ADVERTISEMENT

Socialism

charlespig

All-American
Jun 20, 2014
5,609
6,400
113
Before we begin, let me preface by saying that I am in favor of capitalism. Always been. Used to be 100% and want to push everything to the extreme, like a 100% market-driven capitalist economy, but now more towards the middle but still capitalism-leaning.

What prompts me to start this thread though is how misunderstood "socialism" is. I've heard a lot of people demonizing "socialism" as if it is some kind of monster, like Nazism (although, to be fair, there is a part of socialism in Nazism, since Nazi really means Nationalsozialistische, or National Socialist, which is the strange brainchild and take the worst elements of far-right and far-left). But the truth is, socialism covers a very wide range of ideas, for example:

xaqzr1suz5801.png




Obviously it is impossible to know all of those, so if we simplify it to just the most famous ones, we can largely divide it based on level of political freedom and how much the economy is market-based:

different-types-socialism-600x394.jpg



I suppose very few people in the US would want to live in the authoritarian state, so we can put aside the bottom for now and just focus on the top right. Now, we can further discuss the pros and cons of it:

democratic-socialism-pros-cons.jpg



Again, let me be clear that I am not advocating to turn American into a socialistic country. But I find it hilarious that people would b!tch how much a threat socialism is in an echo chamber without even knowing what socialism really is about. They are just attacking their straw man idea of socialism and feel they are beating up a monster. If you think socialism is so harmful to the country, the way to get rid of it is not to b!tch about it, but rather, to understand what it is promoting that appeals to the masses (e.g., look at the "pros" in the table above), and see if you can address those issues under the current capitalist framework. Coz once those concerns are addressed, there is no more incentive for people to choose socialism.

I say the same thing with Trumpism too. One can b!tch about it, esp. in an echo chamber, and feel righteous. More productive is to understand why an arrogant, narcissistic, boastful person (basically the opposite of everything that Jesus preached for) won so many votes, esp. among Evangelical Christians. What is his appeal, and what is the issue that people thought he was addressing?

And ultimately, b!tching about an idea is not helpful. What we really want is to build the kind of society that we want. We probably want to take the best elements from various ideas, for example, capitalism is great at achieving efficiency and incentivizing people to work hard and create, while socialism can help reduce externalities, promote protection of the environment, and increase social cohesion. Try to see how we can achieve the best of both worlds. That will be a much healthier and productive dialogue than just beating up on a word. Just like "Muslim." Some people have a negative opinion of it and they don't even understand what the religion is about. I know that very well because I used to be one of those people.
 
Last edited:
Joe Biden ran as a moderate Democrat, but he has tried to implement several progressive ideas that are “left of moderate Democrats”.

Republicans and independents recognize the slippery slope that Joe Biden and his handlers are leading the country down and are calling him and the Democrats on his progressive agenda for fear of inflation and initiating more social programs that can never removed.

I posted this in another thread...

The most intriguing political straw of public doubt I’ve seen recently was inside the May 26 Fox poll: “More voters say socialism is a major threat to the stability of the U.S. today: 49% feel that way, up from 39% percent in 2019.” Among independents, fear-of-socialism sentiment rose 17 points.

That’s a huge move among swing voters. Look at the then-and-now dates on the poll—2019 and 2021. They bracket the coronavirus pandemic. Call this the Covid Effect—hard-to-predict shifts in public attitudes from the pre-pandemic status quo


 
Joe Biden ran as a moderate Democrat, but he has tried to implement several progressive ideas that are “left of moderate Democrats”.
That's the opposite of true. Biden ran on a left campaign (increase min. wage, forgive student loans, a public option, etc.) and has literally turned against all of them.
 
That's the opposite of true. Biden ran on a left campaign (increase min. wage, forgive student loans, a public option, etc.) and has literally turned against all of them.
There are a number of articles that claim Joe seems to have drifted left. I think most would disagree. As for $15/hr, if it could have passed, Joe would have included it.

Below is one of several articles that would disagree.

 
There are a number of articles that claim Joe seems to have drifted left. I think most would disagree. As for $15/hr, if it could have passed, Joe would have included it.

Below is one of several articles that would disagree.

That article is from February … before much had really happened. AOC and the rest of the far left are already going public with their frustration that he’s not doing enough/far enough.

FTR .. no, i don’t like all the spending he’s proposing, but not sure how much of that gets any further than a speech.

 
That article is from February … before much had really happened. AOC and the rest of the far left are already going public with their frustration that he’s not doing enough/far enough.

FTR .. no, i don’t like all the spending he’s proposing, but not sure how much of that gets any further than a speech.

Ok, here’s a couple from April and the end of April.



and one from May 2nd

 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Ok, here’s a couple from April and the end of April.



and one from May 2nd

Good reads … I’ve was going more off what I’ve seen and heard in recent days from the AOCs of the world (Bernie seems suspiciously quiet, but maybe I’ve just been ignoring him) … lol.

Also worth noting a fair amount in those articles are touting Biden’s big Infra deal … which at the moment sure seems like it’s heading towards a compromise with Rs that is more palatable.

Time will tell i guess. Let’s see what actually gets passed or snuck through reconciliation or whatever other mechanism.
 
Good reads … I’ve was going more off what I’ve seen and heard in recent days from the AOCs of the world (Bernie seems suspiciously quiet, but maybe I’ve just been ignoring him) … lol.

Also worth noting a fair amount in those articles are touting Biden’s big Infra deal … which at the moment sure seems like it’s heading towards a compromise with Rs that is more palatable.

Time will tell i guess. Let’s see what actually gets passed or snuck through reconciliation or whatever other mechanism.
IMO, Joe would be leaning further left if he had the votes in the Senate. Biden recognizes that if Manchin and Sinema aren’t in line, nothing happens. The far left don’t care, they only answer to their far left constituents
 
There are a number of articles that claim Joe seems to have drifted left. I think most would disagree. As for $15/hr, if it could have passed, Joe would have included it.

Below is one of several articles that would disagree.

Ok, and those articles are wrong. He literally ran on specific policy proposals that he literally has the power to enact now (e.g. overruling or replacing the parliamentarian re: reconciliation) and he doesn't – because he doesn't want to.

Biden is a big business neolib who has been paid for by credit card companies since he was a Senator in Delaware, the state that literally houses most credit card companies because their tax code is so friendly to them. He's neither socialist nor Left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill4411
Ok, and those articles are wrong. He literally ran on specific policy proposals that he literally has the power to enact now (e.g. overruling or replacing the parliamentarian re: reconciliation) and he doesn't – because he doesn't want to.

Biden is a big business neolib who has been paid for by credit card companies since he was a Senator in Delaware, the state that literally houses most credit card companies because their tax code is so friendly to them. He's neither socialist nor Left.
You are entitled to your opinion as are others.
 
It is not an opinion that Biden is governing to the right of the campaign he ran.
Yes it is. When liberal outlets say he is working more towards a progressive stance, I would say the majority people would believe that to be true. You and others may wish he was further left, but most political pundits would agree that he is left of where he ran, or at least where they expected him to be.
 
Yes it is. When liberal outlets say he is working more towards a progressive stance, I would say the majority people would believe that to be true. You and others may wish he was further left, but most political pundits would agree that he is left of where he ran, or at least where they expected him to be.
Will have to see what he actually does vs. what you or i or any other news outlet ‘thinks’. So far, i think he has largely stuck to what he campaigned on.

Bernie’s ears must have been burning (when i said earlier he was quiet). Will be interesting if he nukes the bi-partisan thing and may end up with nothing.

 
Will have to see what he actually does vs. what you or i or any other news outlet ‘thinks’. So far, i think he has largely stuck to what he campaigned on.

Bernie’s ears must have been burning (when i said earlier he was quiet). Will be interesting if he nukes the bi-partisan thing and may end up with nothing.

Won the primary as a "moderate" democrat, and then went left in general election and won that as well. His proposals are pretty far left.

Manchin (and to lesser extent Synema) is the only roadblock to a far left agenda so far.
 
Won the primary as a "moderate" democrat, and then went left in general election and won that as well. His proposals are pretty far left.

Manchin (and to lesser extent Synema) is the only roadblock to a far left agenda so far.
Agree he definitely went left of his primary position to attract the more progressive side in the general and he has proposed some stuff that is further left … but let’s see what he actually does. The infra bill to me is the first big litmus test.
 
I posted this in another thread...

The most intriguing political straw of public doubt I’ve seen recently was inside the May 26 Fox poll: “More voters say socialism is a major threat to the stability of the U.S. today: 49% feel that way, up from 39% percent in 2019.” Among independents, fear-of-socialism sentiment rose 17 points.

That is precisely the stupidity. Somehow words get a bad rep (whether intentionally got smeared or not), and people have an insane fear of the word. "Socialism" is one, and "Muslim" is another. People who carry a negative view probably don't even know what socialism really means or what Muslim really preaches. It's just automatically gotten associated with "not us", or "not good."
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
Won the primary as a "moderate" democrat, and then went left in general election and won that as well. His proposals are pretty far left.

