ADVERTISEMENT

So who is leaving?

11
10.3
13.8

32%
44%
46%

1.7
1.6
2.1

PPG, 3P%, 3PM for Frosh, soph and junior year for fletch.

Improved every year.

% wise he is currently 4th in the country on 150 attempts. You sure you are good with him to leave? Cuz I certainly am not.
I mean that's not major improvement and you've listed basically one thing, 3p shooting.

Now, is his 3p shooting a weapon you want in your tool kit? Absolutely. Does it get lessened when he plays poor defense, passes up open shots for ill advised drives and disappears offensively for large chunks of games? Absolutely.
 
As others have said, Loyer would be perfect as a 4-5-6 option. He just doesn't have the overall game needed to be the 3rd option on a team without Edey. Get in the portal and get a couple studs that can be the 3rd and 4th options with Smith and TKR. Let Loyer be Loyer and hit open 3's when they are there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
I didn’t start this thread. Painter was asked a question about portal transfers. The question was never about Furst leaving. He knew Furst was leaving last year.

You use the portal when a current player announces their decision to leave during the year and you have to find a player to replace the departing player from a resource pool of players you haven’t previously recruited.

A case could be made for a number of players. But if you look at the history of Purdue players that have decided to enter the portal, it was never the 13th man. It was that player in the 6-10th spot That had hopes of getting more playing time that he knew he wouldn’t receive at Purdue. Look at Eastern, Haarms, Stephens, Morton, Newman and others. None of them were our 13th man. All of them were players seeking more playing time and a chance to shine.

Now take a look at our past and the players who transferred out and take a look at our present. What are the names of the players who are currently in those 6-10 slots? That’s your transfer candidate. And that’s the player you replace with someone from the portal.
 
I didn’t start this thread. Painter was asked a question about portal transfers. The question was never about Furst leaving. He knew Furst was leaving last year.

You use the portal when a current player announces their decision to leave during the year and you have to find a player to replace the departing player from a resource pool of players you haven’t previously recruited.

A case could be made for a number of players. But if you look at the history of Purdue players that have decided to enter the portal, it was never the 13th man. It was that player in the 6-10th spot That had hopes of getting more playing time that he knew he wouldn’t receive at Purdue. Look at Eastern, Haarms, Stephens, Morton, Newman and others. None of them were our 13th man. All of them were players seeking more playing time and a chance to shine.

Now take a look at our past and the players who transferred out and take a look at our present. What are the names of the players who are currently in those 6-10 slots? That’s your transfer candidate. And that’s the player you replace with someone from the portal.
Or it could be one of the starters seeking glory, fame, and the all mighty dollar. The current starters will be hard pressed to make the pros, including Smith or TKR, so they may want to pad the account before playing in Europe.
 
A strong case could be made for Benter. He red shirted this year because of the potential of zero playing time. The same players who were here this year will be here next year. And you will add West to that mix. Benter is still not going to see any playing time. In 2 years you will add Ertel. Playing time won’t get any better.

I’m not saying it’s Benter, but it wouldn’t shock me if he left via the portal.

A strong case could be made for Harris and Myles wanting to be a starter next year.

A strong case could be made for Heide wanting to play a position other than backup power forward.

A weaker case would involve Berg and Wadell. I don’t see either player wanting to leave.

I’m not sure what say about Burgess. I kind of expected more from him. At the beginning of the year Painter said Burgess needed more physical conditioning to be ready to play more minutes And he never elaborated and nobody leaked out the real issues .

I read a lot of different stuff on Purdue basketball. One of those articles/posts said a player actually went to Painter and informed him he planned to enter the portal and would be leaving. I don’t really know how much truth there was to that statement. No name was mentioned.

Based on Purdue’s past history, it was a believable statement that a player looked at the future and informed painter he was leaving. Based on the current culture of players leaving, it was believable. The original poster wasn’t. Trying to create drama or trying to get a scoop over the mainstream media. That poster also had no reason to be lying.

Look at how many of you who are also speculating.

The one thing that I know is true is that the story wasn’t leaked by Painter. And he is not going to acknowledge it or address it publicly until after Purdue’s season is officially over.
 
A strong case could be made for Benter. He red shirted this year because of the potential of zero playing time. The same players who were here this year will be here next year. And you will add West to that mix. Benter is still not going to see any playing time. In 2 years you will add Ertel. Playing time won’t get any better.

I’m not saying it’s Benter, but it wouldn’t shock me if he left via the portal.

A strong case could be made for Harris and Myles wanting to be a starter next year.

A strong case could be made for Heide wanting to play a position other than backup power forward.

A weaker case would involve Berg and Wadell. I don’t see either player wanting to leave.

I’m not sure what say about Burgess. I kind of expected more from him. At the beginning of the year Painter said Burgess needed more physical conditioning to be ready to play more minutes And he never elaborated and nobody leaked out the real issues .

I read a lot of different stuff on Purdue basketball. One of those articles/posts said a player actually went to Painter and informed him he planned to enter the portal and would be leaving. I don’t really know how much truth there was to that statement. No name was mentioned.

Based on Purdue’s past history, it was a believable statement that a player looked at the future and informed painter he was leaving. Based on the current culture of players leaving, it was believable. The original poster wasn’t. Trying to create drama or trying to get a scoop over the mainstream media. That poster also had no reason to be lying.

Look at how many of you who are also speculating.

The one thing that I know is true is that the story wasn’t leaked by Painter. And he is not going to acknowledge it or address it publicly until after Purdue’s season is officially over.
as I said before, I could see Heide going to Minny if they get a coach he likes, would be an instant starter and closer to home
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolegib
I see possible portal transfers as Heide, Berg, Colvin, Cox,and Harris. They all would like more playing time and don't see that happening here next year. The only one leaving is Furst so if they want to play more it won't be here. Hope they don't leave but we must face the reality of some of them going where they could play more.
Cox starts for goodness sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBG
I could see Miles and Cam leaving simply because someone will offer them a boatload of money. And with the 3 seniors getting theirs will there be enough ? Cox and Harris are going to want their bag as well but probably would stay knowing they will get theirs when Smith and Loyer leave . Hoping all 4 stay but with West coming in who knows. And jury still out on Benter cause we just don’t know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChoiceBeef
Money talks. And players who want to play in the nba usually don’t want to stick around for three years waiting for their moment to shine.

Cox started this year but he wasn’t the guy who played to close out games. There’s no guarantee he’ll remain the starter .

As we look at Purdue’s potential transfer candidates, the same speculation can be made for every team. Look at IU. Their coach is leaving. Do you truly believe all their players will remain?
 
Colvin already gave up a shit load of money to come to a purdue, not to mention he already has a shit load of money.
 
using some of the listed transfer logic here, every player 6-13 on each teams roster will hit portal, unless guy in 1-5 position is leaving, so how do teams have depth? Somebody has to assume they’re 5-15(two more this year), so why wouldn’t our guys behind the top
3 stay and compete, get a guy or two from
Portal and have a great year, then they take top roles in 26, assuming some think this way…..
 
And exactly what did that do for us? We need scorers not shooters. Dakota became a scorer and evolved his game. Once again, he doesn't rebound very good, he isn't a strong guard who can dribble/drive and he struggles with defense.

Being a good shooter doesn't necessarily help this team become better. Exactly, why we have 3 guys sitting out on the corners looking for Smith and TKR to create an opening. I want players who can create off the dribble/drive. Do you not notice these long scoring droughts?
"I want players who can create off the dribble/drive."

Hey, you know.....there are plenty of those types that play for mid-major teams. Maybe we can get a couple from the NIL portal so the core-3 dont waste their senior season.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT