Vote counts don’t matter. Send in the tanks.
- Thread starter BuilderBob6
- Start date
Next time you interview for a job and don't get it, you should just show up anyway at the new gig, say "No, I actually got the job" and maybe bring a gun or two with you too, just for effect. Mind boggling how people in this country can't see how utterly "undemocratic" the current GOP mindset is. I see it as no longer a problem with the candidates, but the F'wads willing to continue to vote for those candidates who have no character or integrity. And FWIW, I USED to vote straight Republican. But enough is enough.
Only goose-steppers like you and Bob think that DNC mouthpieces like Mediaite are legit news outlets.
And Fox is a legitimate news outlet? Hahahaha. F'ing ridiculous.
Way closer than Mediaite, or NBC, ABC, CNN, WaPo, NYT, etc.
I mean, how dumb do they think Americans are, that we wouldn’t figure out that these “news outlets” are filled with Left wing hacks like Chuck, Georgie, etc etc.
We don't need to wait until next Tuesday. Educated people see the GOP filth every day on this website
.I don't think, I know how dumb people like you are. And how racist and homophobic, and how little you care about the environment and the planet as long as you can continue to drive your jacked up gas guzzling pickup trucks and shooting big animals to make you feel cool. The GOP way, White Power.
Yep, blame the Jews, the Blacks, the Hispanics, the Liberals, the Democrats. Basically anyone who isn't white and Conservative is the problem for said white peoples meaningless lives who need to find someone to hate on. Such a sad state this country is in.
Then surely no one would vote for these monsters on Tuesday, right ?We don't need to wait until next Tuesday. Educated people see the GOP filth every day on this website
No, I said Dan Abrams is middle of the road. You should just stfu about Abrams since you clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.
Your Hannity statement is the first thing I’ve ever read from you that is absolutely believable and true.
But congratulations on successfully turning the thread into yet another attempted indictment of a media company and avoiding the topic……..which is the truth no matter WHO reports it.
They are STILL turning themselves into pretzels trying to make the Pelosi attacker a liberal and create the impression this is all a coverup. Unbelievable.
Sure I do. He’s a left wing MSNBC reject from NYC.
He’s no more middle of the road than Hannity is.
Two things to add: 1) The mere advocacy of intersectionality as a MAJOR part of the dems platform "purpose" is to divide. 2) The inability to distinguish the difference between what the "government" is doing and citizens is mind boggling...particularly into which is the much bigger threat!
To your point...in addition to "INTERSECTIONALITY" being the ultimate, purposely divider by the dems, the social media along with the right arm of the news in the media have a history of knowingly hiding valuable information from the citizens.
Yeah, I'd buy Bob a beer, but it wouldn't be a tall one or one with high alcohol content...and all this coming from a "dumbass", "fool" and "arrogant tool"...
We aren't disputing that the 19 and 20 year Olds running that twitter account said something stupid. But hey at least Democrats don't do things like that, right... right?
We are wondering why you get news from mediaite and insist it is "middle of the road" when almost all evidence is to the contrary.
Hannity is a Cheney/Bush Republican - he is about as far to the right as Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney, the "good Republicans" according to some of the left wing posters here.
Mediaite/Abrams - middle of the road.
Hannity - far right.
Because Bob and BNI said so.
The Ds are lily white and pure as the driven snow?
Both parties have corruption. Both parties have extremists. It’s incomprehensible to me how a supposed R voter could side with Ds and their horrendous policies?
You obviously do not watch Hannity. Fine with me actually. How in the so and so is Hannity middle of the road or even a Cheney/Bush Republican. Hannity is a full fledge MAGGOT Chumper. He can’t stand Liz Cheney. Hannity is the typical Chumper 2020 election denier. During Jan 6, Hannity, as well as Laura Ingraham and Chump Jr. called the White House and begged Meadows to tell Chump to stop the insurrection. They were worried about his legacy being tarnished. Hannity is no where near a good Republican.
Because he is. I have talked to people who know him, that's what he is. On his TV/Radio show he says what he says to get ratings. I don't listen nor watch, why would I? He isn't a news source, he just gives political opinions.
I think you severely overestimate how many conservative posters here watch Fox News
I commend you for not watching that crap. If you did watch him I think you will agree with me. Any Chumper cannot be middle of the road.
