I think he said that too or alluded to it if he didn't. I already broke a lot of things down. The videos are available and I think I called out the exact time for review. In one Matt only calls it out when a player is coming up from the baseline for the Purdue player to follow him to half court. How many times have you heard Paul break down the different D rules they may use during a game...or any particulars on D. They will give a general comment and go on. Ever hear him state many specifics or any of the coaches. What Matt did say is that they were trying to give an appearance of zone and get into man when the movement starts. Maryland does this. Matt went on to say a lot of teams do this. It is something I mentioned many years ago when Crean tried it. Matt of fact in my limited viewings Crean was the first I saw do it...and it wasn't very successful since some were defending an area and other were defending a man. Lot of various hybrids out there, but few pure zones due to the higher level of skill in shooting the ball and so people want a person on a person whether out of a zone look or out of man...a man typically defends another man. The old Anderson Highland coach Bob Fuller who called his match up a "man zone" and played it 100% would not allow any player younger than JV to play anything other than Man defense because he knew man was the fundamental for a zoneI believe Lusk said "zone" (or answered yes to the question) on the CMP radio show a few weeks back.