Manchin (and to lesser extent Synema) is the only roadblock to a far left agenda so far.

ROFL, if those proposals are already "pretty far left" to you, you haven't seen anything. Wait till you see what "really far left" is.
 
That is precisely the stupidity. Somehow words get a bad rep (whether intentionally got smeared or not), and people have an insane fear of the word. "Socialism" is one, and "Muslim" is another. People who carry a negative view probably don't even know what socialism really means or what Muslim really preaches. It's just automatically gotten associated with "not us", or "not good."
Or put another way, maybe Americans are satisfied with capitalism or wherever you want to call our current form that led to record unemployment and record low poverty.

The Democrats are out to fix poverty with a system that causes more poverty (see prior German articles I posted).
 
Yes it is. When liberal outlets say he is working more towards a progressive stance, I would say the majority people would believe that to be true. You and others may wish he was further left, but most political pundits would agree that he is left of where he ran, or at least where they expected him to be.

He was labeled asa moderate to moderates and as a socialist to the socialists. In reality he's a decrepit old creep who isn't running anything.

His policies are a disaster, enough said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGunner
OP made me laugh with that chart.

I mean the important conversation of the day is Queer Anarchism in contrast to Broghdism.
 
I mean, Neozapatism has some points. Am I right? Its split from anarcho-syndiclism is an important point to study.
 
We are going to reduce poverty by legislating raising taxes, reducing the incentives for work and investment, having wealthy people flee to other countries, the government fails in industry...not going to do the rest.

#5 is happening right now.

Was this a UBI test run?

F it, I'll add another. They want to crush unions. The government is your union now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SDBoiler1
This is why you listen to economists like you listen to your alarm clock.
 
Before we begin, let me preface by saying that I am in favor of capitalism. Always been. Used to be 100% and want to push everything to the extreme, like a 100% market-driven capitalist economy, but now more towards the middle but still capitalism-leaning.

What prompts me to start this thread though is how misunderstood "socialism" is. I've heard a lot of people demonizing "socialism" as if it is some kind of monster, like Nazism (although, to be fair, there is a part of socialism in Nazism, since Nazi really means Nationalsozialistische, or National Socialist, which is the strange brainchild and take the worst elements of far-right and far-left). But the truth is, socialism covers a very wide range of ideas, for example:

xaqzr1suz5801.png




Obviously it is impossible to know all of those, so if we simplify it to just the most famous ones, we can largely divide it based on level of political freedom and how much the economy is market-based:

different-types-socialism-600x394.jpg



I suppose very few people in the US would want to live in the authoritarian state, so we can put aside the bottom for now and just focus on the top right. Now, we can further discuss the pros and cons of it:

democratic-socialism-pros-cons.jpg



Again, let me be clear that I am not advocating to turn American into a socialistic country. But I find it hilarious that people would b!tch how much a threat socialism is in an echo chamber without even knowing what socialism really is about. They are just attacking their straw man idea of socialism and feel they are beating up a monster. If you think socialism is so harmful to the country, the way to get rid of it is not to b!tch about it, but rather, to understand what it is promoting that appeals to the masses (e.g., look at the "pros" in the table above), and see if you can address those issues under the current capitalist framework. Coz once those concerns are addressed, there is no more incentive for people to choose socialism.

I say the same thing with Trumpism too. One can b!tch about it, esp. in an echo chamber, and feel righteous. More productive is to understand why an arrogant, narcissistic, boastful person (basically the opposite of everything that Jesus preached for) won so many votes, esp. among Evangelical Christians. What is his appeal, and what is the issue that people thought he was addressing?

And ultimately, b!tching about an idea is not helpful. What we really want is to build the kind of society that we want. We probably want to take the best elements from various ideas, for example, capitalism is great at achieving efficiency and incentivizing people to work hard and create, while socialism can help reduce externalities, promote protection of the environment, and increase social cohesion. Try to see how we can achieve the best of both worlds. That will be a much healthier and productive dialogue than just beating up on a word. Just like "Muslim." Some people have a negative opinion of it and they don't even understand what the religion is about. I know that very well because I used to be one of those people.
Democratic socialism is antithetical to American ideals. Simple as that.
 
Last edited:
Before we begin, let me preface by saying that I am in favor of capitalism. Always been. Used to be 100% and want to push everything to the extreme, like a 100% market-driven capitalist economy, but now more towards the middle but still capitalism-leaning.

What prompts me to start this thread though is how misunderstood "socialism" is. I've heard a lot of people demonizing "socialism" as if it is some kind of monster, like Nazism (although, to be fair, there is a part of socialism in Nazism, since Nazi really means Nationalsozialistische, or National Socialist, which is the strange brainchild and take the worst elements of far-right and far-left). But the truth is, socialism covers a very wide range of ideas, for example:

xaqzr1suz5801.png




Obviously it is impossible to know all of those, so if we simplify it to just the most famous ones, we can largely divide it based on level of political freedom and how much the economy is market-based:

different-types-socialism-600x394.jpg



I suppose very few people in the US would want to live in the authoritarian state, so we can put aside the bottom for now and just focus on the top right. Now, we can further discuss the pros and cons of it:

democratic-socialism-pros-cons.jpg



Again, let me be clear that I am not advocating to turn American into a socialistic country. But I find it hilarious that people would b!tch how much a threat socialism is in an echo chamber without even knowing what socialism really is about. They are just attacking their straw man idea of socialism and feel they are beating up a monster. If you think socialism is so harmful to the country, the way to get rid of it is not to b!tch about it, but rather, to understand what it is promoting that appeals to the masses (e.g., look at the "pros" in the table above), and see if you can address those issues under the current capitalist framework. Coz once those concerns are addressed, there is no more incentive for people to choose socialism.

I say the same thing with Trumpism too. One can b!tch about it, esp. in an echo chamber, and feel righteous. More productive is to understand why an arrogant, narcissistic, boastful person (basically the opposite of everything that Jesus preached for) won so many votes, esp. among Evangelical Christians. What is his appeal, and what is the issue that people thought he was addressing?

And ultimately, b!tching about an idea is not helpful. What we really want is to build the kind of society that we want. We probably want to take the best elements from various ideas, for example, capitalism is great at achieving efficiency and incentivizing people to work hard and create, while socialism can help reduce externalities, promote protection of the environment, and increase social cohesion. Try to see how we can achieve the best of both worlds. That will be a much healthier and productive dialogue than just beating up on a word. Just like "Muslim." Some people have a negative opinion of it and they don't even understand what the religion is about. I know that very well because I used to be one of those people.

Anarcha-feminism
 
Democratic socialism is antithetical to American ideals. Simple as that.

To them that is a feature not a bug.

Ill go further, it's antithetical to basic human rights and welfare, which is why people risk death to escape from it. It's tyranny which quickly devolves into complete totalitarian brutality
 
Before we begin, let me preface by saying that I am in favor of capitalism. Always been. Used to be 100% and want to push everything to the extreme, like a 100% market-driven capitalist economy, but now more towards the middle but still capitalism-leaning.

What prompts me to start this thread though is how misunderstood "socialism" is. I've heard a lot of people demonizing "socialism" as if it is some kind of monster, like Nazism (although, to be fair, there is a part of socialism in Nazism, since Nazi really means Nationalsozialistische, or National Socialist, which is the strange brainchild and take the worst elements of far-right and far-left). But the truth is, socialism covers a very wide range of ideas, for example:

xaqzr1suz5801.png




Obviously it is impossible to know all of those, so if we simplify it to just the most famous ones, we can largely divide it based on level of political freedom and how much the economy is market-based:

different-types-socialism-600x394.jpg



I suppose very few people in the US would want to live in the authoritarian state, so we can put aside the bottom for now and just focus on the top right. Now, we can further discuss the pros and cons of it:

democratic-socialism-pros-cons.jpg



Again, let me be clear that I am not advocating to turn American into a socialistic country. But I find it hilarious that people would b!tch how much a threat socialism is in an echo chamber without even knowing what socialism really is about. They are just attacking their straw man idea of socialism and feel they are beating up a monster. If you think socialism is so harmful to the country, the way to get rid of it is not to b!tch about it, but rather, to understand what it is promoting that appeals to the masses (e.g., look at the "pros" in the table above), and see if you can address those issues under the current capitalist framework. Coz once those concerns are addressed, there is no more incentive for people to choose socialism.

I say the same thing with Trumpism too. One can b!tch about it, esp. in an echo chamber, and feel righteous. More productive is to understand why an arrogant, narcissistic, boastful person (basically the opposite of everything that Jesus preached for) won so many votes, esp. among Evangelical Christians. What is his appeal, and what is the issue that people thought he was addressing?

And ultimately, b!tching about an idea is not helpful. What we really want is to build the kind of society that we want. We probably want to take the best elements from various ideas, for example, capitalism is great at achieving efficiency and incentivizing people to work hard and create, while socialism can help reduce externalities, promote protection of the environment, and increase social cohesion. Try to see how we can achieve the best of both worlds. That will be a much healthier and productive dialogue than just beating up on a word. Just like "Muslim." Some people have a negative opinion of it and they don't even understand what the religion is about. I know that very well because I used to be one of those people.
If we are really going to get to the root differences rather than some selected topics for comparison, it is a "planned economy" versus an "unplanned economy" and all the things that divide would gather. Can't think of many things more basic than that. Deep within the philosphy of either approach we can find alignment with this
41lMdS8KJUL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


and perhaps this which I haven't listened to...

 
Yes it is. When liberal outlets say he is working more towards a progressive stance, I would say the majority people would believe that to be true. You and others may wish he was further left, but most political pundits would agree that he is left of where he ran, or at least where they expected him to be.
Liberal outlets say he is working more towards a progressive stance because they are whitewashing him for the masses. MSM is beholden to corporations and billionaires, they absolutely do not him to go left. But the people who voted him in do, so outlets placate them.

Very interesting how liberal pundits are somehow the mouth of God now that the goalposts have shifted.
 
Liberal outlets say he is working more towards a progressive stance because they are whitewashing him for the masses. MSM is beholden to corporations and billionaires, they absolutely do not him to go left. But the people who voted him in do, so outlets placate them.

Very interesting how liberal pundits are somehow the mouth of God now that the goalposts have shifted.
TV, I agree with everything you say. It’s interesting, because many liberals and people on this board have argued that MSM is not biased or those that acknowledge it, say there is only a slight bias left of center. I see a left bias across most traditional media sources that has become more slanted over the last year election cycle (except for noted conservative media outlets like Fox News, NY Post, etc. and even those outlets have become more slanted to the right).
 
Or put another way, maybe Americans are satisfied with capitalism or wherever you want to call our current form that led to record unemployment and record low poverty.

Kinda cherry-picking, no? The same capitalism also brought about the Great Recession and put the global economy at the brink of collapse. If you give it credit for record low unemployment and poverty rate in 2019, what about 2008 when it almost f***ed everyone?

The Democrats are out to fix poverty with a system that causes more poverty (see prior German articles I posted).

I am not saying whether the Dems are doing is helping or hurting. But if we have such a great system, why do we have chronic deficits that seem to be growing endlessly with no end in sight? We keep b!tching about China but they've been subsidizing for our living by lending us money that we don't have.
 
To them that is a feature not a bug.

Ill go further, it's antithetical to basic human rights and welfare, which is why people risk death to escape from it. It's tyranny which quickly devolves into complete totalitarian brutality

Sounds like you are describing the lower left corner of the second chart in the OP, the "State Communism" that has proven to be a disaster. Still, that doesn't describe what "socialism" is, any more than KKK describes what "Christians" are. I don't see many Scandi European trying to escape from their countries. On the contrary, they are ranked very high on the Qualify of Life Index:

 
Kinda cherry-picking, no? The same capitalism also brought about the Great Recession and put the global economy at the brink of collapse. If you give it credit for record low unemployment and poverty rate in 2019, what about 2008 when it almost f***ed everyone?



I am not saying whether the Dems are doing is helping or hurting. But if we have such a great system, why do we have chronic deficits that seem to be growing endlessly with no end in sight? We keep b!tching about China but they've been subsidizing for our living by lending us money that we don't have.
It's amazing isn't it. We give China millions through programs like The Paris Accord and for research through the Wuhan lab. They turn around and buy US savings bonds with the money.
Now KH want to send millions to South American Countries to keep their citizens from coming across the border.
We pay for and defend Europe from Russia while the European Countries go behind our back and make trade deals with them.
I wonder where that money will end up?
 
TV, I agree with everything you say. It’s interesting, because many liberals and people on this board have argued that MSM is not biased or those that acknowledge it, say there is only a slight bias left of center. I see a left bias across most traditional media sources that has become more slanted over the last year election cycle (except for noted conservative media outlets like Fox News, NY Post, etc. and even those outlets have become more slanted to the right).
As I've told you and others on this board multiple times, I am neither a Democrat nor a liberal.

And it's not a left-bias in media that you're seeing, it's a status-quo bias. It just happens that the status quo of the past 20 years has been globalist stick-and-carrot neoliberal hegemony across America's domestic and international policy. It's getting worse because more and more wealth is getting consolidated in fewer and fewer hands and the machine needs fewer and fewer people to run it as time goes on.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT