two questions.
is brohm saying AOC is a game time decision based on his performance in the last game while others are looking better in practice? or is it injury related?
second question. Who do you believe was the better Purdue QB ? Breese or Gresie ? I know who wins stats wise. But Greise has a Rose Bowl victory to his name - something no other Purdue QB can lay claim to. Greise's stats in the NFL weren't great either, but his mediocre stats produced a Super Bowl championship as well. and he's a Hall of famer despite his mediocre stats.
To me, QB stats are rather meaningless. growing up, I learned championships were far more important than stats. Given a choice of Unitas or Starr, I chose Starr. I didn't really care how great Unitas' stats were. Given a choice of Starr verses Favre or Rodgers, I still choose Starr.
Given a choice of wins over great stats, I choose wins. I don't care if a QB throws for 600 yards. if it's a loss, give me the guy who gets 150 yards and the win. Paul Horning won the Heisman trophy throwing for 5 TDs and 13 interceptions. Obviously the people that voted and knew something about football didn't care much about stats.
Ok, go back to your arguing. And NAT, sometimes you can be less than forthcoming in your replies You never divulge as much as you know. and that's sometimes very frustrating for people who cannot afford to be a paying customer.
and to me going 6-6 is nothing to brag about. Down here in Georgia, you get fired for that type of season. Unlike at Purdue where they give you extensions.
is brohm saying AOC is a game time decision based on his performance in the last game while others are looking better in practice? or is it injury related?
second question. Who do you believe was the better Purdue QB ? Breese or Gresie ? I know who wins stats wise. But Greise has a Rose Bowl victory to his name - something no other Purdue QB can lay claim to. Greise's stats in the NFL weren't great either, but his mediocre stats produced a Super Bowl championship as well. and he's a Hall of famer despite his mediocre stats.
To me, QB stats are rather meaningless. growing up, I learned championships were far more important than stats. Given a choice of Unitas or Starr, I chose Starr. I didn't really care how great Unitas' stats were. Given a choice of Starr verses Favre or Rodgers, I still choose Starr.
Given a choice of wins over great stats, I choose wins. I don't care if a QB throws for 600 yards. if it's a loss, give me the guy who gets 150 yards and the win. Paul Horning won the Heisman trophy throwing for 5 TDs and 13 interceptions. Obviously the people that voted and knew something about football didn't care much about stats.
Ok, go back to your arguing. And NAT, sometimes you can be less than forthcoming in your replies You never divulge as much as you know. and that's sometimes very frustrating for people who cannot afford to be a paying customer.
and to me going 6-6 is nothing to brag about. Down here in Georgia, you get fired for that type of season. Unlike at Purdue where they give you extensions.