks video around 6:17. This is not a hard thing to correct, but unsure Myles is even aware????I agree, I think if Myles was in the position of being given the opportunity in the offense that Jaden was or Fletcher has we might see a different Myles. I believe he’s playing his expected role he’s been given within the current Purdue offensive scheme. I guess what I’m saying is that if he was put in fletches roll with motions being run for him I believe he could be highly effective. Maybe I’m wrong 🤷🏼♂️
With Caleb and Trey on the court...that probably doesn't happen, but with Trey on the floor...maybe Caleb...just one that would be possible. Interesting is that neither probably has much experience working down low...AND their defenders wouldn't either. Players shoot the three ball and get to the rim, but the really good offensive threats can do all three.I’d like to see some booty ball out of Cam and Myles. Use their size to get to the hoop and take advantage of having weaker defenders defending them.