Not so sure about that. Faux News has the highest ratings among all of network news agencies. Somebody is watching them and a lot of it. Perhaps folks on here won't admit that they watch Faux News.
And that could be, there are some old people around here, lol. But I don't watch, and only know of 1 person who does (my wife's great uncle)
That’s like someone saying all Democrats are bad people. We know that’s not true. You believe everyone in Charlottesville was a bad person. We also know that’s not true.
Dude, something is seriously wrong with you. During the Charlottesville fiasco, I was clearly talking only about the racist and fascist white supremacists involved in the violence and killing of a woman they ran over. There are no good people in all in any of those white supremacy groups involved. That is why Chump's statement, whether it's the full context or the abridged version, is preposterous.
Here’s the full transcript:
Full text: Trump’s comments on white supremacists, ‘alt-left’ in Charlottesville
A transcript of the president's remarks at Trump Tower.
www.politico.com
What is so preposterous?
Are you purposely lying about what I said or have you been trained that things become true if you repeat them enough? Quote where I said that Mediaite was middle of the road. For the third time I said Abrams is.
All evidence to the contrary?
This site says they are 90% trustworthy and their policy leanings is center.
Mediaite - Bias and Reliability
Mediaite has a media bias score of Medium Liberal and an accuracy score of 90% Reliable. The bias rating assesses political policies and politician sentiments, bias words, and other leanings found in the article.
www.biasly.com
So you don’t dispute the story is true yet can’t help but attack the source for being liberal? Doesn’t really make sense……..unless you’re trying to prove that some news organizations that favor the left or right can actually report the facts.
Biasly.com - LOL.Are you purposely lying about what I said or have you been trained that things become true if you repeat them enough? Quote where I said that Mediaite was middle of the road. For the third time I said Abrams is.
All evidence to the contrary?
This site says they are 90% trustworthy and their policy leanings is center.
Mediaite - Bias and Reliability
Mediaite has a media bias score of Medium Liberal and an accuracy score of 90% Reliable. The bias rating assesses political policies and politician sentiments, bias words, and other leanings found in the article.
So you don’t dispute the story is true yet can’t help but attack the source for being liberal? Doesn’t really make sense……..unless you’re trying to prove that some news organizations that favor the left or right can actually report the facts.
Are you purposely lying about what I said or have you been trained that things become true if you repeat them enough? Quote where I said that Mediaite was middle of the road. For the third time I said Abrams is.
All evidence to the contrary?
This site says they are 90% trustworthy and their policy leanings is center.
Mediaite - Bias and Reliability
Mediaite has a media bias score of Medium Liberal and an accuracy score of 90% Reliable. The bias rating assesses political policies and politician sentiments, bias words, and other leanings found in the article.
So you don’t dispute the story is true yet can’t help but attack the source for being liberal? Doesn’t really make sense……..unless you’re trying to prove that some news organizations that favor the left or right can actually report the facts.
Read the NewPal post and mistook that one for yours. I attack the source for finding on more than one site that they are less trustworthy than average. Didn't make it to biasly... sorry Bob
It's not just about giving facts, it the context around how those facts are given.
So you're saying that your original post was not just slightly irrelevant, but TOTALLY irrelevant.
You saw Trump mentioned and your TDS got triggered. We understand. Trump's been living rent free in your head for almost 7 years now.
Hmmm? Is that the definition of obsession?
FYI, it looks like NY may have a Republican Governor soon. Perhaps there is hope that they're getting a little smarter.
What power does this group have in Brazil? NONE
If you hadn't seen Trump associated with this article, you would have ignored it.
TDS continues to control your life...
I think you may want to go back and review the history of Radical Dem (Left Wing) Extremists, since it's been a lot more violent than anything the Right has done in this country.
Stay in your echo chamber, Bob and keep believing every word that the DNC & MSM (DNC's Marketing Division) tell you. We all hope you can find a vaccine for your TDS soon.
FBI statistics show that political violence is firmly on the right wing. Just the facts.
That's got to be one of the more idiotic posts I've read in a long time. You seem to be the product of years of faithful indoctrination and now you're regurgitating what you've been taught. Well Done.
It's pointless trying to have an intelligent discussion with someone, who's a clueless drone.
So you think that Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, Schiff & Swallwell all have good character and integrity? LOL
FYI, NOBODY believes that you ever voted Republican.
