Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article in star says she has her radar on a few selected college programs if they were interested in her. Wonder if Purdue is one. If we had a savvy AD, I would think you would look in to her interest. SW is a major basketball talent and would be a large upgrade at Purdue.
Winning. Stephanie White is a winner. And, her history should give her a boost in recruiting.What qualities do you see in Stephanie that are greater than those you saw in Sharon when she was hired? Sharon had been a successful college coach and a star at Purdue. Stephanie has never been a college head coach, and the WNBA is a different world.
I also think it might be time for a change, however, Sharon was definitely a "winner" as a head coach everywhere she went. I don't see any quality of White that exceeds our current coach. ...and please don't resort to "anything would be better", because that is not a good argument. Sharon has shown to be a good X & O coach when she gets the talent. I think her major shortcoming is her recruiting. White has good X&O skills (I assume) but she has never recruited in the D1 college game. Hence my caution about bringing her into Purdue WBB as a head coach.Winning. Stephanie White is a winner. And, her history should give her a boost in recruiting.
I think Steph brings the national exposure of being on ESPB and BTN commentating that SV does not. Steph also is much smoother talking to people. SV seems to me to be a "take it or leave it" type of scholly presenter that just doesn't seem to make it today.I also think it might be time for a change, however, Sharon was definitely a "winner" as a head coach everywhere she went. I don't see any quality of White that exceeds our current coach. ...and please don't resort to "anything would be better", because that is not a good argument. Sharon has shown to be a good X & O coach when she gets the talent. I think her major shortcoming is her recruiting. White has good X&O skills (I assume) but she has never recruited in the D1 college game. Hence my caution about bringing her into Purdue WBB as a head coach.
I think you have a valid point about SW being a smoother and more polished person when interacting with recruits and with recruits families. I don't knw that her talent will translate into better recruiting. It seems like it should, but I'd like to see it in action first.I think Steph brings the national exposure of being on ESPB and BTN commentating that SV does not. Steph also is much smoother talking to people. SV seems to me to be a "take it or leave it" type of scholly presenter that just doesn't seem to make it today.
I also think it might be time for a change, however, Sharon was definitely a "winner" as a head coach everywhere she went. I don't see any quality of White that exceeds our current coach. ...and please don't resort to "anything would be better", because that is not a good argument. Sharon has shown to be a good X & O coach when she gets the talent. I think her major shortcoming is her recruiting. White has good X&O skills (I assume) but she has never recruited in the D1 college game. Hence my caution about bringing her into Purdue WBB as a head coach.
Here recruiting is her shortcoming? I don't agree with that. She's had plenty of talent. She just can't put it together. Her recruiting, according to ESPN rankings, 2011-2015:I also think it might be time for a change, however, Sharon was definitely a "winner" as a head coach everywhere she went. I don't see any quality of White that exceeds our current coach. ...and please don't resort to "anything would be better", because that is not a good argument. Sharon has shown to be a good X & O coach when she gets the talent. I think her major shortcoming is her recruiting. White has good X&O skills (I assume) but she has never recruited in the D1 college game. Hence my caution about bringing her into Purdue WBB as a head coach.
Firing Versyp and replacing her with Steph would have been a ballsy and aggressive move. Morgue doesn't do ballsy and aggressive.So.. Vandy just signed BOTH the only coach to lead Purdue to a basketball national championship in my lifetime AND the captain of that team, each with professional coaching credentials and experience in television/media.
On the bright side, it is Vandy not UConn. If she has some success there, the new AD (assuming he/she is not totally worthless) should be able to lure her back home in a couple years if Versyp continues to underperform.Firing Versyp and replacing her with Steph would have been a ballsy and aggressive move. Morgue doesn't do ballsy and aggressive.
Once again MB fails Purdue on his way out the door. He is content with every team at Purdue on the downswing while he is retiring. What a joke the athletic department and BOT have become.Firing Versyp and replacing her with Steph would have been a ballsy and aggressive move. Morgue doesn't do ballsy and aggressive.
I am not a fan of SV, but I do recognize her accomplishments. At Maine, she had a very good record (98-51), and won the conference championship something like 3 times in a row. That winning percentage is better than Lynn Dunn's overall record (65% vs 63%)..I'm not sure that I agree that SV was a "winner." Being a head coach at Maine certainly doesn't qualify anyone as being a winner, and her tenure at IU wouldn't either. Also, neither one of those positions would qualify her as an elite coach.
I am not a fan of SV, but I do recognize her accomplishments. At Maine, she had a very good record (98-51), and won the conference championship something like 3 times in a row. That winning percentage is better than Lynn Dunn's overall record (65% vs 63%)..
I know Maine is not a powerhouse program, but never the less, she was a winner there. She also took over an IU program that was in the dumps, and engineered the second biggest turn around in IU athletic history, taking them to a winning record and an NIT berth. She had a far, far better collegiate record at the point we hired SV than Stephanie White has.
White has just about zero college coaching experience, and no experience in recruiting. That is why I am hesitant to declare White as some sort of savior we somehow missed getting. Personally, I hope S White becomes the second coming of John Wooden, and starts beating the crap out of UConn.
I agree that the potential is there for White & Peck to be a great combination. Like you, I will be cheering for them to be successful.It's not about hiring a known savior, because that is almost never possible. It is about looking for signs of potential to be GREAT versus picking a safe, inexpensive choice with fair to good accomplishments. Versyp was the safe choice. She did not cost a lot of money. She was not likely to be looking at Purdue as a stepping stone to the next job and, as far as I know at the time, she had never really failed at anything basketball related. Vanderbilt's hire of Stephanie White, however, gets them a coach who, as a player was more successful than Versyp; someone who has a National Championship ring; someone who has WNBA coaching experience and has taken a team to the WNBA finals; someone who has national exposure as a basketball commentator on ESPN; someone whose personality and abilities as a communicator are superior to Versyp's; and, someone who can bring, as a member of her staff, a coach who has won a National Championship and also has national television exposure, along with a history of having played at Vandy, coached as an assistant in the premiere women's college basketball program in the state and, at that time, in the nation. This adds up to many more qualifications which strongly suggest a great possibility for outstanding recruiting results. There are no guarantees, but I do not see how anybody could doubt that White and Peck are highly likely to have far more success in recruiting top national prospects than Versyp has ever had or will ever have. Add to that a proven knowledge of x's and o's and a demonstrated ability to motivate players (even pro players who are often harder to motivate than college players) and Stephanie White is the kind of bold, reach for the brass ring, kind of choice that I wish Burke and Daniels had the wisdom, guts and gumption to pursue. Give Stephanie and Carolyn the three or four years that it takes for a college women's basketball coach to make the program her own and I expect to see Vanderbilt consistently in the Top Ten and challenging for the Final Four. Purdue will continue to be mediocre at best and Purdue fans will only be able to think about what might have been. I don't think that it is possible to deny the enormous difference in the two hires.
I graduated from Purdue. I bleed gold and black. I attended the first basketball game ever played in Mackey Arena.. I bought my first Purdue Women's Basketball season tickets a couple of years before Purdue went to the first of three Final Fours (in 8 years) and I held my season tickets continuously through the first 7 years of Sharon Versyp. During one stretch, I did not miss a home game in three years. I traveled to post season games, including all three Final Fours. I used to be excited to watch and follow Purdue Women's Basketball. Now, I am more excited about watching and following Vanderbilt Women's Basketball. That makes me very sad. I wish Burke, Daniels and the Board of Trustees had cared about the program and that they had felt the desire to keep it great, instead of only safe and cheap.
Agreed. That's why it would have been gutsy and visionary. Not how we roll.I agree that the potential is there for White & Peck to be a great combination. Like you, I will be cheering for them to be successful.
I just caution about expectations here. Peck was HC for one year, no, two years (Correction from Old Gold - Thanks). She had kids who pretty much understood the game and won regardless of who coached. I don't credit Peck with building that team, or for that matter, giving them the core skills that allowed them to win the NC. As for White vs Versyp as a player, yes, no comparison. Does that translate to coaching? Many time it does not. It may take White & Peck a while to get going, and they will experience a learning curve.
Agreed. That's why it would have been gutsy and visionary. Not how we roll.
Reportedly $300,000 a year more than what Purdue is paying.
I don't know much about women's hoops, but I do know Steph is a winner. Morgue? Not so much. This really is a great finishing touch for his Purdue tenure.Yep, By the last year of a six year contract she will be pushing $1 million. Those who do not follow WBB don't have a clue how highly regarded she is.