Come on man, he did his thing but it's not enough. Painter understands it and made the change.
Newman had three steals and took their best player out of the game for the entire first half. Add 19 points 6 boards and 5 assists and you have a great game.
I'd go as far as to say this, I doubt Purdue wins if Morton started yesterday. Loyer and Edey were off and Purdue needed offense. Never would have gotten anything remotely close from Morton on the offensive side of the ball as we got from Newman.
Agree 100%. And not that you need any unsolicited advice but as you know (or does anyone who has been on these boards long enough and you clearly have) just about every year there seems to be posters whose suggestions go *ahem* a bit beyond constructively critical. Which is fine, whatever. I'm no mod and would never want to be one.
But for whatever reasons, said posters will decide on one player (often a role player or back-up, "glue guy", etc, which is puzzling but also a bit comical IMO) and will often decide that particular player is what is basically holding Purdue back.
Last week, the poster you are replying to wrote this:
"Hoping Loyer, Smith and Gillis break out and hit threes.
Newman? Ok but he is 8-25 in last 6, 32% ok, but not special."
Interesting that Loyer's or hell, anyone's, percentages were not included (I included them in my reply) during the then 6 game rough patch (was prior to the Wisky game that night). He didn't stop there. Read last Thur's Wisky game thread if curious.
Edit: here were the shooting % prior to last Thurs Wisky game when we saw Newman inserted and -some of us had been pining for a line-up shake up:
Loyer 6-28,
21%
Morton 5-16 for
31%
Gillis 6-18 for 33%
Smith 6-15 for 40%
Furst 2-7 for
29%
Jenkins 4-16 for
25%
But Newman? His 32% was deemed, "ok but nothing special."
Bizarre!
I mean, don't you know Brandon Newman is the reason Purdue isn't 31-0 rather than 26-5?