ADVERTISEMENT

Moore's Injury

I really hope you guys underuse him this week.

Moore and Knox are two fun players to watch.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PUBV
I don't know that I'd say he's "overused", but there are times when trying to get him the ball seems a bit forced. Just my two cents, but in the MSU game they had 1st & Goal from inside the 5 and got a little too cute with some sort of misdirection/end around trick play for him that involved multiple flips of the ball which resulted in a large loss. Maybe just run it off tackle with Knox there and see what happens.
 
I don't know that I'd say he's "overused", but there are times when trying to get him the ball seems a bit forced. Just my two cents, but in the MSU game they had 1st & Goal from inside the 5 and got a little too cute with some sort of misdirection/end around trick play for him that involved multiple flips of the ball which resulted in a large loss. Maybe just run it off tackle with Knox there and see what happens.
Yeah! Good example and common sense too. I like to see both Knox and Markell Jones getting short yardage work as well.
 
my main point is that we have more weapons than just Moore. Rather than risk injury to Moore like has happened to so many of our other previous receivers and running backs, why not utilize some of our other weapons in some situations?
 
[
my main point is that we have more weapons than just Moore. Rather than risk injury to Moore like has happened to so many of our other previous receivers and running backs, why not utilize some of our other weapons in some situations?

you've been down this road repeatedly. Ad nauseum.

We're not "risking injury to Moore."

His injury has nothing to do with . . . 'overuse.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: mathboy
I would have taken grief from certain posters regardless of my intent or comments.

Purdue has a very bad track record regarding injuries to skill position players! I'd like to see that change and not repeat itself.

I'm with you Wole! The collisions that happen on kickoffs and punt returns can be awful. To use him for everything, just increases the chances that he will get hurt. Plus, the chances for injury increase when you are fatigued.

I said the same thing about Biggie. It's pretty easy to defend when a team (in the last minutes of a close game) only use one option. When I coached, I would NEVER set up one guy. "Run the offense and let's see who gets open. If you have a good shot, take it!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: MilwaukeeBoilerFan
Ok I was watching the game. And it just seemed like Brohm was trying to use him to do everything when we have other players on our team who could have been doing those same things. Unlike basketball, football is not a one and done sport. This is Moore's first year . I'm sure he wants to play and do as much as possible to help the team win. But I'd hate to see him burn out or become injured in his first season like so many other Boilers backs have in the past. I'd just like to see his usage scaled back a bit and allow some of our other players a chance to mix it up and keep the defenses honest rather than keying on one player and Blough forcing all his passes to one player.

It's refreshing to see some things never change. If a poster disagrees with a point of view, rather than engaging in conversation or offering their own take, you resort to name calling. If I was an idiot, I wouldn't have initiated this thread. I knew in advance what the majority of replies would be. It's odd you say place the person on ignore yet you feel compelled to replying to posts that you supposedly ignored. Hmmmmmmmm!!

Who would you have return kickoffs and punts that can have a chance To make big plays?
 
Zico, Anthrop and Sparks. Maybe a DB.

As for big plays, how many has Moore made on punt returns?

With Anthrop that’s a fair catch only. Catching the ball is important but teams have kicked away from Moore.

Sparks would not be good as he’s not fast or shifty and actually has had trouble catching the ball.

Not sure on Zico.

Amad Anderson could be used the last four games and still redshirt so he may be an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FearTheTrain
I’m ok with moving Moore of KOR once someone shows they can have an impact. He’s the best option on punt returns as he can make people miss and that’s his ticket to playing at the next level.
 
With Anthrop that’s a fair catch only. Catching the ball is important but teams have kicked away from Moore.

Sparks would not be good as he’s not fast or shifty and actually has had trouble catching the ball.

Not sure on Zico.

Amad Anderson could be used the last four games and still redshirt so he may be an option.
didn't Anderson get some time in one of the recent games?
 
didn't Anderson get some time in one of the recent games?

I don’t believe he’s seen the field yet. I’d anticipate him getting some plays the remainder of the season.

I’d also anticipate seeing Jack Smith, DT Johnson, CB Rucker, and maybe DE Stokes.
 
His ankle was rolled on because the other team wanted to inflict pain and potentially knock him out of the game or at least that series. The more you trot him out to play the more times you risk an opponent trying to make a cheap shot at him. Nobody has ever said to take him out of our offense or only use him as part of certain formations. What we've try to say is we believe he is being over used which will lead to a possible injury. We need to do a better job of protecting our assets. We do have other players very capable of doing punt returns and kick-offs. They may not be as good as Moore, but they are capable. What did we gain if Moore has to sit out the Iowa game?
so when Tiller was here, Drew should have sat every third series so he wasn’t over used? Kerrigan should have been taken out of every third down snap so he wasn’t exposed to increased risk?
 
I believe somebody predicted this would happen through his overuse.

he is now questionable for the Iowa game because of an injury sustained in the MSU game. he may play , but won't be 100%.

I know - you hate me for posting this. it's not fake news. Brian also posted it o n the home page.

This seems like a stretch to me as well. 12.5 touches per game would strike me as low for your best weapon. Guys like Beckham get 12 plus targets in the nfl all the time.
This is his first injury in a violent game, I'd say that's pretty good management.
Unless the player is saying he's getting too beat up, I'd say let it ride up to a ridiculous point like 25 touches
 
the statement is not overused physically. I' m sure he's young enough to handle any amount of physical activity given him.

however, I' m saying overused strategically. When you use a player so much, the defense tends to key on that player. And some teams like to take out that player. And that's what MSU tried to do. If Moore suffered a tore ACL or broken leg returning punts, what would your opinion be?

If you have a weapon, you need to use him strategically to ensure he'll be available for every game and also for key situations in those games.

and for physical purposes, when it comes to calling somebody smaller, I consider a WR who is 5'9 and 175 pounds to be a smaller WR in comparison to the typical ones who are 6'2 and 190-200. and especially smaller when it comes to defensive linemen and linebackers who are tackling him on running plays.

I want to see Moore succeed just as much as anyone. but I also cringe when I see him used in so many different situations. Purdue's injury history has not been a good one.

Woke, respectfully doubt other teams keyed on him because of his number of plays...If they had not keyed on Moore they would have to have had the dumbest Defensive Coordinator in the world!!!
 
I was talking about a receiver of which we have many of, not our starting QB or defensive lineman. I also said to spare him from some of his return duties. His ticket in the MFL may be as a return specialist. I'm sure the NFL also wants him to be healthy.

Odd , I don't recall Drew or Kerrigan returning punts or kickoffs either. My thought was to spare Moore from our special teams play.

And I'm sorry but a smart coach tells his players how much they will play rather than allowing the player to tell him how much he can play. It's kind of like a pitcher telling the coach to leave me in. The smart coach should have already made up his mind before going to the mound.
 
I was talking about a receiver of which we have many of, not our starting QB or defensive lineman. I also said to spare him from some of his return duties. His ticket in the MFL may be as a return specialist. I'm sure the NFL also wants him to be healthy.

Odd , I don't recall Drew or Kerrigan returning punts or kickoffs either. My thought was to spare Moore from our special teams play.

And I'm sorry but a smart coach tells his players how much they will play rather than allowing the player to tell him how much he can play. It's kind of like a pitcher telling the coach to leave me in. The smart coach should have already made up his mind before going to the mound.

?

I don't think this coaching staff is letting players dictate who plays and how much.
 
I came here to find news because the line went from 3 to 1.5 this morning. Hard to believe that it's from Moore not returning kicks.
 
I came here to find news because the line went from 3 to 1.5 this morning. Hard to believe that it's from Moore not returning kicks.
maybe because the 2 DB's from Iowa got suspended earller in the week, don't know if they were starters are not, maybe some Iowa lurkers will respond.
 
Typical game from Rondale.

6 receptions.
1 return.

no injuries, so no carping and b*tching about the coaching decisions.
Did we watch the same game? You forgot his 3 kick returns and the amount of times he was targeted and the amount of times Blough tried to throw him the ball. To me, that's kind of forcing the action.
 
You're kidding, right? You did see the 3 TDs to Wright, didn't you? And the one to Zico? And the long reception to Hopkins?

What's your deal??
This thread is sort of about Moore. That's my deal. Did you not see how many plays Blough wanted to throw to Moore? Did you not see the kickoffs?
 
I have to admit, I just don't get this forum.

We have an incredible play-maker. Possibly one in a generation. An athlete in which you want to get the ball in his hands as often as possible.

!

Yet, we have people questioning whether or not he is . . . OVERUSED. (I'm not kidding.)

Or, that he is given the ball to . . . MAKE PLAYS.

FOLKS!!!
Wole likes to believe he knows everything and everyone else has ignored his advice. He likes to pat his own back and say, “I told you so”. Just thank him for warning us and move on.
 
Can any of you answer my simple question? What Purdue player ran out those three kick-offs in the second half when they could have taken a knee? Is that too tough of a question to ask? If you can't answer the question , I have serious doubts you actually watched the game, and all you really want to do is argue.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT